1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

truong quang binh khoi tri

26 31 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 26
Dung lượng 2,09 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

4 Systolic BP: highly predictive of stroke risk Stroke mortality* * Floating absolute risk and 95% confidence interval.. SBP, systolic blood pressure... 1,991 CAD patients ≥ 20%; doubl

Trang 1

KHỞI TRỊ TĂNG HA Ở

NGƯỜI CAO TUỔI:

CHỨNG CỨ LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN THUỐC LỢI TiỂU

PGS TS Trương Quang Bình

ĐHYD TP HCM

Trang 4

4

Systolic BP:

highly predictive of stroke risk

Stroke mortality*

* Floating absolute risk and 95% confidence interval

SBP, systolic blood pressure

1 Lewington S et al Lancet 2002;360:1903-1913

Age at risk

80-89 y 70-79 y 60-69 y 50-59

Trang 5

Hypertension sub-type According to Age

Franklin SS, et al Circulation 1997;96: 308-15

Trang 6

6

Reflected waves due to stiffer arteries from periphery

increase pulse wave velocity & Systolic BP

1 O’Rourke M Hypertension 1995;26:2-9

Trang 7

7

Older patients have a low level of renin activity

1 Belmin et al Drugs Aging 1994;5(5):391-400

Supine plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone plasma level

as a function of age in healthy normotensive people receiving an ad libitum sodium diet

Trang 8

Tieán trieån cuûa taêng HA

B Williams 2007 Number

Trang 9

Amlodipine has Shown CV Protective Efficacy in

Landmark Studies

1 Pitt et al Circulation 2000;102:1503–1510; 2 Nissen et al JAMA 2004;292:2217–2226; 3 Dahlof et al Lancet

2005;366:895–906; 4 Williams et al Circulation 2006;113:1213 –1225; 5 Leenen et al Hypertension.2006;48:374–384

1,991 CAD patients (≥ 20%); double-blind,

randomized study vs placebo and enalapril

randomized, prospective study vs atenolol

Primary outcome: 10%↓in non-fatal MI and fatal CHD

randomized, prospective study vs lisinopril

Primary outcome: no difference in composite of fatal CHD and non-fatal MI vs lisinopril

23% ↓stroke

Trang 10

A = ACE-inh or ARB, C = CCB, D = thiazide type diuretic

Trang 11

11

Trang 12

ALLHAT

Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril

Trang 13

Cumulative Event Rates for Heart Failure

by ALLHAT Treatment Group

HR (95% CI) p value A/C 1.38 (1.25-1.52) <.001 L/C 1.19 (1.07-1.31) <.001

ALLHAT

Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril

Number at risk:

Chlor 15,255 14,528 13,898 13,224 11,511 6,369 3,016 384

Amlo 9,048 8,535 8,185 7,801 6,785 3,775 1,780 210

Lisin 9,054 8,496 8,096 7,689 6,698 3,789 1,837 313

Trang 14

HYVET Trial: Study Design

causes, cardiac causes and any cause

Active Treatment 1.5 mg Indapamide (SR)

n=1933

Placebo Matching Dose

n=1912

3845 patients > 80 years with continual hypertension and systolic blood pressure ≥

160 mm Hg prior to randomization Prospective Randomized Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Mean follow-up 1.8yrs

N Engl J Med 2008;358/ACC 2008

R

2 yrs follow-up

Trang 19

ESH/ESC guidelines suggest a diuretic or a CCB may be

particularly useful for elderly patients

19

Thiazide diuretics / CCB combination is recommended

for older hypertensive patients

Trang 20

JNC8 panel report recommends a CCB or a thiazide-type diuretic, alone or in combination for patients over 60

20

Thiazide diuretics / CCB combination is recommended

for older and black hypertensive patients

James PA et al JAMA 2014;311(5):507-520

Trang 21

21

2015

Trang 22

Hypertension Canada CHEP Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension

2016

Trang 24

Indapamide is more potent than HCTZ & chlorthalidone

at reducing systolic blood pressure

24

Roush et al Hypertension 2015;65:1041-1046

Indapamide is significantly more potent than HCTZ at reducing systolic blood

pressure, which is not the case with chlorthalidone

Roush meta-analysis (2015) 1

Systematic review and meta-analysis; head-to- head RCTs comparing HCTZ vs indapamide (10 RCTS, n=813) and HCTZ

vs chlorthalidone (3 RCTS, n=70)

Trang 25

25

Indapamide has a better metabolic profile…

1 Ambrosioni E, Safar M, Degaute JP, et al J Hypertens 1998;16:1677-1684; 2 ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997

Trang 26

• Above age 50, systolic BP management becomes

more important

• High SBP is linked to stroke risk & is difficult to

control

• Thiazide-like diuretics & CCBs are logical choice

for treatment of high SBP

• Among thiazide-like diuretics, indapamide has

better metabolic safety

26

In summary

Ngày đăng: 24/10/2019, 00:05

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w