Some DMARDs and Biologic Agents Page 39 Treatment Guidelines Published by The Medical Letter, Inc.. • 145 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication Volume 10 Issu
Trang 1Treatment Guidelines
Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • 1000 Main Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication
FORWARDING OR COPYING IS A VIOLATION OF US AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAWS
The Medical Letter® publications are protected by US and international copyright laws Forwarding, copying or any distribution of this material is prohibited
Sharing a password with a non-subscriber or otherwise making the contents of this site available
to third parties is strictly prohibited
By accessing and reading the attached content I agree to comply with US and international copyright laws and these terms and conditions of The Medical Letter, Inc
or call customer service at: 800-211-2769
Important Copyright Message
IN THIS ISSUE (starts on next page)
Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis p 37
Trang 2Federal copyright law prohibits unauthorized reproduction by any means and imposes severe fines.
Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Table
1 Some DMARDs and Biologic Agents Page 39
Treatment Guidelines
Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • 145 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication
Volume 10 (Issue 117) May 2012
www.medicalletter.org
Take CME Exams
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
are now used early in the treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) to achieve clinical remission, prevent
irreversible damage to joints, and minimize toxicity
associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) and corticosteroids.1 DMARDs (Table 1)
generally do not have an immediate analgesic effect,
but over time can control symptoms and have been
shown to delay and possibly stop progression of the
disease NSAIDs have immediate analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, but may not affect the disease process Oral corticosteroids can relieve joint symp-toms and control systemic manifestations, but their chronic use can cause many complications Judicious use of intra-articular corticosteroids can rapidly decrease inflammation in acute joints with few, if any, adverse effects
DMARDs
Most DMARDs have a slow onset of action and require regular monitoring for adverse effects
Methotrexate (Rheumatrex, and others) is generally
the first DMARD prescribed; it can be used in mild, moderate or severe RA For mild disease, some clini-cians prefer to start with hydroxychloroquine
(Plaquenil, and others) or sulfasalazine (Azulfidine,
and others)
METHOTREXATE — Methotrexate is usually the
standard of care for initial DMARD therapy Even in low doses, it can decrease symptoms, limit joint dam-age, and improve long-term outcomes Methotrexate can induce a sustained clinical remission and has been reported to prolong survival in patients with RA, pos-sibly by a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease.2 The anti-rheumatic effect of methotrexate is usually apparent within 4-6 weeks, but sometimes not for sev-eral months
Dosage – Many rheumatologists recommend starting
with a single dose of oral methotrexate 7.5-15 mg once a week In patients who cannot tolerate the single dose, methotrexate can be given in 3 divided doses at 12-hour intervals The dosage can be increased over 1-2 months to 25 mg once a week Intramuscular (IM)
or subcutaneous (SC) methotrexate once weekly (in the same dose as the oral formulation) may be helpful for patients who have adverse gastrointestinal (GI)
RECOMMENDATIONS: For initial treatment of
rheumatoid arthritis, most Medical Letter
consult-ants prescribe a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic
drug (DMARD), and add a nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with or without a
corticosteroid to control symptoms Methotrexate is
generally the DMARD of choice;
hydroxychloro-quine is a safer alternative that may be appropriate
in the mildest cases
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (etanercept,
infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and
certolizu-mab pegol) are typically the first-line biologic agents
prescribed after an inadequate response to a DMARD;
they may be given as monotherapy or in combination
with methotrexate For patients who do not respond
adequately to a TNF inhibitor, switching to a second
TNF inhibitor may be effective, but with the
availability of non-TNF biologic agents, many
rheumatologists change to a biologic agent with a
dif-ferent mechanism of action
The combination of a biologic agent with a DMARD
(usually methotrexate) offers better disease control
without a substantial increase in toxicity and is now
commonly used to achieve remission Aggressive
early therapy with methotrexate and/or a biologic
agent results in longer disease-free remissions, less
joint destruction, and a better quality of life
The Medical Letter publications are protected by US and international copyright laws.
Forwarding, copying or any other distribution of this material is strictly prohibited.
For further information call: 800-211-2769
Trang 3effects from the oral formulation or lose benefit over
time because of poor absorption Supplements
contain-ing folic acid (1-4 mg daily) or folinic acid (2.5-10 mg
weekly 24 hours after the methotrexate dose) are
rec-ommended to decrease methotrexate’s adverse effects
Adverse Effects – In low doses, methotrexate is
usu-ally well tolerated, but it can cause stomatitis, anorexia,
nausea, abdominal cramps, increased aminotransferase
activity and, rarely, hepatic fibrosis Parenteral
admin-istration decreases the GI effects of the drug Many
rheumatologists would not prescribe methotrexate for
patients with pre-existing liver disease or for those
who consume large amounts of alcohol All patients
taking methotrexate should be discouraged from
drink-ing alcohol Hepatic transaminases should be
monitored before and during treatment and patients at
risk for hepatitis B and C should be screened before
starting the drug
Methotrexate is an antifolate that is toxic to all rapidly
dividing cells; even in low doses it can suppress the
bone marrow, and peripheral blood counts should be
monitored periodically Bone marrow suppression can
be treated with leucovorin rescue Infections such as
herpes zoster may be more common in patients taking
the drug A rare association has been reported between
methotrexate use and localized lymphoma, which
often regresses when methotrexate is discontinued
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which can be severe,
occurs in 1-2% of patients and may be more common
in those with antecedent lung disease An increase in
rheumatoid skin nodules and (rarely) cutaneous
necro-tizing vasculitis has been reported
Since methotrexate is eliminated primarily by renal
excretion, serious toxicity is more likely in patients
with decreased creatinine clearance (CrCl)
Methotrexate is not recommended for use in patients
with CrCl <30 mL/min
Pregnancy – Methotrexate is teratogenic and should not
be prescribed for women who are or may become
preg-nant It is also an abortifacient and can decrease fertility
in both men and women The drug should be stopped in
both sexes at least 3 months before conception.3
Drug Interactions – Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
(Bactrim, and others), trimethoprim (Proloprim, and
others) and other drugs that interfere with folate
metabolism may increase bone marrow suppression
caused by methotrexate NSAIDs decrease the renal
tubular secretion of methotrexate and may increase its
toxicity, but many patients take both drugs without
adverse effects
LEFLUNOMIDE — An oral inhibitor of pyrimidine
synthesis, leflunomide (Arava, and others) can be
used as initial monotherapy instead of methotrexate or can replace methotrexate in patients who do not toler-ate it Like methotrextoler-ate, leflunomide can reduce symptoms, limit damage to joints, and improve func-tion.4 Leflunomide and methotrexate have been used together, but their hepatotoxicity may be additive
Dosage – The maintenance dose of leflunomide is 20
mg daily; if not well tolerated, the dose can be reduced to 10 mg daily A loading dose of 100 mg daily for 3 days is sometimes recommended, but many clinicians omit this because of a high incidence
of GI intolerability
Adverse Effects – Diarrhea occurs frequently with
leflunomide and is sometimes debilitating Reversible alopecia, rash, myelosuppression, and increases in aminotransferase activity can also occur; complete blood counts and liver function tests should be moni-tored The risk of severe liver toxicity may be greater in patients taking leflunomide and methotrexate concur-rently Anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, weight loss, interstitial lung disease, peripheral neuropathy and leukocytoclastic vasculitis have occurred rarely
Pregnancy – Leflunomide is carcinogenic and
terato-genic in animals and is contraindicated during pregnancy Women who want to become pregnant and men who want to father a child after beginning treat-ment with leflunomide should discontinue it and take
cholestyramine (Questran, and others) 8 g three times
a day for 11 days to bind and eliminate the drug;
plas-ma levels of the active metabolite should then be checked to verify that they are <0.02 mg/L The same detoxification protocol can be used for acute toxic effects of leflunomide Without cholestyramine, it could take up to 2 years for serum concentrations of the drug to become undetectable
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE — The antimalarial
hydroxychloroquine is moderately effective for mild
RA and is usually well tolerated It is now often used with other drugs, particularly methotrexate and sul-fasalazine It may require 3-6 months for the drug’s effectiveness to become apparent
Adverse Effects – Nausea and epigastric pain can
occur, but serious adverse effects are rare Hemolysis may occur in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehy-drogenase (G6PD) deficiency Some patients report immediate blurred vision or difficulty seeing at night that reverses upon discontinuation of the drug Retinal damage is a rare complication that can be avoided if vision is monitored (visual fields, color vision), dosage
Trang 4Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 117) • May 2012
is kept below 6.5 mg/kg/day, and the drug is
discontin-ued promptly when signs of retinal toxicity first
appear; it should not be used in patients with
signifi-cant renal insufficiency A complete ophthalmologic
exam is recommended before treatment and annually
for those at high risk (age >60, hepatic or renal disease,
retinal disease); patients at low risk may be examined
less frequently Use of hydroxychloroquine during
pregnancy is thought to be relatively safe.5
SULFASALAZINE — Sulfasalazine (Azulfidine, and
others) has been shown to prevent joint erosions It
often requires 2-3 months of therapy for beneficial
effects to become apparent Sulfasalazine causes more toxicity than hydroxychloroquine
Adverse Effects – Nausea, anorexia and rash are
fair-ly common with sulfasalazine Use of enteric-coated tablets may decrease GI toxicity Serious reactions such as hepatitis, leukopenia and agranulocytosis are rare and usually occur within the first 2-3 months of treatment A lupus-like syndrome has been reported Hemolysis may occur in patients with G6PD
deficien-cy Sperm counts may decrease, but return to normal after withdrawal of the drug Sulfasalazine is probably safe for use during pregnancy
39
DMARDs
Rheumatrex (DAVA)
(25 mg/mL)
Plaquenil (sanofi)
Azulfidine (Pfizer)
Azulfidine EN-tabs
Arava (sanofi)
Minocycline – generic 50, 75, 100 mg caps, tabs 50 to 200 mg/d in divided doses PO
BIOLOGIC AGENTS
TNF Inhibitors
Certolizumab pegol – Cimzia (UCB) 200 mg vial; 400 mg 2 SC at 0, 2, and 4 wks, then
200 mg/mL syringe 200 mg every other week or 400 mg
q4 weeks Etanercept – Enbrel (Immunex) 25 mg vial; 25, 50 mg/mL 25 mg 2x/wk or 50 mg once/wk SC
syringe
6 wks, then q8 wks IV
Non-TNF Inhibitors
Rituximab 4 – Rituxan (Genentech) 100, 500 mg vials 1000 mg IV twice, 2 weeks apart 5
Tocilizumab – Actemra (Genentech) 80, 200, 400 mg single-use vials 4-8 mg/kg IV q4 weeks
(20 mg/mL) Abatacept – Orencia (BMS) 15 mL (250-mg vial) 500, 750, or 1000 mg at 0, 2 and 4
weeks, then q4 weeks IV 6
1 mL (125 mg syringe) 125 mg once/wk SC 7
1 The manufacturer recommends a loading dose of 100 mg/day for the first three days, but many clinicians omit it due to GI intolerability.
2 Given as 2 SC injections of 200 mg.
3 Approved for use only in combination with methotrexate.
4 FDA-approved only for use with methotrexate in patients with an inadequate response to at least one TNF antagonist.
5 To reduce the incidence and severity of infusion reactions, IV methylprednisolone 50-100 mg or equivalent infused 30 minutes before rituximab is recommended.
6 Dose is 500 mg for patients weighing <60 kg, 750 mg for patients 60-100 kg, and 1000 mg for patients >100 kg.
7 The first 125-mg SC injection is given within a day of an IV loading dose (see footnote 6).
Table 1 Some DMARDs and Biologic Agents
Trang 5MINOCYCLINE — The antibiotic minocycline
(Minocin, and others) may offer some benefit in the
mildest cases of RA; it is relatively safe, but can cause
drug-induced lupus and is contraindicated for use in
young children and in women during pregnancy and
when breastfeeding
RARELY USED DMARDs — Gold salts, although
now used infrequently, can induce a complete
remis-sion in RA Injectable gold, which is much more
effec-tive than oral gold, is an alternaeffec-tive for patients who
cannot tolerate methotrexate or the biologic agents It
has numerous adverse effects, particularly stomatitis,
rash, proteinuria and, less commonly, leukopenia and
thrombocytopenia Enterocolitis, aplastic anemia and
interstitial pneumonitis are rare serious adverse effects
of injectable gold Gold therapy is not recommended
for use during pregnancy
Azathioprine (Imuran, and others) is an
immunosup-pressive purine analog sometimes used for patients
with refractory RA or systemic involvement such as
rheumatoid vasculitis GI intolerance, hepatitis and
bone marrow suppression can occur, and an increased
risk of lymphoma has been reported Azathioprine is
contraindicated for use during pregnancy
Cyclosporine (Neoral, and others) is an inhibitor of
T-cell activation that can be helpful in some patients with
RA, but nephrotoxicity and many interactions with
drugs and foods have limited its use Cyclosporine
should not be used during pregnancy
BIOLOGIC AGENTS
Biologic agents are generally reserved for use in
patients with moderate to severe disease
TNF INHIBITORS — Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
is a pro-inflammatory cytokine present in the
synovi-um of patients with RA Five parenteral drugs that bind
to TNF and block its activity are approved for
treat-ment of RA They relieve symptoms and may be more
effective than methotrexate and other DMARDs in
limiting joint destruction TNF inhibitors also act more
quickly than DMARDs; some patients report
substan-tial improvement after the first dose Use of a TNF
inhibitor in combination with methotrexate has
syner-gistic beneficial effects
Etanercept (Enbrel) is a subcutaneously (SC)
admin-istered recombinant human fusion protein consisting
of a soluble TNF receptor covalently linked to a human
IgG1 Fc fragment In patients who do not respond
ade-quately to methotrexate alone, addition of etanercept
has been effective in improving signs and symptoms of
RA and slowing joint damage It is also FDA-approved for monotherapy The dose of etanercept is 25 mg SC twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly
Infliximab (Remicade), which is given intravenously
(IV), is a chimeric human/mouse anti-TNF monoclonal antibody Infliximab is not approved for monotherapy Concurrent methotrexate therapy enhances its efficacy, possibly by inhibiting formation of neutralizing anti-bodies against infliximab In patients with persistently active RA, addition of infliximab 3 mg/kg IV every 8 weeks to methotrexate has improved symptoms and slowed progression of joint damage Some patients may require higher (up to 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks) or more frequent (up to every 4 weeks) doses
Adalimumab (Humira) is a recombinant human
monoclonal anti-TNF antibody It can be injected sub-cutaneously in a dose of 40 mg once a week or (more commonly) every other week Adalimumab appears to
be about as effective as etanercept or infliximab when used with methotrexate.6
Golimumab (Simponi) is a high-affinity human
monoclonal antibody approved as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate.7It is available as a
50-mg SC injection administered monthly
Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) is a humanized
pegylat-ed, anti-TNF monoclonal antibody approved for monotherapy or in combination with DMARDs.8The pegylated structure increases the biologic half-life of the medication and may possibly help target it to sites
of inflammation The recommended dosage of cer-tolizumab is 400 mg SC every other week for three doses, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every other week; monthly injections of 400 mg are an alter-native maintenance regimen
Injection-site reactions are common with etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol and adalimumab Infusion reactions can occur with infliximab and may include severe back pain, fever, urticaria, dyspnea and hypotension Cytopenias can occur with any anti-TNF therapy; complete blood counts should be monitored regularly
Serious infections, including bacterial sepsis and tuber-culosis (usually reactivation and often disseminated), are the most important potential adverse effects of TNF inhibition These drugs should not be given to patients with an active infection Patients should be screened for latent tuberculosis infection before and during treat-ment with a TNF inhibitor Appropriate treattreat-ment for latent tuberculosis reduces the risk of reactivation TNF inhibitors also increase the risk of invasive and
Trang 6dissem-Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 117) • May 2012
inated infections caused by viral, fungal and other
opportunistic pathogens such as histoplasmosis,
candidiasis, aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis,
blasto-mycosis, pneumocystosis and toxoplasmosis Serious
infection with Legionella and Listeria have also been
reported Reactivation of hepatitis B can occur
Malignancies, especially lymphomas, have been
reported in association with TNF inhibitors, but a
cause-and-effect relationship has not been established;
patients with RA in general have an increased risk of
lymphoma TNF inhibitors should not be used in
patients with a recent history of malignancy
TNF inhibitors may rarely induce new-onset or
exacer-bate pre-existing congestive heart failure or induce a
reversible lupus-like syndrome Demyelinating
condi-tions, including multiple sclerosis, have occurred in
patients being treated with these agents Patients with
pre-existing demyelinating disorders should not receive
anti-TNF therapy The manufacturer of infliximab has
issued a warning about possible hepatotoxicity, including
jaundice, hepatitis, cholestasis and acute liver failure
Pregnancy – TNF inhibitors are classified as category
B for use in pregnancy, but serious congenital
anom-alies have been reported in the offspring of women
tak-ing TNF inhibitors durtak-ing pregnancy.9
Choice of a TNF Inhibitor – Patients who do not
respond to one TNF inhibitor may respond to another
Some clinicians would use etanercept first because it
has a rapid onset of action and a short half-life that
makes toxicity, if it occurs, relatively short-lived
Others would start with infliximab, and if it proves
ineffective, would try etanercept or adalimumab next
NON-TNF BIOLOGICS — Rituximab (Rituxan) is a
genetically engineered chimeric monoclonal antibody
against CD20, a B-cell specific surface antigen It has
been effective in patients with RA who have had
inade-quate responses to methotrexate and/or anti-TNF
agents.10,11Rituximab is commonly given concurrently
with methotrexate or another DMARD; concomitant use
of another biologic agent is not recommended It is
administered as two IV infusions given 2 weeks apart
IV methylprednisolone 50-100 mg or its equivalent
infused 30 minutes before rituximab can reduce the
incidence and severity of infusion reactions Patients
can be retreated every 6 months
Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions can occur
within 2 hours of a rituximab infusion; fatalities have
been reported Late adverse effects of the drug include
progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
due to JC virus infection, which often causes death or
severe neurological disability, and reactivation of hep-atitis B infection Screening patients at high risk of hepatitis B is recommended before treatment An increased risk of tuberculosis has not been observed with rituximab
Abatacept (Orencia) is a genetically engineered fusion
protein that interferes with T-cell activation.12It is avail-able in both IV and SC formulations, with no apparent difference in efficacy between the two formulations.13 Abatacept can be used as monotherapy or in combina-tion with a DMARD, but should not be used concur-rently with other biologic agents After an initial IV dose, subsequent doses are given at weeks 2 and 4, fol-lowed by monthly maintenance dosing Alternatively, after an initial IV loading dose, subcutaneous abata-cept can be administered weekly starting the day after
IV induction Some prescribers omit the IV dose and start directly with the subcutaneous weekly regimen Adverse events occurring within an hour after the start
of an abatacept infusion can include hypertension, headache, dizziness, and, rarely, anaphylactoid reac-tions Abatacept probably increases the risk of serious infections such as pneumonia, pyelonephritis, cellulitis and diverticulitis, but no clear association with tuber-culosis has been demonstrated
Tocilizumab (Actemra) is a humanized monoclonal
antibody that competitively inhibits the binding of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) to its receptors.14 It has been shown to achieve clinical improvement in some RA patients as early as two weeks after start of therapy Tocilizumab is given as a monthly IV infusion
Infusion reactions, hypertension, neutropenia, elevated serum transaminases, and dyslipidemia can occur Severe complications including GI perforation, serious infections, and hypersensitivity with anaphylaxis have been reported in clinical trials
Anakinra (Kineret) is a genetically engineered IL-1
receptor antagonist that competitively inhibits the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-1 It is considered the least effective biologic DMARD for RA and is not recommended.1
COMBINATION THERAPY
A combination of 2 or even 3 DMARDs or a DMARD with a biologic agent may be more effective than monotherapy without causing a significant increase in toxicity Combinations are used particularly for patients with highly active disease, a long duration of disease, or with clinical features that indicate a poor
41
Trang 7prognosis, such as a positive rheumatoid factor or
anti-CCP test, functional limitations, extra-articular disease,
or bony erosions In one study in
methotrexate-refrac-tory patients randomized to addition of infliximab or
addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine,
radiographic progression after 24 months was slower in
the infliximab group.15 The combination of
methotrex-ate with a biologic agent has been more efficacious
than methotrexate alone in achieving and maintaining
remission.16Concurrent use of methotrexate and a TNF
inhibitor has been more effective than either one alone
and in early RA can induce a clinical response in up to
50% of patients.17,18Leflunomide used in combination
with methotrexate increases the risk of hepatotoxicity;
patients must be monitored closely Combining
differ-ent biologic agdiffer-ents increases the risk of infections
without providing any appreciable additional benefit
and is not recommended
VACCINATIONS
All patients starting therapy with a DMARD or
bio-logic agent should be immunized against influenza,
pneumococcal disease, hepatitis B, and herpes zoster.19
Live virus vaccines, such as herpes zoster, MMR
(measles, mumps, rubella), varicella or intranasal
influenza, should not be used in patients taking a
bio-logic agent If needed, they should be given at least one
month before initiating treatment
NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY
DRUGS
Because of the efficacy of methotrexate alone or in
combination with a biologic, NSAIDs now are used
mainly as bridge drugs for relief of pain No oral
NSAID is consistently more effective than any other
for treatment of RA, but some patients who do not
respond to or tolerate one may respond to or tolerate
another.20Aspirin in high doses is as effective as any
other NSAID, but may have more GI toxicity
Non-acetylated salicylates have less GI toxicity than
aspirin Although approved only for use in
osteoarthri-tis, topical diclofenac 1% gel (Voltaren Gel) could be
helpful in some patients with RA who have isolated
symptomatic joints.21
Mechanism of Action – The physiologic effects of
NSAIDs are due mainly to inhibition of the two
iso-forms of cyclooxygenase, COX-1 and COX-2 COX-1
is expressed in most tissues and is thought to protect
the gastric mucosa COX-2 is expressed in various
tis-sues, especially in the kidney, where it helps to
main-tain perfusion, and is inducible at sites of
inflamma-tion Inhibition of COX-1 decreases synthesis of
thromboxane in platelets and interferes with their
aggregation, a cardioprotective effect Inhibition of COX-2 is responsible for the anti-inflammatory effect
of NSAIDs At therapeutic doses, the older traditional
NSAIDs such as ibuprofen (Advil, and others) or naproxen (Naprosyn, and others, and others) block
both isoforms to varying degrees, while COX-2-selec-tive inhibitors (“coxibs”) selecCOX-2-selec-tively inhibit COX-2 At
present, celecoxib (Celebrex) is the only
FDA-approved coxib on the market; its potential for cardiovascular toxicity has limited its use.22
Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects – All NSAIDs can
cause dyspepsia and more serious GI toxicity, including gastric and duodenal ulceration, perforation and bleed-ing (with or without warnbleed-ing symptoms), especially in elderly patients, those with a previous GI bleed, and those receiving anticoagulants or systemic cortico-steroids Celecoxib has been shown to have less upper
GI toxicity than some of the nonselective NSAIDs Concurrent use of a proton pump inhibitor such as
omeprazole (Prilosec, and others), a double dose of a
histamine H2-receptor antagonist such as ranitidine
(Zantac, and others), or the prostaglandin analog miso-prostol (Cytotec, and others), may decrease the
incidence of GI toxicity caused by NSAIDs.23 Arthrotec
(diclofenac/misoprostol), Vimovo (naproxen/esomepra-zole) and Duexis (ibuprofen/famotidine) are three
commercially available NSAID preparations combined with an agent for gastrointestinal protection.24,25 Concurrent use of even low doses of aspirin increases the risk of NSAID GI toxicity
Effects on Bleeding – All NSAIDs, with the exception
of celecoxib, non-acetylated salicylates and, to a lesser
extent, meloxicam (Mobic, and others) and nabumetone (Relafen, and others), can interfere with platelet
func-tion and prolong bleeding time This effect is reversible when the drug is cleared, except with aspirin, which has
an irreversible inhibitory effect on platelets that persists for the life of the platelet (7-10 days)
Cardiovascular Risk – NSAIDs in general have
under-gone scrutiny of their cardiovascular safety.26 According to a meta-analysis of controlled clinical tri-als, the thrombotic risk increased with diclofenac
(Voltaren, and others), meloxicam and indomethacin (Indocin, and others), increased slightly with high-dose
ibuprofen (>1200 mg/d), and did not increase with naproxen Celecoxib did not appear to increase the inci-dence of cardiovascular events compared to placebo or non-selective NSAIDs.27,28
Renal Toxicity – Because of their inhibition of renal
prostaglandins, all NSAIDs, including celecoxib, decrease renal blood flow, cause fluid retention, and may cause hypertension and renal failure in some
Trang 8Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 117) • May 2012
patients, particularly the elderly Diminished renal
function or decreased effective intravascular volume
due to diuretic therapy, cirrhosis or congestive heart
failure increases the risk of NSAID renal toxicity
Other Effects – NSAIDs can cause central nervous
system effects such as dizziness, anxiety, drowsiness,
confusion, depression, disorientation, severe headache
and aseptic meningitis
NSAIDs frequently cause small increases in
amino-transferase activity; serious hepatic toxicity is rare, but
may occur more frequently with diclofenac
Pancreatitis has been reported Cholestatic hepatitis
has occurred with celecoxib, possibly related to
sul-fonamide allergy; celecoxib is contraindicated in
patients allergic to sulfonamides
NSAIDs rarely cause blood dyscrasias; aplastic
ane-mia has been reported with ibuprofen, fenoprofen
(Nalfon, and others), naproxen, indomethacin,
tol-metin and piroxicam (Feldene, and others).
Asthmatic patients sensitive to aspirin could develop
severe bronchospasm and anaphylactoid reactions with
any NSAID; non-acetylated salicylates and possibly
coxibs are less likely to cause these reactions
NSAIDs have been associated with both mild and severe
skin reactions, including exfoliative dermatitis,
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
Pregnancy – Exposure to NSAIDs during pregnancy
or around the time of conception has been associated
with an increased risk of miscarriage, but the data are
weak Use of NSAIDs during the third trimester of
pregnancy may cause premature closure of the ductus
arteriosus and persistent pulmonary hypertension in
the neonate, but these effects appear to be uncommon
if the drug is discontinued 6-8 weeks before delivery
Drug Interactions – NSAIDs may decrease the
effec-tiveness of diuretics, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors
and some other antihypertensive drugs, and may
increase the toxicity of lithium and methotrexate
Celecoxib and other NSAIDs can increase the
interna-tional normalized ratio (INR) if given with warfarin
(Coumadin, and others) and might increase the risk of
bleeding Patients taking aspirin for cardiovascular
protection should not take ibuprofen because it can
interfere with aspirin’s antiplatelet effect
CORTICOSTEROIDS
Use of oral corticosteroids in RA remains
controver-sial Many rheumatologists use short courses of
low-dose corticosteroids for symptomatic relief until the beneficial effects of DMARDs become apparent In patients with early RA, prednisone 7.5 mg daily has been reported to reduce radiographic progression, and the addition of daily prednisone 10 mg to methotrexate has been shown to reduce erosive joint damage and increase the likelihood of remission compared to methotrexate alone,29 but most clini-cians do not use corticosteroids as DMARDs because
of the complications associated with long-term use Use of corticosteroids in higher doses may be required to control severe systemic manifestations of
RA, such as pericarditis or vasculitis, but with the use
of methotrexate and the biologics, these are now uncommon
Intra-articular injection of a corticosteroid such as
triamcinolone (Aristospan) often can relieve an
acute-ly inflamed rheumatoid joint with minimal adverse effects; injecting 1 or 2 joints to control a patient who does not have generalized disease is an underutilized way of controlling the inflammatory process.30
Adverse Effects – Intra-articular corticosteroids cause
few, if any, adverse effects The adverse effects of sys-temic corticosteroids include osteoporosis, weight gain, fluid retention, cataracts, glaucoma, poor wound healing, gastric ulcers and GI bleeding, hyper-glycemia, hypertension, adrenal suppression and increased risk of infection Even short-term cortico-steroid use in low doses can cause bone loss; calcium and vitamin D supplements should be given concur-rently Using a bisphosphonate, such as alendronate
(Fosamax, and others) or risedronate (Actonel), or the
parathyroid hormone formulation teriparatide
(Forteo)31 can help to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis Prophylactic antibiotic therapy against
Pneumocystis jiroveci (formerly carinii) pneumonia is
recommended for patients receiving prolonged moder-ate or high-dose corticosteroid therapy (>20 mg daily prednisone or equivalent), especially when combined with an immunosuppressive DMARD
1 JA Singh et al 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64:625.
2 SL Westlake et al.The effect of methotrexate on cardiovascular disease
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review Rheumatology 2010; 49:295.
3 A Golding et al Rheumatoid arthritis and reproduction Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007; 33:319.
4 N Alcorn et al Benefit-risk assessment of leflunomide: an appraisal of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis 10 years after licensing Drug Saf 2009; 32:1123.
5 F Vroom et al Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: current status and implications for the future Drug Saf 2006; 29:845.
6 YF Chen et al A systematic review of the effectiveness of
adalimum-ab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
43
Trang 9in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.
Health Technol Assess 2006; 10:iii.
7 Golimumab (Simponi) for inflammatory arthritis Med Lett Drugs
Ther 2009; 51:55.
8 Certolizumab (Cimzia) for Crohn’s disease Med Lett Drugs Ther
2008; 50:81.
9 JD Carter et al A safety assessment of tumor necrosis factor
antago-nists during pregnancy: a review of the Food and Drug Administration
database J Rheumatol 2009; 36:635.
10 Rituximab (Rituxan) for rheumatoid arthritis Med Lett Drugs Ther
2006; 48:34.
11 SB Cohen et al Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to
anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized,
dou-ble-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy
and safety at twenty-four weeks Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54:2793.
12 Abatacept (Orencia) for rheumatoid arthritis Med Lett Drugs Ther
2006; 48:17.
13 MC Genovese et al Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous
abat-acept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate
response to methotrexate Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63:2854.
14 Tocilizumab (Actemra) for rheumatoid arthritis Med Lett Drugs Ther
2010; 52:47.
15 RF van Vollenhover et al Conventional combination treatment versus
biological treatment in methotrexate-refractory early rheumatoid
arthritis: 2 year follow-up of the randomised, non-blinded,
parallel-group Swefot trial Lancet 2012 Epub ahead of print.
16 B Kuriya et al Efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus
combination therapy with a biological agent in early rheumatoid
arthritis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic remission Ann
Rheum Dis 2010; 69:1298.
17 YH Lee et al Meta-analysis of the combination of TNF inhibitors plus
MTX compared to MTX monotherapy, and the adjusted indirect
com-parison of TNF inhibitors in patients suffering from active rheumatoid
arthritis Rheumatol Int 2008; 28:553.
18 KE Donahue et al Systemic review: comparative effectiveness and
harms of disease-modifying medications for rheumatoid arthritis Ann
Intern Med 2008; 148:124.
19 Adult immunization Treat Guidel Med Lett 2011; 9:75.
20 Drugs for pain Treat Guidel Med Lett 2010; 8:25.
21 Diclofenac gel for osteoarthritis Med Lett Drugs Ther 2008; 50:31.
22 PL McCormack Celecoxib: a review of its use for symptomatic relief
in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing
spondylitis Drugs 2011; 71:2457.
23 Primary prevention of ulcers in patients taking aspirin or NSAIDs.
Med Lett Drugs Ther 2010; 52:17.
24 Naproxen/esomeprazole (Vimovo) Med Lett Drugs Ther 2010; 52:74.
25 A fixed-dose combination of ibuprofen and famotidine (Duexis) Med
Lett Drugs Ther 2011; 53:85.
26 ME Farkouh and BP Greenberg An evidence-based review of the
car-diovascular risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Am J
Cardiol 2009; 103:1227.
27 P McGettigan and D Henry Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based
con-trolled observational studies PLoS Med 2011; 8:e1001098.
28 WB White et al Risk of cardiovascular events in patients receiving
celecoxib: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Am J Cardiol
2007; 99:91.
29 MF Bakker et al Low-dose prednisone inclusion in a
methotrexate-based, tight control strategy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a
random-ized trial Ann Intern Med 2012; 156:329.
30 E Dernis et al Use of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis -
practi-cal modalities of glucocorticoid therapy: recommendations for
clini-cal practice based on data from the literature and expert opinion Joint
Bone Spine 2010; 77:451.
31 Drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis Treat Guidel Med Lett 2011;
9:67.
Copyright and Disclaimer: The Medical Letter is an independent nonprofit
organ-ization that provides healthcare professionals with unbiased drug prescribing rec-ommendations The editorial process used for its publications relies on a review of published and unpublished literature, with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials, and on the opinions of its consultants The Medical Letter is supported solely by sub-scription fees and accepts no advertising, grants or donations.
No part of the material may be reproduced or transmitted by any process in whole or
in part without prior permission in writing The editors do not warrant that all the mate-rial in this publication is accurate and complete in every respect The editors shall not
be held responsible for any damage resulting from any error, inaccuracy or omission.
Subscription Services
Mailing Address:
The Medical Letter, Inc.
145 Huguenot Street, Ste 312 New Rochelle, NY 10801-7537
Customer Service:
Call: 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 Fax: 914-632-1733
Web Site: www.medicalletter.org E-mail: custserv@medicalletter.org
Permissions:
To reproduce any portion of this issue, please e-mail your request to:
permissions@medicalletter.org
Subscriptions (US):
1 year - $98; 2 years - $189;
3 years - $279 $49/yr for students, interns, residents and fellows in the
US and Canada.
E-mail site license inquiries to:
info@medicalletter.org or call 800-211-2769 x315.
Special fees for bulk subscriptions Special classroom rates are avail-able Back issues are $12 each Major credit cards accepted.
Copyright 2012 ISSN 1541-2792
Treatment Guidelines
from The Medical Letter®
EDITOR IN CHIEF: Mark Abramowicz, M.D.
EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Gianna Zuccotti, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P., Harvard Medical
School
EDITOR: Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D.
ASSISTANT EDITORS, DRUG INFORMATION: Susan M Daron, Pharm.D., Corinne E Zanone, Pharm.D.
CONSULTING EDITORS: Brinda M Shah, Pharm.D., F Peter Swanson, M.D CONTRIBUTING EDITORS:
Carl W Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Vanessa K Dalton, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical School Eric J Epstein, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Jules Hirsch, M.D., Rockefeller University David N Juurlink, BPhm, M.D., PhD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Richard B Kim, M.D., University of Western Ontario
Hans Meinertz, M.D., University Hospital, Copenhagen Sandip K Mukherjee, M.D., F.A.C.C., Yale School of Medicine Dan M Roden, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
F Estelle R Simons, M.D., University of Manitoba Jordan W Smoller, M.D., Sc.D., Harvard Medical School Neal H Steigbigel, M.D., New York University School of Medicine Arthur M.F Yee, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.R, Weill Medical College of Cornell University SENIOR ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Donna Goodstein, Amy Faucard ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Cynthia Macapagal Covey
EDITORIAL FELLOW: Esperance A K Schaefer, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Medical
School
MANAGING EDITOR: Susie Wong ASSISTANT MANAGING EDITOR: Liz Donohue PRODUCTION COORDINATOR: Cheryl Brown EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SALES: Gene Carbona FULFILLMENT AND SYSTEMS MANAGER: Cristine Romatowski DIRECTOR OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: Joanne F Valentino VICE PRESIDENT AND PUBLISHER: Yosef Wissner-Levy
Founded in 1959 by Arthur Kallet and Harold Aaron, M.D.
Follow us on Twitter @MedicalLetter
Coming soon: Our blog and Facebook page
Trang 10Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 117) • May 2012
Free Individual Exams - Free to active subscribers of Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter Answer 12 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn
up to 2 credits/exam.
Paid Individual Exams - Available to non-subscribers Answer 12 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn up to 2 credits/exam $12/exam.
ACCREDITATION INFORMATION:
ACCME: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians The Medical
Letter Inc designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity This CME activity was planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essentials and Policies.
AAFP: This Enduring Material activity, Treatment Guidelines from the Medical Letter Continuing Medical Education Program, has been reviewed and is acceptable for
up to 15 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians AAFP accreditation begins January 1, 2012 Term of approval is for 1 year from this date Each issue is approved for 1.25 Prescribed credits Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of each issue.
ACPE: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education This exam is
acceptable for 2.0 hour(s) of knowledge-based continuing education credit (0.2 CEU).
AANP and AAPA: The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept AMA Category 1 Credit for the Physician’s Recognition Award from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
AOA: This activity, being ACCME (AMA) approved, is acceptable for Category 2-B credit by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA).
Physician Assistants: The National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from organiza-tions accredited by ACCME NCCPA also accepts AAFP Prescribed credits for recertification Treatment Guidelines is accredited by both ACCME and AAFP.
Physicians in Canada: Members of The College of Family Physicians of Canada residing in the US are eligible to receive Mainpro-M1 credits (equivalent to AAFP
Prescribed credits), and members residing in Canada are eligible to receive Mainpro-M2 credits due to a reciprocal agreement with the American Academy of Family Physicians Treatment Guidelines CME activities are eligible for either Section 2 or Section 4 (when creating a personal learning project) in the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC).
Physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists and physician assistants may earn 2 credits with this exam.
MISSION:
The mission of The Medical Letter's Continuing Medical Education Program is to support the professional development of healthcare professionals including physi-cians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists and physician assistants by providing independent, unbiased drug information and prescribing recommendations that are free
of industry influence The program content includes current information and unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs, their mechanisms of action, clinical trials, dosage and administration, adverse effects and drug interactions The Medical Letter delivers educational content in the form of self-study material The expected outcome of the CME Program is to increase the participant’s ability to know, or apply knowledge into practice after assimilating, information presented
in materials contained in Treatment Guidelines.
The Medical Letter will strive to continually improve the CME program through periodic assessment of the program and activities The Medical Letter aims to be a leader in supporting the professional development of healthcare professionals through Core Competencies by providing continuing medical education that is unbiased and free of industry influence The Medical Letter is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants or donations.
GOAL:
Through this program, The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with unbiased, reliable and timely educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
The objective of this activity is to meet the need of healthcare professionals for unbiased, reliable and timely information on treatment of major diseases The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice Participants will be able to select and prescribe, or confirm the appropriateness of the prescribed usage of the drugs and other therapeutic modalities discussed in Treatment Guidelines with specific attention to clinical evidence of effectiveness, adverse effects and patient management.
Upon completion of this program, the participant will be to:
1 Explain the current approach to the management of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.
2 Discuss the pharmacologic options and treatment regimens available for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and compare them based on their efficacy, dosage and administration, potential adverse effects and drug interactions.
3 Determine the most appropriate therapy given the clinical presentation of an individual patient.
Privacy and Confidentiality: The Medical Letter guarantees our firm commitment to your privacy We do not sell any of your information Secure server software (SSL)
is used for commerce transactions through VeriSign, Inc No credit card information is stored.
IT Requirements: Windows 98/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, Pentium+ processor, Mac OS X+ w/ compatible process; Microsoft IE 6.0+, Mozilla Firefox 2.0+ or any other
com-patible Web browser Dial-up/high-speed connection.
Have any questions? Call us at 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 or e-mail us at: custserv@medicalletter.org
Treatment Guidelines: Online Continuing Medical Education
Up to 24 credits included with your subscription
medicalletter.org/cme
Choose CME from Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter and earn up to 24 Category 1 Credits per year:
Questions start on next page
®