Capillary Electrokinetic SeparationsLecture Date: April 23 rd , 2008 Capillary Electrokinetic Separations – Brief review of theory – Capillary zone electrophoresis CZE – Capillary gel el
Trang 1Capillary Electrokinetic Separations
Lecture Date: April 23 rd , 2008
Capillary Electrokinetic Separations
– Brief review of theory
– Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)
– Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE)
– Capillary electrochromatography (CEC)
– Capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF)
– Capillary isotachophoresis (CITP)
– Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC)
– Chapter 30, Capillary Electrophoresis and Electrochromatography
Trang 2What is Capillary Electrophoresis?
of ions by attraction or repulsion in an electric field
Proteins
Peptides
Amino acids
Nucleic acids (RNA and DNA)
- also analyzed by slab gel electrophoresis
Trang 3The Basis of Electrophoretic Separations
Migration Velocity:
Where:
v = migration velocity of charged particle in the potential field (cm sec -1 )
Inside the Capillary: The Zeta Potential
The inside wall of the
SiO-attracts cations
to the inside wall of
Trang 4 It would seem that
CE separations would
start in the middle
and separate ions in
two linear directions
Another effect called
electroosmosis
makes CE like batch
chromatography
Excess cations in the
diffuse Stern
double-layer flow towards the
cathode, exceeding
the opposite flow
towards the anode
Net flow occurs as
solvated cations drag
along the solution
Top figure: R N Zare (Stanford University), bottom figure: Royal Society
of Chemistry
Silanols fully ionized above
pH = 9
Electroosmotic Flow (EOF)
Where:
v = electroosomotic mobility
= dielectric constant of the buffer
– A 50 mM pH 8 buffer flows through a 50-cm capillary at 5 cm/min
with 25 kV applied potential (see pg 781 of Skoog et al.)
Key factors that affect electroosmotic mobility: dielectric
constant and viscosity of buffer (controls double-layer
compression)
Electroosmotic mobility:
E E
Trang 5Electroosmotic Flow Profile
Cathode Anode
Electroosmotic flow profile
Hydrodynamic flow profile
High
Pressure
Low Pressure
capillary wall)
- no pressure drop is encountered
- flow velocity is uniform across the capillary
Frictional forces at the column walls - cause a pressure drop across the column
Result: electroosmotic flow does not contribute significantly
to band broadening like pressure-driven flow in LC and
related techniques
Example Calculation of EOF at Two pH Values
A certain solution in a capillary has a electroosmotic mobility of 1.3 x 10-8
m2/Vs at pH 2 and 8.1 x 10-8m2/Vs at pH 12 How long will it take a
neutral solute to travel 52 cm from the injector to the detector with 27 kV
applied across the 62 cm long tube?
At pH = 2
At pH = 12
Trang 6Controlling Electroosmotic Flow (EOF)
E E
Electric Field Proportional change in EOF Joule heating may result
Buffer pH EOF decreased at low pH,
increased at high pH
Best method to control EOF, but may change charge of analytes
Ionic Strength Decreases and EOF with
increasing buffer concentration
High ionic strength means high current and Joule heating
Organic Modifiers Decreases and EOF with
Surfactant Adsorbs to capillary wall through
hydrophobic or ionic interactions
Anionic surfactants increase EOF Cationic surfactants decrease EOF
Covalent coating Chemically bonded to capillary
Temperature Changes viscosity Easy to control
Electrophoresis and Electroosmosis
Combining the two effects for migration velocity of an ion
(also applies to neutrals, but with ep= 0):
At pH > 2, cations flow to cathode because of positive
contributions from both epand eo
At pH > 2, anions flow to anode because of a negative
contribution from ep, but can be pulled the other way by a
positive contribution from eo (if EOF is strong enough)
At pH > 2, neutrals flow to the cathode because of eoonly
– Note: neutrals all come out together in basic CE-only separations
Trang 7Electrophoresis and Electroosmosis
A pictorial representation of the combined effect in a
capillary, when EO is faster than EP (the common case):
conditions, all species are driven in this direction by EOF
Detectors similar to those used in LC, typically UV
absorption, fluorescence, and MS
– Sensitive detectors are needed for small concentrations in CE
Figure from Royal Society of Chemistry
Trang 8CE Theory
The unprecedented resolution of CE is a consequence of
the its extremely high efficiency
Van Deemter Equation:
relates the plate height H to the velocity of the carrier gas
or liquid
Cu u B A
Where A, B, C are constants, and a lower
value of H corresponds to a higher
separation efficiency
CE Theory
– No A term (multipath) because tube is open
– No C term (mass transfer) because there is no stationary phase
– Only the B term (longitudinal diffusion) remains:
Cross-section of a capillary:
Figure from R N Zare, Stanford
u B
H /
Trang 9Number of theoretical plates N in CZE
uses a pressure difference between the two ends of the capillary
V c = Pd 4 t 128L t
Trang 10Capillary Electrophoresis: Detectors
detector
– These have ~0.01 attomole sensitivity for fluorescent
molecules (e.g derivatized proteins)
instead, where a absorptive buffer (e.g chromate) is
displaced by analyte ions
– Detection limits are in the 50-500 ppb range
conductometric detection are also used
– Potentiometric detection: a broad-spectrum ISE
– Conductometric detection: like IC
J Tanyanyiwa, S Leuthardt, P C Hauser, Conductimetric and potentiometric detection in
conventional and microchip capillary electrophoresis, Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 3659–3666
Joule Heating
solution to the flow of current
– if heat is not sufficiently dissipated from the system the resulting
temperature and density gradients can reduce separation
efficiency
For smaller capillaries heat is dissipated due to the large
surface area to volume ratio
– capillary internal surface area = 2 r L
End result: high potentials can be applied for extremely
fast separations (30kV)
Trang 11Capillary Electrophoresis: Applications
Applications (within analytical chemistry) are broad:
– For example, CE has been heavily studied within the
pharmaceutical industry as an alternative to LC in various
situations
We will look at just one example: detecting
bacterial/microbial contamination quickly using CE
– Current methods require several days Direct innoculation (USP)
requires a sample to be placed in a bacterial growth medium for
several days, during which it is checked under a microscope for
growth or by turbidity measurements
– False positives are common (simply by exposure to air)
– Techniques like ELISA, PCR, hybridization are specific to certain
microorganisms out of the
sample zone and a small plug of
“blocking agent” negates the
cells’ mobility and induces
aggregation
– Method detects whole bacterial
cellls
Trang 12Detection of Bacterial Contamination with CE
show single-cell detection
of a variety of bacteria with
Lantz, A W.; Bao, Y.; Armstrong, D W., “Single-Cell Detection: Test of Microbial Contamination Using Capillary Electrophoresis”, Anal Chem 2007, ASAP Article.
Rodriguez, M A.; Lantz, A W.; Armstrong, D W., “Capillary Electrophoretic Method for the Detection of Bacterial Contamination”, Anal Chem 2006, 78, 4759-4767
Capillary Electrophoresis: Summary
● CE is based on the principles of electrophoresis
● The speed of movement or migration of solutes
in CE is determined by their charge and size
Small highly charged solutes will migrate more
quickly then large less charged solutes.
● Bulk movement of solutes is caused by EOF
● The speed of EOF can be adjusted by changing
the buffer pH
● The flow profile of EOF is flat, yielding high
separation efficiencies
Trang 13Offers new selectivity, an alternative to HPLC
Easy and predictable selectivity
Small sample sizes (1-10 ul)
Fast separations (1 to 45 min)
Cannot do preparative scale separations
Low concentrations and large volumes difficult
“Sticky” compounds
Species that are difficult to dissolve
Reproducibility problems
Advantages and Disadvantages of CE
Capillary Zone electrophoresis (CZE)
Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE)
Capillary electrochromatography (CEC)
Capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF)
Capillary isotachophoresis (CITP)
Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC)
Common Modes of CE in Analytical Chemistry
Trang 14Capillary Zone Electrophoresis
(CZE), also known as free-solution CE
(FSCE), is the simplest form of CE
(what we’ve been talking about)
The separation mechanism is based on
differences in the charge and ionic
radius of the analytes
Fundamental to CZE are homogeneity
of the buffer solution and constant field
strength throughout the length of the
capillary
The separation relies principally on the
pH controlled dissociation of acidic
groups on the solute or the protonation
of basic functions on the solute
Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE)
Figure from delfin.klte.hu/~agaspar/ce-research.html
Capillary Gel Electrophoresis (CGE) is the adaptation of traditional
gel electrophoresis into the capillary using polymers in solution to
create a molecular sieve also known as replaceable physical gel
This allows analytes having similar charge-to-mass ratios to also be
resolved by size
This technique is commonly employed in SDS-Gel molecular weight
analysis of proteins and in applications of DNA sequencing and
genotyping
Capillary Gel Electrophoresis (CGE)
Trang 15Capillary Isoelectric Focusing (CIEF) allows amphoteric molecules,
such as proteins, to be separated by electrophoresis in a pH gradient
generated between the cathode and anode
A solute will migrate to a point where its net charge is zero At the
solute’s isoelectric point (pI), migration stops and the sample is focused
into a tight zone
In CIEF, once a solute has focused at its pI, the zone is mobilized past
the detector by either pressure or chemical means This technique is
commonly employed in protein characterization as a mechanism to
determine a protein's isoelectric point
Capillary Isoelectric Focusing (CIEF)
Capillary Isotachophoresis (CITP) is a focusing technique based on
the migration of the sample components between leading and
terminating electrolytes
(isotach = same speed)
Solutes having mobilities intermediate to those of the leading and
terminating electrolytes stack into sharp, focused zones
Although it is used as a mode of separation, transient ITP has been used
primarily as a sample concentration technique
Currently, cITP is being combined with NMR to produce a new
hyphenated techinque (Cynthia Larive)
Capillary Isotachophoresis (CITP)
Trang 16● Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC) is a hybrid
separation method
● CEC couples the high separation efficiency of CZE with
the selectivity of HPLC
● Uses an electric field rather than hydraulic pressure to
propel the mobile phase through a packed bed
● Because there is minimal backpressure, it is possible to
use small-diameter packings and achieve very high
efficiencies
● Its most useful application appears to be in the form of
on-line analyte concentration that can be used to concentrate
a given sample prior to separation by CZE
Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC)
Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC)
R Dadoo, C.H Yan, R N Zare, D S Anex, D J Rakestraw,and G A Hux, LC-GC International 164-174
Actual instrument
Trang 17Consider a CEC test mixture containing:
• The neutral marker thiourea for indication of the electroosmotic flow
• Two compounds with very different polarities (#2 and #5)
• Two closely related components (#3 and #4) to test resolving power
An Example of CEC
An Example of CEC
Separation was carried out on an ODS stationary phase at pH = 8:
Trang 18An Example of CEC
Separation was carried out on an ODS stationary phase at pH = 2.3:
Because the packed length and overall length of these two
capillaries are identical, it is possible to make a direct comparison of
the performance because the field strength and column bed length
are the same
The EOF has decreased dramatically between pH 8 and pH 2.3 with
the resulting analysis time increasing from approximately 5 min to
over 20 min at the lower pH
Conclusions from the CEC Example
Trang 19Electrokinetic Chromatography (EKC):a family of electrophoresis
techniques named after electrokinetic phenomena, which include
electroosmosis, electrophoresis and chromatography
A key example of this is seen with cyclodextrin-mediated EKC Here the
differential interaction of enantiomers with the cyclodextrins allows for
the separation of chiral compounds
This approach to enantiomer analysis has made a significant impact on
the pharmaceutical industry's approach to assessing drugs containing
enantiomers
Electrokinetic Capillary Chromatography
Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary
Chromatography (MECC OR MEKC) is a mode
of electrokinetic chromatography in which
surfactants are added to the buffer solution at
concentrations that form micelles
The separation principle of MEKC is based on a
differential partition between the micelle and the
solvent (a pseudo-stationary phase) This
principle can be employed with charged or neutral
solutes and may involve stationary or mobile
micelles.
MEKC has great utility in separating mixtures that
contain both ionic and neutral species, and has
become valuable in the separation of very
hydrophobic pharmaceuticals from their very polar
Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary Chromatography
Analytes travel in here
Sodium dodecyl sulfate:
Trang 20• The MEKC surfactants are surface
active agents such as soap or
synthetic detergents with polar and
non-polar regions
• At low concentration, the surfactants
are evenly distributed
• At high concentration the surfactants
form micelles The most hydrophobic
molecules will stay in the
hydrophobic region on the surfactant
micelle
• Less hydrophobic molecules will
partition less strongly into the
micelle
• Small polar molecules in the
electrolyte move faster than
molecules associated with the
surfatant micelles
• The voltage causes the negatively
charged micelles to flow slower than
the bulk flow (endoosmotic flow)
Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary Chromatography
Trang 21New Technology: Electrokinetic Pumping
P V
- Voltage controlled, pulseless
No moving parts or seals
Inherently microscale
High pressure generation
Rapid pressure response
Inexpensive
V d
V k
P
P P
2 max
– J Tanyanyiwa, S Leuthardt, P C Hauser,
Conductimetric and potentiometric detection in
conventional and microchip capillary electrophoresis,
Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 3659–3666