1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng

CFA level 3 CFA level 3 CFA level 3 CFA level 3 CFA level 3 finquiz curriculum note, study session 15, reading 28

8 12 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 8
Dung lượng 291,9 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

When using futures based on broad stock market indices, they provide the best way to manage the risk of diversified equity portfolios.. Given that there are no futures contracts on the t

Trang 1

Reading 28 Risk Management Applications of Forward and Futures Strategies

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Copyright © FinQuiz.com All rights reserved ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

The preferred approach regarding risk management is

that companies should take risk in those areas in which

business has expertise and comparative advantage and

avoid risks in areas which are not related to their primary

lines of business i.e exchange rate risk, interest rate risk

Hedging: Hedging refers to a risk management approach in which a market position is taken to protect against undesirable outcomes

However, risk management is not only hedging risk;

rather, it involves managing risk i.e reducing or

increasing risk exposures, i.e changing risk exposures to the desired level

MARKET RISK

Stock market is more volatile compared to bond market

However, stock market has higher liquidity relative to the

bond market (i.e long-term and corporate bonds and

municipal bonds)

Risks associated with stock market volatility can be

managed by using futures contracts which are generally

based on stock market indices (not individual stocks)

When using futures based on broad stock market

indices, they provide the best way to manage the risk of

diversified equity portfolios Beta measures the risk of a

diversified stock portfolio i.e it measures the relative

riskiness of a stock portfolio compared to a benchmark

(market) portfolio e.g S&P 500

Beta is a relative risk measure It is used to measure only

the risk that cannot be eliminated by diversifying a

portfolio i.e systematic, non-diversifiable or market risk A

portfolio that is not well diversified could contain

additional risk known as nonsystematic, diversifiable or

asset-specific risk

•Risk associated with broad market movements is

known as Systematic risk e.g changes in interest

rates by the Federal Reserve

•Risk associated with a specific company is known

as nonsystematic risk e.g labor strike on a

particular company This risk can be managed by

diversification and by using options

Given that there are no futures contracts on the true

market portfolio, beta of a stock portfolio should be

measured relative to the index on which the futures

contract is based

Beta is similar to duration

Beta plays a critical role in risk management

Limitation of Beta: Beta measures only systematic risk not

non-systematic risk; therefore, it represents a limited

measure of risk

Example:

Consider a stock with beta of 1.20 (ignoring any asset-specific risk) and beta of benchmark index is 1.0 It represents that the stock is 20% more volatile than the index

If a stock has beta of 0.85 (ignoring any asset-specific risk), it represents that the stock is 15% less volatile than the index

NOTE:

S&P 500 Index is used as a proxy to represent the market portfolio; however, it does not truly represent the true market portfolio

Formula to compute Beta:

β = CovSI / σ2I

where,

index

σ2 I = variance of the index

Covariance measures the extent to which two assets (i.e portfolio and the index) move together

• If the covariance is positive, the portfolio and the index tend to move in the same direction

• If the covariance is negative, the portfolio and the index tend to move in the opposite direction

Dollar beta of the stock portfolio = beta of stock portfolio

× market value of the stock portfolio

= βs S Futures dollar beta = beta × futures price

= βf f

where,

βf = Futures contract beta

• Beta of Futures contract is often assumed to be 1.0 However, it is not necessarily equal to 1.0 Thus,

Trang 2

it is preferably specified as βf

•Value of the futures is zero at start of each day

because it is marked to market at the end of each

day; therefore, combination of stock and futures, if

the target beta is achieved, is BTS

To achieve desired/target level of beta exposure The

following relationship holds:

βT S = βs S + Nfβf f

where,

βT = Desired beta or a target beta

ΒS = Current portfolio beta

S = stock portfolio value

f = futures price*

βf = Futures contract beta

N f = Number of futures contracts i.e

N=B− B

B  SF

*Actual futures price = Quoted futures price × Multiplier

Example:

Quoted futures price = 1225 and Multiplier

= $250 Then, Actual futures price = 1225 × $250 = $306,250

•When futures price is simply stated, multiplier is

taken as 1

Observe that:

•When the goal is to increase the beta, βT>βs and

the sign of Nf will be positive which indicates that

futures should be bought in order to increase the

portfolio beta

•When the goal is to decrease the beta, βT<βs and

the sign of Nf will be negative which indicates that

futures should be sold in order to lower the

portfolio beta

When Goal is to reduce Beta to zero: When the objective

is to completely eliminate the risk, βT would be zero and

Nf would be:

N=−B

B  Sf 

•To hedge away all of the risk, Nf number of futures

should be sold

Example:

Value of portfolio = $9,300,000

Manager wants to decrease beta from 1.3 to 1.0

Beta of futures contract = 1.05

Futures price = $220,000

Number of futures contracts =..

.  × $,,

= –12.08 ≈ –12

• Manager must sell 12 futures contracts to decrease the beta to the desired level

= 0

Number of futures contracts = .

.  × $,,

=–52.3377 ≈ –52

• Manager must sell 52 futures contracts to completely hedge away the equity risk

Effectiveness of Futures Contract to hedge risk:

Futures contract can be used to hedge the risk only associated with the relationship between the stock portfolio and the index on which the futures contract is based

• This implies that to hedge the risk of the portfolio consisting of small-cap stocks, futures contract based on large-cap index (i.e S&P 500) should not

be used The appropriate approach is to use futures contract based on small-cap index

In addition, index futures typically are based only on price indices and they do not reflect payment and reinvestment of dividends This implies that dividends will accrue on the stocks but the index used to hedge risk does not reflect any dividends However, it does not adversely affect the effectiveness of the futures

The portfolio manager can manage the risk of an equity position as follows:

• Increasing beta when the market is expected to move up

o But increasing the beta increases the risk i.e if the market falls, the loss on the portfolio will be greater than if beta had not been increased

• Decreasing beta when the market is expected to move down

o But decreasing the beta decreases the risk i.e if the market rises, the portfolio value will rise but the rise will be smaller than if beta had not been decreased

• Adjusting beta from its actual level to the desired level when beta of portfolio changes due to the change in market value of portfolio over time

It is important to note that Betas are difficult to measure

Example:

Dollar value of portfolio = $38,500,000

Price of futures contract (S&P 500) = $275,000 Portfolio beta = 0.90

Target beta = 1.10 Futures beta = 0.95

Trang 3

Nf* =..

.   $",,

= 29.47 ≈ 29 contracts

1)Assume the S&P 500 index increases by 4.4% portfolio

value increases to $40,103,000 Stock index futures

rises to $286,687.50 (i.e increase of 4.25%)

If you bought 29 contracts at $275,000, profit on the

futures contract will be:

($286,687.50 - $275,000) × 29= $338,937.50

Rate of return on stock portfolio = ($40,103,000 /

$38,500,000) – 1

= 00416 = 4.16%

The combined positions (stock and futures contracts)

result in portfolio value= $40,103,000 + $338,937.50

= $40,441,937.50

Rate of return on combined position = ($40,441,937.50 /

$38,500,000) –1

= 5.04%

Effective beta = Combined position return in % / Market

return in %

= 5.04% / 4.4% = 1.15

Thus, effective beta is close to target beta of 1.10 but

not equal to target beta due to:

1)The number of futures contracts is rounded off

2)The expected value of betas may not be equal to the

observed actual value of beta

Stock index futures can be used to create synthetic

positions in equity

Synthetic Cash:

Long Stock + Short Futures = Long risk-free bond

Synthetic Stock:

Long Stock = Long risk-free bond + Long Futures

• In synthetic equity exposure, investors hold cash

and obtain equity market exposure by using futures contracts

Advantages of Stock index futures to create synthetic positions in equity:

1 Provide significant transaction cost savings

2 Highly liquid

3.3.1) Creating a Synthetic Index Fund

A synthetic index fund is a combination of risk-free bonds and futures on the desired index i.e

Long Stock = Long risk-free bond + Long Futures

Steps to create Synthetic Index Fund:

Step 1: Calculate the number of futures contracts that

corresponds to the amount of cash investor will have at the end of the time period

Number of futures contract = Nf*

={V ×(1 + r) T}/ (q×f)

where,

N f * = number of futures contracts

q = multiplier

V = Portfolio value

r = risk-free rate

T = time period

f = futures price

Step 2: We cannot use fractional contracts; therefore,

we need to round the number of contracts to the nearest whole number By using this number

of contracts, we can estimate the amount of cash that needs to be invested or equitized Amount need to invest in bonds = V*

= (Nf*× q× f) / (1 + r)T

Step 3: The amount of Treasuries equitized will grow at

the risk-free rate Thus, amount of equity (stocks) that will be effectively purchased at the start of the contract will be:

Equity purchased = (Nf* ×q) / (1 + δ) T

where,

δ = dividend yield

• This implies that investing V* in bonds and buying

Nf* futures contracts at a price of f is equivalent to buying (Nf* q) / (1 + δ) T units of stock

of equity, then after reinvestment of dividends, value of equity at the end of time period wiould be:

Equity purchased × (1 + dividend yield)T = Nf*×q

Step 4: Futures position pay-off at the end of investment

horizon:

Practice: Example 3,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 3,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Trang 4

The pay-off of Nf* futures contracts = Nf*× q ×(ST –f)

where,

S T = Index value at time T

Equitized cash amount grows enough to settle futures

position and investor is left with exactly the amount of

equity exposure as desired at the beginning of period

i.e

Nf* × q × ST

NOTE:

It is important to note that all of these transactions are

synthetic

Issues:

1 The index is a price index only and does not include

dividends Hence, creating synthetic equity position

by using index futures can capture only the index

performance without the dividends

2 The expiration date of Futures contract can be

different from the desired date However, strategy

using futures contract will still be effective if the futures

contract is correctly priced both when the position is

opened and when the strategy is completed

Example:

Manager has $70 million investment in T-bills with a yield

of 2%

He wants to create synthetic equity position equal to the

amount invested in cash/ T-bills

S&P 500 Index level = 1065

Multiplier = $250

T = 3 months

Step 1:

Number of futures contracts = $70,000,000 (1.02) 0.25 /

(1065 × $250)

= 264.22

contracts

Step 2:

Amount of cash actually invested = (264 × $250 × 1065) /

(1.02) 0.25

= $69,942, 878 Step 3:

After three months, this amount will grow to:

$69,942, 878 (1.02)0.25 = $70,289,999

At expiration, this cash is used to settle futures contract and achieve the equity exposure desired at the beginning of the investment horizon

• It should be noted that rounding down reduced the exposure i.e Actual exposure = $69,942,878 (1.02)0.25 ≠ Target exposure = $70,000,000 (1.02)0.25

3.3.2) Equitizing Cash Equitizing cash is a transaction in which a given amount

of cash is converted into equity position using futures contract while maintaining the liquidity provided by the cash

Issues:

Investor does not have control over the pricing of the futures

• If the futures contract is overpriced, the investor will pay too much for the futures and the risk-free bonds will not be enough to offset the excessively high price effectively paid for the stock

• Opposite results when the futures contract is underpriced

Synthetic cash position: synthetic position in cash can be created by selling futures against a long stock position Long stock + Short futures = Long risk-free bonds Step 1:

Number of contracts = Nf*= –10,000,000 (1.03) 0.5 / (1425 ×

$250)

=–28.49 ≈ –28

• Manager need to sell 28 contracts

Step 2:

Actual amount of synthetic cash created = V*=(28 × 1425 × $250) / (1.03) 0.5 = $9,828,659

• After 6 months, this amount of synthetic cash will grow to $9,828,659 (1.03) 0.5 = $9,975,000

• 28 contracts are equivalent to Nf* × q = 28 × 250 =

7000 units of stocks

Step 3:

Futures pay-off at maturity = – 28 ($250) (ST – 1425) =

$9,975,000 – 7000ST

Practice: Example 4, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 4,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Trang 5

• The manager can settle the short futures position

by selling the equity position Thus the manager is

left with the synthetic cash (i.e $9,975,000)

• It should be noted that due to rounding, synthetic

cash is ≠ manager’s original “real” position

NOTE:

When portfolio is identical to the index on which the

futures contracts is based, both the formulas (i.e formula

given in section 3.1 and formula given in Exhibit 5) will

provide the same result i.e same number of futures

contracts to sell

Example:

Portfolio value invested in S&P 500 index = $10,000,000

Manager wants to covert equity exposure to cash over

6-month time period

Risk-free rate = 3%

S&P 500 index level = 1,425

Multiplier = $250

Formula given in section 3.1 is a general formula and

can be used to eliminate systematic risk of any portfolio

Alternative ways to manage risk:

• Beta can be increased (decreased) by selling (buying) low-beta stocks and buying (selling) high-beta stocks

• Beta can be reduced to zero by selling the entire portfolio and investing that money in the risk-free asset

• Beta can be increased by reducing any position in the risk-free asset or even by issuing a risk-free asset (i.e borrowing)

Advantages of using derivatives i.e stock index futures

to manage risk:

1)Derivatives are less costly because they involve lower transaction costs

2)Derivatives have greater liquidity

3)Derivatives provide better timing and allocation strategies

4)Derivatives provide a quicker way to execute a transaction and/or to acquire the portfolio or to dispose a position

5)Derivatives are less disruptive in nature

6)Derivatives provide ease of altering risk exposures without disturbing the asset allocation

7)Derivatives require less capital to trade than the underlying securities

Limitation:

Derivatives do not solve liquidity problems For example, the greatest liquidity in the futures market is in the shortest expirations However, generally, derivatives are more liquid than the underlying securities

The performance of an asset portfolio significantly

depends on the allocation of the portfolio among asset

classes Portfolio manager can effectively alter the asset

allocation through the use of futures contract

Example:

Manager wants to change $7 million of a large cap

position with a current beta of 0.90 to a mid cap position

with a beta of 1.20

Large-cap futures price = $95,000

Large-cap futures beta = 0.84

Mid-cap futures price = $36,000

Mid-cap futures beta = 1.5

To achieve the desired asset allocation:

Number of Large cap futures contract required to sell =

.

."%   $$,,

Number of Mid cap futures contract required to buy =

 

.   $$,,

Important:

Reducing duration of a portfolio through futures contract does not increase the liquidity of the position For

example, when duration is reduced, it only converts the volatility of the long-term instrument to that of a short-term instrument i.e long-short-term instrument will have interest rate sensitivity of the short-term instrument Reasons why hedge is not perfect: A hedge will usually not be perfect because:

1)It is not possible to hedge exactly

2)The number of futures contracts is rounded off 3)Both beta and duration are difficult to measure due

to their unstable nature The expected value of betas and duration may not be equal to the observed

Practice: Example 6, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 6, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 5,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Trang 6

actual values i.e they may not truly reflect the

sensitivities of stocks and bonds to the underlying

sources of risk

• Stock portfolios do not always respond in the exact

manner as predicted by their betas

• Bond portfolios do not always respond in the exact

manner as predicted by their durations

4) The futures contract is subject to basis risk i.e

change in futures price is different from the change

in underlying index

5) Futures contracts are based on price index and do

not include dividends

Pre-investing: It is a strategy in which futures contracts

are used to create or add exposure that converts a

yet-to-received cash into a desired synthetic equity or bond

exposure

This strategy is useful to use when the investor might not

have the cash to invest at a time when the investment

opportunities are attractive

We know:

Long underlying + Short futures = Long risk-free bond

Long Underlying = Long risk-free bond + Long futures

Long underlying + Loan = Long Futures

It implies that an outright long position in futures is

similar to a fully leveraged position in the

underlying

• So, by taking long position in futures, investor

effectively borrows against the cash that he/she

expects to receive in the future

• When cash is eventually received, the investor will

close out the futures position and invest the cash in

the underlying

• Risks: Taking a leveraged long position in the

market is similar to speculating that the market will

perform well and the gain from outperformance of the market will be > the cost of borrowing But when gain < cost of borrowing, leveraged position magnifies the losses

Example:

Manager will receive $10 million after 3 months The manager wants to invest 60% in equity and 40% in debt Equity beta = 1.5

Bond duration = 4 Stock index futures price = $200,000 with beta = 1.05 Bond futures price = $98,000 with duration = 5 and yield beta = 1

Objective:

To create

• Equity position = $10 million × 60% = $6 million

and

• Bonds position = $10 million × 40% = $4 million number of Equity contracts = .

.  $&,,

= 42.86 ≈ long 43 contracts number of Bonds contracts = 1  %

   $%,,

$", 

= 32.65 ≈ long 33 contracts

CURRENCY RISK

Companies are affected both by the exchange rate

uncertainty itself and also by its effects on their ability to

plan for the future e.g a parent company not only

needs to predict its foreign subsidiary’s sales but also

needs to predict the exchange rate at which it will

convert its foreign cash flows into domestic cash flows

Predicting foreign exchange rates with much certainty is

extremely difficult; therefore, companies prefer to

manage exchange rate risk with the use of derivatives

Types of Foreign Exchange Rate Risk:

1) Transaction Exposure: It is a foreign exchange risk

when foreign transactions are made For example,

• Risk that contracted future cash flows i.e foreign currency receipts become less valuable in terms of domestic currency when foreign currency

depreciates or

• When planned purchases i.e foreign currency payments become more expensive when foreign currency appreciates

2) Translation Exposure: It is a risk that multi-national corporations face due to decline in the value of their assets denominated in foreign currencies as a result of foreign currency depreciation when they are converted into their domestic currency at an appropriate

Practice: Example 7, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 7, 8 & 9, Volume 5, Reading 28

Trang 7

exchange rate Managing translation exposure requires

a focus on accounting

3) Economic Exposure: It is a risk faced by a domestic

exporter when domestic currency appreciates relative

to foreign currency and negatively affects its

competitiveness Similarly, a domestic importer faces

economic exposure when domestic currency

depreciates relative to foreign currency To manage

economic exposure, investors need to forecast demand

in the light of competitive products and exchange rates

Receipt

Currency

Exposure

Position in Foreign Currency

Action taken to hedge Currency Risk Receiving

Foreign

Currency

Contract Paying Foreign

Buy Forward Contract

Example:

A firm expects to receive a payment in British pounds

worth ₤10 million

Payment will be received in 60 days

Current spot exchange rate = $1.45/ ₤

60-days forward exchange rate = $1.47/ ₤

A firm is long foreign currency because it expects to

receive foreign currency Therefore, a firm should take

short position in a forward contract i.e using forward

contract a firm will receive (after 60 days):

₤10,000,000 × $1.47/₤ = $14,700,000

• This amount will be received by the firm

irrespective of exchange rate at that time

Hedging Exchange rate risk:

An equity investment in the foreign market is subject to

both equity (market) risk and foreign exchange risk

• To manage equity/market risk i.e risk of decrease

in foreign market investment, we need to sell

futures contracts on foreign market index

• To reduce foreign exchange risk i.e volatility

resulting from uncertainty of exchange rate e.g risk of depreciation of foreign currency when we have long position in foreign currency, we need to sell forward contracts on the foreign currency

Portfolio Investor has following choices available:

1)Hedge local/foreign equity market return and leave the currency risk unhedged

2)Hedge both local/foreign equity market return and the currency risk

i Use futures contract on the foreign equity portfolio to lock in the future value of the portfolio (ignoring any currency risk)

ii By hedging foreign equity portfolio, investor will

be able to know the number of units of the foreign currency that he/she will need to convert

to his/her domestic currency at the hedge termination date Investors can use forward contract to hedge the exchange rate/currency risk

3)Hedge neither the local/foreign equity market return nor the currency risk

NOTE:

It is not possible to leave the local equity market return unhedged and hedge the currency risk i.e to hedge

currency risk, investor must hedge local equity market

return

• Hedging only the market risk generates return equal to foreign risk-free rate

• Hedging both the market risk and exchange rate risk generates return equal to domestic risk-free rate

This implies that neither strategy is feasible to use in the long-run These strategies can be used only in the short-run by investors who have foreign market investments and want to temporarily alter a position without liquidating the portfolio and converting it to cash

Practice: Example 9, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 12, Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Example 8,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Practice: Exhibit 10 & 11,

Volume 5, Reading 28

Trang 8

6 FUTURES OR FORWARDS?

• Standardized

contracts

• All terms (except

price) are set by

futures exchange

clearinghouse against

default

• Requires margin

deposits and daily

settlement of gains

and losses

• Regulated by federal

authorities

• Conducted in a

public arena i.e

futures exchange

• Futures trade on

active secondary

markets

• Reported to the

exchanges and

regulatory authority

• They represent fully

leveraged positions

• Both futures and

forwards have initial

value of zero and

offer linear pay-offs

• Customized contracts

• Terms are set by the parties according to their needs

• Subject to default risk

• Pay the full value of the contract at contract expiration

• Forward contracts are not cleared through an exchange and are not marked to market

However, parties may decide to use margin deposits and

occasional settlements

to reduce default risk

• Unregulated

• Conducted privately

• Forward contracts do not trade in secondary markets

• Not reported to the public or regulators

• Hedging a specific portfolio using Forwards contracts is a more costly approach relative to futures but provides a better hedge

• They represent fully leveraged positions

• Both futures and forwards have initial value of zero and offer linear pay-offs

Preferred instruments to use in different situations:

A.When risks are associated with very specific dates e.g

a loan in which interest rates are reset, Forward

contracts should be preferred Because futures

contract has specific expirations

B When investors do not require a perfect hedge and

transaction costs are a concern, risk of bond portfolios

can be managed using Treasury Bond Futures

C.When investors have the flexibility with respect to the

horizon date, Treasury bond futures can be used to

manage risk of bond portfolios

D.Generally, risk of equity portfolios is managed by using

stock index Futures because equity investors usually

require only satisfactory protection against market

declines rather than a perfect hedge

E Generally, investors prefer to use less costly standardized futures contracts instead of relatively costly customized forwards contract in spite of better hedge provided by forwards

F Foreign currency should be hedged using Forward contracts because foreign currency forward contracts have greater liquidity relative to foreign currency Futures market

Forward contracts are preferred by investors when they are exposed to specific currency transactions

G.When investors want to maintain privacy of the transaction, forward contracts are preferred to use

H.Some investors use different hedging instruments to meet requirements of regulatory bodies i.e when regulation prevents use of credit risky instruments i.e forward contracts and OTC options, investors should use Futures or exchange-listed options

Futures and Forwards versus Options:

• Many organizations are not permitted to use futures or forwards because they represent fully leveraged positions These firms can use options, which are not fully leveraged

• Futures or forwards are exposed to greater loss potential whereas the maximum loss borne by an investor in options is limited to the option premium paid

• Both futures and forwards have initial value of zero and offer linear pay-offs whereas, options require cash investment at the start (i.e option premium) and offer non-linear pay-offs i.e investor can gain from favorable movements and avoid

unfavorable movements

Practice: End of Chapter Practice Problems for Reading 28 &FinQuiz Item-set ID# 8812, 8805 & 8798

Ngày đăng: 18/10/2021, 16:12

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN