To deal with this problem, one may want to evaluate by test the optimal moment for the application of pr essure, by the measurement of the flexural rigidity of a specimen as a function o
Trang 1the fiber volume fraction V f varies, and as a result, the dimensional characteristics
of the piece (thickness) also vary To deal with this problem, one may want to evaluate by test the optimal moment for the application of pr essure, by the measurement of the flexural rigidity of a specimen as a function of time of fabrication (see Figure 3.24)
Figure 3.22 Tensile Test
Figure 3.23 Short Beam Shear Test
Figure 3.24 Variation In Stiffness During Curing
Trang 24 SANDWICH STRUCTURES
Sandwich structures occupy a large proportion of composite materials design They appear in almost all applications Historically they were the first light and high-performance structures.1 In the majority of cases, one has to design them for a specific purpose Sandwich structures usually appear in industry as semi-finished products In this chapter we will discuss the principal pr operties of sandwich structures
4.1 WHAT IS A SANDWICH STRUCTURE?
A sandwich structure results from the assembly by bonding—or welding—of two thin facings or skins on a lighter core that is used to keep the two skins separated (see Figure 4.1)
Their properties are astonishing They have
Very light weight. As a comparison, the mass per unit area of the dome
of the Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome (45 meter diameter) is 2,600 kg/m2, whereas the mass per surface area of the same dome made of steel/ polyurethane foam sandwich (Hanover) is only 33 kg/m2
Very high flexural rigidity. Separation of the surface skins increases flexural rigidity
Excellent thermal insulation characteristics.
However, be careful:
Sandwich materials are not dampening (no acoustic insulation)
Fire resistance is not good for certain core types
The risk of buckling is greater than for classical structures
The facing materials are diverse, and the core materials are as light as possible One can denote couples of compatible materials to for m the sandwich (see Figure 4.2)
Be careful: Polyester resins attack polystyrene foams
1
See Section 7.1.
Trang 3To evaluate t and s, one makes the following simplifications:
The normal stresses are assumed to occur in the facings only, and they are uniform across the thickness of the facings
The shear stresses are assumed to occur in the core only, and they are uniform in the core.3
One then obtains immediately the expressions for t and s for a beam of unit width and thin facings shown in Figure 4.4
4.2.2 Displacements
In the following example, the displacement D is determined for a sandwich beam subjected to bending as a consequence of
Deformation due to normal stresses s and
Deformation created by shear stresses t (see Figure 4.5)
Figure 4.3 Bending Representation
Figure 4.4 Stresses in Sandwich Structure
3
See Section 17.7.2 and the Applications 18.2.1 and 18.3.5 for a better approach.
Trang 4The end displacement D can be written as
Then for an applied load of 1 Newton
Remark: Part of the displacement D due to shear appears to be higher than that due to bending, whereas in the case of classical homogeneous beams, the shear displacement is very small and usually neglected Thus, this is a specific property
of sandwich structures that strongly influences the estimation of the bending displacements
4.3 A FEW SPECIAL ASPECTS
4.3.1 Comparison of Mass Based on Equivalent Flexural Rigidity (EI)
Figure 4.7 allows the comparison of different sandwich structures having the same flexural rigidity ·EI Ò Following the discussion in the previous section, this accounts
for only a part of the total flexural deformation
Figure 4.6 Cantilever Beam
EI
· Ò = 475¥102; -· ÒGS k = 650¥102
D = ∂ -∂W F
D = 0.7¥10 2 mm/N+1.54¥102 mm/N
Trang 54.3.2.2 Local Buckling of the Facings
The facings are subject to buckling due to the low stiffness of the core Depending
on the type of loading, one can find the modes of deformation as shown in Figure 4.9
The critical compression stress is given in the equation below where nc is the Poisson coefficient of the core
The critical load to cause local damage by local buckling of a facing and the types of damage are shown in Figure 4.10
4.3.3 Other Types of Damage
Local crushing: This is the crushing of the core material at the location of the load application (see figure below)
Figure 4.9 Local Buckling of Facings
Figure 4.10 Damage by Local Buckling
scr a E p E c
2
¥ ( )1 /3
¥
= with
a 3 12 3( –v c)2
1+v c
( )2
=
Trang 6Compression rupture: In this case (see figure below), note that the weak com-pression resistance of Kevlar fibers7 leads to a compression strength about two times less than for sandwich panels made using glass fibers
4.4 FABRICATION AND DESIGN PROBLEMS
4.4.1 Honeycomb: An Example of Core Material
These well-known materials are made of hexagonal cells that are regularly spaced Such geometry can be obtained using a technique that is relatively simple Many thin sheets are partially bonded Starting from stacked bonded sheets, they are expanded as shown in Figure 4.11
The honeycomb material can be metal (light alloy, steel) or nonmetal (carton impregnated with phenolic resin, polyamide sheets, or impregnated glass fabrics) Metallic honeycombs are less expensive and more resistant Nonmetallic hon-eycombs are not sensitive to corrosion and are good thermal insulators The following table shows the mechanical and geometric characteristics of a few current honeycombs, using the notations of Figure 4.11
7
See Section 3.3.3.
Table 4.1 Properties of Some Honeycomb
Bonded Sheets of Polyamide: Nomex a
Light Alloy AG3
Light Alloy 2024
Dia (D): inscribed circle (mm)
Shear strength
txz rup (MPa)
Shear modulus:
Gxz (MPa) # 1.5 Gmat(e/D)
Shear strength tyz rup
(MPa)
Shear modulus: Gyz
(MPa)
Compression strength:
sz rup (MPa)
a
Nomex® is a product of Du Pont de Nemours.
Trang 7The processing can be facilitated using the method of overexpansion which
modifies the configuration of the cells as shown in Figure 4.14
At limit of curvature, R is the radius of the contour, and e is the thickness
of the sheets which consitute the honeycombs (see Figure 4.15) Nomex
honey-combs (sheets of bonded polyamide) must be processed at high temperature The
schematic for the processing of a structural part of sandwich honeycomb is as in
Figure 4.16 For moderate loadings (for example, bulkheads), it is possible to fold
a sandwich panel following the schematic in Figure 4.17
Figure 4.14 Over-Expansion of Honeycomb
Figure 4.15 Curvature of Honeycomb
Figure 4.16 Processing of a Sandwich Piece of a Structural Part
Trang 8When a composite structure (for example, a reservoir under pressure) is subjected to loading, many microcracks can occur within the piece Microcracking
in the resin, fiber fracture, and disbond between fiber and matrix can exist even within the admissible loading range These ruptures create acoustic waves that propagate to the surface of the piece They can be detected and analyzed using
acoustic emission sensors (see Figure 4.22)
The number of peaks as well as the duration and the amplitude of the signal can be used to indicate the integrity of the piece In addition, the accumulated number of peaks may be used to predict the fracture of the piece (i.e., the change
of slope of the curve in Figure 4.23)
Figure 4.19 Some Links for Sandwich Structures
Figure 4.20 Honeycomb Repair
Trang 9Figure 4.21 Principal Nondestructive Testing Methods
Trang 10Figure 4.21 (Continued).
Trang 115 CONCEPTION AND DESIGN
A different paradigm: As every mechanical part, a composite part has to withstand loadings In addition, the conception process has to extend over a range much larger than for a component made of “pre-established” material In fact,
For isotropic materials, the classical process of conception consists of selection of an existing material and then design of the piece
For a component made of composites, the designer “creates” the material based on the functional requirements The designer chooses the reinforce-ment, the matrix, and the process for curing
Following that the designer must define the component architecture, i.e., the arrangement and dimensions of plies, the representation of these on the designs, etc These subjects are covered in this chapter
5.1 DESIGN OF A COMPOSITE PIECE
The following characteristic properties always have to be kept in mind by the designer:
Fiber orientation enables the optimization of the mechanical behavior along
a specific direction
The material is elastic up to rupture It cannot yield by local plastic deformation as can classical metallic materials
Fatigue resistance is excellent
A Very Good Fatigue Resistance
The specific fatigue resistance is expressed by the ratio (s/r), with r being the specific mass For composite materials, this specific resistance is three times higher than for aluminum alloys and two times higher than that of high strength steel and titanium alloys because the fatigue resistance is equal to 90% of the static fracture strength for a composite, instead of 35% for aluminum alloys and 50% for steels and titanium alloys (see Figure 5.1).1
1
See Section 5.4.4.
Trang 12Figure 5.2 Comparison of Characteristics of Different Materials
Figure 5.3 Specific Characteristics of Different Fibers
Trang 135.2 THE LAMINATE
Recall that laminates result in the superposition of many layers, or plies, or sheets, made of unidirectional layers, fabrics or mats, with proper orientations in each ply This is the operation of hand-lay-up
5.2.1 Unidirectional Layers and Fabrics
Unidirectional layersare as shown in Figure 5.4 The advantages of unidirec-tional layers are:
They have high rigidity (maximum number of fibers in one direction)
The ply can be used to wrap over long distance Then the load transmission
of the fibers is continuous over large distance
They have less waste
The disadvantages of unidirectional layers are
The time for wrapping is long
One cannot cover complex shapes using wrapping
Example: Carbon/epoxy unidirectionals: Width 300 or 1000 mm, preimpreg-nated with resin; usable over a few years when stored at cold temperature (–18∞C)
Fabrics can be found in rolls in dry form or impregnated with resin (Figure 5.5) The advantages of fabrics are
Reduced wrapping time
Possibility to shape complex form using the deformation of the fabric
Possibility to combine different types of fibers in the same fabric
The disadvantages of fabrics are
Lower modulus and strength than the case of unidirectionals
Larger amount of waste material after cutting
Requirement of joints when wrapping large parts
Figure 5.4 Unidirectional Layer
Trang 14Figure 5.6 Effect of Ply Orientation
Figure 5.7 Bad Design
Trang 155.2.3.2 Middle Plane
By definition the middle plane is the one that separates two half-thicknesses of the laminate In Figure 5.11, the middle plane is the plane x–y On this plane, z = 0
5.2.3.3 Description of Plies
The description of plies is done by beginning with the lowest ply on the side z < 0
and proceeding to the uppermost ply of the side z > 0 In so doing,
Each ply is noted by its orientation
The successive plies are separated by a slash “/”
Figure 5.8 Mediocre Design
Figure 5.9 Good Design
Figure 5.10 Common Orientations
Trang 165.2.3.4.1 What Is the Need of Midplane Symmetry
For the construction of laminated pieces, the successive impregnated plies are stacked at ambient temperature, then they are placed within an autoclave for curing
At high temperature, the extension of the whole laminate takes place without warping However, during cooling, the plies have a tendency to contract differently depending on their orientations From this, thermal residual stresses occur
When midplane symmetry is utilized, it imposes the symmetry on these stresses and prevents the deformations of the whole part, for example, warping as shown
in Figure 5.12
5.2.3.5 Particular Cases of Balanced Fabrics
Some laminates are made partially or totally of layers of balanced fabric One then needs to describe on the drawing the composition of the laminate
Example:
The previous laminate, made up of three layers of balanced fabric, has midplane symmetry In effect, if one considers one woven fabric layer as equivalent to two series of unidirectional layers crossed at 90∞, it also has midplane symmetry.3
Figure 5.12 Effect of Laminate Lay-up on Deformation
3
If this hypothesis is to be verified for a plain weave or a taffeta (see Section 3.4.1), and even for a ribbed twill, it becomes worse as long as the pitch of the weaving machine increases (pitch of the plain weave: 2; ribbed twill: 3; 4-harness satin: 4; 5-harness satin: 5; etc.) If one supposes that this pitch is increasing towards infinity, then the woven fabric becomes the superposition of two unidirectional layers crossed at 90 ∞ It then does not possess midplane symmetry any more This property can be observed on a unique ply of 5-harness satin of carbon/epoxy as it is cured in an autoclave, which deforms (curved surface) on demolding (see Application 18.2.17).
Trang 17As indicated in Section 3.4.2, one can consider the resulting laminate in two different ways4:
(a) Each layer of fabric is replaced by two identical plies crossed at 90∞,
each with thickness equal to half the thickness e of the fabric layer and
each with known elastic properties This representation is convenient for the determination of the elastic properties of the laminate One then has the equivalencies shown in Figure 5.13
(b) Each layer of fabric is replaced by one anisotropic ply with thickness e
for which one knows the elastic properties and failure strengths This representation is useful for the determination of the rupture stress of the laminate One then has the equivalencies shown in Figure 5.14
5.2.3.6 Technological Minimum
Generally one uses a minimum amount of plies (from 5 to 10%) for each direction:
0∞, 90∞, 45∞, -45∞ The minimum thickness of a laminate5
should be of the order
of one millimeter, for example, eight unidirectional layers, or three to four layers
of balanced fabric of carbon/epoxy
5.2.4 Arrangement of Plies
The proportion and the number of plies to place along each of the directions — 0∞,
90∞, 45∞, -45∞—take into account the mechanical loading that is applied to the laminate at the location under consideration A current case consists of loading
Figure 5.13 Laminate with Balanced Fabrics; Representation 1
4
See Exercises 18.2.9 and 18.2.10.
5
Apart from space applications, where thicknesses are very small, the skins of sandwich plates are laminates which do not have separately midplane symmetry.
Trang 18might not be compatible with minimum weight One will see in Section 5.4 guidelines for proportions values that allows a laminate with minimum laminate thickness to support specified mechanical loading without damage,
Once a laminate is defined (number of layers and orientations), one must respect the following conditions (without forgetting the technological minimum indicated
at the end of the previous paragraph) as much as possible:
90∞ plies placed on the surface, then 45∞ and -45∞ plies, when the pre-dominant stress resultant is oriented along the 0∞ direction
No more than 4 consecutive plies along the same direction
5.2.4.1 Example of Representation
The plies are progressively terminated to obtain a gradual change in thickness (maximum 2 plies for each 6 mm interval) The symbols for the composition of
the laminate are shown on plan view (see Figure 5.16)
5.2.4.2 The Case of Sandwich Structure
The description of the sandwich material is done as in Figure 5.17
5.3 FAILURE OF LAMINATES
5.3.1 Damages
Figure 5.18 shows schematically different types of failure leading to damage of a laminate
The main modes of damage, when the loads exceed the critical limits, are illus-trated in Figure 5.19
Figure 5.16 Example of Representation