Trade disputesWTO dispute settlement procedures Sanctions Examples What’s a trade dispute in WTO?. Ari KokkoThe WTO dispute settlement process Emphasis on consultations and voluntary se
Trang 1Trade disputes
WTO dispute settlement procedures Sanctions
Examples
What’s a trade dispute in WTO?
One member government believes that another member government is violating
an agreement or a commitment made to the WTO
– “Unfair” antidumping levies – Non-tariff barriers
– Administrative practices Note: initial antidumping determination purely national process
Trang 2Ari Kokko
The WTO dispute settlement process
Emphasis on consultations and voluntary settlement of disputes
Detailed schedules for formal dispute settlement process
– complaint to Dispute Settlement Body – expert panel
– report and proposed resolution – process for appeals
The panel process
Complaint and consultation
– 60 days for bilateral discussions
Establishment of panel
– must be done within 45 days
Final panel report to parties
– max 6 months after establishment of panel, includes conclusions and recommendations
Final panel report to all DSB members
– 3 weeks after parties have received it
Report automatically adopted after 60 days if there is no consensus against it
Trang 3Ari Kokko
Appeals
The panel’s ruling can be appealed by either party
Appeals examined by three person group from permanent 7-member Appellate Body
– Appellate Body report in 60-90 days
New report accepted or rejected by DSB within 30 days
– rejection requires consensus
After adoption of panel report
Country at fault must reform its policy according to recommendations
– statement of intent within 30 days – compliance required within “reasonable” period of time
Alternative is to negotiate payment of mutually acceptable compensation
– 20 days for negotiations
Trade sanctions can be authorized by DSB if compensation is not agreed upon
Trang 4Ari Kokko
Sanctions
Retaliatory action – suspension of concession and obligations – should primarily be in same sector
– some possibilities to retaliate in areas of other WTO agreements
Level of retaliation to match injury
– arbitration by original panel
How effective is retaliation?
– How can small countries “hurt” the US?
WTO disputes 1995-2004 (Dec)
324 cases reported to DSB
103 panel reports
64 appellate body decisions
only 5 cases where retaliation has been authorized
Trang 5Ari Kokko
Retaliation authorized in 5 cases
Foreign sales corporations
– EU complaint about tax benefits to exports
Level of retaliation: USD 4,043 million
Implemented from March 2004
US Antidumping Act of 1916
– EU request to adopt similar system with
“triple damages”
Airplane subsidies
– Canadian complaint about Brazilian subsidies Level of retaliation: CAD 344 million Not yet implemented
Retaliation authorized in 4 cases
Bananas
– Latin American countries and US complaint about EU banana import regime Value of retaliation: USD 393 million Withdrawn after agreement
Hormones
– US and Canadian complaint about EU ban
of imports of hormone treated meat products Level of retaliation: USD 125 million In force, but calls for removal after
EU rules revision in late 2003
Trang 6Ari Kokko
The Banana case
The establishment of the Single Market
1992 required unified banana policy
– widely different national policies
Distinct interest groups
– protection of EU producers – support to former colonies – support to EU distributors – consumer interest for cheap bananas
Heavy lobbying of EU decision makers
– effective alliance in favor of protection
EU:s 1993 banana policy
Tariff free quotas for ACP bananas
– based on “best” year before 1991
More restrictive tariff quotas for dollar bananas
Quota licensing system for dollar bananas included shares reserved for ACP banana importers
Trang 7Ari Kokko
WTO dispute settlement
Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and Panama file complaint with WTO in 1996
– joined by US, to defend interests of US banana companies
Support for complaint from WTO panel and Appellate Body
– but EU unwilling to change until sanctions were imposed
Any similarities with Catfish case?
GM: next big case?
Genetically Modified (GM) food products
EU unwilling to allow imports of GM foods
– health / safety: GM food may affect human genes – discussion about labeling and tracing GM
US strongly opposed to import restrictions
Unwillingness to take problem to WTO
– US would probably win case, but lose publicity war – standing of WTO may weaken if it makes
unpopular decisions