Land Use Changeand Mountain Biodiversity Maximo Liberman, and Christian Körner A CRC title, part of the Taylor & Francis imprint, a member of the Taylor & Francis Group, the academic div
Trang 1Part I Introduction
3523_book.fm Page 1 Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:23 AM
Trang 2Land Use Change
and Mountain Biodiversity
Maximo Liberman, and Christian Körner
A CRC title, part of the Taylor & Francis imprint, a member of the Taylor & Francis Group, the academic division of T&F Informa plc.
Boca Raton London New York
Trang 3Published in 2006 by
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group
No claim to original U.S Government works
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-8493-3523-X (Hardcover)
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-8493-3523-5 (Hardcover)
Library of Congress Card Number 2005047213
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated A wide variety of references are listed Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials
or for the consequences of their use.
No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc (CCC) 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923, 978-750-8400 CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Land use change and mountain biodiversity / [edited by] Eva Spehn, Maximo Liberman, and Christian Körner.
p cm.
Selected papers from 2 workshops, the first held in Moshi, Tanzania, Aug 19-24, 2002 and the second held in La Paz, Bolivia, Aug 20-23, 2003.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 0-8493-3523-X (alk paper)
1 Mountain ecology Congresses 2 Land use Environmental aspects Congresses 3 Biological diversity Congresses I Körner, Christian, 1949- II Spehn, E M Eva M.) III Liberman, Máximo.
QH541.5.M65L36 2005
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the CRC Press Web site at http://www.crcpress.com
Taylor & Francis Group
is the Academic Division of Informa plc.
3523_Discl.fm Page 1 Wednesday, November 23, 2005 3:10 PM
Trang 4Preface
SUSTAINABLE USE AND BIODIVERSITY OF SUBTROPICAL AND TROPICAL
HIGHLANDS
Within the worldwide biodiversity program of
DIVERSITAS, the Global Mountain Biodiversity
Assessment (GMBA) seeks to assess the biological
richness of high-elevation biota around the world
Mountains provide an excellent opportunity for a
global biodiversity research network, as they exist
in every climatic zone GMBA has a high-elevation
focus, including the uppermost forest regions or
their substitute rangeland vegetation, the treeline
ecotone, and the alpine and the nival belts
Although acknowledging the significance of
lower-montane biota, they fall outside the GMBA
agenda Beyond description, GMBA aims at
explaining the causes of biological richness in
mountains and its change over time Given that
changes in biodiversity most often result from
human land use, one specific GMBA agenda is the
assessment of land use impacts Such assessments
have priority in low-latitude regions, where land
use pressure on upland biota is greatest Upland
grazing, often facilitated by fire management, is
the most widespread utilization of mountain
ter-rain, often followed by erosion and enhanced risk
for valley and foreland environments
High-eleva-tion forests have disappeared in most regions, and
the few relicts are under intense use Cultivation
of formerly pristine areas and intensification of
agriculture in montane areas are often associated
with a loss of mountain biodiversity Both
prob-lems are most severe in the tropics and subtropics
This book is the second volume produced by
the Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment
(GMBA) of DIVERSITAS, following Mountain
Biodiversity: A Global Assessment (eds Ch
Körner and E.M Spehn), published by Parthenon
in 2002 The chapters of this volume have been
selected in a peer-reviewing process from the
pre-sentations offered at two GMBA workshops, one
in Africa (Moshi, Tanzania, August 19 to August
24, 2002) and the other one in the Andes (La Paz,Bolivia, August 20 to August 23, 2003) More than
50 researchers actively participated, sharingknowledge from all major mountain regions, with
a particular focus on the Andes and the Africanmountains The two workshops profited greatlyfrom the hospitality of the African Mountain Asso-ciation (AMA), which hosted the African work-shop at its sixth international conference on sus-tainable mountain development in Africa Wewould like to cordially thank Prof Salome Misana
of the Department of Geography, University of Dar
es Salaam, Tanzania, for the organization of theconference and for her local support and inputduring the first workshop The second workshop
in the Andes was locally organized by MaximoLiberman, SERNAP, in Huarina at the shore ofLake Titikaka in Bolivia, under the auspices of theAndean Mountain Association (AMA)
Under the patronage of, and with support from,DIVERSITAS, these workshops have been under-written by various agencies The workshops andthe synthesis process were generously funded bythe Swiss Agency for Development and Coopera-tion The Swiss Federal Office for Agricultureenabled the cooperation with the Swiss FederalResearch Station of Agroecology and Agriculture(Agroscope Zürich–Reckenholz) on this project.The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) ofthe United Nations supported the preparation ofthis publication through the FAO/NetherlandsPartnership Programme “Assessment of Agricul-tural Biodiversity.” SERNAP (Servicia Nacional
de Areas Protegidas de Bolivia)/ II Bolivia ported the Spanish edition of this volume, printed
sup-in Bolivia (SERNAP, La Paz, 2005)
We wish to thank the following persons whohelped with the editing of this volume: AndreasGrünig of the Swiss Federal Research Station for
Trang 5vi Land Use Change and Mountain Biodiversity
Agroecology and Agriculture (Agroscope
Zürich–Reckenholz) for his valuable help in the
process of editing submitted manuscripts;
Anne-marie Brennwald, Sylvia Martinez, and Susanna
Pelaez-Riedl of the Institute of Botany, University
of Basel, for text editing and graphic support;
Emma Sayer, who translated chapters to English,
and Cecile Belpaire (La Paz, Bolivia), who
trans-lated chapters to Spanish in the Spanish edition
Under the auspices of the Swiss Academy of
Natural Sciences, the GMBA office in Basel,
Swit-zerland (Eva Spehn and Sylvia Martinez) weresupported by the Swiss Federal Office of Scienceand Education 2001–2003 and the Swiss NationalScience Foundation (SNF) (2004– )
Eva Spehn, Maximo Liberman, and
Christian Körner
Basel, Switzerland and La Paz, Bolivia
January 2005
Trang 6Contributors
Bhupendra Singh Adhikari
Wildlife Institute of India
Dehradun, India
Khukmatullo Akhmadov
Tajik Forestry Research and Development Institute
Dushanbe, Tajikistan
Humberto Alzérreca Angelo
Programa Estralégico de Acción para la Cunca del
Rio Bermejo (PEA-Bolivia)
Tarija, Bolivia
Roxana Aragón
Facultad de Agronomía
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Buenes Aries, Argentina
Yoseph Assefa
Department of Biology
Addis Ababa University
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Jorge Alberto Bustamante Becerra
Department of Ecology, Biosciences InstituteUniversity of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Konrad Fiedler
Population EcologyInstitute for Ecology and Conservation BiologyUniversity of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Menassie Gashaw
Ethiopian Wildlife OrganizationAddis Ababa, Ethiopia
Trang 7viii Land Use Change and Mountain Biodiversity
Roger B Good
National Parks and Wildlife Service
Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia
Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Ecológicas
Universidad de Los Andes
School of Resources, Environment and Society
Australian National University
Andrea Corinna Mayer
Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research
Davos, Switzerland
Marcelo Fernando Molinillo
Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y EcológicasUniversidad de Los Andes
Trang 8Range and Forage Institute
Agricultural Research Council
Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Jesus Orlando Rangel Churio
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Ecologicas
Universidad de los Andes
Núcleo la Hechicera, Facultad de Ciencias
Julia K Smith
Instituto de CienciasAmbiental y EcologicasUniversidad de los AndesMenda, Venezuela
Eva M Spehn
Global Mountain Biodiversity AssessmentInstitute of Botany
University of BaselBasel, Switzerland
Trang 9x Land Use Change and Mountain Biodiversity
New Haven, Connecticut
Trang 10Table of Contents
PART I Introduction 1
Christian Körner, Gia Nakhutsrishvili, and Eva M Spehn
PART II Effects of Fire on Mountain Biodiversity 23
in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia and the Influence of Fire 25
Masresha Fetene, Yoseph Assefa, Menassie Gashaw, Zerihun Woldu, and Erwin Beck
Karsten Wesche
Vegetation on Mt Kilimanjaro 51
Andreas Hemp
Jan C Axmacher, Ludger Scheuermann, Marion Schrumpf, Herbert V.M Lyaruu, Konrad Fiedler, and Klaus Müller-Hohenstein
Their Small-Mammal Communities in Madagascar 77
Bernardin P.N Rasolonandrasana and Steven M Goodman
Grasslands of Northwest Argentina 89
Roxana Aragón, Julietta Carilla, and Luciana Cristóbal
PART III Effects of Grazing on Mountain Biodiversity 101
Anthropogenic Impact 103
Jesus Orlando Rangel Churio
Trang 11xii Land Use Change and Mountain Biodiversity
Richness in an Old-Field Succession of the Venezuelan Páramos 119
Lina Sarmiento
Systems in Punas and Páramos 137
Marcelo Molinillo and Maximina Monasterio
the Southeastern Andes of Peru (Palccoyo, Cusco) 153
Jorge Alberto Bustamante Becerra
of Key High-Andean Puna Rangelands (Bofedales) in Ulla Ulla, Bolivia 167
Humberto Alzérreca, Jorge Laura, Freddy Loza, Demetrio Luna, and Jonny Ortega
Zulimar Hernández and Maximina Monasterio
in Rangeland Vegetation 199
Gopal S Rawat and Bhupendra S Adhikari
and Stabilization of the Ecosystem 211
Ken Green, Roger B Good, Stuart W Johnston, and Lisa A Simpson
Siegmar-W Breckle and Walter Wucherer
Pastures in Tajik Mountains 239
Khukmatullo M Akhmadov, Siegmar W Breckle, and Uta Breckle
PART IV Effects of Grazing on Mountain Forests 249
Chapter 18 Plant Species Diversity, Forest Structure, and Tree Regeneration in
Subalpine Wood Pastures 251
Andrea C Mayer, Christine Huovinen, Veronika Stoeckli, and Michael Kreuzer
Trang 12Table of Contents xiii
Chapter 19 Patterns of Forest Recovery in Grazing Fields in the Subtropical Mountains
of Northwest Argentina 261
Julietta Carilla, H Ricardo Grau, and Agustina Malizia
Chapter 20 Climatic and Anthropogenic Influences on the Dynamics of Prosopis ferox
Forests in the Quebrada de Humahuaca, Jujuy, Argentina 275
Mariano Morales and Ricardo Villalba
Chapter 21 Conservation of Biodiversity in the Maloti–Drakensberg Mountain Range 285
Terry M Everson and Craig D Morris
Chapter 22 Effects of Anthropogenic Disturbances on Biodiversity: A Major Issue
of Protected-Area Management in Nepal 293
Khadga Basnet
Chapter 23 Agricultural Development and Biodiversity Conservation in the Páramo
Environments of the Andes of Mérida, Venezuela 307
Maximina Monasterio, Julia K Smith, and Marcelo Molinillo
Chapter 24 Multidimensional (Climatic, Biodiversity, Socioeconomic), Changes in
Land Use in the Vilcanota Watershed, Peru 319
Stephan Halloy, Anton Seimon, Karina Yager, and Alfredo Tupayachi
PART VI Synthesis 335
Chapter 25 Fire and Grazing — A Synthesis of Human Impacts on Highland Biodiversity 337
Eva M Spehn, Maximo Liberman, and Christian Körner
Chapter 26 The Moshi-La Paz Research Agenda on “Land Use Effects on Tropical
and Subtropical Mountain Biodiversity” 349
Trang 131 High-Elevation Land Use,
Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Functioning
Christian Körner, Gia Nakhutsrishvili, and Eva Spehn
ANTHROPOGENIC HIGHLAND
ECOSYSTEMS
Humans have shaped much of the world’s lands over millennia Landscapes of sustainableproductivity, high biodiversity, and aestheticattractiveness have developed through livestockgrazing These landscapes also exhibit highecosystem stability, a key requisite for erosioncontrol and catchment quality (Körner, 2000,2004; Figure 1.1)
high-As a cultural heritage associated with tional-knowledge-based land management,many of these high-elevation pasture landscapes,hayfields, marginal crop fields, and rangelandsare of significant conservational and historicalvalue In some parts of the world, however, high-land management had no tradition (e.g., NewZealand and Australia), and when abruptly intro-duced to an unadapted flora, often had disastrousconsequences (e.g Costin 1958)
tradi-Over the last 50 years, these anthropogenichighland biota have undergone dramatic changesassociated with even more dramatic societal andeconomic changes, in addition to the atmo-spheric (climatic) changes underway In the morewealthy parts of the world, much of the high-lands have undergone extensivation of use orabandonment In the less economically privi-leged parts, population growth and land use pres-sure have often caused an expansion of agricul-tural land use into less suitable regions andabandonment of traditional land use practices
Both of these facets of global change have haddrastic influences on highland integrity andbiodiversity Unfortunately, both these depar-tures from the traditional middle ground of sus-tainable land use have caused a loss of biological
richness, and both tend to incur land degradation,though this is only a transitory risk in the case
of abandonment (e.g Tasser et al 2003) but isoften terminal in the case of overusing when soilsare washed away
In this overview of the ecological dimensions
of highland grazing, we will follow the simpleand common biogeographic nomenclature of ele-vational belts We will use the altitudinal position
of the natural upper-climatic treeline, defined asthe line connecting the uppermost pockets oftrees (i.e below the tree species line but abovethe forest line; Körner, 2003), as a reference (irre-spective of whether such forest patches arelocally present or not) We will define the moun-tain slopes below as montane and the naturallytreeless land above as alpine In this sense
“alpine” does not refer to the Alps but appliesglobally (following from its preIndo-Germanicmeaning of “steep slopes”), with “Andean” and
“Afroalpine” as synonyms The climatic vation treeline correlates worldwide with a sea-sonal mean temperature of 6.7 ± 0.8°C (indepen-dent of season length; Körner and Paulsen, 2004).Somewhat lower threshold temperatures (5 to6°C) can be found at the equator (treelines at
high-ele-3800 to 4100 m), but the thresholds in the tropics match with those at higher latitudes Inthe humid and semihumid tropics and subtropics,much of the high-elevation pastureland is foundbetween 500 and 800 m below and between 300and 400 m above the treeline elevation (i.e.between 3000 and 4400 m), with lower elevationscommonly used for crop production and higherelevations commonly carrying too little vegeta-tion and not regularly grazed In the NorthernHemisphere temperate zone, with treeline posi-tions varying widely between 1500 and 3500 m3523_book.fm Page 3 Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:23 AM
Trang 14sub-4 Land Use Change and Mountain Biodiversity
depending on latitude and oceanic climate, the
corresponding amplitudes are wider, namely,
from at least 1000 m (1500 m in continental
ranges) below to 400 m above treeline These are
the elevational ranges considered here and in the
remainder of this volume when the term highland
is used As the focal elevations of GMBA are the
upper-montane, treeline ecotone, and alpine belts,
most of the contributions refer to these higher
parts of what could be considered highlands in
the widest sense
According to an assessment by Kapos et al
(2000; cf Körner, 2004), the global land area
above 1000 m and below 4500 m represents
14.3% of the terrestrial area Given that (1) in
the subtropics and tropics, much of the lower
part of this topography-based assessment falls
outside the climatic range of interest here, and
that (2) a great fraction of mountains falls in the
largely bare polar and subpolar regions, a
realis-tic estimate of the global land area fraction
suit-able for agricultural use in the highlands will be
somewhere around 8%, with 3% falling in the
alpine belt (Körner 1995), and the remaining
(around 5%) in the montane belt About 25% of
the montane land area is still forested according
to Kapos et al (2000), and a similar area may
be arid or barren, so that the nonforested, tially grazed montane and alpine highlands willcover roughly 5% of the global terrestrial area,
poten-an area as large as the polar tundra region(Körner, 1995) Approximately half of this arealies in the tropics and subtropics
As small as this area may look on a globalscale, it covers a very critical mountain zone Ithas been estimated that nearly half of humanitydepends directly or indirectly on the water yieldfrom mountain catchments (Messerli and Ives,1997; Messerli, 2004), with the vegetation-cov-ered upper-catchment regions playing a key rolefor clean and steady discharge In this sense,highlands control much of the so-called watertowers of the globe, and the functional integrity
of these highlands matters for land areas (andpopulations) by far exceeding their actual size(Figure 1.2) The slopes of these catchments areonly as stable as their green cover This coverneeds a high functional diversity of plants tofulfill its protective role under all sorts of unpre-dictable environmental conditions Thus theecology and richness of highland biota are inti-mately linked to the welfare of a large fraction ofhuman population, beyond their significance forlocal livelihoods (Körner and Spehn, 2002;
FIGURE 1.1 Fingerprints of millennia of land use in the highlands Examples of anthropogenic grassland from (a) Bolivian altiplano, 4100 m; (b) Cayambe region, 3700 m, Ecuador; (c) Sajama region bofedales, Bolivia,
4100 m; and (d) Spiti Valley, the Himalayas, 3700 m, India.
3523_book.fm Page 4 Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:23 AM
Trang 15High-Elevation Land Use, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Functioning 5
Körner, 2004) Given that much of the tropical
and subtropical mountain forelands is rather dry,
this interdependency is even larger at
low-lati-tude regions The teleconnection between
high-land grazing grounds and metropolitan areas
may be thousands of kilometers as, for instance,
exists between the upper-Nile catchments and
Cairo or between eastern Anatolia and what was
Mesopotamia Sustainable highland
manage-ment, thus, has significant economic impact on
people living far outside the mountains
In this introductory chapter, we (1) aim to
the functioning of highland biota with specialreference to low latitudes, (2) will provide a briefsummary of previous observations on highlandpasture systems, and (3) will, then, open thearena for the global change implications forbiodiversity and ecosystem functioning in sub-tropical and tropical highlands, the main theme
of this volume
DRIVERS OF HIGHLAND ECOLOGY (WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS)
The following is a brief reconsideration of themajor forces that shape upland biota These fallinto topography-related and climatic driversand biological determinants
Compression of climatic zones Mountainsare inhabited by more species of plants, animals,and microbes as one would estimate from theirland area and have often been called “hot spots”
of biodiversity (Körner, 2004) This has severalreasons intrinsically linked to topography andgravity Due to the elevational range covered,mountains encapsulate several climatic lifezones that would otherwise be separated by thou-sands of kilometers at low elevation (Barthlott et
al 1996) Hence, nowhere else on land can morebiological richness be encountered on a 100-km2scale than on the slopes of a high tropical moun-tain In relative terms, this effect also holds formountains in extratropical regions
Habitat diversity The second importantfactor at smaller scales is topographic diversity.Exposure, steepness of slope, variation of sub-strate, and microclimate over short distancescreate a multitude of microhabitats, each nest-ing a different set of organisms This habitatdiversity again permits aggregation of ratherdiverse biota over otherwise short distances.Gravity is the primary force behind this geodi-versity; where it lacks action, as in plains, irre-spective of elevation, biological diversitydeclines Because preferred grazing grounds areoften flat and smooth, their biological inventory
is commonly smaller than is found on the rounding slopes However, the species pool insuch plains could be even lower without grazingbecause grazing often creates “structure” bypatchy disturbance, dung deposition, food pref-erence, etc (Edwards et al 2004) Such effects
sur-FIGURE 1.2 Nearly half of mankind depends in one
way or the other on mountain water Highland
vegeta-tion is the safeguard of catchment quality and yield It
cleans, stores, and channels water to the lowlands.
Land use in these regions has far-ranging economic
consequences From top to bottom: upper catchment,
Bolivia, 4000 m; montane transgression, Sichuan, west
China; irrigation canal, lowland California.
3523_book.fm Page 5 Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:23 AM