Become familiar with the legal environment affecting compensation and pay system governance Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc... Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, • Enable firm
Trang 1Chapter
10
Managing Compensation
10-1Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc
Trang 23 Understand the difference between job
and individual pay options
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education,
Trang 3Chapter Challenges
4 Develop familiarity with compensation
tools
5 Become familiar with the legal
environment affecting compensation and pay system governance
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-3
Trang 4Managerial Perspective of
Designing Compensation
Programs
• Who should be responsible for making salary decisions?
• Should pay be dictated by what other employers are
paying?
• What types of activities should be rewarded with higher salaries?
• What criteria should be used to determine salaries?
• Which employee group should receive special
treatment when scarce pay resources are allocated?
• How does an employer balance ethical concerns for
employees’ welfare versus the need to save on labor
costs?
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education,
Trang 5What Is Compensation?
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-5
Trang 6Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education,
• Enable firm to achieve its strategic
objective
• Mold to the firm’s unique
characteristics and environment
• Internal equity: perceived fairness
Trang 7Nine Criteria for
Developing a Compensation Plan
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc
10-7
Trang 8Compensation Systems:
Equity
• Distributive Justice Model
• Labor Market Model
• Balancing Equity
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-8
Trang 9Compensation System
Design
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-9
Fixed vs Variable Pay
Performance vs Membership
Trang 10Compensation Entitlements Are Going Out the Window
• Shift to Variable Pay Plans Continues
• Race to the Bottom: Mexico Lowers Wages
to Snare International Auto Production
• Making Wage Concessions at Airlines
• Pensions Going Up in Smoke
• Medical Doctors Being Squeezed
• Documenting Pay Cuts Around the World
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-10
Trang 11Job-Based Pay Policies
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-11
Technology is stable Jobs do not change often
Employees do not need to cover for one another
frequently Much training is required to learn a given job
Turnover is relatively low
Employees are expected to move up through the ranks
over time Jobs are fairly standardized within the industry
Trang 12Individual-Based Pay
Policies
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-12
The firm has educated workforce with ability to learn
different jobs The company’s technology and organizational
structure change frequently Employee participation and teamwork are encouraged
Opportunities for upward mobility are limited
Opportunities to learn new skills are present
The costs of employee turnover and absenteeism are
high These plans are more common in manufacturing
environments
Trang 13Compensation System
Design
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-13
Elitism Pay System
Egalitarianism Pay System
Trang 15Compensation System
Design
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-15
Open vs Secret Pay
Centralized vs Decentralized Pay
Trang 16Compensation Tools
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-16
Job-Based-Approach Pay Systems
Skill-Based-Approach Pay Systems
Trang 17Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-17
Key Steps in Creating
Job-Based Compensation
Plans
Trang 18Achieving Equity
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc
Internal Equity
Step 1: Conduct Job Analysis
Step 2: Write Job Descriptions
Step 3: Determine Job Specifications
Step 4: Rate Worth of All Jobs Using Predetermined
System
Step 5: Create a Job Hierarchy
Step 6: Classify Jobs by Grade Levels
External Equity
Step 1: Identify Benchmark or Key Jobs
Step 2: Establish Pay Policies
10-18
Trang 19• Do not take into account the nature of the business
• This plan is more subjective and arbitrary
• These plans are less appropriate at higher levels within an
organization
• With job descriptions becoming more generalized, these
plans are more difficult to evaluate
• These plans tend to be more bureaucratic, mechanistic,
and inflexible
• The job-evaluation process tends to be biased against
women
• Wage and salary data are not definitive
• Employees’ perceptions of equity are what count
• High-tech skilled employees tend to not be loyal to one firm
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-19
Evaluating Job-Based
Compensation Plans
Trang 20The Legal Environment
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc
• Fair Labor Standards Act
Trang 21Summary and Conclusions
Trang 22Pearson Education, Inc.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc 10-22