In addition, mutated RGG containing Lys residues replacing Arg residues at specific Arg-Gly-Gly sites and RGG con-taining Arg methylated by protein arginine N-methyltransferase 3 decrease
Trang 1G-quadruplex DNA- and RNA-binding protein
Kentaro Takahama1,*, Katsuhito Kino2,*, Shigeki Arai3, Riki Kurokawa3and Takanori Oyoshi1
1 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University, Japan
2 Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Kagawa, Japan
3 Division of Gene Structure and Function, Saitama Medical University Research Center for Genomic Medicine, Japan
Introduction
The current knowledge of Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS)
derives primarily from studies of a group of dominant
oncogenes that arise due to chromosomal
transloca-tions in which EWS is fused to a variety of cellular
transcription factors [1–3] EWS fusion proteins are
very potent transcription activators that depend on the
EWS N-terminal domain and a C-terminal
DNA-bind-ing domain contributed by the fusion partner [4–9]
EWS⁄ ATF1 is a potent constitutive activator of
ATF-dependent promoters [10] The EWS N-terminal binds
directly to the RNA polymerase II subunit hsRPB7
and this interaction is thought to be important for transactivation [11]
In contrast to EWS fusion proteins, however, the normal function and the nucleic acid-binding proper-ties of EWS remain poorly characterized EWS belongs
to a family that includes the closely related proteins translocated in liposarcoma and the TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 which are involved in several aspects of gene expression [12–15] This protein family contains the transcriptional activation domain
in the N-terminal region and the RNA-binding domain
Keywords
Ewing’s sarcoma; G-quadruplex DNA;
G-quadruplex RNA; RGG motif; RNA-binding
protein
Correspondence
T Oyoshi, Department of Chemistry,
Faculty of Science, Graduate School of
Science, Shizuoka University, 836 Oya,
Suruga, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan
Fax: +81 54 237 3384
Tel: +81 54 238 4760
E-mail: stohyos@ipc.shizuoka.ac.jp
*These authors contributed equally to this
work
(Received 27 August 2010, revised 23
December 2010, accepted 13 January 2011)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08020.x
The Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS) oncogene contains an N-terminal transcrip-tion activatranscrip-tion domain and a C-terminal RNA-binding domain Although the EWS activation domain is a potent transactivation domain that is required for the oncogenic activity of several EWS fusion proteins, the nor-mal role of intact EWS is poorly characterized because little is known about its nucleic acid recognition specificity Here we show that the Arg-Gly-Gly (RGG) domain of the C-terminal in EWS binds to the G-rich single-stranded DNA and RNA fold in the G-quadruplex structure Furthermore, inhibition of DNA polymerase on a template containing a human telomere sequence in the presence of RGG occurs in an RGG concentration-dependent manner by the formation of a stabilized G-quad-ruplex DNA–RGG complex In addition, mutated RGG containing Lys residues replacing Arg residues at specific Arg-Gly-Gly sites and RGG con-taining Arg methylated by protein arginine N-methyltransferase 3 decrease the binding ability of EWS to G-quadruplex DNA and RNA These find-ings suggest that the RGG of EWS binds to G-quadruplex DNA and RNA via the Arg residues in it
Abbreviations
dsHtelo, human telomere duplex DNA; EAD, Ewing’s sarcoma activation domain; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; ETS, external transcribed spacer; EWS, Ewing’s sarcoma; FMRP, fragile X mental retardation protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; Htelo, human telomere DNA; mut Htelo, mutated human telomere; mut rHtelo, mutated human telomere RNA; PRMT3, protein arginine
N-methyltransferase 3; RBD, RNA-binding domain; rHtelo, human telomere RNA; RRM, RNA recognition motif; ZnF, zinc finger.
Trang 2(RBD) in the C-terminal region as multiple domains
involved in nucleic acid–protein interactions: an RNA
recognition motif (RRM) flanked by two regions in
Arg-Gly-Gly repeats (RGG) and a C2C2 zinc finger
(ZnF) with an RGG domain in the C-terminal [16,17]
They bind to RNA as well as single- and
double-stranded DNA [18–20] In the case of EWS, the
C-terminal amino acids that constitute RGG
specifi-cally bind to poly G and poly U RNA in vitro [8] On
the other hand, Hume et al [15] suggested that EWS
binds to the proximal-element DNA of the
macro-phage-specific promoter of the CSF-1 receptor gene
The RGG domain, initially identified as a
single-stranded RNA-binding motif in hnRNP U, is reported
to be the G-quadruplex RNA-binding motif in the
fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and the
G-quadruplex DNA-binding motif in nucleolin [21–
27] The RGG domain of FMRP, which is an
RNA-binding protein involved in nerve cell differentiation,
interacts with the G-quartet forming RNA [22–25] In
addition, the RBD and the RGG domain of nucleolin,
a DNA-binding protein contributing to the
transcrip-tion of ribosomal RNA, bind to the G-quadruplex
forming ribosomal DNA [26] Moreover, nucleolin
binds to the c-myc G-quadruplex DNA with high
affinity in vitro [27] Little is known, however, about
the DNA and RNA recognition specificity of EWS,
which contains three RGG domains To gain further
insight into the nucleic acid–EWS interaction, we
per-formed an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
with EWS and several G-quadruplex or single- or
dou-ble-stranded DNA and RNA Here, we show that
EWS specifically targets G-quadruplex DNA and
RNA in vitro We also determined that the specificity
of G-quadruplex recognition depends on the
guanidini-um group of the Arg in the RGG domain in the
C-terminal of EWS
Results and Discussion
Several DNA-binding proteins that bind to
G-quadru-plex DNA have been investigated in vitro [28–36]
Hanakahi et al [26] reported that the four RBD and
the Arg-Gly-Gly repeats of nucleolin, which is
involved in transcription, rRNA processing and
ribo-some assembly, can bind to G-quadruplex DNA
formed from the external transcribed spacer region of
human rDNA, ETS-1 We performed an EMSA of
EWS and ETS-1 to investigate the ability of EWS to
bind to G-quadruplex DNA (Fig 1A, Table 1)
Recombinant EWS, which contains RBD in the
C-ter-minal region comprising RRM, ZnF and three RGG
(RGG1, RGG2 and RGG3) for binding to nucleic
acids, was expressed in Escherichia coli as proteins fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST) and purified using glutathione agarose 32P-labeled ETS-1 was first incubated for 24 h in 100 mm KCl to allow for quad-ruplex formation and then with GST-tag-digested EWS for 1 h at room temperature The EWS–DNA complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE and visualized
by autoradiography Binding analyses revealed that EWS binds to the G-quadruplex formed from the ETS-1, but not to the control single-stranded DNA Similar results were obtained with a human telomere DNA (Htelo) in the presence of 100 mm K+(Fig 1B, Table 1) The results demonstrated that EWS binds to Htelo, but not to human telomere duplex DNA (dsHt-elo), in the presence of K+ The results of previous studies indicated that Htelo in a K+ ion-containing solution exists as an equilibrium G-quadruplex forma-tion of some antiparallel form of the hybrid paral-lel⁄ antiparallel (3 + 1) form together with the parallel propeller form and the basket type [37–42] These find-ings indicate that EWS binds to G-quadruplex DNAs formed from different synthetic oligonucleotides and thus appears to recognize the G-quadruplex DNA structure independently of the sequence context
We further investigated the region of EWS that con-tributes to the G-quadruplex binding specificity by
– EWS – EWS
B A
– EWS – EWS – EWS
Fig 1 Affinity of EWS for binding to G-quadruplex DNA (A) EMSA was performed with EWS (lanes 2 and 4) and 32 P-labeled ETS-1 (lanes 3 and 4) or ssDNA L (lanes 1 and 2) (B) EMSA was per-formed with EWS (lanes 2, 4 and 6) and 32 P-labeled Htelo (lanes 3 and 4), dsHtelo (lanes 5 and 6) or ssDNA S (lanes 1 and 2) The structures of DNAs used as probes are indicated above each lane The DNA–protein complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE and visu-alized by autoradiography.
Trang 3comparing the behavior of various mutant
recombi-nant proteins, i.e the EWS activation domain (EAD),
RGG1, RRM–RGG2–ZnF and RGG3, with regard to
Htelo (Fig 2A) RGG3 interacted with Htelo in
EMSA, whereas the proteins containing EAD, RGG1
and RRM–RGG2–ZnF did not bind to Htelo
(Fig 2B) The RGG domain in FMRP has a closely
spaced Arg-Gly-Gly repeat, which is necessary for
G-quadruplex structure binding [23,24] RGG3,
containing 12 RGG repeats, of EWS binds to the
G-quadruplex structure, whereas RGG1, containing six fewer RGG repeats than RGG3, does not (Table 2) Additional binding studies demonstrated that recombinant RGG3 does not bind to dsHtelo or single-stranded DNA (Fig S1, Table 1) These studies revealed that RGG3 of EWS binds mainly to the G-quadruplex
To test whether formation of the G-quadruplex is necessary for RGG3 binding, we assayed the binding
of RGG3 with Htelo in the presence of K+ or Li+
EAD
RGG1
RRM-RGG2-ZnF
RGG3
B
EAD RGG3
– RGG1 RRM-RGG2-ZnF
C
1 287 347 469 501 544 656
A
Htelo mut Htelo
– – RGG3
D
E
dsHtelo – – 1x 10x 100x
F
Htelo – – 1x 10x 100x
RBD
RGG3
RGG3
Full length
Primer
RGG3
Pausing product
Fig 2 Structural features of EWS and DNA-binding specificities of RGG3 (A) Sche-matic representation of the deletion mutants constructed to map the Htelo-binding speci-ficity of each one of the EWS AD (residues 1–287); RGG 1 (288–347); RRM (residues 348–469); RGG 2 (residues 450–501); ZnF (residues 502–544); RGG 3 (residues 545– 656) (B) DNA-binding activities of EAD (lane 2), RGG1 (lane 3), RRM–RGG2–ZnF (lane 4) and RGG3 (lane 5) EMSA was performed with these proteins and32P-labeled Htelo (C) EMSA was performed with RGG3 (lanes
2 and 4) and 32 P-labeled Htelo (lanes 1 and 2) or mut Htelo (lanes 3 and 4) (D, E) Bind-ing competition assay, assayBind-ing bindBind-ing of RGG3 to 32 P-labeled Htelo in the presence
of unlabeled dsHtelo (D) or Htelo (E) at the indicated molar ratios of unlabeled ⁄ labeled DNA The DNA–protein complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE and visualized by autoradiography (F) DNA polymerase arrest assays Primer extension reactions were performed with rTaq DNA polymerase The primer, full-length primer extension products and DNA polymerase arrest products are indicated by arrows Extension through the template after incubation in increasing con-centrations of RGG3 The concon-centrations of RGG3 were 0 l M (lane 1), 0.2 l M (lane 2), 0.5 l M (lane 3) and 1 l M (lane 4).
Trang 4Figures S1 and S2 show that RGG3 binding to Htelo
in the presence of Li+, which did not form the
G-quadruplex as confirmed by CD spectroscopy, was
blocked To further test whether RGG3 bound to
Htelo folds into a G-quadruplex, we analyzed the
binding between RGG3 and a mutated human
telo-mere (mut Htelo) that replaces G with T at positions 9
and 15, which destabilized the G-quadruplex
forma-tion, as confirmed by CD and UV spectroscopy
(Figs 2C, S2, Table 1) The analysis showed that
RGG3 binds to the folded Htelo G-quadruplex, but
not to unfolded mut Htelo despite containing one
TTAGGG sequence Furthermore, competitive
experi-ments performed in the presence of cold competitor
Htelo or dsHtelo showed that Htelo effectively
com-peted for binding, whereas dsHtelo had no effect, even
at a 100-fold molar excess (Fig 2D, E) These findings
suggest that RGG3 binds to G-quadruplex DNA with
structure specificity
Having found that EWS binds to G-quadruplex
con-formations and not to single- and double-stranded
conformations by RGG3, we aimed to determine
whether RGG3 of EWS modulates the formation or
unwinding of Htelo G-quadruplex DNA To determine
whether the RGG3 binding affected the stability of the
G-quadruplex structure of Htelo, we performed a
poly-merase stop assay as described previously [43] The
32
P-labeled 25-mer primer annealed to the 3¢ end of
the template and could be extended by a DNA
poly-merase upon the addition of the dNTPs If complete
extension of the primer occurred, a full-length 76-mer
product would be formed Factors that promote and stabilize intramolecular G-quadruplex formation, however, led to a specific pausing site on the template This assay showed that the stopping site corresponded
to the base located 3¢ to the first guanine base involved
in G-quadruplex formation (Fig 2F, lane 1) More-over, as the RGG3 protein concentration increased, the full-length 76-mer product decreased, and the stop-ping site product increased (Fig 2F, lanes 2–4) Thus, these results indicate that RGG3 binds to and stabi-lizes the folded G-quadruplex formation
To test whether RGG3 contributes not only to the G-quadruplex DNA binding, but also to G-quadruplex RNA binding, we assayed the binding of RGG3 with
a human telomere RNA (rHtelo) in the presence of
K+, which exists as a G-quadruplex formation of the parallel propeller form [44] Figure 3(A, B) shows that RGG3 bound to rHtelo in the presence of K+, whereas binding between RGG3 and a mutated human telomere RNA (mut rHtelo) that replaces G with T at positions 9 and 15 destabilized the G-quadruplex for-mation, as confirmed by CD and UV spectroscopy (Fig S2, Table 1) Furthermore, competitive experi-ments performed in the presence of cold competitor rHtelo or mut rHtelo showed that rHtelo effectively competed for binding, whereas the mut rHtelo had no effect, even at a 100-fold molar excess (Fig 3C, D) These findings suggest that RGG3 also binds to G-quadruplex RNA with structure specificity
To elucidate the ability of RGG3 to bind the G-quad-ruplex, various concentrations of RGG3 were incu-bated with 5¢ 32P-labeled Htelo or rHtelo in a K+ solution As the RGG3 concentration increased, the free DNA or RNA decreased, and the higher molecu-lar weight complex increased (Fig 4) The mobility shift data were fitted to a hyperbolic equation to give
a Kd of 13 ± 3 nm (Htelo) and 10 ± 2 nm (rHtelo)
In comparison with RGG3, the full-length EWS and RBD containing RGG3 bound to Htelo with
Table 1 Sequence of oligonucleotides used in EMSA and CD spectroscopy Oligonucleotides were diluted to 0.5 m M (base concentration)
in 50 m M Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 7.5) in the presence of 100 m M KCl or 100 m M LiCl, as specified Duplex annealing or quadruplex formation was performed by heating samples to 95 C on a thermal heating block and cooling to 4 C at a rate of 2 CÆmin –1
Table 2 Amino acid sequences of RGG1 and RGG3.
SAGERGGFNKPGGPMDEGPDLDLGPPVDP
GGMFRGGRGGDRGGFRGGRGMDRGGFGGGRRGGPGGPP
GPLMEQMGGRRGGRGGPGKMDKGEHRQERRDRPY
Trang 5Kd= 30 ± 5 and 14 ± 3 nm, respectively (Fig S3).
The EAD domain therefore inhibited the high-affinity
Htelo binding of RGG3 and RBD The ability of
RGG3 and RBD to repress transcription activation by
EAD raised the possibility that RGG3 and RBD block
the interaction between the EAD and RNA
polymer-ase II subunit [11,45] The interaction between the
EAD and RGG3 might inhibit the high-affinity Htelo
binding of RGG3
To gain further insight into the induction of G-quad-ruplex formations by RGG3 of EWS, we performed a
CD spectroscopic analysis that was conducted with Htelo in the presence of various amounts of RGG3 The CD spectrum of Htelo, a hybrid (3 + 1) form, showed a strong positive band at 290 nm and a nega-tive band at around 235 nm, whereas the addition of 1 ratio excess of RGG3 led to an increase in ellipticity and shifted the spectrum from a strong positive band
to 265 nm (Fig 5), which is characteristic of the paral-lel form and consistent with the results of previous CD studies [40–42] These data indicate that RGG3 binds
to the Htelo G-quadruplex and changes the hybrid (3 + 1) G-quadruplex formation of Htelo Moreover,
it may provide a model showing the change from the hybrid (3 + 1) G-quadruplex to the parallel form with the association of RGG3 Incubation of rHtelo with RGG3 did not alter the G-quadruplex RNA, however,
as demonstrated by CD spectrum analysis (data not shown)
Rajpurohit et al [46] reported that binding of the recombinant hnRNP A1 protein to single-stranded nucleic acid is reduced upon enzyme methylation of Arg To evaluate the role of Arg in RGG3 on G-quad-ruplex DNA recognition, we performed EMSA using Htelo with RGG3 methylated by protein arginine N-methyltransferase 3 (PRMT3) (Fig 6) In vitro methylation of the recombinant EWS with PRMT3 showed that PRMT3 is responsible for the asymmetric dimethylations of specific Arg in the RGG region [47]
In our study, the methylation of the RGG3 by PRMT3 with [3H]AdoMet as a methyl donor was monitored with a liquid scintillation counter (Fig S4) RGG3-methylated Arg did not bind to Htelo (Fig 6, lane 6), whereas PRMT3 and AdoMet did not inhibit the Htelo binding of RGG3 (Fig 6, lanes 1–4) Simi-larly, RGG3-methylated Arg did not bind to rHtelo, whereas PRMT3 and AdoMet did not inhibit the rHt-elo binding of RGG3 (Fig S4) These results indicate that enzyme methylation of Arg reduces the binding of RGG3 to G-quadruplex DNA or RNA
Previous results demonstrated that nine Arg are potential methylation sites within RGG3 that react with PRMT3 [47] We next created mutated RGG3 to precisely define the residues within RGG3 that bind to G-quadruplex DNA (Fig 6B) Simultaneous substitu-tion of Arg by Lys in two (KGG3-2) Arg within RGG3 reduced G-quadruplex DNA binding and in six (KGG3-6) and four Arg (KGG3-4) within RGG3, eliminated G-quadruplex DNA binding despite the basic nature of the Lys side-chain (Fig 6C) Similarly, KGG3-2, KGG3-4 and KGG3-6 reduced G-quadru-plex RNA binding (Fig S5) These findings indicate
Htelo rHtelo
–
B A
rHtelo
mut rHtelo
– –
rHtelo – – 1x 10x 100x
RGG3
D C
mut rHtelo – – 1x 10x 100x
RGG3
Fig 3 Protein–nucleic acid complexes (A) EMSA was performed
with RGG3 (lanes 2 and 4) and 32 P-labeled Htelo (lanes 1 and 2) or
rHtelo (lanes 3 and 4) (B) EMSA was performed with RGG3 (lanes
2 and 4) and32P-labeled rHtelo (lanes 1 and 2) or mut rHtelo (lanes
3 and 4) (C, D) Binding competition assay assaying binding of
RGG3 to 32 P-labeled rHtelo in the presence of unlabeled rHtelo (C)
or mut rHtelo (D) at the indicated molar ratios of unlabeled ⁄ labeled
DNA The DNA–protein complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE
and visualized by autoradiography.
Trang 6that Arg between amino acids 589 and 597 within
RGG3 are important for the binding of RGG3 to
G-quadruplex DNA and RNA In ssDNA and ssRNA
recognition, the methylation of Arg in a peptide or a protein does not affect the binding strength [25,48,49] Methylated RGG3 of EWS inhibited G-quadruplex Htelo binding, but was able to bind mut Htelo (Fig S6) These findings indicate the importance of the guanidinium group of the Arg in RGG3 for binding to the G-quadruplex
In conclusion, EWS appears to be a DNA- and RNA-binding protein that recognizes the G-quadru-plex structure It remains unclear, however, whether the role of EWS in transcription or other functions is determined by its ability to target a specific DNA and RNA structure Rossow & Janknecht [50] reported that overexpression of EWS in RK13 and AKR cells leads to the activation of the c-fos, Xvent-2 and ErbB2 promoters, indicating that EWS functions as a transcriptional cofactor EWS, however, has not been reported to bind to double-stranded DNA in these promoters The c-fos and ErbB2 promoters contain G-rich sequences that could potentially form G-quad-ruplex structures [51,52] On the basis of a combina-tion of in silico and experimental approaches, Verma
et al [53,54] reported an enriched sequence with the potential to adopt the G-quadruplex motifs near tran-scription start sites These findings suggest that G-quadruplex motif-mediated regulation is a more common mode of transcription control On the other hand, Dejardin & Kingston [55] purified human telomeric chromatin using proteomics of isolated
B A
0.6 0.4 0.2 0
0.8 1
0.6 0.4 0.2 0
0.8 1
Fig 4 Binding affinity of RGG3 to Htelo or
rHtelo The DNA or RNA concentration was
fixed at 1 n M , whereas the concentration of
RNase-treated RGG3 added to the binding
reaction was varied, as shown above each
lane The equilibrium-binding curve was
obtained by calculating the fraction of Htelo
(A) or rHtelo (B) bound at varying RGG3
con-centrations K d was determined by fitting to
the equation (see Materials and methods).
The DNA–protein complexes were
resolved by 6% PAGE and visualized by
autoradiography.
Wavelength (nm)
6 · mde
–2
0
2
4
6
220
Hybrid (3 + 1) form Parallel form
Fig 5 CD of Htelo in the presence of various amounts of RGG3.
Titration of Htelo with RGG3 (1.2, 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1 and 0
equiv of RGG3) in 100 m M KCl and 50 m M Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 7.5) The
concentration of DNA was 0.2 m M base concentration Line colors:
black = 0 equiv.; blue = 0.1 equiv.; cyan = 0.2 equiv.; green = 0.4
equiv.; light green = 0.6 equiv.; yellow = 0.8 equiv.; orange = 1.0
equiv.; red = 1.2 equiv.
Trang 7chromatin segments and identified that the protein
translocated in liposarcoma, which is related to EWS
as a subgroup within the RNP family of RNA-binding
proteins containing RRM and RGG domains, binds to
telomeres Further studies are required to identify the
role of EWS and the possible function of such
G-quadruplex structures in genomic DNA
Materials and methods
Preparation, expression and purification of GST
fusion proteins
The EWS cDNA was cloned into the pGEX6P-1 vector
between the EcoRI and XhoI sites for expression as an
N-terminal GST fusion protein (pGEX–EWS) pGEX–EAD,
RGG3 vectors contain a PCR encoding EWS amino acids 1–
287, 288–347, 348–544 and 545–656, respectively, cloned in
pGEX6P-1 using the following sets of primers: EWS forward
d(CGG AAT TCA TGG CGT CCA CGG ATT ACA G)
and EWS reverse d(CGC TCG AGT CAC TAG TAG GGC
CGA TCT CTG C), for pGEX–EWS; EAD forward d(CGG
AAT TCA TGG CGT CCA CGG ATT ACA G) and EAD
reverse d(CGC TCG AGT CAT CCG GAA AAT CCT
CCA GAC T), for pGEX–EAD; RGG1 forward d(CGG
AAT TCC CAG GAG AGA ACC GGA GCA T) and
RGG1 reverse d(CGC TCG AGT CAA TCA AGA TCT
GGT CCT TCA TCC ATG G), for pGEX–RGG1; RRM–
RGG2–ZnF forward d(CGG AAT TCC TAG GCC CAC
CTG TAG ATC C) and RRM–RGG2–ZnF reverse d(CGC
TCG AGT CAC TTA CAC TGG TTG CAC TCT GTT
CTC C), for pGEX–RRM–RGG2–ZnF; and RGG3 forward
d(CGG AAT TCG CCC CAA AGC CTG AAG GCT T)
and RGG3 reverse d(CGC TCG AGT CAC TAG TAG
GGC CGA TCT CTG C), for pGEX–RGG3 pGEX–
obtained by replacing Arg with Lys in pGEX–RGG3 using a KOD -Plus- mutagenesis kit (Toyobo, Japan) To construct pGEX–KGG3-2, PCR was performed with pGEX–RGG3 as
a template and the following primers: KGG3-2 forward d(AAA GGT GGC AAA GGT GGA GAC AGA GGT GGC TT) and KGG3-2 reverse d(GAA CAT TCC ACC GGG ACC ACC AC) pGEX–KGG3-4 was generated by PCR using pGEX–KGG2 as a template and the following primers: KGG3-4 forward d(AGA CAA AGG TGG CTT CAA AGG TGG CCG) and KGG3-4 reverse d(CCA CCT TTG CCA CCT TTG AAC A) PCR was conducted with pGEX–KGG3-4 as a template and the following primers: KGG3-6 forward d(GGC AAA GGC ATG GAC AAA GGT GGC TTT GG) and KGG3-6 reverse d(ACC TTT GAA GCC ACC TTT GTC TCC ACC), for
pGEX–KGG3-6 All reactions were performed according to the manu-facturer’s protocol for the KOD-Plus- mutagenesis kit (Toyobo) Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3) pLysS-competent cells were transformed with the vectors, and the transformants were grown at 37C in a Luria Bertani medium containing ampicillin (0.1 mgÆmL)1) Protein expres-sion was induced at A600= 0.6 with 0.1 mm isopropyl b-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside The cells were then grown for
an additional 16 h at 25C and harvested by centrifugation (6400 g for 20 min) Pellets were resuspended in buffer A (100 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA acid and 1 mm dithiothreitol) and lysed by sonication (model UR-20P, Tomy Seiko, Tokyo, Japan) at 4C The super-natants containing the expressed proteins were centrifuged for 15 min at 16 200 g at 4C, and the proteins were then purified by glutathione agarose (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) The supernatant and glutathione agarose were incu-bated with gentle mixing for 1 h at 4C; resin was washed with buffer A at 4C Proteins were eluted with buffer B (50 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 9.5, 20 mm reduced glutathione and
1 mm dithiothreitol) Buffer B of the elution was exchanged
RGG3 PRMT3 AdoMet + + – – + + – + – + – + – – + + + +
MF RGG RGG D RGG F RGG RGMD RGG F
MF KGG KGG D RGG F RGG RGMD RGG F
MF KGG KGG D KGG F KGG RGMD RGG F
MF KGG KGG D KGG F KGG KGMD KGG F
RGG3 KGG3-2 KGG3-4 KGG3-6
RGG3
RGG3 KGG3-2 KGG3-4 KGG3-6 –
B
545 656
587 610
Fig 6 Identification of significant residues at RGG3 for G-quadruplex binding ability (A) Ability of RGG3 to bind to Htelo in the presence (+)
or in the absence ( )) of PRMT3 or AdoMet RGG3 (lanes 2, 4 and 6) was incubated with (lanes 1, 2, 5 and 6) or without (lanes 3 and 4) PRMT3 in a potassium buffer with (lanes 3–6) or without (lanes 1 and 2) AdoMet (B) Schematic illustration of amino acids 587–610 within RGG3 (residues 545–656) The point mutations are shown in bold (C) EMSA of RGG3 (lane 2), 2 (lane 3), 4 (lane 4) and
KGG3-6 (lane 5) using Htelo The DNA–protein complexes were resolved by KGG3-6% PAGE and visualized by autoradiography.
Trang 8with buffer C (50 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 100 mm KCl and
1 mm dithiothreitol) or buffer D (50 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 7.5,
100 mm LiCl and 1 mm dithiothreitol) by dialysis The
protein concentrations were determined using the BCA
Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) For all
experi-ments, GST-tag was digested according to the
manu-facturer’s instructions (GE Healthcare, Precision Protease,
Little Chalfont, UK), and 20 nmol of each protein was
incubated with 20 lg RNase A (Nippon Gene, Tokyo,
Japan) at 4C for 16 h before use
EMSA
Labeled oligonucleotides were diluted to 0.2 mm (base
con-centration) in 50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.5) in the presence of
100 mm KCl or 100 mm LiCl, as specified Duplex
anneal-ing or quadruplex formation was performed by heatanneal-ing
samples to 95C on a thermal heating block and cooling to
4C at a rate of 2 CÆmin)1 Binding reactions were
performed in a final volume of 20 lL using 100 fmol of
the labeled oligonucleotide and a varying concentration (0–
2.5 lm) of purified proteins in a binding buffer (50 mm
Tris⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 0.5 mm EDTA, 0.5 mm dithiothreitol,
0.1 mgÆmL)1bovine serum albumin, 1 lgÆmL)1calf thymus
DNA and 100 mm KCl or 100 mm LiCl) After the samples
were incubated for 1 h at 25C, they were loaded on a 6%
polyacrylamide (acrylamide⁄ bisacrylamide = 19 : 1)
nonde-naturing gel; 0.5· TBE with 20 mm KCl was used, both in
the gel and as the electrophoresis buffer Electrophoresis
was performed at 10 VÆcm)1for 1 h at 4C The gels were
exposed in a phosphorimager cassette and imaged (Personal
Molecular Imager FX; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA)
Bands were quantified using imagequant software The
data were plotted as u (1 fraction of free DNA) versus the
protein concentration to determine the Kd, which is equal to
the protein at which half of the free DNA is bound Kdwere
extracted by nonlinear regression using Microsoft Excel
2007 and the following equation: u = [P]⁄ {Kd+ [P]}
DNA polymerase stop assay
This assay was adapted from the method described by
Han et al [43] The 25-mer primer was 5¢-labeled with
32P, mixed with the 76-mer template DNA and annealed
as described above The polymerase reaction was
per-formed in a final volume of 20 lL using 20 fmol of the
duplex and various amounts of purified RGG3 in a
bind-ing buffer (50 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 1 mm dithiothreitol,
100 lgÆmL)1 bovine serum albumin, 1 lgÆmL)1 calf
thy-mus DNA and 100 mm KCl) RGG3 was incubated with
the duplex for 1 h at room temperature The polymerase
extension reaction was initiated by adding Taq
polymer-ase, dNTP (1 mm each) and MgCl2(10 mm) The reaction
was incubated at 30C for 10 min and then stopped by
adding an equal volume of a stop buffer (95% formamide,
10 mm EDTA, 10 mm NaOH, 0.1% bromophenol blue and 0.1% xylenecyanol) Extension products were sepa-rated on a 12% polyacrylamide (acrylamide⁄ bisacryla-mide = 19 : 1) gel; 1· TBE was used, both in the gel and
as the electrophoresis buffer Electrophoresis was per-formed at 1500 V for 1 h at 4C, and gels were visualized
on a phosphorimager
CD spectroscopy
CD spectra were recorded on a CD spectrometer model J-500A (Jasco) The CD spectra of Htelo (0.2 mm base con-centration) and RGG3 (1.2, 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0) equivalent to Htelo DNA (RGG3⁄ DNA) in 50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.5) and 100 mm KCl were recorded using a 0.2 cm path length cell at 25C The spectra of the Htelo–RGG3 complex were corrected by subtracting the spectra of the free RGG3 at the same ratios
Methylation of recombinant RGG3 This assay was adapted from the method described by Geh-ring et al [47] RGG3 was incubated with PRMT3 and AdoMet in a final volume of 50 lL with 50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mm KCl, 1 mm EDTA and 1 mm dithiothrei-tol for 3 h at 30C The reaction solution was exchanged with a potassium buffer containing 50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mm KCl and 1 mm dithiothreitol by dialysis
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society and
a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (2008, 20750130) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan We thank Dr Harvey R Herschman at UCLA for the PRMT3 cDNA
References
1 Ron D (1997) TLS-CHOP and the role of RNA-bind-ing proteins in oncogenic transformation Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 220, 131–142
2 May WA & Denny CT (1997) Biology of EWS⁄ FLI and related fusion genes in Ewing’s sarcoma and primi-tive neuroectodermal tumor Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 220, 143–150
3 Rauscher FJ III (1997) Chromosome translocation-mediated conversion of a tumor suppressor gene into a dominant oncogene: fusion of EWS1 to WT1 in desmoplastic small round cell tumors Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 220, 151–162
4 Brown AD, Lopez-Terrada D, Denny CT & Lee KAW (1995) Promoters containing ATF-binding sites are
Trang 9de-regulated in cells that express the EWS⁄ ATF1
ontogeny Oncogene 10, 1749–1756
5 Fujimura Y, Ohno T, Siddique H, Lee L, Rao VN &
Reddy ESP (1996) The EWS-ATF-1 gene involved in
malignant melanoma of soft parts with t(12;22)
chromosome translocation, encodes a constitutive
transcriptional activator Oncogene 12, 159–167
6 May WA, Lessnick SL, Braun BS, Klemsz M,
Lewis BC, Lunsford LB, Hromas R & Denny CT
(1993) The Ewing’s sarcoma EWS⁄ FLI-1 fusion gene
encodes a more potent transcriptional activator and is a
more powerful transforming gene than FLI-1 Mol Cell
Biol 13, 7393–7398
7 Ohno T, Rao VN & Reddy ESP (1993) EWS⁄ Fli-1
chi-meric protein is a transcriptional activator Cancer Res
53, 5859–5863
8 Ohno T, Ouchida M, Lee L, Gatalica Z, Rao VN &
Reddy ES (1994) The EWS gene, involved in Ewing
family of tumors, malignant melanoma of soft parts
and desmoplastic small round cell tumors, codes for an
RNA binding protein with novel regulatory domains
Oncogene 9, 3087–3097
9 Sanchez-Garcia I & Rabbitts TH (1994)
Transcrip-tional activation by TAL1 and FUS-CHOP proteins
in acute malignancies as a result of chromosomal
abnormalities Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91,
7869–7873
10 Pan S, Koh YM, Dunn TA, Li KKC & Lee KAW
(1998) The EWS⁄ ATF1 fusion protein contains a
dispersed activation domain that functions directly
Oncogene 16, 1625–1631
11 Petermann R, Mossier BM, Aryee DN, Khazak V,
Golemis EA & Kover H (1998) Oncogenic EWS-Fli1
interacts with hsRPB7, a subunit of human RNA
poly-merase II Oncogene 17, 603–610
12 Wang X, Arai S, Song X, Reichart D, Du K, Pascual
G, Tempst P, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK & Kurokawa
R (2008) Induced ncRNAs allosterically modify
RNA-binding proteins in cis to inhibit transcription Nature
454, 126–131
13 Hicks GG, Singh N, Nashabo A, Mai S, Bozek G,
Klewes L, Arapovic D, White EK, Koury MJ, Oltz EM
et al.(2000) Fos deficiency in mice results in defective
B-lymphocyte development and activation, high levels
of chromosomal instability and perinatal death Nature
24, 175–179
14 Araya N, Hirota K, Shimamoto Y, Miyagishi M,
Yosh-ida E, IshYosh-ida J, Kaneko S, Kaneko M, Nakajima T &
Fukamizu A (2003) Cooperative interaction of EWS
with CREB-binding protein selectively activate
hepato-cyte nuclear factor 4-mediated transcription J Biol
Chem 278, 5427–5432
15 Hume DA, Sasmono T, Himes SR, Sharma SM,
Bronisz A, Constantin M, Ostrowski MC & Ross IL
(2008) The Ewing sarcoma protein (EWS) binds directly
to the proximal elements of the macrophage-specific promoter of the CSF-1 receptor (csf1r) gene J Immunol
180, 6733–6742
16 Delattre O, Zucman J, Plougastel B, Desmaze C, Melot
T, Peter M, Kovar H, Joubert I, de Jong P, Rouleau G
et al.(1992) Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours Nature 359, 162–166
17 Li KKC & Lee KAW (2000) Transcription activation
by the Ewing’s Sarcoma (EWS) oncogene can be cis-repression by the EWS RNA-binding domain J Biol Chem 275, 23053–23058
18 Perrotti D, Bonatti S, Trotta R, Martinez R, Skorski T, Salomoni P, Grassilli E, Iozzo RV, Copper DR & Calabretta B (1998) TLS⁄ FUS, a pro-oncogene involved in multiple chromosomal translocations, is a novel regulator of BCR⁄ ABL-mediated leukemogenesis EMBO J 15, 4442–4455
19 Bertolotti A, Lutz Y, Heard DJ, Chambon P & Tora L (1996) hTAFII68, a novel RNA⁄ ssDNA the pro-onco-proteins TLS⁄ FUS and EWS is associated with both TFIID and RNA polymerase II EMBO J 15, 5022– 5031
20 Crozat A, Aman P, Mandahl N & David R (1993) Fusion of CHOP to a novel RNA-binding protein in human myxoid liposarcoma Nature 363, 640–644
21 Kiledjian M & Dreyfuss G (1992) Primary structure and binding activity of the hnRNP U protein:
binding RNA through RGG box EMBO J 11, 2655– 2665
22 Darnell JC, Jensen KB, Jin P, Brown V, Warren ST & Darnell RB (2001) Fragile X mental retardation protein targets G quartet mRNAs important for neuronal func-tion Cell 107, 489–499
23 Zanotti KJ, Lackey PE, Evans GL & Mihailescu MR (2006) Thermodynamics of the fragile X mental retarda-tion protein RGG box interacretarda-tions with G quartet forming RNA Biochemistry 45, 8319–8330
24 Menon L & Mihailescu M-R (2007) Interactions of the
G quartet forming semaphorin 3F RNA with the RGG box domain of the fragile X protein family Nucleic Acids Res 35, 5379–5392
25 Ramos A, Hollingworth D & Pastore A (2003) G-quar-tet-dependent recognition between the FMRP RGG box and RNA RNA 9, 1198–1207
26 Hanakahi LA, Sun H & Maizels N (1999) High affinity interactions of nucleolin with G-G-paired rDNA J Biol Chem 274, 15908–15912
27 Gonzalez V, Guo K, Hurley L & Sun D (2009) Identifi-cation and characterization of Nucleolin as a c-myc G-quadruplex-binding protein J Biol Chem 284, 23622– 23635
28 Fang G & Cech TR (1993) The b subunit of Oxytricha telomere-binding protein promotes G-quartet formation
by telomeric DNA Cell 74, 875–885
Trang 1029 Fukuda H, Katahira M, Tsuchiya N, Enokizono Y,
Sugimura T, Nagano M & Nakagama H (2002)
Unfold-ing of quadruplex structure in the G-rich strand of the
minisatellite repeat by the binding protein UP1 Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 12685–12690
30 Etzioni S, Yafe A, Khateb S, Weisman-Shomer P,
Bengal E & Fry M (2005) Homodimeric MyoD
preferentially binds tetraplex structures of
regula-tory muscle-specific genes J Biol Chem 280,
26805–26812
31 Zaug AJ, Podell ER & Cech TR (2005) Human POT1
disrupts telomeric G-quadruplexes allowing telomerase
extension in vitro Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 10864–
10869
32 Salas TR, Petruseva I, Lavrik O, Bourdoncle A,
Mergny J-L, Favre A & Saintome C (2006) Human
replication protein A unfolds telomeric G-quadruplexes
Nucleic Acids Res 34, 4857–4865
33 Thakur RK, Kumar P, Halder K, Verma A, Kar A,
Paret J-L, Basundra R, Kumar A & Chowdhury S
(2009) Metastases suppressor NM23-H2
inter-action with G-quadruplex DNA within c-MYC
promoter nuclease hypersensitive element induces
c-MYC expression Nucleic Acids Res 37,
172–183
34 Paramasivam M, Membrino A, Cogoi S, Fukuda H,
Nakagama H & Xodo LE (2009) Protein hnRNP A1
and its derivative Up1 unfold quadruplex DNA in the
human KRAS promoter: implications for transcription
Nucleic Acids Res 37, 2841–2853
35 Soldatenkov VA, Vetcher AA, Duka T & Ladama S
(2008) First evidence of a functional interaction between
DNA quadruplexes and poly(ADP-ribose)
polymerase-1 ACS Chem Biol 3, 214–219
36 Fry M (2007) Tetraplex DNA and its interacting
pro-teins Front Biosci 12, 4336–4356
37 Ambrus A, Chen D, Dai J, Bialis T, Jones RA &
Yang D (2006) Human telomeric sequence forms a
hybrid-type intramolecular G-quadruplex structure with
mixed parallel⁄ antiparallel strands in potassium
solu-tion Nucleic Acids Res 34, 2723–2735
38 Xu Y, Noguchi Y & Sugiyama H (2006) The new
models of the human telomere d[AGGG(TTAGGG)3]
in K+solution Bioorg Med Chem 14, 5584–
5591
39 Luu KN, Phan A, Kuryavyi V, Lacroix L & Patel DJ
(2006) Structure of the human telomere in K+solution:
an intramolecular (3 + 1) G-quadruplex scaffold J Am
Chem Soc 128, 9963–9970
40 Lim KW, Amrane S, Bouaziz S, Xu W, Mu Y,
Petel DJ, Luu KN & Pjan AT (2009) Structure of the
human telomere in K+solution: a stable basket-type
G-quadruplex with only two G-tetrad layers J Am
Chem Soc 131, 4301–4309
41 Singh V, Azarkh M, Exner TE, Hartig JS &
Drescher M (2009) Human telomeric quadruplex conformations studied by pulsed EPR Angew Chem Int
Ed 48, 9728–9730
42 Balagurumoorthy P, Brahmachari SK, Mohanty D, Bansal D & Sasisekharan V (1992) Hairpin and parallel quartet structures for telomeric sequences Nucleic Acids Res 20, 4061–4067
43 Han H, Hurley LH & Salazar M (1999) A DNA poly-merase stop assay for G-quadruplex-interactive com-pounds Nucleic Acid Res 27, 537–542
44 Martadinate H & Phan AT (2009) Structure of propel-ler-type parallel-strand RNA G-quadruplexes, formed
by human telomeric RNA sequence in K solution
J Am Chem Soc 131, 2570–2578
45 Alex D & Lee KAW (2005) RGG-boxes of the EWS oncoprotein repress a range of transcriptional activation domains Nucleic Acids Res 33, 1323–1331
46 Rajpurohit R, Paik WK & Kim S (1994) Effect of enzy-mic methylation of heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particle A1 on its nucleic-acid binding and controlled proteolysis Biochem J 304, 903–909
47 Pahlich S, Bschir K, Chiavi C, Belyanskaya L & Gehring H (2005) Different methylation characteristics
of protein arginine methyltransferase 1 and 3 toward the Ewing sarcoma protein and a peptide Proteins 61, 164–175
48 Raman B, Guarnaccia C, Nadassy K, Zakhariev S, Pintar A, Zanuttin F, Frigyes D, Acatrinei C, Vindigni
A, Pongor G et al (2001) Nx-arginine dimethylation modulates the interaction between a Gly⁄ Arg-rich peptide from human nucleolin and nucleic acids Nucleic Acids Res 29, 3377–3384
49 Valentini SR, Weiss VH & Silver PA (1999) Arginine methylation and binding of Hrp1p to the efficiency element for mRNA 3¢-end formation RNA 5, 272–280
50 Rossow KL & Janknecht R (2001) The Ewing’s sarcoma gene product functions as a transcriptional activator Cancer Res 61, 2690–2695
51 Ishii S, Imamoto F, Yamanashi Y, Toyoshima K & Yamamoto T (1987) Characterization of the promoter region of the human c-erbB-2 protooncogene
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 4374–4378
52 Coulon V, Chebli K, Cavelier P & Blanchard JM (2010) A novel mouse c-fos intronic promoter that responds to CREB and AP-1 is developmentally regulated in vivo PLoS ONE 5, e11235
53 Verma A, Halder K, Halder R, Yadav VK, Rawal P, Thakur RK, Mohd F, Sharman A & Chowdhury S (2008) Genome-wide computational and expression analyses reveal G-quadruplex DNA motifs as conserved cis-regulatory elements in human and related species
J Med Chem 51, 5641–5649