R E S E A R C H Open AccessCoupled fixed point theorems for mixed g-monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces Duran Turkoglu1,2and Muzeyyen Sangurlu1,3* * Correspondence: msang
Trang 1R E S E A R C H Open Access
Coupled fixed point theorems for mixed
g-monotone mappings in partially ordered
metric spaces
Duran Turkoglu1,2and Muzeyyen Sangurlu1,3*
* Correspondence:
msangurlu@gazi.edu.tr
1 Department of Mathematics,
Faculty of Science, University of
Gazi, Teknikokullar, Ankara, 06500,
Turkey
3 Department of Mathematics,
Faculty of Science and Arts,
University of Giresun, Gazipa¸sa,
Giresun, Turkey
Full list of author information is
available at the end of the article
Abstract
In this paper, we prove some coupled coincidence point results for mixed
g-monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces The main results of this
paper are generalizations of the main results of Luong and Thuan (Nonlinear Anal 74:983-992, 2011)
MSC: Primary 54H25; secondary 47H10 Keywords: coupled fixed point; mappings having a mixed monotone property;
partially ordered metric space
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Fixed point theory plays a major role in mathematics The Banach contraction principle [] is the simplest one corresponding to fixed point theory So a large number of mathe-maticians have extended it and have been interested in fixed point theory in some met-ric spaces One of these spaces is a partially ordered metmet-ric space, that is, metmet-ric spaces endowed with a partial ordering The first result in this direction was given by Ran and Reurings [] who presented their applications to a matrix equation Subsequently, the ex-istence of solutions for matrix equations or ordinary differential equations by applying fixed point theorems were presented in [–]
The existence of a fixed point for contraction type mappings in partially ordered met-ric spaces has been considered by Ran and Reurings [], Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham
[], Nieto and Rodriquez-Lopez [, ], Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [], Agarwal et al []
and Samet [] Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [] introduced the notion of coupled fixed point and proved some coupled fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying the mixed monotone property and discussed the existence and uniqueness of a solution for a peri-odic boundary value problem Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [] introduced the concept of
a mixed g-monotone mapping and proved coupled coincidence and common fixed point
theorems that extend theorems from [] Subsequently, many authors obtained several coupled coincidence and coupled fixed point theorems in some ordered metric spaces [–]
Definition ([]) Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and F : X × X → X The mapping
F is said to have the mixed monotone property if F(x, y) is monotone non-decreasing in x
©2013 Turkoglu and Sangurlu; licensee Springer This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com-mons Attribution License (http://creativecomCom-mons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
Trang 2repro-and is monotone non-decreasing in y, that is, for any x, y ∈ X,
x, x∈ X, x≤ x ⇒ F(x, y) ≤ F(x, y)
and
y, y∈ X, y≤ y ⇒ F(x, y)≥ F(x, y)
Definition ([]) An element (x, y) ∈ X ×X is called a coupled fixed point of the mapping
F : X × X → X if F(x, y) = x, F(y, x) = y.
Definition ([]) An element (x, y) ∈ X ×X is called a coupled coincidence point of
map-pings F : X × X → X and g : X → X if F(x, y) = gx, F(y, x) = gy.
Definition ([]) Let X be non-empty set and F : X × X → X and g : X → X We say F
and g are commutative if gF(x, y) = F(gx, gy) for all x, y ∈ X.
Definition ([]) Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and F : X × X → X, g : X → X be
mappings The mapping F is said to have the mixed g-monotone property if F is monotone
g-non-decreasing in its first argument and is monotone g-non-increasing in the second
argument, that is, for any x, y ∈ X,
x, x∈ X, gx≤ gx ⇒ F(x, y) ≤ F(x, y)
and
y, y∈ X, gy≤ gy ⇒ F(x, y)≥ F(x, y)
Lemma ([]) Let X be a non-empty set and F : X × X → X and g : X → X be mappings.
Then there exists a subset E ⊆ X such that g(E) = g(X) and g : E → X is one-to-one.
Theorem ([]) Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric
d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let F : X × X → X be a continuous
mapping having the mixed monotone property on X Assume that there exists k ∈ [, ) with
d
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤k
d(x, u) + d(y, v)
for all x ≥ u and y ≤ v.
If there exist two elements x, y∈ X with
x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x),
then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
x = F(x, y) and y = F(y, x).
Theorem ([]) Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a
met-ric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metmet-ric space Assume that X has the following
property:
Trang 3() if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, () if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Let F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X Assume that
there exists k ∈ [, ) with
d
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤k
d(x, u) + d(y, v)
for all x ≥ u and y ≤ v.
If there exist two elements x, y∈ X with
x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x),
then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
x = F(x, y) and y = F(y, x).
Theorem ([]) Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a
metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered
set and suppose that there exists a metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space.
Let F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X and there exist
two elements x, y∈ X with x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x) Suppose that F, g satisfy
ϕd
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤
ϕd(x, u) + d(y, v)
–ψ
d(x, u) + d(y, v)
for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with x ≥ u and y ≤ v Suppose that either
() F is continuous or () X has the following property:
(a) if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, (b) if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
x = F(x, y) and y = F(y, x), that is, F has a coupled fixed point in X.
2 The main results
In this paper, we prove coupled coincidence and common fixed point theorems for mixed
g-monotone mappings satisfying more general contractive conditions in partially ordered
metric spaces We also present results on existence and uniqueness of coupled common
fixed points Our results improve those of Luong and Thuan [] Our work generalizes,
extends and unifies several well known comparable results in the literature
Let denote all functions ϕ : [, ∞) → [, ∞) which satisfy
() ϕ is continuous and non-decreasing,
() ϕ(t) = and only if t = ,
() ϕ(t + s) ≤ ϕ(t) + ϕ(s), ∀t, s ∈ [, ∞)
and denote all functions ψ : [, ∞) → [, ∞) which satisfy lim t →r ψ(t) > for all r >
and limt→ +ψ(t) = .
Trang 4Theorem Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric d
on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and
suppose that there exists a metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let
F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X and there exist
two elements x, y∈ X with x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x) Suppose that F, g satisfy
ϕd
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤
ϕd(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
–ψ
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
(.)
for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv, F(X × X) ⊆ g(X), g(X) is complete and g is
continuous.
Suppose that either
() F is continuous or () X has the following property:
(a) if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, (b) if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
gx = F(x, y) and gy = F(y, x), that is, F and g have a coupled coincidence point in X × X.
Proof Using Lemma , there exists E ⊆ X such that g(E) = g(X) and g : E → X is
one-to-one We define a mapping A : g(E) × g(E) → X by
As g is one-to-one on g(E), so A is well defined Thus, it follows from (.) and (.) that
ϕA(x, y), A(u, v)
≤
ϕd(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
–ψ
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
(.)
for all gx, gy, gu, gv ∈ g(E) with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv Since F has the mixed g-monotone
property, for all x, y ∈ X, we have
x, x∈ X, gx≤ gx ⇒ F(x, y) ≤ F(x, y) (.) and
y, y∈ X, gy≥ gy ⇒ F(x, y)≤ F(x, y) (.)
Thus, it follows from (.), (.) and (.) that, for all gx, gy ∈ g(E),
gx, gx∈ g(X), gx≤ gx ⇒ A(gx, gy) ≤ A(gx, gy)
and
gy, gy∈ g(X), gy≥ gy ⇒ A(gx, gy)≤ A(gx, gy),
which implies that A has the mixed monotone property.
Trang 5Suppose that assumption () holds Since F is continuous, A is also continuous Using Theorem with the mapping A, it follows that A has a coupled fixed point (u, v) ∈ g(E) ×
g(E).
Suppose that assumption () holds We can conclude similarly in the proof of Theorem
that the mapping A has a coupled fixed point (u, v) ∈ g(X) × g(X).
Finally, we prove that F and g have a coupled fixed point in X Since (u, v) is a coupled fixed point of A, we get
Since (u, v) ∈ g(X) × g(X), there exists a point (u, v)∈ X × X such that
Thus, it follows from (.) and (.) that
gu= A
gu, gv , gv= A
gv, gu
Also, from (.) and (.), we get
gu= F
u, v , gv= F
v, u
Therefore, (u, v) is a coupled coincidence point of F and g This completes the proof.
Corollary Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric d
on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and
suppose that there exists a metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let
F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X and there exist
two elements x, y∈ X with x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x) Suppose that F, g satisfy
ϕd
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤k
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv, F(X × X) ⊆ g(X), g(X) is complete and g is
continuous.
Suppose that either
() F is continuous or () X has the following property:
(a) if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, (b) if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
gx = F(x, y) and gy = F(y, x), that is, F and g have a coupled coincidence point in X × X.
Proof In Theorem , taking ϕ(t) = t, we get Corollary .
Trang 6Corollary Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric d
on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and
suppose that there exists a metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let
F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X, and there exist
two elements x, y∈ X with x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x) Suppose that F, g satisfy
d
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
–ψ
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv, F(X × X) ⊆ g(X), g(X) is complete and g is
continuous.
Suppose that either
() F is continuous or () X has the following property:
(a) if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, (b) if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
gx = F(x, y) and gy = F(y, x), that is, F and g have a coupled coincidence point in X × X.
Proof In Corollary , taking ψ(t) = –k
Theorem Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and suppose that there exists a metric d
on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and
suppose that there exists a metric d on X such that (X, d) is a complete metric space Let
F : X × X → X be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on X and there exist
two elements x, y∈ X with x≤ F(x, y) and y≥ F(y, x) Suppose that F, g satisfy
ϕd
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤
ϕd(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
–ψ
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv, F(X × X) ⊆ g(X), g(X) is complete and g is
continuous.
Suppose that either
() F is continuous or () X has the following property:
(a) if a non-decreasing sequence {x n } → x, then x n ≤ x for all n ∈ N, (b) if a non-increasing sequence {y n } → y, then y ≤ y n for all n∈ N
Then there exist x, y ∈ X such that
gx = F(x, y), gy = F(y, x) and
x = gx = F(x, y), y = gy = F(y, x), that is, F and g have a coupled common fixed point (x, y) ∈ X × X.
Trang 7Proof Following the proof of Theorem , F and g have a coupled coincidence point We
only have to show that x = gx and y = gy.
Now, xand yare two points in the statement of Theorem Since F(X × X) ⊆ g(X),
we can choose x, y∈ X such that gx= F(x, y) and gy= F(y, x) In the same way, we
construct gx= F(x, y) and gy= F(y, x) Continuing in this way, we can construct two
sequences{x n } and {y n } in X such that
gx n+ = F(x n , y n) and gy n+ = F(y n , x n), ∀n ≥ . (.)
Since gx ≥ gx n+ and gy ≤ gy n+, from (.) and (.), we have
ϕd(gx n+ , gx)
=ϕd
F(x n , y n ), F(x, y)
≤
ϕd(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
–ψ
d(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
(.)
Similarly, since gy n+ ≥ gy and gx n+ ≤ gx, from (.) and (.), we have
ϕd(gy, gy n+)
=ϕd
F(y, x), F(y n , x n)
≤
ϕd(gy, gy n ) + d(gx, gx n)
–ψ
d(gy, gy n ) + d(gx, gx n)
(.) From (.) and (.), we have
ϕd(gx n+ , gx)
+ϕd(gy, gy n+)
≤ ϕd(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
– ψ
d(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
(.)
By property () ofϕ, we have
ϕd(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy, gy n+)
≤ ϕd(gx n+ , gx)
+ϕd(gy, gy n+)
(.) From (.) and (.), we have
ϕd(gx n+ , gx)+d(gy, gy n+)
≤ ϕd(gx n , gx)+d(gy n , gy)
–ψ
d(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
, which implies
ϕd(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy, gy n+)
≤ ϕd(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy)
Using the fact thatϕ is non-decreasing, we get
d(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy, gy n+)≤ d(gx n , gx) + d(gy n , gy). (.) Set δ n = d(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy n+ , gy), then sequence {δ n} is decreasing Therefore, there is
someδ ≥ such that
lim
n→∞δ n= lim
n→∞
d(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy n+ , gy)
=δ.
Trang 8We shall show thatδ = Suppose, to the contrary, that δ > Then taking the limit as
n → ∞ (equivalently, δ n → δ) of both sides of (.) and having in mind that we suppose
that limt →r ψ(t) > for all r > and ϕ is continuous, we have
ϕ(δ) = lim
n→∞ϕ(δ n)≤ lim
n→∞
ϕ(δ n–) – ψ
δ n–
=ϕ(δ) – lim
δ n– →δ ψ
δ n–
<ϕ(δ),
a contradiction Thusδ = , that is,
lim
n→∞δ n= lim
n→∞
d(gx n+ , gx) + d(gy n+ , gy)
= (.)
Hence d(gx n+ , gx) = and d(gy n+ , gy) = , that is, x = gx and y = gy.
Theorem In addition to the hypotheses of Theorem , suppose that for every (x, y), (z, t)
in X × X, there exists (u, v) in X × X that is comparable to (x, y) and (z, t), then F and g
have a unique coupled fixed point.
Proof From Theorem , the set of coupled fixed points of F is non-empty Suppose that
(x, y) and (z, t) are coupled coincidence points of F, that is, gx = F(x, y), gy = F(y, x), gz =
F(z, t) and gt = F(t, z) We will prove that
gx = gz and gy = gt.
By assumption, there exists (u, v) in X × X such that (F(u, v), F(v, u)) is comparable with
(F(x, y), F(y, x)) and (F(z, t), F(t, z)) Put u= u and v= v and choose u, v∈ X so that
gu= F(u, v) and gv= F(v, u) Then, similarly as in the proof of Theorem , we can
inductively define sequences{gu n }, {gv n} with
gu n+ = F(u n , v n) and gv n+ = F(v n , u n) for all n.
Further set x= x, y= y, z= z and t= t, in a similar way, define the sequences {gx n},
{gy n } and {gz n }, {gt n} Then it is easy to show that
gx n → F(x, y), gy n → F(y, x) and gz n → F(z, t), gt n → F(t, z)
as n→ ∞ Since
F(x, y), F(y, x)
= (gx, gy) = (gx, gy) and
F(u, v), F(v, u)
= (gu, gv)
are comparable, then gx ≤ guand gy ≥ gv, or vice versa It is easy to show that, similarly,
(gx, gy) and (gu n , gv n ) are comparable for all n ≥ , that is, gx ≤ gu n and gy ≥ gv n, or vice
versa Thus from (.), we have
ϕd(gx, gu n+)
=ϕF(x, y), F(u n , v n)
≤
ϕd(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
–ψ
d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
(.)
Trang 9ϕd(gv n+ , gy)
=ϕF(v n , u n ), F(y, x)
≤
ϕd(gv n , gy) + d(gu n , gx)
–ψ
d(gv n , gy) + d(gu n , gx)
(.) From (.), (.) and the property ofϕ, we have
ϕd(gx, gu n+ ) + d(gv n+ , gy)
≤ ϕd(gx, gu n+)
+ϕd(gv n+ , gy)
≤ ϕd(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
– ψ
d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
, (.) which implies
ϕd(gx, gu n+ ) + d(gv n+ , gy)
≤ ϕd(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
Thus,
d(gx, gu n+ ) + d(gv n+ , gy) ≤ d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
That is, the sequence{d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)} is decreasing Therefore, there exists α ≥
such that
lim
n→∞
d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
=α.
We shall show thatα = Suppose, to the contrary, that α > Taking the limit as n → ∞
in (.), we have
ϕ(α) ≤ ϕ(α) – lim
n→∞ψ
d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
<ϕ(α),
a contradiction Thus,α = , that is,
lim
n→∞
d(gx, gu n ) + d(gy, gv n)
=
It implies
lim
n→∞d(gx, gu n) = lim
Similarly, we show that
lim
n→∞d(gz, gu n) = lim
From (.), (.) and by the uniqueness of the limit, it follows that we have gx = gz and
gy = gt Hence (gx, gy) is the unique coupled point of coincidence of F and g.
Trang 10Example Let X = [, +∞) endowed with the standard metric d(x, y) = |x – y| for all
x, y ∈ X Then (X, d) is a complete metric space Define the mapping F : X × X → X by
F(x, y) = y if x ≥ y,
x if x < y.
Suppose that g : X → X is such that gx = xfor all x ∈ X and ϕ(t) : [, +∞) → [, +∞) is
such thatϕ(t) = t Assume that ψ(t) = t
+t
It is easy to show that for all x, y, u, v ∈ X with gx ≤ gu and gy ≥ gv, we have
ϕd
F(x, y), F(u, v)
≤
ϕd(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
–ψ
d(gx, gu) + d(gy, gv)
Thus, it satisfies all the conditions of Theorem So we deduce that F and g have a coupled
coincidence point (x, y) ∈ X × X Here, (, ) is a coupled coincidence point of F and g.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Both authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper Both authors read and approved the final
manuscript.
Author details
1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Gazi, Teknikokullar, Ankara, 06500, Turkey 2 Department of
Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, University of Amasya, Amasya, 05100, Turkey 3 Department of Mathematics,
Faculty of Science and Arts, University of Giresun, Gazipa¸sa, Giresun, Turkey.
Received: 11 June 2013 Accepted: 1 December 2013 Published: 20 Dec 2013
References
1 Banach, S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales Fundam.
Math 3, 133-181 (1922)
2 Ran, ACM, Reurings, MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations.
Proc Am Math Soc 132, 1435-1443 (2004)
3 Altun, I, Simsek, H: Some fixed point theorems on ordered metric spaces and application Fixed Point Theory Appl.
2010, Article ID 621469 (2010)
4 Bhaskar, TG, Lakshmikantham, V: Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications Nonlinear
Anal 65, 1379-1393 (2006)
5 Harjani, J, Sadarangani, K: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces and applications to ordinary
differential equations Nonlinear Anal TMA 72, 1188-1197 (2010)
6 Nieto, JJ, Rodriquez-Lopez, R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary
differential equation Order 22, 223-239 (2005)
7 Nieto, JJ, Rodriquez-Lopez, R: Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to
ordinary differential equations Acta Math Sin Engl Ser 23(12), 2205-2212 (2007)
8 Lakshmikantham, V, ´Ciri´c, LB: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric
spaces Nonlinear Anal (2008) doi:10.1016/j.na.2008.09.020
9 Agarwal, RP, El-Gebeily, MA, O’Regan, D: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces Appl Anal 87,
1-8 (2008)
10 Samet, B: Coupled fixed point theorems for a generalized Meir-Keeler contraction in partially ordered metric spaces.
Nonlinear Anal TMA (2010) doi:10.1016/j.na.2010.02.026
11 Aydi, H, Karapınar, E, Shatanawi, W: Coupled fixed point results for (ψ-ϕ)-weakly contractive condition in ordered
partial metric spaces Comput Math Appl 62, 4449-4460 (2011)
12 Choudhury, BS, Kundu, A: A coupled coincidence point result in partially ordered metric spaces for compatible
mappings Nonlinear Anal 73, 2524-2531 (2010)
13 Samet, B: Coupled fixed point theorems for a generalized Meir-Keeler contraction in partially ordered metric spaces.
Nonlinear Anal 72, 4508-4517 (2010)
14 Nashine, HK, Kadelburg, Z, Radenovi´c, S: Coupled common fixed point theorems forω∗-compatible mappings in
ordered cone metric spaces Appl Math Comput 218, 5422-5432 (2012)
15 Radenovi´c, S, Kadelburg, Z: Generalized weak contractions in partially ordered metric spaces Comput Math Appl.
60, 1776-1783 (2010)
16 Abbas, M, Sintunavarat, W, Kumam, P: Coupled fixed point of generalized contractive mappings on partially ordered