11.1 Cauchy’s Integral FormulaResult 11.1.1 Cauchy’s Integral Formula.. We will evaluate this integral using the Cauchy integralformula.. Exercise 11.10 Use Cauchy-Goursat, the generaliz
Trang 211.1 Cauchy’s Integral Formula
Result 11.1.1 Cauchy’s Integral Formula If f (ζ) is analytic in a compact, closed, nected domain D and z is a point in the interior of D then
con-f (z) = 1
ı2π I
∂D
f (ζ)
ζ − z dζ =
1 ı2π X
Here the set of contours {Ck} make up the positively oriented boundary ∂D of the domain
D More generally, we have
f(n)(z) = n!
ı2π I
∂D
f (ζ) (ζ − z)n+1 dζ = n!
ı2π X
k
I
Ck
f (ζ) (ζ − z)n+1 dζ (11.2)
Cauchy’s Formula shows that the value of f (z) and all its derivatives in a domain are determined by the value of
f (z) on the boundary of the domain Consider the first formula of the result, Equation 11.1 We deform the contour
to a circle of radius δ about the point ζ = z
Trang 3The remaining integral along Cδ vanishes as δ → 0 because f (ζ) is continuous We demonstrate this with the maximummodulus integral bound The length of the path of integration is 2πδ.
lim
δ→0
I
Cδ
f (ζ) − f (z)
ζ − z dζ
≤ lim
δ→0
(2πδ)1
C
f (ζ)(ζ − z)n+1dζExample 11.1.1 Consider the following integrals where C is the positive contour on the unit circle For the thirdintegral, the point z = −1 is removed from the contour
Trang 42 (z−3)(3z−1)1 has singularities at z = 3 and z = 1/3 Since z = 3 is outside the contour, only the singularity at
z = 1/3 will contribute to the value of the integral We will evaluate this integral using the Cauchy integralformula
I
C
1(z − 3)(3z − 1)dz = ı2π
1(1/3 − 3)3
= −ıπ4
3 Since the curve is not closed, we cannot apply the Cauchy integral formula Note that √
z is single-valued andanalytic in the complex plane with a branch cut on the negative real axis Thus we use the Fundamental Theorem
Cauchy’s Inequality Suppose the f (ζ) is analytic in the closed disk |ζ − z| ≤ r By Cauchy’s integral formula,
f(n)(z) = n!
ı2πI
C
f (ζ)(ζ − z)n+1 dζ,
Trang 5where C is the circle of radius r centered about the point z We use this to obtain an upper bound on the modulus of
C
f (ζ)(ζ − z)n+1 dζ
f c + eıθ dθ
If |f (z)| < |f (c)| for any point on |z − c| = , then the continuity of f (z) implies that |f (z)| < |f (c)| in a neighborhood
of that point which would make the value of the integral of |f (z)| strictly less than |f (c)| Thus we conclude that
|f (z)| = |f (c)| for all |z − c| = Since we can repeat the above procedure for any circle of radius smaller than ,
|f (z)| = |f (c)| for all |z − c| ≤ , i.e all the points in the disk of radius about z = c are also maxima By recursivelyrepeating this procedure points in this disk, we see that |f (z)| = |f (c)| for all z ∈ D This implies that f (z) is aconstant in the domain By reversing the inequalities in the above method we see that the minimum modulus of f (z)must also occur on the boundary
Result 11.1.6 Extremum Modulus Theorem Let f (z) be analytic in a closed, connected domain, D The extreme values of the modulus of the function must occur on the boundary.
If |f (z)| has an interior extrema, then the function is a constant.
Trang 911.2 The Argument Theorem
Result 11.2.1 The Argument Theorem Let f (z) be analytic inside and on C except for isolated poles inside the contour Let f (z) be nonzero on C.
1 ı2π Z
C
f0(z)
f (z) dz = N − P Here N is the number of zeros and P the number of poles, counting multiplicities, of f (z) inside C.
First we will simplify the problem and consider a function f (z) that has one zero or one pole Let f (z) be analyticand nonzero inside and on A except for a zero of order n at z = a Then we can write f (z) = (z − a)ng(z) where g(z)
is analytic and nonzero inside and on A The integral of ff (z)0(z) along A is
1ı2πZ
A
f0(z)
f (z) dz =
1ı2πZ
A
d
dz(log(f (z))) dz
= 1ı2πZ
A
n
z − adz
= n
Trang 10Now let f (z) be analytic and nonzero inside and on B except for a pole of order p at z = b Then we can write
f (z) = (z−b)g(z)p where g(z) is analytic and nonzero inside and on B The integral of ff (z)0(z) along B is
1ı2πZ
B
f0(z)
f (z) dz =
1ı2πZ
B
d
dz(log(f (z))) dz
= 1ı2πZ
B
−p
z − bdz
= −p
Now consider a function f (z) that is analytic inside an on the contour C except for isolated poles at the points
b1, , bp Let f (z) be nonzero except at the isolated points a1, , an Let the contours Ak, k = 1, , n, be simple,positive contours which contain the zero at ak but no other poles or zeros of f (z) Likewise, let the contours Bk,
k = 1, , p be simple, positive contours which contain the pole at bk but no other poles of zeros of f (z) (SeeFigure 11.1.) By deforming the contour we obtain
Trang 11A1
B1 B3
B2 A2
Figure 11.1: Deforming the contour C
First note that since |f (z)| > |g(z)| on C, f (z) is nonzero on C The inequality implies that |f (z) + g(z)| > 0
on C so f (z) + g(z) has no zeros on C We well count the number of zeros of f (z) and g(z) using the ArgumentTheorem, (Result11.2.1) The number of zeros N of f (z) inside the contour is
N = 1ı2πI
C
f0(z) + g0(z)
f (z) + g(z) dz
= 1ı2πI
C
f0(z) + f0(z)h(z) + f (z)h0(z)
f (z) + f (z)h(z) dz
= 1ı2πI
C
f0(z)
f (z) dz +
1ı2πI
Trang 12(Note that since |h(z)| < 1 on C, <(1 + h(z)) > 0 on C and the value of log(1 + h(z)) does not not change intraversing the contour.) This demonstrates that f (z) and f (z) + g(z) have the same number of zeros inside C andproves the result.
Trang 13ezt
z2(z2+ a2)dz,
Trang 14where C is any positively oriented contour surrounding the circle |z| = a.
Note that z0 may be either inside or outside of C
Trang 15Z π 0
ea cos θcos(a sin θ) dθ = π
Exercise 11.10
Use Cauchy-Goursat, the generalized Cauchy integral formula, and suitable extensions to multiply-connected domains
to evaluate the following integrals Be sure to justify your approach in each case
Trang 16Exercise 11.11
Use Liouville’s theorem to prove the following:
1 If f (z) is entire with <(f (z)) ≤ M for all z then f (z) is constant
2 If f (z) is entire with |f(5)(z)| ≤ M for all z then f (z) is a polynomial of degree at most five
Trang 18Hint 11.11
Hint 11.12
Hint 11.13
Trang 19f0(z)
f (z) dz = N − P,where N is the number of zeros and P is the number of poles, (counting multiplicities), of f (z) inside C The theorem
is aptly named, as
1ı2πZ
C
f0(z)
f (z) dz =
1ı2π [log(f (z))]C
= 1ı2π [log |f (z)| + ı arg(f (z))]C
= 12π[arg(f (z))]C.Thus we could write the argument theorem as
1ı2πZ
C
f0(z)
f (z) dz =
12π[arg(f (z))]C = N − P.
Since sin z has a single zero and no poles inside the unit circle, we have
12πarg(sin(z))
C = 1 − 0arg(sin(z))
C = 2πSolution 11.2
1 Since the integrand zsin z2 +5 is analytic inside and on the contour, (the only singularities are at z = ±ı√
5 and atinfinity), the integral is zero by Cauchy’s Theorem
Trang 202 First we expand the integrand in partial fractions.
z=−ı
= 12Now we can do the integral with Cauchy’s formula
dz
=Z
C
f (z)(z − α)(z − β)dz
≤ 2πr max
|z|=r
... data-page= "23 ">
-4 -2 4< /p>
-4 -2
24
Figure 11 .2: The contours and the singularities of 3z2< /small>1+1
-6 -4 -2
-6 -4 -2
24 6...
C2
Trang 29-4 -2 4< /h3>
-4 -2< /h3>
2 4< /h3>
C... deforming C onto C1, C2< /sub> and C3.)
Trang 27-6 -4 -2 6
-4 -2
Figure