This study aims at quantifying the landscape patterns and ecological processes or clearly linking pattern to process to identify green space changes and their driving forces, based on gr
Trang 1O R I G I N A L P A P E R
Analyzing urban green space pattern and eco-network
in Hanoi, Vietnam
Pham Duc Uy Æ Nobukazu Nakagoshi
Received: 24 May 2007 / Revised: 20 August 2007 / Accepted: 7 September 2007 / Published online: 12 October 2007
International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2007
Abstract In Hanoi, the capital city of Vietnam, there has
recently been a growing awareness about the roles and
benefits of greening in urbanized areas As a result,
plan-ners and decision-makers propose a combination of water
bodies and green areas, using cultural as well as historic
values, in a strategic concept for city planning in Hanoi
This study aims at quantifying the landscape patterns and
ecological processes or clearly linking pattern to process to
identify green space changes and their driving forces, based
on gradient analysis combined with landscape metrics, GIS
support, and FRAGSTATS 3.3, from 1996 to 2003 The
results of gradient analysis taken four directions show that
green spaces have been become more fragmented in this
period, especially in the south and west directions These
changes could be caused by land use change, economic
growth, population increase, urbanization, and weakness in
planning and managing the urban development From this
context, graph theory was also applied to find any
eco-networking, by mitigating the fragmentation and enhancing
the green space connectivity, as a biodiversity conservation
strategy for the city Analyzing the green network based on
graph theory indicates that among six different network
scenarios which were produced from several models
(Traveling Salesman, Paul Revere, Least Cost to User),
network F with 37 links, and gamma (0.07), beta (0.62),
cost ratio (0.606), circuitry (0.098) and connectivity
(0.398) is the best option for ecological restoration in the Hanoi city This will be a basis for the 2020 Green Space Planning in Hanoi
Keywords Urban green spaces Gradient analysis Graph theory Connectivity Landscape metrics
Introduction
Urbanization is a vital process and one necessary for human development; and has been occurring much faster in developing countries than in developed countries How-ever, it also had a negative impact on city dwellers, the environment, and biodiversity To reduce these impacts, it
is found that the conservation and development of green areas are a good solution Therefore, recently, human beings over the world are paying attention to the roles and functions of them more and more Previous urban green space studies mention many cases where methods of landscape ecology are especially suitable for the urban process
Gradient analysis originated from vegetation analysis, and it is found that gradient analysis based on landscape metrics is useful and effective for studying the urbanization process (Luck and Wu 2002; Ma et al 2005; Yu and Ng
2007; Zhu et al 2006) Kong and Nakagoshi (2006) find that this method is useful for studying urban green spaces because the results of gradient analysis show changes in the spatio-temporal pattern and give light to the driving forces behind the process as well Luck and Wu (2002) also show that quantifying the urbanization gradient is an important first step to linking pattern with process in urban ecological studies because they found spatial pattern undoubtedly affects physical, ecological and socioeconomic processes
P D Uy (&) N Nakagoshi
Graduate School for International Development
and Cooperation, Hiroshima University,
1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8259, Japan
e-mail: ducanhy2000@yahoo.com
N Nakagoshi
e-mail: nobu@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
DOI 10.1007/s11355-007-0030-3
Trang 2How to conserve the pre-urban natural remnants and
create urban green spaces will be the most important task in
any effort to mitigate the potential impacts of urbanization
Linking gradient analysis with urban dynamics can help
detect such spatially explicit urban green space patterns,
and improve the ability of planners to integrate ecological
considerations in urban planning (Yu and Ng2007) Also,
applying graph theory, which is a useful tool in researching
landscape connectivity especially ecological network
research (Bunn et al 2000; Forman and Godron 1986;
Gross and Yellen 1999; Linehan et al 1995; Rudd et al
2002; Zhang and Wang 2006), helps to organize green
space networks for ecological restoration in terms of
reducing fragmentation impact and enhancing the
connec-tivity Because, in graph theory, like island biogeography
theory, gravity model is used to express the interaction of
habitat areas, which shows the greater area and number of
patches, the closer they are, the higher biodiversity and
colonization Graph theory used here represents through
green nodes, their interactions, and links used to connect
these nodes The root purpose of graph theory in ecological
restoration is to identify the most optimal network or flow
which satisfies both ‘‘least cost to builder’’ and ‘‘least cost
to user’’ as the best potential network for conserving
bio-diversity, especially in the urban context, where number
and area of green spaces are usually constrained Moreover,
in biodiversity, landscape connectivity has a special
sig-nificance for seed dispersal and wildlife movement, which
play a decisive role in determining the survival of a
metapopulation Rudd et al (2002) have showed that
connectivity analysis in urban green spaces, based on graph
theory presented here, explores the numbers and patterns of
corridors required to connect urban green spaces as part of
an overall biodiversity conservation strategy
The objectives of this study are to assess spatio-temporal
changes in green spaces, as well as identify their driving
forces; and examine the most effective network for
biodi-versity conservation based on graph theory In addition,
this study will research how to apply graph theory and
landscape metrics in organizing green spaces and
eco-networking, in order to optimize the benefits of urban green
spaces for biodiversity
Methods
Data and study area
Study area: Hanoi—the capital of the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam, is the political, economic, cultural, scientific and
technological center of the whole country with latitude
from 20530to 21230north, and longitude from 105440to
106020 east Hanoi is an ancient city with nine urban
districts and five rural districts, which has been developing for almost 1,000 years, viz since establishment in 1010 It
is located in the center of the Northern Delta with a pop-ulation of 3,055,300 (2004), and an area of 920.97 km2 (within downtown: 150 km2) The downtown area of Hanoi city was selected for this study (Fig 1)
Data sources: the primary data was obtained from satellite images including those from the 1996 Spot3 BW taken in September with a resolution of 10 m, band 1; and
2003 Quickbird taken in November with a resolution of 0.7 m, three bands A 2005 topographic map of 1:25000 was used for geo-referencing In addition, secondary data includes that from the 2020 Hanoi Master Plan, from the Hanoi Department of Planning and Architecture, and other sources
Analysis methods All satellite images were rectified, processed, and geo-referenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_48N) coordinate system, using the ERDAS image system (Version 8.5, ERDAS, Atlanta, GA, USA) The geo-referencing process was car-ried out with the necessary information from labeled latitude and longitude and distinct ground control points through field verification with a GPS-model Garmin-12 (Global Positioning System) and then these images were interpreted manually based on the ArcGIS 9 (Arc/Info, release version 9.1, ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA) platform
Fig 1 Hanoi (left down) and the studied urban area of Hanoi, Vietnam
Trang 3Because the different resolution of the 1996 and 2003
satellite images caused difficulties in interpretation, we
used not only the ERDAS system to perform a resolution
merge but also the 1992 aerial photos, historical data and
reports combined with field surveys and ground-truthing
taken in August 2006 as referencing sources This allowed
for referencing, merging and validating of the necessary
data to make them more reliable and accurate Urban green
spaces in Hanoi were reclassified into seven types
includ-ing real green spaces or evergreen (parks, public green
spaces, roadside green spaces, riverside green spaces,
attached green spaces), and non-real green spaces called
open green spaces (agricultural land and cultivated alluvial
land) using Vietnamese standards and regulations as shown
in Table1 This allowed vector green maps for 1996 and
2003 to be created, and then converted into raster format
with a pixel size of 10 m · 10 m with the support of Arc/
Map Spatial Analysis (version 9.1, ESRI)
To analyze urban green space pattern change, only
landscape metrics, which is sensitive to landscape change,
was chosen since it includes compositional and
configu-rational metrics including: class area (CA), percent of
landscape (PLAND), patch density (PD), largest patch
index (LPI), landscape shape index (LSI), mean patch size
(MPS), and a weighted mean shape index (AWSI), number
of patches (NP), and mean shape index (MSI) by using the
raster version of FRAFSTATS 3.3 (McGarigal et al.2002)
(Table2) Firstly, an analysis of green space change at
class level metrics (CA, PLAND, PD, LPI, LSI, MPS, NP,
AWSI) over the entire area was implemented to capture synoptic features Then, to detect the urban green space gradient change, samples were taken along two transects: west–east and south–north, cutting across the Hanoi downtown area The center area is identified as the ancient quarter and shown in Fig.2 The west–east and south– north transects were composed of eight and seven
2 km · 2 km zones respectively Landscape level metrics were computed using an overlapping moving window across transects with the support of FRAGSTATS 3.3 The window moved over the whole landscape and calculated the selected metrics inside the window As shown by Kong and Nakagoshi (2006), although this method can cause over-sampling in the center and under-sampling in the periphery, it does not affect the final conclusion Moreover,
it can describe the landscape pattern better; and the moving window analysis supported by FRAGSTATS combined with landscape metrics is a suitable approach for such analysis, Luck and Wu (2002), Yu and Ng (2007), Zhu
et al (2006)
Network analysis for organizing green space systems, with the purpose of ecological restoration based on graph theory, is done in terms of nodes (non-linear elements) and links (linear elements) Nodes in this study refer to green patches or habitat areas with an area of more than 10 ha Ten hectares was chosen as a hypothetical minimum area because it can encompass a wider range of species Hanoi areas are home of a variety of species such as insects (595 species, 395 genera, 101 families and 13 orders), reptilia
Table 1 Reclassification of urban green spaces
Circular Number 20 2005 TCXDVN 362: 2005
central park \15 ha and
£ 50 ha, multiple functional park [10 ha and £15 ha, small park
planted vegetation and higher bio-diversity
recreational areas such as flower gardens, squares, historical sites and others
Roadside green space (linear element)
Roadside green spaces RoSP Trees planted beside transportation
routes, creeks, canals to prevent dust, noise, add beauty and create corridors Riverside green spaces RiSP
hospitals, factories, temples and other organizations
places sometimes cultivated in the year, grassland, and aquatic plants
cultivated activities
Trang 4Table 2 Definitions of landscape metrics (adopted from McGarigal et al 2002)
Compositional measures
patches of the corresponding patch type divided by 10.000 (to convert to hectares).
corresponding patch type (class).
particular patch type; a measure of landscape composition and dominance of patch type.
100 hectares
[ 0 without limit
divided by the number of patches of that type.
the corresponding patch type divided by total landscape area (m 2 ), multiplied by 100 (to convert to a percentage).
Configurational measures
corresponding class divided by the maximum length of class edge for a maximally aggregated class, a measure of class aggregation or clumpiness.
divided by the square root of patch area (m 2 ) for each patch of the corresponding patch type, divided by the number of patches of the same type or MSI equals to the average shape index of patches of the corresponding patch type.
Area weighted mean shape index AWMSI AWMSI equals the sum, across all patches of the
corresponding patch type, of each patch perimeter (m) divided the square root of patch area (m2), multiplied by the patch area (m2), divided by total class area or AWMSI equals
to the average shape index of patch of the corresponding patch type, weighted by each area.
limit
Fig 2 The 1996 and 2003
green transects for gradient
analysis
Trang 5(33 species, 12 families, 3 orders), mammalian (38 species,
16 families, 6 orders) etc Especially, there are many
threatened species (9 reptiles), (3 insects), (7 small
mam-mals) (Yen2005) Almost all these species have a habitat
area smaller than 10 ha, for example the musk shrew
(Suncus murinus) and tree shrew (Tupaia glis) with habitat
ranges 240–1,200 m2 (0.024–0.12 ha), Chinese
ferret-badger (Melogale moschata) with habitat ranges 4–9 ha
etc The green patches left were considered as links acting
as corridors or stepping stones In graph theory and gravity
models for analyzing networks, node weight was calculated
as follows: Na= {X (ha)/S (ha)} · 10 (Linehan et al
1995) Where: Na= the node weight for the green space,
X= the area of the green space measured in hectares,
S= the minimum area required for the indicator species,
and multiplying by a factor of 10 normalizes the data
Connectivity analysis is based on the interaction between
pairs of nodes in the gravity model as shown by Linehan
et al (1995) Gab= {Na· Nb}/Dab2 (km) and Gab= Gba;
where Gabthe level of interaction between nodes a and b;
Nathe weight of node a; Nbthe weight of node b; and Dabis
the distance between the centroid of node a and the
cen-troid of node b Then, network generation was carried out
based on the concept of ‘‘least cost to user’’ and ‘‘least cost
to builder’’ There are two major groups of network
mod-els: branching and circuit, producing three graphs (Fig.3)
Branching networks, for example Paul Revere model-the
simplest network, are formed based on connecting all
nodes but visiting once, and there are no extraneous
seg-ments (Linehan et al 1995; Rudd et al 2002) Thus, no
circle is created While circuit models are established based
on the form of closed loops, for instances Traveling
Salesman-the simplest circuit network where each node is
connected only to two other nodes, and Least Cost to
User-the most complex circuit network where all nodes are
connected each other (Linehan et al 1995; Rudd et al
2002) Connectivity analysis, which is tested following the
above network models, shows the level of interaction
between each of the green spaces in the study area Next, it
is necessary to evaluate the circuit network and branching
network approaches This evaluation is based on gamma,
beta, and cost ratio indices (Forman and Godron 1986;
Linehan et al.1995; Rudd et al.2002) where:
Gamma¼ ðnumber of linksÞ=ðmaximum number of linksÞ; Beta¼ ðnumber of linksÞ=ðnumber of nodesÞ; and the Cost ratio ¼ 1 ðnumber of linksÞ=ðdistance of linksÞ:
To analyze networks here, the formulae of circuitry and connectivity (Forman and Godron 1986) were also used, where L and V are links and nodes respectively
Circuitry: a = L – V + 1/2V – 5 where zero means no circuitry, and positive values mean more circuitry Connectivity: c = L/3(V – 2) in that greater values mean more connectivity
Results
Synoptic characteristics of urban green spaces in Hanoi
A study of the synoptic characteristics using landscape metrics over the entire study area will provide general information on urban green space patterns in Hanoi In the year 1996, there were 357 green patches totalling 8449.6 ha; and in the year 2003, there were 669 green patches totalling 7139.4 ha Comparing these two years, there was a reduction in green space area of 1310.2 ha and
an increase in the number of patches by 312 The reduction
in the whole area: parks, attached green spaces, and agri-cultural land was 2.2, 3.4, 2.7 and 3.1% per year The patches increased at about 12.5% per year Likewise, the increase rate of patches for P, PGS, AGS, AA, CAL, RiSP, RoSP were 14.3, 23.8, 11.6, 11.1, 5.3, 14.3, 20.95% (Table 3a, i) respectively The increase in the fragmenta-tion index, such as in the number of patches (NP) and patch density (PD), indicates that the landscape was highly fragmented providing less connectivity, greater isolation and a higher percentage of edge area in patches McGarigal
et al (2002), Luck and Wu (2002) have shown that NP and
PD are two important metrics, which are usually used for assessing the landscape fragmentation As expressed in Table 3a, b, agricultural land (AA), attached green spaces (AGS) and parks (P) had a reduction of area of 1,170 ha,
247 ha, and 20.5 ha, respectively This suggests that the urban sprawl process is occurring strongly in the peri-urban areas, and the city became more compact However, public green spaces (PGS) and roadside green spaces (RoGS) showed a remarkable increase PLAND (percent of land) of real green spaces (parks, public green spaces, riverside green spaces, roadside green spaces) showed a slight increase from 18% in 1996 to 19% in 2003 However, non-real green spaces or open-green spaces (agricultural land) reduced from 63 to 58% in the period 1996–2003 This reflects the dominance of this green space type AA exists
at the periphery of urban areas Thus, a decrease of its
Paul reserve Traveling salesman Least cost to user
Where Node: and Link:
Fig 3 Examples of branching and circuit networks
Trang 6PLAND suggested an increase in the urban sprawl process.
The ranking of PLAND for urban green spaces is
AA[CAL[AGS[RoSP[PGS[P[RiSP for both of the
years mentioned The density of all types of green spaces
increased from 1996 to 2000 (Table3c) This index
indi-cated a higher fragmentation of all green space types and
could be confirmed by the decrease in mean patch size
index (MPS) of all green space types (Table3f)
The largest patch index (LPI) of AA reduced from 12.8
to 10.34 indicating that AA patches became smaller
(Table3d) An increase in LSI (landscape shape index)
showed that the total length of edges within the landscape
increased, and shape become more irregular as these
green spaces suffered more impact from surrounds The
AWMSI (area weighted mean shape index) of almost all
green space types increased also, indicating that the patch
shape became more irregular However, the decrease of
AWMSI for RiGS (river green spaces) combined with an
increase of CA and PLAND indicated an improvement of
this green space type over that of other green spaces In
general, fragmentation of green patches increased from
1996 to 2003 Green patches became smaller and more isolated
Gradient analysis of landscape level metrics Gradient analysis of landscape level metrics is shown in Figs 4a–g,5a–g By comparing NP and PD (Fig.4a, b) in the west–east transect, there was a shift in peak position, as well as an increase of NP and PD in going from the center
in 1996 to 4 km west in 2003 Fluctuation in NP and PD in the east was smaller than that in the west Both indicators suggest that the dynamic for this variation might be the urbanization process The above judgment was confirmed
by considering Mean Patch Size (MPS), where the lowest values were distributed from 4 km west to the center, the closer to the center the higher the MPS The MPS peaked at
a distance 4 km to the east A decline of NP from 1996 to
2003 indicated that green patches became smaller This is obvious since they are under pressure from human impact more and more The LPI in 1996 at 4–2 km west was
Table 3 Class level metrics of green spaces
(a) Class area (CA)
(b) Percent of landscape (PLAND)
(c) Patch density (PD)
(d) Largest patch index (LPI)
(e) Landscape shape index (LSI)
(f) Mean patch size (MPS)
(g) Area weighted mean shape index (AWMSI)
(i) Number of Patches
Trang 7higher than that of the year 2003 showing that green spaces
at this distance became more fragmented and smaller
except other distances This may indicate that some green
spaces were preserved as core areas while other green
spaces were reducing in area Combining this result with
configurational metrics, we can quantify and understand
better the variation in urban green space patterns As shown
in the Fig.4e, LSI peaked at a distance around 4 km west
and in the transect center, suggesting that at these distances
the shape of urban green spaces is the most complex This
seems to reflect different stages in urban development The
center area is the old quarter and is very compact; the
neighboring areas belong to the government and French
colonial towns; and outside these are new urbanized areas
and urban fringes However, the Mean Shape Index (MSI)
was stable along the transect and over time While there was a big fluctuation of AWMSI in the year 2003, espe-cially in the center area to 3 km west, it then decreased slightly on going eastward
Like the west–east transect, the peak position of NP in the south–north transect varied from near center (1996) to
4 km south (2003) and then reduced in both directions The
NP of 2003 was much larger than that of 1996 and its fluctuation in the south was stronger as well (Fig.5a) Together with NP, PD is one of the most important frag-mentation indices, the PD of 1996 and 2003 peaked at
4 km south and its change in the north was lower than that during 2003 The LPI for urban green spaces varied irregularly with multiple peaks At 4 km south, the varia-tion of NP and PD was the strongest, but the fluctuavaria-tion of
0 20 40 60 80
-8 -6 -4 -2 0
Number of Patches (NP) Patch density (PD)
0 30 60 90 120
Mean Patch Size (MPS) (ha)
0 30 60 90
Largest Patch Index (LPI)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Landscape Shape Index (LSI)
0 4 8 12 16
Mean Shape Index (MSI)
0 1 2 3 4 5
Area weighted mean shape index (AWSI)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Distance to center (km)
1996 2003
d c
f e
g
6 4 2
Fig 4 Gradient changes in
landscape level metrics of
Hanoi urban green spaces, from
west to east in the period
1996–2003
Trang 8LPI and MPS was lowest For MPS closer to the center,
there was a remarkable decrease comparing 2003–1996,
especially from a distance of 6 km southward This is
evidence that these green patches here suffered more
pressure from surrounds A decrease of LSI at 4 km south
suggested that the shape of green patches at this distance
became more complex, while in the center area there was
an improvement The MSI showed no big changes along
the transect and a slight increase toward the center
Com-pared to the west–east transect, variation in the MSI of the
south–east transect was bigger The AWMSI seems to be
similar to the LSI, with the highest values being found at a
distance of 2 km south where the AWMSI then showing a
reduction at 4 km south This was consistent with an
increase in NP and PD The AWMSI then slightly
increased again at a distance of 6 km south However, it
decreased toward the center when comparing 2003 and
1996 In general, the variation in landscape metrics of
urban green spaces in the south was stronger than that of
the north The peak change was at around 4 km south
indicating that land use change at this distance was
greatest Moreover one of the more interesting results, in terms of configurational metrics, was found at the center where the LSI, MSI and AWMSI for urban green spaces declined on comparing 2003 and 1996 This revealed an improvement in green patch shape
Network analysis The result of the node interaction (gravity model) of the 33 existing green patches with an area larger than 10 ha (Table 4) and the common network types (Fig.3) have produced six different network scenarios from A to F (Fig.6) Specifically, the theory maximum expresses all nodes connected each other including unfeasible links and feasible links Feasible links to connect these nodes are identified based on the existing land use including corridors (road green ways, etc.), open spaces, or other small green spaces, and unfeasible links are virtual links or do not exist
in the reality (business areas, busy highways, etc.) (Linehan
et al 1995) The network A based on the network model
Number of patches (NP)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Patch Density (PD)
0 50 100 150 200
Largest Patch Index (LPI)
0 25 50 75 100
Mean Patch Size (MPS) (ha)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Landscape Shape Index (LSI)
0 4 8 12 16
Mean Shape Index (MSI)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Area weighted mean shape index (AWSI)
0 2 4 6
Distance to center (km)
1996 2003
a
d c
f e
g
2
b
Fig 5 Gradient changes in
landscape level metrics of
Hanoi urban green spaces, from
south to north in the period
1996–2003
Trang 9‘‘Least Cost to User’’, namely project max, expresses the
highest connectivity or connects all green spaces with all
feasible links The network B, based on circle networking,
represents the connection of all largest nodes only The
network C was built based on the network model ‘‘Paul
Revere’’ or branching network The Network D was
developed following the network type ‘‘Traveling
Sales-man’’ or circle networking The network E represents the
connection of the closest green patches as its name
‘‘Minimum Spanning Tree’’ Finally, the network F, based
on the ‘‘Least Cost to User’’, expressed the connection of
selected groups of green patches The gamma, beta and
cost ratio were used to evaluate each graph model or
net-work scenario (Table5) In addition to using gamma, beta
and cost ratio scenarios to evaluate networks, the circuitry
(a) and connectivity (c) indices were also used to analyze
network structure These formulae were adopted by
For-man and Godron (1986), Hagget et al (1977) In analyzing
networks, these indices are not as sensitive as the other
mentioned indices but they support connectivity analysis
more efficiently and clearly (Table5)
Discussion
What is the driving force of green space change
in Hanoi?
Analyzing green space patterns over the entire landscape,
and analyzing gradients based on landscape metrics along
two transects, showed that green spaces have changed at
different distances and in different directions, from 1996 to
2003 However, analyzing synoptic characteristics of
landscapes as traditional ways that the averaging of
land-scape metrics over an entire study area may lead to
incorrect interpretation of the causal dynamics in the
region As shown by Kong and Nakagoshi (2006, p 12),
‘‘It is difficult to link changes in green space patterns in
local areas accurately with the processes that produced
these changes’’ This difficulty can be solved by using
gradient analysis or the ‘‘moving window’’ method
com-bined with spatially explicit landscape metrics This
method can provide adequate quantitative information
about the structure and pattern of urban green spaces
Therefore, a better link between pattern and process, and a
more effective capture of the dynamic changes can result
Generally, there are two main driving forces causing the
urbanization process: population and economy (Ma et al
2005) In addition, Luck and Wu (2002) recognize
urbanization as one of the most important driving forces
for land use and land cover change When studying the
spatio-temporal green space change in Jinan City (China),
Kong and Nakagoshi (2006) found that the driving forces Table
Trang 10Table 4 continued
1 116.9 344.2 184.2 1407.1 171.5 1111.4 1959.9 430 57.3 1066.2 806.9 1485.9 9039.6 1040.4 1072.6 1320
2 151.5 400.9 142.6 1192 92.7 826.3 1562.1 300.2 39.3 713.6 473.8 783.9 3063.6 543.7 332.9 256.3
4 240.3 606.6 225.5 1194.8 55.7 455.2 839.8 156.3 20.9 332 205.7 330.4 930.5 225.3 97.9 62.2
Because Gab= Gbaso that this table is symmetrical and it is unnecessary to calculate both values (Linehan et al 1995 )