welding inspection
Trang 1150 A SURVEY OF THE WELDING PROCESSES
2 American Welding Society, Welding Handbook, 3rd Ed New
York: 1949
3 The Linde Air Products Co., The Oxy-Acetylene Handbook, 3rd
Ed New York: 1943
4 Lincoln Electric Co., Procedure Handbook of Arc Welding, Design
and Practice, %h Ed Cleveland: 1950
5 The Welding Engincer Publishing Co., The Welding Encyclopedia,
12th Ed Chicago: 1947,
6 Chute, George M., Electronic Control of Resistance Welding, 1st
Ed New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1943
7 General Electric Co., Arc Welding Manual, Schenectady: 1940
8 Conway, M J., “Inert-Gas Welding of Hard-to-Weld Metals,”
Welding Arcs, 15, 3 (June, 1949)
9 Pilia, F J., “Inert-Gas Shielded-Arc Spot Welding,” reprint from
The Welding Journal, 28, 5 { January, 1949)
10 Anderson, R J., “Heli-Arc Welding,” reprint from Canadian
Metals and Metallurgical Industries, 10, 14 (January, 1947)
11 Singleton, Robert C., “Electric-Arc Stud Welding,” reprint from
The Welding Journal, 26, 1095 (December, 1947)
12 Harris, H., Metal Arc Welding New York: Longmans, Green and
Co., 1935
—
TESTING AND INSPECTION
OF WELDS
Gencrally speaking, satisfactory use of a weld will usually depend on the ability of the associated personnel to predict, with reasonable accuracy, its final quality This can be done by making certain suitable tests prior to application Also it is paramount that the re- sults of the application be checked, qualified, or otherwise judged
as to quality
After exhaustive tests have been made to establish the suitability
of the purposed constructional metals, tests must be made to qualify the process or processes and the operators Inspection usually in- volves the examination of completed welds to establish their quality and their conformation to specifications
Thus, testing and inspection determines whether or not the quality standards of materials and workmanship are being met Testing and inspection are closcly related and, in some instances, may considerably overlap
In this chapter an effort is made to describe the common tests applicable to welded joints and to point out some of the more impor- tant methods of maintaining quality standards
Societies concerned with the fabrication of structures or manu- facture of products, in most cases, have formulated testing and in- spection standards applicable to their particular fields of interest
It is important to understand that the tests discussed herein and their an~“cations are of general nature To meet specific standards, appli odes should be followed
) ive tests are those tests in which the materials being
151
Trang 2152 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
examined are of such shape or condition after testing that they are
of no further constructional value Nondestructive tests have no
tendencies to reduce the usefulness of the test piece
The specimens for destructive testing may be taken either from
a completed joint in a welded structure or from a test: piece welded
under conditions closely simulating field or shop practice Such tests
are designed to represent, in some instances, the various types of
anticipated service loads
DESTRUCTIVE TESTS
Tensile Test
The tensile testing of welded specimens or coupons differs from
other tensile tests only in the manner in which they are taken In
TEST PLaTe `
Ce ` số
mm
+
—⁄ tt WELO
/ Fic 83 Test coupon should be taken from a representative locality
im the weld In the finished cougon the weld should be at the approxi-
mate center
order to obtain the tensile properties of a deposited weld the speci-
mens must be taken transversely to the joint, from a representative
region within the joint, and with the weld located in the approxi-
mate center of the coupon as in Fig 83
Although testing specifications vary widely, a common procedure
is to use a % in thick parent metal plate where the test involves
steel being welded with either the oxy-acetylene or metal are process
The plates welded together are machined into strips 144 in wide to
comp'ete the coupon Whether or not the reinforcement is removed
will depend upon the information sought Where strength compari-
sons between the parent metal and the reinforced weld are required,
no machining is done on the coupon other than that of reducing it
to the correct width Where strength comparisons are to be made
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 153 between the parent metal and a similar cross section of weld metal, all reinforcements are removed In testing procedures requiring unit tensile strengths of the weld metal rather than comparisons, the coupon is reduced in width at the welding zone to assure its failure
at that point
‘Tensile specimens selected from a joint in a fabricated structure usually require machining to reduce them to standard dimensions since the thickness of the section in question may be other than that
of a standard test specimen
—
uLTmwate
STRENGTH ane amis
YIELO STRENGTH
STRENGTH
UNIT STRENGTH
ELASTIC ZONE
UNIT DEFORMATION
Fro 8+ Typical stress-strain curve
In addition to tensile strength, other information is obtained from the tensile test such as clongation, reduction in area, and yield strength
The tensile test essentially consists of subjecting the prepared coupon to a measured tensile load; deformation data are taken as the loading progresses By plotting unit load as the ordinate against unit deformation as the abscissa a curve is obtained Figure 84 is typical of such a curve
It is important to note that in tensile tests made on specimens in which the measured elongation includes that of both parent metal
and weld metal, the total unit deformation obtained is not likely to
be typical of either To obtain the true tensile properties of weld metal the procedure is to deposit beads or layers into the open side
of a section of angle shape (or other suitable shapes) to a depth
Trang 3154 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
sufficient to allow the machining of a coupon of all-weld metal Thus
any tensile properties taken are not influenced by adjacent parent
metal
Tensile testing may be adapted to the determination of fillet-wel 4
shear strengths by fillet welding two butt straps to opposite sides of
two abutting test bars and loading as in the standard tensile tests
(see Fig 85) Properly proportiuned, failure will occur along the
fillet welds with a shearing action The total load divided by the
«2s & ;ˆ«
~ + - -— ©
` LES sumer _a* _
POR AU WELOS T7”
American Welding Society
Fic 85 Transverse fillet-weld shearing specimen
total length of the welds will give the unit shear strength in pounds
per linear inch of fillet weld
A modern tensile testing machine, fully mechanized, is illus-
trated in Fig 86 Some machines, suitable for loading small speci-
mens, are hand-operated The coupon is gripped by self-tightening
jaws on cither end or by screwing the threaded ends of the specimen
into threaded jaws To obtain deformation data, an extensometer
is mounted directly upon the coupon to indicate its extension unde:
the progressive load Before failure of the specimen the instrument
should be removed since it is obvious that the violence of the final
failure would cause damage
The tensile strength is calculated by dividing the maximum
total load by the original cross-sectional area in square inches Per-
cent elongation between gage marks is calculated by use of the fol-
lowing formula:
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 155
final length — original length x 100 = percent elongation of the gage length
original length
Reduction in area is calculated by the following relationship:
original cross-sectional area final cross-sectional area
orginal cross-sectional area
100 = percent reduction in area
Tiwler Olsen Testing Machine Co
Fra 86 Tensile testing machine
A simple method for finding the yield strength is to locate it directly on a carefully plotted stress-strain curve similar to that
Trang 4156 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
shown in Fig 84, The unit load at which extension occurs without
appreciable increase im the load is called the yield strength In low-
carbon steels it is identified by a hook or a flattened section in the
curve at the upper limit of the elastic range
Nick-Break Test
For preliminary testing, the nick-break test affords combined
convenience and economy The technique of making this test is
Iaponox Pase e0ces wa BE FLAME Ct
[P| ~
Loao
k) fw
American Welding Society
Fin 87 (a) Nick-break specimen (b) Method of rupturing nick-breat
specimens,
comparatively simple A coupon representing the weld to be tested
is notched or nicked in the weld metal in such a manner that the
fracture is sharp and in the weld as shown in Fig 87 Breaking of
the notched coupon is obtained by securing one end in a jig or vise
and striking the end with a hammer Probably a safer practice would
be to support the two ends and conéentrate a steady press load in
the center, thus preventing possible injury to personnel by flying
test pieces,
The nick-break test is a continuity and homogencity test that
shows the number of gas pockets, their location and arrangement,
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 157 degree of penetration, slag inclusions, and overlap, as well as some approximate information in regard to number of passes used and the grain size
On the basis of density being a rather dependable criterion of weld quality, the gas- and slag-pocket count and their size determina- tion is probably the most significant information obtained from the nick-break test Although policies vary some, a standard often used
is that of approving a fractured coupon if the number of voids does
—
"5 MINIMUM LENGTH
et OF WELO+L.=t”
a
Ị all a
Le APPROX,
“te
(b
i
oo mage |
American Welding Society
Fr 88 (a) Fillet-weld break specimen (b) Method of rupturing
Allet-weld break specimen
not exceed eight per square inch, if no single void has a dimension greater than Ye in., and if the largest combined dimensions of all voids do not exceed ¥ in
Fillet welds may be given a fracture test similar to the nick-break test, the principle difference being the manner in which they are broken The test is usually made by fillet welding two pieces of plate
of suitable length and thickness to form a T joint The weld is ruptured by pressing or hammering, the load being applied from a direction so as to cause the failure to be initiated at the weld root
(Fig 88).
Trang 5158 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
The quality of the weld is revealed by visual examination similar
to that used in the nick-break test
Bend Tests
Bend tests are becoming increasingly popular since they do not
require expensive equipment for the rapid testing of welds, Also the
information derived from bend tests is generally thought to be more
indicative of the quality of the weld than tensile testing
Bend tests are of two general types—the guided bend and the
free bend
The guided-bend test is a bending test in which the coupon IS
forced to conform to the shape of a jig (Figs 89a und b) Guide
bend test disclose defects in the welded joint such as voids and lack
of penetration The preparation of these coupons is giv cn in relating
codes
Bend tests may be made either by bending against the face of
the weld or against the root side or both Root bends are particularly
valuable for testing the welded joint for root penetration and
porosity
Free-bend tests are methods by which the shape of the speci-
men is obtained without constraint (see Fig 90) Their most valu-
able use is in the determination of the plastic properties of the
welded joint
Preparation of the free-bend coupons is also given in relating
codes They are usually given some initial bend in a press to provide
columnar eccentricity, and all bending thereafter is obtained vy the
coupon acting as a column, Bending is continued until a surface
crack occurs between the gage marks If failure does not occur, the
coupon is bent until its ends meet Generally a failure is considered
to be a surface opening of Yo in in length or greater resulting from
the test Corner cracks, if not extensive, are not counted as failures
Ductility may be mathematically computed by dividing the
deformation between gage marks by the origina] gage distance and
multiplying by 100 The result is percent elongation These measure-
ments should be carefully made with a flexible scale, graduated in
hundredths of an inch, and a suitable magnifying glass
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 159
Ceorgie Inmitete of Tech eology
Fico 89a Guided-bend test pig and press
MARDENEO ROLLERS, 1Ý OIlAM
TAPPED MOLE TO SUIT MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR
TESTING MACHINE - > JIG SHOULDERS, =
'
fo RECURRED Sy” \ F AS REQUIRED —
\ SMOULDERS HARDENED
_— > jy”
PLUNGER 4 MEM0e® “ - 4%
3U
a
~- ar -
oe
wewrrere
— ®ˆ——>*
American Welding Soriety
Fico 89b, Guided-bend test sig.
Trang 7162 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
Hardness Tests
Hardness testing methods usually embrace the surface indenta-
tion principle, whereby a penetrator of given size and shape is forced
into the surface of the materials being tested by a given load The
degree of hardness is indicated by the depth penetrated or by the
Frio 93 Shore scleroscope
area of the impression The Brinel] and Rockwell hardness testers
operate on this principle
The Shore scleroscope (Fig 93) operates on the principle of a
bouncing hammer or shaft When the shaft is lifted and allowed to
fall through a fixed distance agaist the surface of the metal being
tested, it rebounds to a height, the extent of which depends upon
the hardness of the tested metal Measurement of the rebound of the
hammer gives the hardness value
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 163 The Brinell tester consists of a suitable loading press and the ball penctrator The 10-mm diameter hardened ball is forced into the surface of the test metal under a load of 3000 kg, allowed to remain
i) sec and released Hardness values are cak ulated by the folk winec
formula:
Brincll number = Vi
where P = load,
A = areca of indentation, and
D = diameter of bali
Brincll hardness numbers are usually taken directly from con
1 «
vern:cnt chart!A
Thc Reckwcl Incas tester makes use of both a diamond cone
; f “| balls: the former is used for the hardest
and various sizcs ol eccl balls: the former is use r the
é
f 94 Pockweil Aardaess tester
materials A minor load of 10 kg is applied for the purpose of pene trating any surface covering such as paint and scale A major load of
150 ke (C scale) is then applied for the actual hardness test The measured depth of penetration induced by the major load is me- chanically transmitted to an indicator dial, calibrated in Rockwell values (Fig 94
Trang 8164 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
For testing soft materials, such as nonferrous metals, a 4¢-in di-
ameter steel ball with 100 kg (B scale) of major load is used Other
penetrators and loads are provided to encompass all hardness values
encountered in the testing of commercial metals
Generally speaking, hardness testing is confined to the laboratory,
although in recent years some excellent portable instruments have
been offered to the market
Fatigue Tests
This test is designed to determine the suitability of a metal for
transmitting cyclic, repetitious, or intermittent types of loads
Failures resulting from this type of load are of a progressive na-
ture and give little warning of their ultimate failure Generally,
cracks of this type emanate from sharp notches where stresses tend
to concentrate The most common example of a stress riser or of
a notch in welding practice is an undercut alongside a weld
To simulate service loads, three common types of tests are used
They are
1 The rotating beam supported on the two ends
2 The rotating cantilever beam i
3 The reciprocating flexure beam i!
In the rotating-beam types the test procedure is ta load the
beams to a predetermined skin fiber unit stress By starting from a
given position, if the beam is rotated through 180 deg) the stress
will be reversed; that is, the side that was formerly in tension will
change to compression, Thus cyclic stresses are imposed Where the
beam is mechanically rotated, many reversals per minute may be
imposed Cyclic stresses may also be imposed by use of reciprocating
testing machines
For a given unit stress intensity, other factors being equal, a
material will sustain a given number of reversals before failure
To plot S-N curves similar to those in Fig 95 a number of indi-
vidual tests are necessary Curve A shows that the number of cycles
of loading sustained will increase as the stress intensity drops At
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 165 point x the curve flattens and seems to indicate that the member would continue to operate indefinitely at that load intensity This load is the endurance limit or fatigue strength of the material tested under these conditions For steel this is roughly 40 to 50% of the tensile strength but less than the yield strength
For many types of materials the S-N curve has no “knee” and no flattened section in the curve but continues to increase in number of sustained cycles as the load intensity drops Nonferrous metals are rather noted for this characteristic Therefore, where materials of this type are used and if their failure would seriously endanger lives
v _NONTERROUS
“wT As
-
x “sag
LOG N (NO CYCLES)
Fic 95 Typical S-N curves
or property, their useful life may be anticipated and the members re- tired from service at the expiration of that time
Figure 96 illustrates welds made in various forms and their en- durance strengths Discontinuities and sharp changes in section tend
to reduce the endurance stre.gth
Figure 97a illustrates a rotating-beam fatigue-testing machine The prepared specimen is shown in Fig 97b
Corrosion Tests Corrosion tests are for the purpose of determining the suitability
of a metal for job application in certain corrosive environments These tests should apply to both the parent metal and the weld metal by taking specimens from a joint in a transverse direction, with the welded area not to exceed 10% of the total specimen area After the suitability of a metal has been established for a given condition, it is desirable that similar tests be imposed on it after
Trang 9166 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
welding to show whether or not the original properties have been
retained The tests used may not resemble service conditions, but
this fact alone does not reduce their usefulness for corrosion deter-
minations The important thought here is that data assembled under
laboratory conditions should be carefully interpreted in order that
degree and taode of corrosion can be anticipated for metals operating
under industrial conditions
si +
‹ 5 2
TYPE I SPECIMEN TYPE I SPECIMEN
BASC METAL ONLY TEE -WELOED wis, TCE ~WELOES wes,
BOTH SIDES
OnE S10e
Average Fatigue Strength, T1 Thousand Psi
ype of Steel Specimen
N = 100,000° | N = 2,000,000°
Plain carbon I 25.8f 22.8
ll 25.4 18.9
Low alloy I 35.3 26.4
* N denotes the number of cycles of stress for failure fi
¢ Each value is the average of three tests ]
(From AWS Handbook, 1942 Ed.) |
Fro 96 Fatigue strength of plates with transeerse fillet
u The aims of corrosion testing of welds are, according to the
American Welding Society Handbook (1942 edition): |
1
1 To find a welded joint to withstand a given environment
2 To determine whether a given weld will stand certain corro-
3 To determine whether the weld metal is more or less resistant
than the parts welded together
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 167
4 To check the corrosion-resisting quality of the welded metal
in a suitable test
Although much time is gained by using accelerated laboratory tests, some applications and metals require that long-time tests be conducted under actual job conditions
Corrosion tests are usually of three types: laboratory, field, and
Laboratory tests are intended to determine, in a comparatively short period of time, the probable extent of corrosion of metal over
Ya-20 AT HAND TAPS 4
(9) |aW°{ ges” $04" G57 °F
nh —
-
¬" . -.- -
au
Loa] Loan]
Liecols Electric Compeny
Fro 97 Attachment to rotating-beam testing machine for fatigue
testing
a normal service period These tests are not necessarily accelerated but are usually short time exposures The results obtained are ex- trapolated to predict long time-exposure effects
Field tests are those in which the specimens are exposed to field conditions but are not working members
Service tests are those in which the specimens become working members This type of test usually requires a longer period of time
to complete than a laboratory test
Trang 10168 TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS
Corroding media consist of the atmosphere, water, and chemical
solutions The appropriateness of each depends mainly upon the
time alloted to the test, materials used, and the intended service con-
ditions Atmospheric exposure is not rapid in comparison with other
media and is generally used for testing the suitability of welded joints
for applications of protective coatings Water is frequently used as
the corroding medium, especially in testing ferrous metals Chemical
solutions are generally used for investigating special properties of
metals
The preparation of specimens is usually done by cutting trans-
verse sections from the welded joint, leaving parent-metal portions
on either side of the weld sufficient to include a portion which has
been unaffected by heat If corrosive attack of the joint is to be
observed, the coupon may be used without removal of reinforcement
Where weight losses are to be computed, careful machining of the
specimen to size is required The test pieces are usually supported in
the medium with glass rods
Under actual conditions of testing, factors such as time, solution,
composition, and agitation should be held constant if dependable
results are expected
Results are usually evaluated by visual inspection, computing
losses in weight, and considering depth of pits Visual inspection will
often give information as to uniformity of attack and appearance of
corrosion products Pits may be macro- or microscopically examined
to determine their size, depth, shape, etc
Photographs make valuable records of degree and nature of cor-
rosion In recent years photography has further extended its useful-
ness in this connection by recording corroded surfaces in their true
colors
Specific Gravity Test
The operation of this test is confined to the laboratory! The test
piece is accurately ground to a cylindrical shape % in injdiaimeter
an! 2 in long Its volume and weight are carefully determined in
metric units, The specific gravity is the result of dividing jts weight
by its volume, and is given as grams per cubic centimeter.’
“
Ị
TESTING AND INSPECTION OF WELDS 169 Other Tests
Where a shape or product does not lend itself readily to the standard forms of the tests described, special tests may be set up
to qualify the welds made or to qualify the welded structure This
is perfectly acceptable practice if the test conditions set up are closely adhered to If the tests are haphazardly conducted, they will have little value
The testing of tubing is typical of these special tests A common practice in this case is to force a section of welded tubing over a tapered pin or drift, thus applying circumferential stress which leads
to its ultimate failure The principle use of this test is to qualify the weld by comparing the weld strength to the strength of the tube wall Another variation of tube tests is obtained by placing a short section of welded tubing in compression Load is applied to cause failure by buckling Stresses thus derived are severe because of their complexity Welds must be of good quality to survive the compres- sion test
NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTS
In welded structures or joints where, for any reason, it is un-
desirable to cut out samples for destructive testing, a type of test must _be applied to the welds that will leave them intact Several of these tests will be described Each has its own advantages; none gives complete information regarding the soundness and mechanical properties of the welded joint
Visual Examination The great majority of all welds made are passed or approved by visual examination This test is far from infallible, but if the general appearance of the finished weld meets certain standards (see Fig 98), the product is usually considered to be satisfactory, except in those cases where danger to life and property or other serious losses may be incurred by failure of a welded joint Fortunately, much of the welding done in industry permits observation of incipient failures
or in case of failure, probably creates no particular hazard