\ Criterion 1 - Application at resources Assertion target the application at resources mentioned is to be evaluated for the proven function/activity.. as the application at raw/A
Trang 1\
Criterion 1 - Application at resources
Assertion target
the application at resources mentioned is to be evaluated for the
proven function/activity Under raw materials all materials are
understood, which or are processed by the described process
The effectiveness (efficient use) of assigned resources is to be represented and where improvement potentials are available
as the application at raw/As aé result of this activity}The application at givenj{in this activity is very effective
materials, etc is effective in this |insufficient effectiveness arises
resources is unsatisfactory the application at resources
area? assigned raw materials, water,
energy The process is_ thus _ still] After today's knowledge status There is thereby a potential of] optimizationable no optimization is possible From it does an optimization|/the improvement regarding the
potential result? use
relevant with the practice of the (not relevant)
activity/function
criterion 2 - loss at resources and productivity
the activity is regarding producing Abwassser, exhaust air, waste, To point out the interdependence on economic as well as
Juli 2001
Issued by
Version
Trang 2
to evaluate waste heat - again in the relation of the area ecological targets, in order to optimize flows regarding their
environmental costs "
A
(high)
(average)
C (low)
as the extent at produced losses
is high, how waste water, etc
within this area?
As a result of this activity a high
extent at the shown features arises within this area
From it does an optimization
potential result?
it exists from it a potential of the improvement regarding the minimization of these factors
from this activity arises a loss as
a result of developing waste, etc
by this activity arises no/minimum loss after today's knowledge status
The process is not thus still optimization able
no optimization possible
the valuation criterion is not
relevant with the practice of the
(not relevant)
Criterion 3 — environmental-legal request
Assertion Target
the issued laws of the different environmental areas, e.g waste
water, waste etc are concretized by appropriate regulations,
administrative regulations and technical guidance’s With this
criterion the observance that is to be checked and evaluated
publicly - legal specifications
The examination whether and to what extent the existing environmental laws and regulations are kept
Trang 3
legal request?
Are stricter regulations
expected?
How is the relation to the
authorities?
Do we keep our edition/limit
values?
Limit values repeatedly easy/occasionally far exceeded
requests can not be kept with
certainty severity monitoring by the authority
with security kept from the
authorities monitors
limit values to become occasionally slightly exceeded
request to become essentially
with security kept Monitored by the authorities
limit values to become
request to become kept always with security kept
very tolerant monitoring by the authority
the valuation criterion is not
relevant with the practice of the
(not relevant)
criterion 4 - hazard potential
this criterion considers the risk potential, which proceeds from this| Possible hazard potentials uncover, in order to prevent activity As potential endangerments possible risks for air, water,|environmental damage, image losses and _ competitive
which could occur with
abnormal or emergency
conditions? Which
environmental consequences
would be connected with it?
Substance as environmental
damaging classified large one quantities begun
emissions are environmental-
high probability of setting free dangerous concentrations
relative small quantities are handled
environment
Quantities very small
Emissions not likely release of dangerous
Date of release
Version
Trang 4
Is there an appropriate
precaution?
damaging quantitatively highly
Handling is incorrectly
substance as precariously regarded
concentrations or quantities very
improbably
no objection during the handling
the valuation criterion is not
relevant hardly with the practice
(not relevant)
Issued by
Date of release
Version