Central-Plant-Conversion-Presentation-September-2011

Additional Analysis y Central Plant and Distributed SSystems DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY... STEAM ABSORPTION CHILLERS35 PSIG STEAM FROM PLANT MORGAN HALL 446 TON 446 TON ABSORBER 446 TON ABSORBE

l Goals

l f Current Plant Information

Summary of Preliminary Findings

d Wind Generation

l ( ) Solar (Concentrating)

l l Fossil Fuels

l Coal ‐ Current

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

d Wood

Additional Analysis y Central Plant and Distributed 

SSystems

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

b Remaining Systems or Combinations

• Fuel sources

– Natural gas

• Biomass generation of gas – Electricity

– Ground water source hybrid system

bl h l f Establish Baseline for Comparison

l Natural Gas

l d Baseline Cost and Scope

l b ? Eliminate Steam Turbine Generator?

l Evaluation

Conclusion: Replace steam chillers with electric centrifugal

ELECTRIC CHILLERS V STEAM ABSORPTION CHILLERS

35 PSIG STEAM FROM PLANT

MORGAN HALL

446 TON

446 TON ABSORBER

446 TON ABSORBER

446 TON ABSORBER

446 TON

TO CAMPUS RUBBERMAID

CENTER

CURRENT CHILLER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

CONDENSATE RETURN CENTER

CURRENT CHILLER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

l d b ( l ) Centralized Microturbines (natural gas)

C C O CENTRALIZED MICROTURBINE

NEW NATURAL GAS

NEW BOILER

NEW BOILER

EXISTING BOILER

EXISTING TURBINE

375 KW ELECTRICITY NEW

MICROTURBINE MICROTURBINE

l d b Centralized Microturbines

into gas

b d l Distributed vs. Central Generation

l h l b d Solar – Photovoltaics – Distributed

l h l b d

Solar – Photovoltaics – Distributed

– 45,000 square feet building– 3 stories

– 15,000 square feet of roof area– 80% of roof covered with PV array = 12,000 square feet array– PV generates about 10 watts/square foot of panel

– This yields a 120 kW system– Approximate installed cost of $6/watt = $720,000– Each installed kW produces about 1,100 kWh/year– 132,000 kWH not purchased from an electric company

– 30% Federal Tax Credit– $150,000 State Grant - figured first– Net Cost: $399,000

– ROI of 1.6% per year

within the next three years Assuming incentives are still in place at that

time, this results in an ROI of 4.3%

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

h l b d Geothermal ‐ Distributed

d l ( l ll) Energy Modeling (Taylor Hall)

etc) as in renovating Taylor Hall

approximate size of Taylor Hall

The systems considered were as follows:

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

SPLIT SYSTEM VAV

THIS IS A REPLACEMENT SYSTEM CONSIDERATION FOR TAYLOR HALL

NEW AIR COOLED CONDENSING UNIT

REFRIGERANT PIPING

EXISTING SUPPLY DUCT SYSTEM

NEW AIR HANDLING UNIT PIPING

NEW TERMINAL BOX (TYPICAL)

SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

* NEW DDC NETWORK INCLUDED

SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

BOILER AND CHILLER CONTAINED IN BUILDING

NEW COOLING TOWER

NEW CHILLER

NEW AIR HANDLING UNIT

NEW CONDENSING

BOX (TYPICAL) GAS

SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

* NEW DDC NETWORK INCLUDED

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

SYSTEM SCHEMATIC

CENTRAL PLANT

TO TERMINAL UNITS

EXISTING HEAT EXCHANGER

HEATING WATER SYSTEM

EXISTING SUPPLY DUCT SYSTEM STEAM

NEW AIR HANDLING UNIT SYSTEM

CWS

NEW TERMINAL BOX (TYPICAL)

GROUND WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP

NEW DEDICATED OUTSIDE AIR OUTSIDE

SYSTEM AIR

REPLACES (E)AHU

EXISTING SUPPLY DUCT SYSTEM

VERTICAL WELL FIELD

MULTIPLE (1 PER TERMINAL BOX), COMPRESSORIZED WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMPS

d l l l ll Modeling Results ‐ Taylor Hall

Existing Dx $0 $48 700 * 296 00 *

Existing Dx $0 $48,700 296.00

Split System Dx $1,021,000 $45,100 0.4% 284.00 4.0 Boiler/Chiller $1,150,000 $44,590 3.2% 250.80 15.3 Central Plant** $1,290,000 $47,440 0.5% 264.09 10.8 GWSHP $1,480,000 $25,300 5.1% 91.23 69.2 GWSHP Hybrid $1,239,000 $26,410 10.2% 76.64 74.1

• The hybrid system provides a 28.2% reduction in CO2 emissions and an 8.6% ROI.

* This system is the baseline comparison.

** System includes 500 feet distribution pipe and a portion of the plant cost.

*** ROI based on change over Split System Dx upgrade price, but current energy cost.

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY

f ld ld ( f ) Greenfield Building (44,000 square feet)

Dx System $1 012 000 $43 100 * 284 *

Dx System $1,012,000 $43,100 284

Boiler/Chiller $1,232,000 $44,590 0.2% 251 11.7 Central Plant** $1,408,000 $47,440 -0.6% 264 7.0 GWSHP $1,320,000 $25,300 6.4% 91 67.9 GWSHP $1,320,000 $26,410 6.1% 77 73.0

Mi bi Di ib d

Microturbines Distributed

conversion efficiency, includes maintenance cost increase

geothermal system

Conclusions and Recommendations

– Natural gas conversion from coal– Replace steam absorption chillers with high efficiency electric

– Ground water source heat pumps in a hybrid system

– If building has a large 'base' heat load and geothermal is not feasible, microturbines should be reviewed

– Pursue identifying local waste streams

– Install a digester to “offset” carbon footprint

DOBER LIDSKY MATHEY