1. Trang chủ
  2. » Nông - Lâm - Ngư

Encyclopedia Of Animal Science - I potx

21 268 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 21
Dung lượng 3,11 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

THE IMMUNE SYSTEM The cells of the immune system and their responses to infection are obviously complex, but can be partitioned into two separate but interacting components those that pr

Trang 1

Immune System: Nutrition Effects

The National Research Council (NRC) nutrient

require-ments for animals can be defined as nutrient levels

adequate to permit the maintenance of normal health and

productivity Failure to provide a diet that fulfills the

minimal requirements established by the NRC for any

nutrient will ultimately immunocompromise the animal

and render it more susceptible to infectious disease

Because nutrient requirements to support optimal

produc-tivity are well defined, marked deficiencies in protein,

amino acids, or trace nutrients are not likely to occur in

animals reared in commercial situations However, the

nutrient requirements for optimal productivity may not

equal those for optimal immunity because the NRC

requirements have been determined from experiments

conducted in laboratory situations where infectious

disease is minimal Thus, an important issue that has

been the focus of nutritional immunology research is

whether specific nutrients fed at or above

NRC-recom-mended levels could be used to modulate the animal’s

immune system in a beneficial manner

THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

The cells of the immune system and their responses to

infection are obviously complex, but can be partitioned

into two separate but interacting components those that

provide innate immunity and those that provide acquired

(or adaptive) immunity (Fig 1) Both components are

influenced by nutrition (Table 1)

The component of the immune system that protects the

host animal but does not distinguish one pathogen from

another provides innate immunity For example,

macro-phages recognize pathogens using relatively

indiscrimi-nant receptors They ingest and degrade microorganisms,

and provide important signals (e.g., cytokines) that

orchestrate other aspects of the immune response The

innate immune system is inherent and the capacity of it to

respond does not change or improve from the first

encounter with a particular pathogen to the second

encounter Neutrophils and natural killer (NK) cells arealso important for innate immunity

Acquired immunity is a highly specific response to aspecific pathogen that is acquired over time due to previousexposure to that same pathogen or through vaccination.Fully differentiated B lymphocytes (i.e., plasma cells) se-crete pathogen-specific antibodies, whereas T lymphocytesuse discrete receptors to recognize and kill infected cells oractivate other cells of the immune system The initialexposure to a pathogen produces lymphocytes with immu-nological memory so that if the pathogen is encountered asecond time, a rapid response is initiated and the pathogen

is eliminated before visible signs of infection appear

Arginine is considered a semiessential amino acid forhumans and other mammals because it is synthesized fromother amino acids via the urea cycle However, exogenousarginine is required for growth in young animals and invarious stress situations (e.g., sepsis, trauma) to optimizegrowth and minimize nitrogen excretion Arginine is adirect precursor of nitric oxide (NO), a potent cytotoxicagent produced by macrophages and neutrophils tokill bacteria

Although glutamine is not an indispensable amino acidfor growth of animals, it may be conditionally essential

DOI: 10.1081/E EAS 120019687

Copyright D 2005 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved.

Trang 2

in times of immune system activation Glutamine is

essential for the normal functioning of macrophages and

lymphocytes during an immune response The requirement

for glutamine in these cells is due to the increased

metabolic activity following stimulation by an infectious

pathogen Accelerated metabolism is necessary to

facil-itate cell division and the secretion of antibodies and

cytokines all processes that require amino acids and

energy Glutamine is a primary carrier of nitrogen in the

blood, and its concentration is generally maintained

within a relatively small range However, during catabolic

states like sepsis, there is an increased demand for

glutamine as a substrate for cells of the immune system

Lipids

High-fat diets reduce lymphocyte proliferation compared

to low-fat diets, but the precise effects depend on the

amount and type of fat There are two major classes of

polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) the n-6 and the n-3

families Linoleic acid is the precursor of the n-6 family,

and is found in plant oils, including corn and soybean oil

In animals, linoleic acid is converted to arachidonic acid,

which can account for 25% of the total fatty acids in the

plasma membranes of immune cells The amount of

arachidonic acid in the plasma membrane of immune cells

is important because it is the precursor of several

prostaglandins and leukotrienes that have potent

inflam-matory effects The precursor of the n-3 PUFAs

is a-linolenic acid, which in animal tissues is converted

to eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids As

op-posed to n-6 PUFAs, which are inflammatory, n-3 PUFAsare anti-inflammatory

Diets rich in n-3 PUFAs decrease inflammation in

at least two ways First, diets rich in n-3 PUFAs increasemembrane levels of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexa-enoic acids at the expense of arachidonic acid Thus,when immune cells are stimulated, there is less arachi-donic acid available to generate prostaglandins andleukotrienes, which are inflammatory in nature Second,eicosapentaenoic acid is a substrate for the same enzymesthat metabolize arachidonic acid However, the products

of eicosapentaenoic acid metabolism are less tory than those derived from arachidonic acid

inflamma-Although it may be useful to consume high levels ofn-3 PUFAs to decrease inflammation associated withautoimmune and neoplastic disease, or to reduce the risk

of heart disease, these conditions are not especiallyrelevant to food-animal production, and the immunosup-pression may render animals more susceptible to infec-tious disease Thus, inclusion of fish or other n-3 PUFA-rich oils in animal diets should be approached withcaution to avoid increased incidence of infections

Zinc

Zinc (Zn) is a component of at least 300 enzymes,and inadequate intake of Zn renders animals severelyimmunodeficient and highly susceptible to infection Bothinnate and acquired immunity are inhibited by Zn de-ficiency Some studies suggest that the Zn required foroptimum immunity is higher than that for optimumproductivity For example, in humans daily Zn supple-mentation reduced the incidence and duration of diarrheaand reduced the incidence of acute and lower respiratoryinfections Furthermore, strains of mice that are geneticallysusceptible to infection by a certain pathogen can be maderesistant by consuming a Zn-enriched diet However,adverse effects of Zn excess on lymphocyte proliferationand chemotaxis and phagocytosis of neutrophils are

Fig 1 The immune system can be partitioned into two separate

but interacting components that which provides innate immu

nity and that which provides acquired immunity Both innate and

acquired immunity can be modulated by nutrition

Table 1 Several nutrients with well documentedimmunomodulatory effects

Primary immunologicalfunction

in blood

Vitamin Eand Selenium

[3] Enhance humoral and

cell mediated immunity andinhibit inflammatorycytokine production

Trang 3

possible, and beneficial immunological effects of excess

Zn have not been clearly demonstrated in livestock

Iron and Copper

The effect of iron (Fe) on immunocompetence is not as

clear as that of Zn; however, generally speaking, an

imbalance in Fe intake either too much or too little

decreases immunity One of the acute responses induced

by infection is hypoferremia The inflammatory cytokines

released by activated macrophages cause Fe to be

se-questered Because Fe is a rate-limiting nutrient for the

growth of several pathogenic microorganisms, its removal

from blood and temporary storage in compartments that

are not accessible to pathogens is considered part of the

host defense Iron-binding proteins chelate the most Fe;

however, supplementation can saturate these proteins,

leaving excess Fe available to pathogens

Copper (Cu) status is determined primarily by the plasma

concentration of the acute-phase protein ceruloplasmin

The inflammatory cytokines induce synthesis of

cerulo-plasmin Therefore, whereas infection decreases circulating

Fe, it increases circulating Cu The increase in plasma Cu

may be to enhance lymphocyte responses because Cu

deficiency reduces production of IL-2 a cytokine that acts

in an autocrine manner to promote T-cell proliferation To

our best knowledge, there have been no studies clearly

demonstrating that the Cu required for optimum immunity

is higher than that for optimum production

Vitamin E and Selenium

The primary role of vitamin E in nutrition is to protect cell

membranes from peroxidative damage, whereas Se is an

integral component of glutathione peroxidase Vitamin E

and Se also play an active role in the host’s response to

infection Vitamin-E and Se supplementation in excess of

minimal requirements may increase both innate and

acquired immunity and offer protection against certain

pathogens such as influenza However, feeding a vitamin

E level 50 times the NRC requirement did not afford pigs

protection from the effects of porcine reproductive and

respiratory syndrome virus infection on growth

perform-ance, cytokine production, or certain hematological traits

(e.g., white blood cell counts) Nonetheless, vitamin E

reduces the production of certain inflammatory

cy-tokines and inhibits some behavioral signs of sickness

Thus, in certain instances vitamin-E supplementation may

be beneficial

Vitamin A

Vitamin-A deficiency severely compromises the integrity

of mucosal epithelial cells in the respiratory,

gastrointes-tinal, and uterine tracts In the respiratory tract, ciliated

columnar epithelium with mucus and goblet cells traps

and removes inhaled microorganisms In animals deficient

in vitamin A, ciliated epithelial cells are replaced bystratified, keratinized epithelium, and there is a decrease

in mucin Similarly, in the small intestine, vitamin-Adeficiency results in a loss of microvilli, goblet cells, andmucin Other effects of vitamin-A deficiency on innateimmunity include changes in epidermal keratins thatdisrupt skin barrier function; defects in chemotaxis,adhesion, phagocytosis, and the ability to produce reactiveoxygen species in neutrophils; decreased number of NKcells and cytotoxicity; and a decrease in the expression ofthe receptor that recognizes Gram-negative bacteria aswell as the secretion of inflammatory cytokines bymacrophages and monocytes

An adequate level of vitamin A is also necessary tosupport acquired immunity The growth and activation of

B cells require retinol Pigs deficient in vitamin Asynthesize less than one-tenth of the amount of antibodyproduced by pigs fed vitamin A fortified diets Infectionwith Trichinella spiralisa normally induces a strong Thelper type 2-like response (i.e., high levels of parasite-specific IgG and production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10), but

in vitamin-A deficiency an inappropriately strong T helpertype 1 like response (i.e., production of interferon-g andIL-12) is induced

CONCLUSION

The nutrient requirements determined to support optimalproductivity of healthy animals may fall short of thoseneeded to promote optimal immune responses in animalschallenged by infectious disease It may be possible todevelop diets that promote optimal immune responses.What is considered optimal may change from oneproduction system to another, or even within a system,depending on the disease environment at a given time.The goal should not always be to minimize the immuneresponse, for in certain environments this would result inincreased incidence of infection Similarly, the goalshould not always be to maximize the immune responsebecause an overzealous response to nonpathogenic stimulican be counterproductive

REFERENCES

1 Johnson, R.W.; Escobar, J.; Webel, D.M Nutrition andImmunology of Swine In Swine Nutrition, 2nd Ed.; Lewis,A.J., Southern, L.L., Eds.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton,2001; 545 562

2 Calder, P.C.; Grimble, R.F Polyunsaturated fatty acids,inflammation and immunity Eur J Clin Nutr 2002, 56(Suppl 3), S14 S19

3 Meydani, S.N.; Beharka, A.A Recent developments in vitamin E and immune response Nutr Rev 1998, 56, S49 S58

Trang 4

Immune System: Stress Effects

Stress has been difficult to define because of its dual

function in life It can be a positive influence that satisfies

a need for excitement (environmental enrichment) or a

negative influence that interferes with homeostasis and

life functions The latter is referred to as a state of distress

Our use of stress will refer to this darker side of stress The

interaction between stress and the immune system is a

conundrum because of the negative impact that stress can

have on immune functions, and because active immune

responses can be stressors in and of themselves Stress can

also activate or suppress immune responses depending on

the degree and persistence of the stressor; the species, age,

sex, and genetics of the subject; and the immune cells that

are the targets of the stress Not all stressors result in the

same immune response, such as isolation compared to

restraint stress But, in general, most psychological and

environmental stressors lead to impaired immune

func-tions, especially those that regulate inflammatory and

cytotoxic responses The deleterious effects of stress are

readily observed at an early gene expression level in cells

of the innate (not requiring prior exposure to foreign

antigen) and adaptive (requiring prior exposure to foreign

antigen) immune systems Thus, stress-immune

interac-tions usually have significant physiological consequences

even before behavioral or gross pathogenic changes are

observed

TWO MAJOR PATHWAYS OF

THE STRESS RESPONSE

The degree to which homeostasis becomes unbalanced

and leads to distress[1]is largely influenced by the impact

of stress hormones on target cells Glucocorticoids

(primarily cortisol in farm animals) are the main effector

endpoints of the neuroendocrine response to stressors,[2]

and result from activation of the

hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Fig 1) Systemic cortisol

concen-trations increase several minutes after a perceived threat

and can last for a number of hours and recur in waves if

the threat (stressor) is not removed The well-known inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of cortisolmay serve as physiological downregulators of initiatedimmune responses following infection or tissue damage.[3]However, contemporary management stressors that sig-nificantly and repeatedly activate the HPA axis inotherwise healthy animals cause pronounced changes inimmune cell physiology, leading to disease susceptibilityand clinical pathology

anti-Another pathway that mediates stress responses inanimals is the sympatho-adrenal axis (Fig 1) Activation

of this neurotransmitter axis results in release of renergic hormones (mainly the catecholamines, adrena-line, and noradrenaline) from the medullae of the adrenalglands and from nerves that innervate lymphoid tissuesand blood vessels Catecholamine secretion occurs sec-onds following perceived threats, enabling rapid increases

ad-in heart and respiration rate and constriction of smallblood vessels in peripheral tissues to increase blood flow

to the brain, liver, and muscles, and enhancing awarenessand athletic prowess to facilitate the fight-or-flightresponse.[4]However, like HPA axis activation, catechol-amine responses may be inappropriate and harmful toimmunity and health in the context of exposure torecurring or chronic stressors

TWO ARMS OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEMAFFECTED BY STRESS

Molecules such as cytokines, chemokines, adhesionmolecules, major histocompatability complexes (MHC),and antibodies link the innate and adaptive arms of theimmune system (Fig 2) The innate immune systemprovides the first line of immune defense and is composedprimarily of neutrophils, macrophages, and dendriticcells Under nonstress conditions, these professionalphagocytes gain rapid entry into infected tissues to clearpathogens by receptor-mediated phagocytosis, leading tothe production of free radicals and the release of enzymesthat kill the ingested microorganisms The adaptiveimmune system is primarily composed of B and T

DOI: 10.1081/E EAS 120019688 Copyright D 2005 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved.

Trang 5

lymphocytes, which require prior exposure to pathogens

for immune activation The B lymphocytes (B cells)

produce and secrete antibodies, which are particularly

effective in protecting animals against extracellular

pathogens The T lymphocytes are made up of several

subpopulations Helper T cells of the type I class (THI)

participate in inflammatory, cytotoxic, and some antibody

responses Helper T cells of the type II class (THII)

facilitate primarily antibody-mediated responses

Cyto-toxic T cells (TC) and their innate counterparts, the natural

killer (NK) cells, lyse and kill host cells infected withintracellular viruses and bacteria Less well-definedgamma delta-T cells (gd T cells) appear to have tissuehealing and immune-modulating roles that vary insignificance across species

STRESS AFFECTS GENE EXPRESSION

IN IMMUNE CELLS

Glucocorticoids (GC) such as cortisol act by regulatingexpression of multiple GC-sensitive genes and thus theexpression of proteins that determine the phenotype andfunction of cells responsible for coordinating the body’sresponse to stress Gene expression regulation results fromthe binding of GC to its receptor (GR), found primarily inthe cytoplasm of target cells, with subsequent transloca-tion of the hormone-activated GR into the nucleus It ishere that GR has its major effects on gene expression, byinteracting either directly (GR-DNA binding, as shown inFig 3) or indirectly (GR-other protein-DNA binding; notshown) with regulatory DNA in and around GC-sensitivegenes Glucocorticoids both induce and inhibit theexpression of sensitive target genes, depending on thegene and the target cell affected Thus, blood cortisolconcentrations resulting from a stress response can havepronounced effects on immunity through altered expres-sion of hundreds of immune cell genes

Phagocytic cells, THI cells, and gd T cells seem to beparticularly sensitive to the potent anti-inflammatory andimmunosuppressive properties of stress cortisol, which:

Fig 1 Environmental and psychological stressors activate the

hypothalamus pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and sympatho adre

nal axis

Fig 2 Two arms of the immune system are affected by stress

Trang 6

1) downregulates the expression of multiple chemokines

responsible for recruitment of innate immune cells into

infected tissue; 2) inhibits expression of leukocyte

adhesion molecules responsible for migration of

circulat-ing innate immune cells into infected tissues and adaptive

immune cells into inflamed lymph nodes; 3) alters the

expression of apoptosis genes in most immune cells,

thereby changing their numbers in primary and secondary

lymphoid tissues and blood; 4) inhibits expression of key

pro-inflammatory cytokines, upsetting the balance of TH

I-based inflammatory/cytotoxic responses in favor of TH

II-based antibody responses; and 5) downregulates MHC II

expression on key antigen presenting cells (macrophages,

dendritic cells) normally responsible for alerting THI cells

to an infection.[5]

More immediate immune regulation is induced by

stress through the actions of catacholamines In addition to

circulating catacholamines secreted by the adrenal

medullae in response to stress (Fig 1), sympathetic nerve

fibers from the central nervous system innervate primary

and secondary lymphoid tissues providing direct ‘‘hits’’

of these neurotransmitters to developing B and T cells

Blood vessels are also innervated, so stress

catachol-amines influence the trafficking of leukocytes between

lymphoid compartments and peripheral tissues by

influ-encing gene expression in vascular endothelial cells The

most common of these in stressed farm animals are

increased circulating neutrophil numbers, which drive

similar increases in blood neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios.Variable decreases in blood TH:TC cell ratios are alsoobserved in stressed animals, but these ratios may bemore responsive to cortisol than to catacholamines.Adrenoreceptors for the catacholamines are expressed

by each of these immune cells and may be partlyresponsible for the acute alterations in lymphoid tissuecellularity, leukocyte trafficking patterns, and cytokineand antibody networks observed in some stressedanimals.[4–7] Compared to glucocorticoids, however,relatively little information is available on molecularmechanisms used by catacholamines to change leukocytebiology and immune responses

STRESS EFFECTS ON THEIMMUNE RESPONSE

Given that stress hormones modify expression patterns ofhundreds of immune genes, it is reasonable to speculatethat stress also has complex and pleiotropic effects ondisease resistance through its effects on innate and adapt-ive immune responses Several examples can be cited tosubstantiate this speculation One is that glucocorticoidsinterfere with activation of adaptive immune responses,including those to vaccinations,[8] via their negative ef-fects on MHC expression, cytokine expression, and the

T :T ratio in blood In addition, the combined actions of

Fig 3 Immune cells respond to stress by expressing cytoplasmic receptors (GR) for glucocorticoids (GC) such as cortisol Cortisolreadily crosses the plasma membrane of cells (step 1) and binds tightly with GR (step 2) This activates GRs to dimerize with anotherhormone bound receptor (step 3), enabling them to translocate into the cell’s nucleus (step 4), where they interact directly (shown in step5) or indirectly (through interaction with other transcription factors; not shown) with promoters of GC responsive genes This interactionwith promoter DNA enables GR to influence transcription of the target gene, either inducing (step 6) or suppressing (not shown)expression of mRNA for the gene When mRNA abundance is increased or decreased by GR, increased abundance or reducedavailability of protein encoded by the affected gene (steps 7 and 8) can alter the phenotype and thus the function of the cell (step 9)

Trang 7

catacholamines and glucocorticoids on adhesion molecule

expression by vascular endothelial cells and circulating

neutrophils prevents this first line of immune defense

from gaining access to infected tissues, leaving animals

susceptible to diseases caused by opportunistic pathogens

The macrophage barrier to infection in peripheral tissues

is also compromised during stress because glucocorticoids

inhibit expression of key inflammatory molecules,

in-cluding prostaglandins, chemokines, cytokines, and free

radicals, which normally clear pathogens, initiate

neut-rophil recruitment to the site, and activate appropriate

adaptive immune responses Glucocorticoids also

dramat-ically reduce circulating numbers of gd T cells in

rumi-nants and alter the expression of key apoptosis genes to

induce death in developing T cells and longevity in

cir-culating neutrophils This partly accounts for the altered

tissue and circulating cell numbers during stress Some

degree of species specificity is evident in responses of the

immune system to stress.[9] However, these changes in

leukocyte numbers and their altered ability to

communi-cate with each other through chemokines, cytokines,

ad-hesion molecules, MHC complexes, and other

inflamma-tory mediators occur in most farm animals when blood

glucocorticoids and catacholamine concentrations

in-crease, leaving stressed animals at risk for diseases caused

by bacteria, virus, and parasites

CONCLUSION

Whereas endocrine factors that link the stress and immune

systems are beginning to be elucidated, phenotypic

responses of the whole immune system to stress are not

well understood and are often unpredictable.[10] Past

studies in the animal sciences have mostly focused on

measuring altered proportions of blood leukocytes as

potential biological indicators of physiological stress and

disease susceptibility However, most of the indicators

studied have been used with little biological justification

Rather, indicators such as the ratios of TH:TClymphocytes

or neutrophil:lympocyte in blood have been used because

researchers have the technology to perform such

measure-ments and can show impressive changes in them due to

imposed stressors Whereas these measurements may

indicate that changes are occurring in the animals, they are

incomplete and not diagnostic of the overall

immunophys-iological response to stress Part of the current lack of

ability to prevent stress-related disease in farm animals is

our lack of basic knowledge about what stress hormones

do to leukocytes at the molecular level Future prevention

and treatment of stress-related infectious diseases will

undoubtedly require that animal science researchers move

beyond the study of isolated cellular phenomena to more

holistic studies of genome-level changes that occur in

specific leukocytes in response to glucocorticoids, cholamines, and other stress mediators and explain thecells’ dysfunctions

cata-ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors extend thanks to Sally Madsen and JenniferJacob for contributing to the development of Figs 2 and 3

ARTICLES OF FURTHER INTEREST

Environment: Effects on Animal Health, p 335Molecular Biology: Animal, p 653

REFERENCES

1 Moberg, G.P Biological Response to Stress: Implicationsfor Animal Welfare In The Biology of Animal Stress BasicPrinciples and Implications for Animal Welfare; Moberg,G.P., Mench, J.A., Eds.; CABI Publishing: New York,2000; 1 21

2 Eskandari, F.; Sternberg, E.M Neural immune interactions

in health and disease Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002, 966,

20 27

3 O’Connor, T.M.; O’Halloran, D.J.; Shanahan, F The stressresponse and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis:From molecule to melancholia Q J Med 2000, 93,

323 333

4 Kohm, A.P.; Sanders, V.M Norepinephrine and beta

2 adrenergic receptor stimulation regulate CD4 + T and Blymphocyte function in vitro and in vivo Pharmacol Rev

2001, 53 (4), 487 525

5 Burton, J.L.; Erskine, R.J Mastitis and immunity: Somenew ideas for an old disease Veterinary Clinics of NorthAmerica Food Anim Pract 2003, 19, 1 45

6 Elenkov, I.J.; Wilder, R.L.; Chrousos, G.P.; Vizi, E.S Thesympathetic nerve An integrative interface between twosupersystems: The brain and the immune system Pharmacol Rev 2000, 52 (4), 595 638

7 Bergmann, M.; Sautner, T Immunomodulatory effects

of vasoactive catecholamines Wien Klin Wochenschr

2002, 114 (17 18), 752 761

8 Kehrli, M.E.; Burton, J.L.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Lee, E.K.Effects of stress on leukocyte trafficking and immuneresponses: Implications for vaccination Adv Vet Med

Trang 8

Higher species have the evolutionary benefit of an

immune system that comprises both innate and acquired

components Whereas the innate immune system confers

initial protection, the acquired immune system provides a

second line of defense against infectious organisms.[1,2]

The acquired immune system is activated once

macro-phages, dendritic cells, and other antigen-presenting cells

(APCs) process foreign antigens (i.e., the products derived

from infectious organisms, tumors, vaccines, etc.) Many

APCs also transport the foreign antigen into regional

immune lymph nodes.[3] APCs initiate adaptive immune

responses by interacting with different populations of T

and B cells

IMMUNE CELL SUBSETS AND MARKERS

Table 1 outlines the differences between the innate and the

adaptive, or acquired, immune response Figure 1 shows

some of the blood cell subsets involved in immune

responses Immune cell subsets are designated by their

cluster of differentiation (CD) antigen markers,

recog-nized by monoclonal antibodies (e.g., CD4 + T helper

cells, CD25 + activation antigen, CD1 + dendritic cells,

CD172 + macrophages).aT cells express the CD3 antigen

and the T cell receptor (TCR) B cells produce

immunoglobulins (Igs); some express them on their

surface as part of the B cell receptor (BCR) The variant

antigen-binding T and B cell receptors the TCR and

Ig are complex; in the genome they are encoded as sets

of gene segments coding for variable and constant

regions.[2,3] To have an active TCR or Ig expressed,

multiple gene rearrangements must take place in eachindividual cell Each TCR has two antigen-bindingpolypeptides the TCR alpha and beta or gamma anddelta gene complexes The gdTCR + T cells and abTCR +

T cells are active in innate and adaptive immuneresponses, respectively Each Ig also has four antigen-binding polypeptides, two heavy and two light chains.[4]bThere are different Ig isotypes defined by their heavychains (e.g., IgA, IgM, IgD, IgE, and multiple IgGisotypes) on B cells or in blood and mucosal secretions.The diversity of TCR and Ig expression adds to immunediversity, enabling the acquired immune system torespond to a broad array of immune molecules

IMMUNE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

As it matures, the fetus develops its immune organs.Lymphocytes are generated in the primary lymphoidorgans: the bone marrow, thymus, and intestinal Peyer’spatches.[2,3]T and B lymphocytes from these tissues thenstart circulating and eventually localize in peripheral orsecondary immune tissues, where adaptive, or acquired,immune responses take place Effective immune re-sponses require immune cells to be localized in secondarylymphoid organs The neonate requires time for itsimmune tissues to become mature Because of their lack

of immune system development, neonates are typicallymore susceptible than older animals to respiratory orintestinal infections Probiotics have been developed toassist in maturing the intestinal immune tissues Cytokinesand chemokines serve as lymphoid tissue hormones andhelp to regulate immune system development anddifferentiation.[5]

Once a foreign antigen (i.e., an antigen produced frominfectious microbes or vaccine preparations) enters thebody, it is encountered by an APC a dendritic cell ormacrophage and is transported to the local lymphoid

b The VIC IUIS Comparative Immunoglobulin Workshop [CIgW] Committee maintains a website on immunoglobulins, Fc receptors and their genes for veterinary species (http://www.medicine.uiowa.edu/cigw/).

a The Veterinary Immunology Committee of International Union of

Immunological Societies (VIC IUIS) maintains a series of websites for

immune reagent information (Pig website: http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~lvkh/

welpig.htm; cattle: www.iah.bbsrc.ac.uk/leucocyte/bovsite.html; horses:

www.vetmed.wisc.edu/research/eirh; other websites are under develop

ment.) The Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigens (HLDA8)

Animal Homologues Workshop (www.hlda8.org) is underway to expand

the CD markers and species tested for cross reaction of anti human CD

markers on other species cells.

DOI: 10.1081/E EAS 120019689 Published 2005 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved.

Trang 9

organ, the lymph node, spleen, or specialized lymphoid

tissues in the gut or respiratory sites In these secondary

lymphoid sites the foreign antigen is presented by APCs to

T and B cells and an acquired immune response is

initiated Many immune cells excrete a broad range of

cytokines and chemokines, such as the interferons (IFNs)

and interleukins (ILs), that activate the immune system

and encourage cells to migrate and localize to the area of

infection or tumor growth.[5]

MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY

COMPLEX (MHC) ANTIGENS

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens

or the swine, dog or bovine leukocyte antigens (SLA,

DLA or BoLA) are highly polymorphic, cell-surface

antigens involved in antigen presentation.[4]cClass I MHC

antigens are expressed on most cells, whereas class II

MHC antigens are preferentially expressed on APC The

MHC genes are localized close together in the genome

Animals are usually MHC heterozygous, having two

alleles at each of the multiple classes I and II genes.[3,4]

Each animal expresses several class I MHC molecules,

each of which is highly polymorphic Class II genes are

encoded by several linked loci, the DR and DQ alpha and

beta genes This wide diversity of MHC antigens is

thought to be needed to handle the enormous number of

foreign antigens that an animal encounters

INITIATION OF ADAPTIVE T CELL IMMUNITY

Innate immune responses help to control and eliminateinfectious organisms, yet they are not always completelyeffective However, even if the innate response is not fullyprotective, it results in the activation of the adaptive im-mune response Numerous innate signals (e.g., Toll-like re-ceptor (TLR) signaling, chemokines, and cytokines) attractimmune cells to the local tissues where they are activated,causing the more complex, adaptive immune response Tostimulate adaptive immunity, foreign antigens must first beprocessed into peptide fragments by APC; the resultingfragments associate with MHC class I or II antigens and arepresented to the TCR In most cases, class I MHC binds in-ternally processed foreign antigens, such as cell-processedviral or parasite peptides, whereas MHC class II presentsexternally generated peptides, such as vaccine peptides(Table 2) CD8 + T cells respond to class I MHC presentedforeign antigens; CD4+ T cells respond to class II MHC.[2,3]The way in which the animal’s immune system initiallyreacts to an infectious pathogen is critical; it determineswhether a protective, or an ineffective, or even a path-ogenic, immune response will be mounted The intensity

of the response to foreign antigen peptides is dependent

on the strength of immunostimulation This is determined

by the immunogenicity of the foreign peptide and thestrength of the MHC-antigen complex, as well as on thefrequency of TCRs that recognize that complex.[2,3]

POLARIZATION OF T CELLCYTOKINE RESPONSES

Cytokines are secreted by immune cells and can eitherstimulate or suppress the activity of immune cells andalter each cell’s pattern of cytokine expression.[5] They

Table 1 Comparison of innate immunity to acquired, or adaptive, immunity

Antigen independent

Narrow antigen specificityAntigen dependent

Enhanced recall responses

Effector proteins Antimicrobial peptides

Acute phase proteins, complementCytokines, chemokines

Cytokines, chemokinesImmunoglobulin (Ig) antibodiesPerforins, granzymes

Granulocytes, neutrophilsNatural killer (NK) cells

APC: dendritic cells, macrophages

T and B cellsRegulatory cell subsets

c The international ImMunoGeneTics project (IMGT) maintains the HLA

website and its IMGT/HLA Sequence Database A related IPD/MHC

sequence database website (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ipd/mhc/index.html)

will be used for MHC sequences of veterinary species.

Trang 10

regulate a broad range of actions resulting in

antigen-specific immune responses, alterations in levels of other

cytokines, chemokine secretion, Ig production and isotype

maturation, eosinophil and mast cell recruitment and

activation, and cytotoxic T cell generation.[3]To

counter-act these mediators of host defense, certain infectious

organisms actually encode their own cytokine modulators

or receptor-blocking proteins

Once activated, CD4 + T cells produce specific sets of

cytokine signals CD4 + T helper 1 (Th1) cells express

the cytokine IFN-g, which is essential for effective

antiviral and bacterial responses (Table 2) In many

species Th1 responses are amplified by the release of

IL-12 Th1 cytokines activate macrophages and naturalkiller cells in response to internally processed antigens.CD4 + Th2 cells stimulate a different set of cytokines,including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in response to externalpeptides These Th2 cytokines increase mast cell andeosinophil numbers and activities and stimulate B cells

to switch to IgA and IgE production, thus enhancinginflammatory and allergic responses

Cytotoxic CD8 + T cells interact with infected cells ortumor cells via antigen presented by class I MHC Cellconjugates stimulate TCR-encoded recognition processes

Fig 1 Cells regulating immune responses Blood immune cells Immune cells that circulate in blood are shown All immune cells inthe blood, the hematopoietic cells, are derived from bone marrow stem cells These hematopoietic stem cells give rise to two mainlineages: one for lymphoid cells (lymphoid progenitor) and one for myeloid cells (myeloid progenitor) The common lymphoidprogenitor will differentiate into either T cells or B cells depending on the tissue to which it travels (homes) In mammals, T cellsdevelop in the thymus while B cells develop in the fetal liver and bone marrow Pigs use special areas of their intestines, termed thePeyer’s patches, for B cell maturation B cells produce the antibodies so crucial to immune and vaccine responses To produceantibodies, B cells must become antibody forming cells (AFC), or plasma cells Innate immune responses are carried out by naturalkiller (NK) cells that also derive from the common lymphoid progenitor cell The myeloid cells differentiate into the committed cells onthe left The platelets help blood to clot and thus heal injured tissue Three other myeloid derived cell types, the monocyte, macrophageand dendritic cells are critical in helping the immune system recognize what is foreign, and thus stimulating specific immune systemresponses Finally, the ‘‘granulocytes’’, a term used for eosinophils, neutrophils and basophils, have specialized functions, e.g.,neutrophils will use antibodies to trap and kill invading bacteria (Picture used with permission of National Hog Farmer.) Adapted fromhttp://www.ed.sc.edu:85/book/immunol sta.htm Courtesy of Department of Pathology & Microbiology, University of South CarolinaSchool of Medicine, Columbia, SC (View this art in color at www.dekker.com.)

Ngày đăng: 02/07/2014, 00:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN