The corrected sentence and corrected Figure 6 appear below: By contrast, the rainbow trout liver RTL cell line showed an EC50 for BNF of 6.1 ± 3.7 nm.. These values increased to 53.4 ± 3
Trang 1The paper by S Boronat et al [1] contains errors on page 3331 The corrected sentence and corrected Figure 6 appear below:
By contrast, the rainbow trout liver (RTL) cell line showed an EC50 for BNF of 6.1 ± 3.7 nm These values increased to 53.4 ± 31.2 nm when the dose–response curve was performed in the presence of 200 lm carbaryl, indicating an antagonistic effect in these cells similar to the one observed for the yeast YCM-RYA system (Fig 6; compare with Fig 3)
Reference
1 Boronat S, Casado S, Navas JM & Pin˜a B (2007) Modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor transactivation by carbaryl, a nonconventional ligand FEBS J 274, 3327–3339
Fig 6 Dose–response curves for BNF in the presence (s) and absence (r) of 200 l M carbaryl in (A) RTL cells and (B) DR-CALUX system Values are average of three independent determinations; bars represent standard deviations.
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4347 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4347