In the hurry driving situation both headway distance and velocity errors are smaller Human accelerator pedal operations are wavier 0 50 100 Time [s] Driver model... Flat and straight ro
Trang 1Ô TÔ THÔNG MINH
TS ĐÀM HOÀNG PHÚC 2012.4.14 SƠN TÂY
Bộ môn Ô tô và xe Chuyên dụng
Đại học Bách khoa Hà nội
INTELLIGENT VEHICLE
Trang 2• Investigate the motivation of adding Intelligence to a car.
• Explore problems and solutions.
• Survey the current state of research.
• Identify future research trends.
Trang 3• Definitions / Motivation
• Design Goals
• Problems / Solutions - Theory
• Current Industry Solutions
• Future Trend
Trang 4Integrated Vehicle Dynamics Control
Active safety devices (driver assistance systems) for reducing road accidents
Controller
Driver-Vehicle Cooperation
Background
Trang 5Motivation : Integrated Vehicle Technology and Robotics
Yaw moment generated
by Lane keeping system
Skidding avoidance is needed to secure vehicle stability during transient steering manoeuvre.
Driver steering behaviour adaptation
・ lane keeping task : lane keeping control activates
・ lane changing : stability control activates
Machine Intelligence : to provide service with respect to the operation task
Sensor information is used to recognize the operation modes /behaviour
Trang 6■ Environment adaptation
■ Driver adaptation
■ Conventional driver assistance systems use average characteristics of drivers. → They do not fit the driver preference and cause sense of discomfort
→ Accident prevention effect cannot fully be obtained as expected
Traffic environment (map, vicinity vehicles) Driver state (drowsy, tired, hurry)
Motivation and Objectives
(Dangerous)
(Cautious)
Trang 70 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0
Driving Database Storage &
Driver Behavior Analysis
Deceleration point at intersections
Following or Stopping etc.
+ _
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0
Driving Database Storage &
Driver Behavior Analysis
Deceleration point at intersections
Following or Stopping etc.
+ _
Based on long-term naturalistic driving data of a driver
in actual traffic condition, the following algorithms for synthesizing DA are designed
(1)”Feature of usual driving behavior”, (2)“Unusual behavior detection and prediction” ,(3)“Individual adaptation of driver assistance system”
Schematic diagram of driver assistance system
Trang 8Driver Assistance Systems
• Night Vision
• Adaptive Cruise Control
• Collision Warning
• Collision Avoidance
• Driver Impairment Monitoring
• Advanced Driver Assistance
• Cooperative Infrastructure
• Automated Driving
Trang 9TTLC : Time To Line Crossing [s]
Trang 10Forward collision warning system
warni ng
brake on
Trang 11• Provide the info./warning/maneuvers to the driver at proper timing and intensity
• Adaptive in real-time to traffic environment & individual drivers' characteristics
Today your headway distance
is shorter than usual
It is not your normal behavior.
Adaptive region
Collision Warning Braking Intervention Safe Distance Advisory
Driver assistance system
10 s
Normal driving Hazardous
Post-acc.
Critical (pre-crash)
Time-to-Collision
0 s
1 s
Collision
Continuous Sensing and Individual User-Adaptive Mechatronics
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (Car-Robotics Technology)
Trang 12In the hurry driving situation both headway distance and velocity errors are smaller
Human accelerator pedal operations are wavier
0 50 100
Time [s]
Driver model
Trang 13Normal Hurry
Trang 14Brake pedal Vehicle
Vehicle velocity
Acceleration
To propose the methodology of driving maneuver (state) recognition
algorithm based on statistical machine learning technique from database
State of the Art of Driver Model/Driver Manoeuvre Recognition
Trang 15Following Braking
Cruising
Decelerating
Stopping
Preceding vehicle Host vehicle
Following a leading vehicle
Stopping
Braking for forward vehicle collision avoidance
Independently free driving
Deceleration at stop line or red signal
Classification of driving behavior (longitudinal direction)
ACC, FSRA
FCWS, PCS
ISA
Stop Assistance
Trang 16①Camera/Image Synthesizer
②Global Positioning System
Rear
6-image synthesizer
③ CAN Signal Probe
Steering wheel angle, Accelerator pedal,
Brake pedal, Winker,
Speed, Accelerations, Yaw rate, …
Headway distance, Relative speed
CAN-probe OBD connector
NTSC/DV conversion
RS/USB conversion
RS/USB conversion
USB/HUB
Laptop-based Logger Captured VDO image
Front Front left Front right Face Foot
Sensor Network of Continuous Sensing Drive Recorder
Trang 17Digital data from on-board vehicle
sensors
Image data
Vehicle position data(GPS)
Trang 18Ground TruthEstimated
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0
50 100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 -10
0 10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 -2
0 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 -0.5
0 0.5
Inverse of time to collision
Time headway Relative velocity
Longitudinal acceleration
Time [s]
V R
Low computational cost
with expectable high accuracy
Easy to interprete the
physical meanings of the model
Driver-Vehicle-Environment modeling based on Boosting Sequential Labeling
Trang 19Comparison between the ground truth (reference) and the estimated state
Road sections : R2
Comparison between the ground truth (reference) and the estimated state
Trang 21Flat and straight road, =0.8
Hurry Driving : 5 times
Driver model
uBe
DS Vehicle Model (C P ++ P )
Engine Model
Motor Model
+ +
Human longitudinal control driver-vehicle system in closed-loop
Five drivers conducted experiments
Trang 22In the hurry driving situation both headway distance and velocity errors are smaller
Human accelerator pedal operations are wavier
0 50 100
Time [s]
Driver model
Trang 23The relationship between velocity tracking performance with fuel economy
Vf following vehicle velocity
Vp Preceding vehicle velocity
Better in velocity tracking performance will give better fuel economy
Velocity Tracking Performance
The average velocity error
Trang 24There are strong relationship between accelerator pedal operation characteristics and velocity tracking performance with fuel economy Therefore the driver model need to describe driver’s accelerator pedal operation and represent of vehicle control process.
Accelerator pedal variance P hm_var [%]
Trang 25Vehicle
L ongitudinal Model
The driver attempt to diminish distance error
between actual headway distance and his
desired headway distance
R hw T
: Relative velocity
: Headway distance error
: Accelerator pedal stroke
: Preceding vehicle velocity
a P
Vehicle Longitudinal Model
C Preceding velocity feed-forward gain
Relative velocity feedback gain
Trang 260 20 40 60 80 100 120 0
20 40 60 80
In normal driving situation, the
time headway, T hw are large and
driver control gain H x and H V are small
In hurry driving situation T hw are
small and driver control gain H x and H V are large.
Verify the accuracy of the driver model
NAGAI LAB
Driver model
Identified Driver Model Parameters
15
Trang 270 50 100
Trang 280 20 40 60 80 100 120 0
The comparison of hurry driving simulation results and experimental data (D4)
In hurry driving situation, the headway distance and velocity errors of simulation results are well-fitted with the experimental data
Trang 29Average velocity errors of simulation results are well-fitted with the experimental
results
Confirms correctness of the identified parameter values and ability of
representations of vehicle control process of proposed driver model
Comparison of average velocity error between the simulation results and experimental data of five drivers
Trang 30The proposed driver model can be used to study of driver behavior
in a systematical driver-vehicle system.
Average error between simulation results and experimental data: 5.1%
NAGAI LAB
Driver model
Comparison of fuel economy between the simulation results and experimental data of five drivers
Trang 31Vehicle
L ongitudinal Model
Trang 32Vehicle Longitudinal Model
The headway distance gain, Hx
contributes stronger effect on fuel economy than relative
velocity gain, H V
Drivers who are good sensitive
in headway distance tend to give good fuel economy.