Some Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure Page 71 Treatment Guidelines Published by The Medical Letter, Inc.. Some of the drugs commonly used now for treatment of chronic heart failure are li
Trang 1Treatment Guidelines
Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • 1000 Main Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication
FORWARDING OR COPYING IS A VIOLATION OF US AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAWS
The Medical Letter® publications are protected by US and international copyright laws Forwarding, copying or any distribution of this material is prohibited
Sharing a password with a non-subscriber or otherwise making the contents of this site available
to third parties is strictly prohibited
By accessing and reading the attached content I agree to comply with US and international copyright laws and these terms and conditions of The Medical Letter, Inc
or call customer service at: 800-211-2769
Important Copyright Message
IN THIS ISSUE (starts on next page)
Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure p 69
Trang 2Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
Tables
1 Some Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure Page 71
Treatment Guidelines
Published by The Medical Letter, Inc • 145 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication
Volume 10 (Issue 121) September 2012
(supercedes vol 7 [Issue 83] July 2009)
www.medicalletter.org
Take CME Exams
Chronic systolic heart failure is usually associated with
a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40%
Many patients with symptoms of heart failure have
higher ejection fractions, but there is no evidence that
drug treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic
function (LVEF >40%) improves clinical outcomes
Some of the drugs commonly used now for treatment of
chronic heart failure are listed in the table on page 71
(ACE) INHIBITORS — Most experts recommend
prescribing an ACE inhibitor for all patients with
symptomatic heart failure and for asymptomatic
patients with a decreased LVEF or a history of
myocardial infarction (MI) Patients should be titrated
to the highest tolerated dose, targeting the maximum
daily dosages listed in Table 1 on page 71.1,2 ACE
inhibitors improve symptoms in patients with heart
failure (sometimes within the first 48 hours, but more
commonly over 4-12 weeks), decrease the incidence of
hospitalization and MI, and prolong survival
Cautions – ACE inhibitors should be used cautiously
in patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, creatinine levels >3 mg/dL, or potassium levels >5.5 mEq/L (>5.0 mEq/L in diabetics) They should not be used in patients with a history of angioedema or with bilateral renal artery stenosis ACE inhibitors cause increased fetal mortality and should not be used dur-ing pregnancy (first trimester, category C [risk cannot
be ruled out]; second and third trimesters, category D [positive evidence of risk])
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse effects
of ACE inhibitors are thought to be related to inhibit-ing breakdown of endogenous kinins (cough and, less commonly, angioedema), suppression of angiotensin II (hyperkalemia, hypotension and renal insufficiency), and reduction of aldosterone production (hyper-kalemia) Cough and angioedema can usually be relieved by replacing the ACE inhibitor with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB); ARBs do not increase concentrations of kinins to the same degree
Formulary Considerations – A few ACE inhibitors are
not approved for treatment of heart failure, but no data are available showing that any ACE inhibitor is more effective than any other for treatment of heart failure
ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS (ARBs) — Long-term therapy with an ARB reduces
the risk of death, MI and other cardiovascular events
in patients with systolic heart failure; results appear to
be similar to those obtained with ACE inhibitors ARBs should be used in patients with heart failure and LVEF <40% who cannot tolerate the common ACE-inhibitor-induced cough
Cautions – As with ACE inhibitors, blood pressure,
renal function and serum potassium concentrations should be monitored in patients taking ARBs They also should not be used during pregnancy Pregnancy ratings for ARBs are the same as those for ACE inhibitors
RECOMMENDATIONS — Unless there is a
spe-cific contraindication, all patients with heart failure
and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <40%) should take
both an ACE inhibitor and a beta blocker, and if
vol-ume overloaded, a diuretic as well An angiotensin
receptor blocker (ARB) is recommended for
patients who cannot tolerate an ACE inhibitor
Addition of an aldosterone antagonist can be
bene-ficial for patients with symptomatic heart failure or
for patients with left ventricular dysfunction after a
myocardial infarction A combination of
hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate added to
stan-dard therapy has been effective in
African-American patients with class III-IV heart failure
Digoxin can decrease symptoms and lower the rate
of hospitalization for heart failure, but does not
decrease mortality There is no evidence that any
drug improves clinical outcomes in patients with
heart failure with preserved systolic function
Forwarding, copying or any other distribution of this material is strictly prohibited.
For further information call: 800-211-2769
Trang 3Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 121) • September 2012
Adverse Effects – ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, block
the effects of angiotensin II and may cause
hypoten-sion, renal insufficiency and hyperkalemia They do
not cause cough Angioedema has occurred, but less
commonly than with ACE inhibitors
Formulary Considerations – Candesartan and
valsar-tan are the only ARBs approved by the FDA for
treatment of heart failure; losartan, which is available
generically, has also been widely used.3,4 Many
Medical Letter reviewers believe that all ARBs could
be effective for this indication
BETA-ADRENERGIC BLOCKERS — Most
guide-lines recommend use of a beta blocker in addition to an
ACE inhibitor for patients with symptomatic systolic
heart failure and for asymptomatic patients with a
decreased LVEF Use of bisoprolol, carvedilol or
sus-tained-release metoprolol succinate consistently leads
to a 30-40% reduction in mortality and hospitalization
in adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA)
class II–IV heart failure These results are less certain
in children and adolescents.5
Cautions – Beta blockers should be started at a low
dose Dosage should be increased gradually, usually at
2-week intervals, to the highest tolerated dose, targeting
the maximum daily dosages listed in Table 1 on page
71 Full clinical benefits may not occur for 3-6 months
or more Beta blockers should be used cautiously, if at
all, in patients with asthma or severe bradycardia
Adverse Effects – Fatigue, hypotension,
asympto-matic fluid retention, and worsening heart failure may
occur during the first 2-4 weeks of treatment
Increasing the dose of a concurrent diuretic may be
helpful for fluid retention
Formulary Considerations – There is no published
evidence supporting the effectiveness of beta blockers
other than bisoprolol, carvedilol, sustained-release
metoprolol succinate or nebivolol for treatment of heart
failure Bisoprolol and nebivolol are not approved for
treatment of heart failure by the FDA, and nebivolol
appears to be the least effective of the four.6
ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONISTS — Some
guide-lines recommend the addition of an aldosterone
antagonist only in selected patients with moderately
severe to severe symptoms of heart failure and reduced
ejection fraction, but addition of eplerenone to standard
therapy in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients
(NYHA class II) with systolic dysfunction has
signifi-cantly reduced both the risk of death and the risk of
hospitalization.7When used in addition to standard
ther-apy in patients with LVEF <40% and heart failure after
MI, one study found that eplerenone significantly
70
reduced the primary endpoints of all-cause mortality and mortality or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons.8
Adverse Effects – Hyperkalemia may occur,
especial-ly in patients also taking potassium supplements or an ACE inhibitor or ARB, and in those with renal impair-ment Aldosterone antagonists should be avoided in patients with a baseline serum creatinine concentration higher than 2.0 (women) or 2.5 (men) mg/dL (or crea-tinine clearance <30 mL/min) or a serum potassium concentration >5.0 mEq/L Spironolactone has anti-androgenic activity and can cause painful gyneco-mastia and erectile dysfunction in men and menstrual irregularities in women; the incidence of these effects has been reported to be lower with eplerenone
Formulary Considerations – Eplerenone may be
similar in effectiveness to spironolactone and may have less anti-androgenic activity, but it costs much more Comparative studies of their use in heart failure are lacking
VASODILATORS — Concurrent use of two oral
vasodilators, hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate, may
be helpful for patients who cannot tolerate or continue
to have significant symptoms with standard therapy The addition of a fixed-dose combination of
hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate (BiDil) to standard
therapy in African-American patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure significantly lowered mortal-ity and the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure while improving quality-of-life scores.9
Adverse Effects – Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate
can cause headache and dizziness Hydralazine alone can cause tachycardia, peripheral neuritis and a lupus-like syndrome A phosphodiesterase inhibitor such as
sildenafil (Viagra, Revatio), vardenafil (Levitra,
Staxyn, and others) or tadalafil (Cialis, Adcirca) should
not be taken concurrently with hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate because of the risk of additive hypotension
DIURETICS — Most patients with heart failure have
fluid retention In these patients, diuretics relieve symptoms, but their effect on survival is unknown Diuretics provide symptomatic relief of pulmonary and peripheral edema more rapidly than other drugs used for the treatment of heart failure Diuretics that act on the loop of Henle, such as furosemide, bumetanide or torsemide, are more effective than thi-azide diuretics, such as hydrochlorothithi-azide, which act
on the distal tubule
Dosage – Diuretics should be started at a low dose,
which can be titrated upward until urine output
increas-es and weight decreasincreas-es Patients with renal dysfunc-tion or prior refractoriness to loop diuretics can be
Trang 4start-ed at higher doses Intravenous (IV) administration,
concurrent use of 2 diuretics (1 loop, 1 thiazide-like) or
addition of an aldosterone antagonist can sometimes
overcome diuretic resistance
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse effect of
diuretic therapy is hypokalemia Diuretics can also
cause worsening of renal function
Formulary Considerations – Torsemide is better
absorbed than furosemide and has a longer duration of
action, but there is no clinical evidence that torsemide
or bumetanide is more effective than furosemide, which has been used longer
DIGITALIS — Digoxin can decrease the symptoms
of heart failure, increase exercise tolerance and decrease the rate of hospitalization, but it does not increase survival.10
Dosage – A low dose of digoxin (0.125 mg/d) is
gener-ally recommended for patients with chronic systolic
Initial Maximum
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)
Beta-Adrenergic Blockers
Metoprolol succinate ext release – generic 12.5-25 mg once 200 mg once 53.70
Aldosterone Antagonists
Vasodilators
Isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine –
Loop Diuretics
in divided doses
Digitalis Glycosides
* Not approved by the FDA for treatment of heart failure.
1 Wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for 30 days' treatment at the lowest maximum dosage Source: PricePointRx™ Reprinted with permission by FDB All rights reserved ©2012 http://www.firstdatabank.com/support/drug-pricing-policy.aspx Accessed August 7, 2012 Actual retail prices may be higher.
2 A 30-day supply costs $4.00 at some large discount pharmacies.
3 Cost of two 20-mg tablets of isosorbide dinitrate plus 3 25-mg tablets of hydralazine given tid.
4 BiDil is a fixed-dose combination that contains 20 mg isosorbide dinitrate and 37.5 mg hydralazine in each tablet.
Table 1 Some Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
Trang 5Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 121) • September 2012
72
Drugs for Chronic Heart Failure
heart failure Dose adjustments based on renal function,
age, and concomitant medications may be required
Adverse Effects – The most common adverse effects
of digitalis glycosides are conduction disturbances,
cardiac arrhythmias, nausea, vomiting, confusion and
visual disturbances
NEW APPROACHES — n-3 polyunsaturated fatty
acids (PUFA) have potent anti-inflammatory actions A
large trial in patients with NYHA class II-IV systolic
heart failure (GISSI-HF) found that PUFA 1 gram daily
added to standard therapy for a median of 3.9 years
modestly reduced all-cause mortality and
hospitaliza-tions for cardiovascular reasons compared to placebo.11
Aliskiren (Tekturna) is a direct renin inhibitor
approved for treatment of systemic hypertension
Whether aliskiren should replace or be added to ACE
inhibitors in patients with systolic heart failure is
under investigation An observed increase in adverse
events in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal
impairment treated with aliskiren in addition to an
ACE inhibitor or ARB has raised safety concerns.12
Ivabradine is a selective If current inhibitor that
slows heart rate It is available in Europe, but not in
the US or Canada Added to standard therapy for
patients with NYHA class II-III systolic heart failure,
ivabradine reduced the incidence of death due to heart
failure and hospital admission for heart failure The
benefit diminished for patients with lower baseline
resting heart rates and those taking higher doses of
beta blockers.13
1 J Lindenfeld et al Executive summary: HFSA 2010 comprehensive
heart failure practice guideline J Card Fail 2010; 16:475 Available at
onlinejcf.com Accessed August 8, 2012.
2 M Jessup et al 2009 Focused update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the
diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the
American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in
collabo-ration with the International Society for Heart and Lung
Transplantation Circulation 2009; 119:1977.
3 H Svanström et al Association of treatment with losartan vs candesartan
and mortality among patients with heart failure JAMA 2012; 307:1506.
4 MA Konstam et al Effects of high-dose versus low-dose losartan on
clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HEAAL study): a
ran-domized, double-blind trial Lancet 2009; 374:1840.
5 RE Shaddy et al Carvedilol for children and adolescents with heart
failure: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2007; 298:1171.
6 Nebivolol (Bystolic) for hypertension Med Lett Drugs Ther 2008;
50:17.
7 F Zannad et al Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and
mild symptoms N Engl J Med 2011; 364:11.
8 B Pitt et al Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients
with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction N Engl J
Med 2003; 348:1309.
9 AL Taylor et al Early and sustained benefit on event-free survival and
heart failure hospitalization from fixed-dose combination of
isosor-bide dinitrate/hydralazine Circulation 2007; 115:1747.
10 The Digitalis Investigation Group The effect of digoxin on mortality and
morbidity in patients with heart failure N Engl J Med 1997; 336:525.
11 GISSI-HF Investigators Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2008; 372:1223.
12 In brief: aliskiren trial terminated Med Lett Drugs Ther 2012; 54:5.
13 K Swedberg et al Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study Lancet 2010; 376:875.
Copyright and Disclaimer: The Medical Letter is an independent nonprofit
organ-ization that provides healthcare professionals with unbiased drug prescribing rec-ommendations The editorial process used for its publications relies on a review of published and unpublished literature, with an emphasis on controlled clinical trials, and on the opinions of its consultants The Medical Letter is supported solely by sub-scription fees and accepts no advertising, grants or donations.
No part of the material may be reproduced or transmitted by any process in whole or
in part without prior permission in writing The editors do not warrant that all the mate-rial in this publication is accurate and complete in every respect The editors shall not
be held responsible for any damage resulting from any error, inaccuracy or omission.
Subscription Services
Mailing Address:
The Medical Letter, Inc.
145 Huguenot Street, Ste 312 New Rochelle, NY 10801-7537
Customer Service:
Call: 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 Fax: 914-632-1733
Web Site: www.medicalletter.org E-mail: custserv@medicalletter.org
Permissions:
To reproduce any portion of this issue, please e-mail your request to:
permissions@medicalletter.org
Subscriptions (US):
1 year - $98; 2 years - $189;
3 years - $279 $49/yr for students, interns, residents and fellows in the
US and Canada.
E-mail site license inquiries to:
info@medicalletter.org or call 800-211-2769 x315.
Special fees for bulk subscriptions Special classroom rates are avail-able Back issues are $12 each Major credit cards accepted.
Copyright 2012 ISSN 1541-2792
Treatment Guidelines
from The Medical Letter®
EDITOR IN CHIEF: Mark Abramowicz, M.D.
EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Gianna Zuccotti, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P., Harvard Medical
School
EDITOR: Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D.
ASSISTANT EDITORS, DRUG INFORMATION: Susan M Daron, Pharm.D., Corinne E Zanone, Pharm.D.
CONSULTING EDITORS: Brinda M Shah, Pharm.D., F Peter Swanson, M.D CONTRIBUTING EDITORS:
Carl W Bazil, M.D., Ph.D., Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Vanessa K Dalton, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical School Eric J Epstein, M.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Jane P Galiardi, M.D., M.H.S., F.A.C.P., Duke University School of Medicine Jules Hirsch, M.D., Rockefeller University
David N Juurlink, BPhm, M.D., PhD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Richard B Kim, M.D., University of Western Ontario
Hans Meinertz, M.D., University Hospital, Copenhagen Sandip K Mukherjee, M.D., F.A.C.C., Yale School of Medicine Dan M Roden, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Esperance A K Schaefer, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Medical School
F Estelle R Simons, M.D., University of Manitoba Neal H Steigbigel, M.D., New York University School of Medicine Arthur M.F Yee, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.R, Weill Medical College of Cornell University SENIOR ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Donna Goodstein, Amy Faucard ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Cynthia Macapagal Covey
MANAGING EDITOR: Susie Wong ASSISTANT MANAGING EDITOR: Liz Donohue PRODUCTION COORDINATOR: Cheryl Brown EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SALES: Gene Carbona FULFILLMENT AND SYSTEMS MANAGER: Cristine Romatowski DIRECTOR OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: Joanne F Valentino VICE PRESIDENT AND PUBLISHER: Yosef Wissner-Levy
Founded in 1959 by Arthur Kallet and Harold Aaron, M.D.
Trang 6Free Individual Exams - Free to active subscribers of Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter Answer 12 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn
up to 2 credits/exam.
Paid Individual Exams - Available to non-subscribers Answer 12 questions per issue and submit answers online Earn up to 2 credits/exam $12/exam.
ACCREDITATION INFORMATION:
ACCME: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians The Medical
Letter Inc designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity This CME activity was planned and produced in accordance with the ACCME Essentials and Policies.
AAFP: This Enduring Material activity, Treatment Guidelines from the Medical Letter Continuing Medical Education Program, has been reviewed and is acceptable for
up to 15 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians AAFP accreditation begins January 1, 2012 Term of approval is for 1 year from this date Each issue is approved for 1.25 Prescribed credits Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of each issue.
ACPE: The Medical Letter is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education This exam is
acceptable for 2.0 hour(s) of knowledge-based continuing education credit (0.2 CEU).
AANP and AAPA: The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accept AMA Category 1 Credit for the Physician’s Recognition Award from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
AOA: This activity, being ACCME (AMA) approved, is acceptable for Category 2-B credit by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA).
Physician Assistants: The National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants (NCCPA) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ from organiza-tions accredited by ACCME NCCPA also accepts AAFP Prescribed credits for recertification Treatment Guidelines is accredited by both ACCME and AAFP.
Physicians in Canada: Members of The College of Family Physicians of Canada residing in the US are eligible to receive Mainpro-M1 credits (equivalent to AAFP
Prescribed credits), and members residing in Canada are eligible to receive Mainpro-M2 credits due to a reciprocal agreement with the American Academy of Family Physicians Treatment Guidelines CME activities are eligible for either Section 2 or Section 4 (when creating a personal learning project) in the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC).
Physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists and physician assistants may earn 2 credits with this exam.
MISSION:
The mission of The Medical Letter's Continuing Medical Education Program is to support the professional development of healthcare professionals including physi-cians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists and physician assistants by providing independent, unbiased drug information and prescribing recommendations that are free
of industry influence The program content includes current information and unbiased reviews of FDA-approved and off-label uses of drugs, their mechanisms of action, clinical trials, dosage and administration, adverse effects and drug interactions The Medical Letter delivers educational content in the form of self-study material The expected outcome of the CME Program is to increase the participant’s ability to know, or apply knowledge into practice after assimilating, information presented
in materials contained in Treatment Guidelines.
The Medical Letter will strive to continually improve the CME program through periodic assessment of the program and activities The Medical Letter aims to be a leader in supporting the professional development of healthcare professionals through Core Competencies by providing continuing medical education that is unbiased and free of industry influence The Medical Letter is supported solely by subscription fees and accepts no advertising, grants or donations.
GOAL:
Through this program, The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with unbiased, reliable and timely educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
The objective of this activity is to meet the need of healthcare professionals for unbiased, reliable and timely information on treatment of major diseases The Medical Letter expects to provide the healthcare community with educational content that they will use to make independent and informed therapeutic choices in their practice Participants will be able to select and prescribe, or confirm the appropriateness of the prescribed usage of the drugs and other therapeutic modalities discussed in Treatment Guidelines with specific attention to clinical evidence of effectiveness, adverse effects and patient management.
Upon completion of this program, the participant will be able to:
1 Explain the current approach to the management of chronic heart failure.
2 Discuss the pharmacologic options available for treatment of chronic heart failure and compare them based on their efficacy, dosage and administration, potential adverse effects and drug interactions.
3 Determine the most appropriate therapy given the clinical presentation of an individual patient.
Privacy and Confidentiality: The Medical Letter guarantees our firm commitment to your privacy We do not sell any of your information Secure server software (SSL)
is used for commerce transactions through VeriSign, Inc No credit card information is stored.
IT Requirements: Windows 98/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, Pentium+ processor, Mac OS X+ w/ compatible process; Microsoft IE 6.0+, Mozilla Firefox 2.0+ or any other
com-patible Web browser Dial-up/high-speed connection.
Have any questions? Call us at 800-211-2769 or 914-235-0500 or e-mail us at: custserv@medicalletter.org
Up to 24 credits included with your subscription
medicalletter.org/cme
Choose CME from Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter and earn up to 24 Category 1 Credits per year:
Questions start on next page
®
Trang 7Treatment Guidelines from The Medical Letter • Vol 10 ( Issue 121) • September 2012
1 Chronic heart failure is associated with a left ventricular ejection
fraction of:
a <50%
b <40%
c <30%
d <20%
Issue 121
2 In patients with symptomatic heart failure, ACE inhibitors:
a improve symptoms
b decrease hospitalizations
c prolong survival
d all of the above
Issue 121
3 The most common adverse effect of ACE inhibitors is:
a cough
b angioedema
c hypokalemia
d dizziness
Issue 121
4 ARBs:
a are less effective than ACE inhibitors for treatment of chronic
heart failure
b have been shown to cause more hyperkalemia than ACE
inhibitors
c do not cause cough
d all of the above
Issue 121
5 A 30-40% reduction in heart failure mortality in adults has been
demonstrated with which of the following beta-blockers?
a bisoprolol
b carvedilol
c sustained-release metoprolol succinate
d all of the above
Issue 121
6 Hyperkalemia can occur with:
a ACE inhibitors
b ARBs
c aldosterone antagonists
d all of the above
Issue 121
7 A combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate has been
shown to be helpful particularly in heart failure patients who are:
a unable to tolerate an ACE inhibitor
b African-American
c >65 years old
d all of the above
Issue 121
8 Because of the risk of additive hypotension, patients taking a combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate should not take:
a vitamin B12 supplements
b Viagra
c St John’s wort
d eplerenone
Issue 121
9 A 66-year-old man with NYHA class III heart failure being treated with losartan and carvedilol comes to your office complaining of shortness of breath On physical examination, he has bilateral rales and edema in both lower extremities The most effective treatment for symptomatic relief probably would be:
a a combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate
b a thiazide diuretic
c a loop diuretic
d spironolactone
Issue 121
10 In patients with heart failure, digoxin has not been shown to:
a improve symptoms
b decrease hospitalizations
c increase survival
d any of the above
Issue 121
11 A 46-year-old Caucasian man presents post-MI with NYHA class
IV heart failure and a LVEF of 29% He is currently being treated with an ACE inhibitor and metoprolol succinate Addition of which
of the following may improve survival in this patient?
a digoxin
b hydrochlorothiazide
c an aldosterone antagonist
d hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate
Issue 121
12 A 79-year-old woman presents with mild symptoms of heart fail-ure and a LVEF of 51% You could tell her that:
a drug treatment of heart failure probably will not increase her life expectancy
b low doses of digoxin will increase her life expectancy
c taking an ARB will lower her risk of being hospitalized
d the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate has been shown to benefit patients like her
Issue 121
DO NOT FAX OR MAIL THIS EXAM
To take CME exams and earn credit, go to:
medicalletter.org/CMEstatus
Issue 121 Questions
ACPE UPN: 0379-0000-12-121-H01-P; Release: August 2012, Expire: August 2013