1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng

2019 CFA level 3 finquiz curriculum note, study session 14, reading 28

14 12 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 14
Dung lượng 495,07 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

APPROACHES TO ACTIVE INVESTMENT Active investing strategies are divided into two categories fundamental and quantitative.. Differences between Fundamental and Quantitative approaches D

Trang 1

Reading 28 Active Equity Investing Strategies

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Copyright © FinQuiz.com.All rights reserved ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Two broad approaches to active equity investing

strategies are fundamental and quantitative The

objective of both approaches is to outperform a passive

benchmark, however, both approaches tend to make investment decisions differently

2 APPROACHES TO ACTIVE INVESTMENT

Active investing strategies are divided into two

categories fundamental and quantitative

Fundamental approaches tend to involve human

judgment and are often stated as ‘discretionary’

Fundamental approaches are based on research into

companies, industries, sectors or markets and use

valuation models such as (free cash flow models),

quantitative screening tools, statistical techniques (such

as, a regression analysis)

Fundamental approach often starts with the analysis of

company’s financial statements to comprehend

company’s profitability, financial position, cash flows This

approach attempts to find company’s future business

outlook by examining the company’s business model,

product lines, management competence, economic

viewpoint The intrinsic value of the stock is then

estimated and compared to the peer group or the

stock’s own historical values Based on these valuations,

the decision is made concerning whether to buy or sell

the stock or overweight/underweight relative to the

benchmark

The valuation process of fundamental analysis can be

classified as top-down or bottom-up depending on their

starting point Top down approach starts by analyzing

markets, industries, or economies whereas bottom-up

approach begins with individual stocks to identify

opportunity

Quantitative approaches make use of rules-based

quantitative models and are often stated as

‘systematic’ Quantitative approaches rely on computer

programs to develop models that have predictive

power to recognize market or security features and

patterns to identify securities that are expected to earn

higher returns relative to the benchmark These

approaches use variables that relate to company

fundamentals Variables may include:

• valuation metrics (e.g., earning yield)

• size (e.g., market capitalization)

• profitability metrics (e.g., return on equity)

• financial strength metrics (e.g., debt-to-equity

ratio)

• market sentiment (e.g., analyst consensus)

• industry membership (e.g., stock’s GICS

classification)

• price-related attributes (e.g., price momentum)

Investment success of this approach depends on the model quality i.e how accurately the model predicts future expected returns of securities

Note: The labels fundamental and quantitative are

confusing in the sense that both approaches use quantitative tools and models

Some hybrid approaches combine elements of

fundamental and quantitative approaches

Differences between Fundamental and Quantitative approaches

Differences between Fundamental

and Quantitative approaches

Fundamental Qualitative

Decision-making process

Primary Resources Human judgment skills Statistical Modeling skills

Information used Research (company,

industry, economy)

Data & statistics

Analysis Focus Conviction in stock, sector, or

region-based selection

Variables (applying over a number

of securities)

Orientation

to data Forecasting views on

companies &

corporate parameters

Drawing conclusions from a variety

of historical data

Portfolio Construction Use judgement within

acceptable risk parameters

Use optimizers

Reference: CFA Institute’s Curriculum, Reading 28, Exhibit

1

Trang 2

2.1 Differences in the Nature of the Information Used

Typical activities for investors using fundamental

approaches (bottom-up or top down) and quantitative

approaches are given below

Bottom-up fundamental investors assess a company

using its recent financial statements and disclosures for

attributes such as profitability, leverage, absolute or

relative valuation to identify trends, to scrutinize

management’s competence and the company’s future

prospects

Top-down fundamental investors’ research typically

begins by analyzing region, sector, economic or macro trends

Quantitative approaches use historical data and

statistical techniques Usually, the data is processed systematically to identify variables that are statistically significant with the stock returns

Historical data for quantitative research should use original accounting data and should include stocks that

no longer exist to minimize look-ahead and survivorship biases

Investment Process: Fundamental vs Quantitative

2.2 Difference in the Focus of the Analysis

Fundamental investors typically perform in depth analysis

on a small group of stocks Take large positions in

selected stocks

Quantitative investors focus on factors across a large

group of stocks Spread their selected factor bets across

large number of holdings

2.3 Forecasting the future vs Analyzing the Past Difference in Orientation to the Data:

Fundamental approach intends to make investment

decisions by forecasting future parameters (e.g future

earnings, cash flows, growth, company’s outlook) using

knowledge, judgment, in-depth analysis

Quantitative approach intends to predict future returns

by analyzing historical data using models (i.e back-testing past data), considering analysts’ reports about future earnings estimates that have been published

2.4 Differences in Portfolio Construction: Judgement vs Optimization

Fundamental investors’ major risk is at company level as

stocks are usually high-conviction stocks Stock selection process involve extensive research on individual

companies however risk may exist that analyst’s earnings

or fair value estimates are incorrect, or market fails to recognize reasons for mispriced stocks

Manager monitor portfolio holdings continuously i.e increase or decrease positions at any time

Quantitative investors’ risk is that factor returns may not perform as expected The risk lies at portfolio level as the

approach invests in larger group of holdings To control

Trang 3

risk at portfolio level, this approach applies portfolio

optimization i.e selecting the best portfolio out of set of

portfolios

Portfolios are usually rebalanced at regular intervals

3 TYPES OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Equity investors have established different procedures or

may take into account multiple approaches to

formulate their opinions about stocks Many

fundamental and quantitative strategies can be

categorized as either bottom-up or top-down

3.1 Bottom-Up Strategies

Bottom-up investing begins the asset selection process

by focusing on attributes such as price momentum,

profitability at the individual stocks

Bottom-up quantitative investors use computer programs

to apply their models to the asset or company-level

information, which is usually quantifiable

Bottom-up fundamental investors rely on analyst’s

in-depth knowledge and ability to identify companies with

strong or weak fundamentals Then the analysts consider

economic & financial elements to evaluate the selected

companies’ intrinsic value and compare them with their

current market prices to identify under or overvalued

stocks

Analysts may find operationally efficient (inefficient)

companies with healthy (poor) future outlook belonging

to deteriorating (booming) industries

Fundamental investors focus on one or more of the

following three parameters:

• business model and branding

• competitive advantages

• company management and corporate

governance

Business Model and Branding:

Business model refers to the company’s overall strategy

to run business and generate profits Business model

analysis provides insight about the company’s

operations, structure of the value chain, branding

strategy, market segments, business scalability etc Such

information help investors in forming opinions about the

company’s competitive advantages and sustainability

Corporate branding serves to define company’s identity

and its promises to customers Strong brand names allow

companies to charge price premiums

Competitive Advantages:

Competitive advantage is a superiority a company has

over its peers There are many types of competitive

advantage such as approach to natural resources, technology, innovation, competent workforce, reputation, brand name, high barriers to entry, superior product etc

Investors should explore sustainable competitive advantage for a company’s long-term success, especially value investors who select companies trading below their intrinsic value

Company Management

A competent management maximizes the growth of enterprise value for the company’s shareholders Indicators that measure the management’s performance include return-on-assets, equity, invested capital, earnings growth etc

Qualitative evaluation of the company’s management and governance structure include:

• Management’s interest towards minimizing agency issues

• Management’s competence to achieve long-term objectives

• Management’s stability and retention of high-performing executives

• Managing ESG considerations and related risks and opportunities

Bottom-up fundamental investors value stocks by applying single or combination of approaches such as discounted cash-flow, dividend models, or earnings-related valuation metrics i.e P/E, price to book, EV/EBITDA

Bottom-up strategies are broadly classified as:

i) value-based approaches ii) growth-based approaches

3.1.1.) Value-Based Approaches

Value-based investors tend to buy stocks trading at a significant discount to their estimated intrinsic value Value-based investors exploit opportunities may arise as

a result of other investors’ irrational behaviors e.g overreaction to negative news

Some value-based approaches are given below

3.1.1.1.) Relative Value

Investors following relative-value approaches compare

a company’s multiple to that of the average value of

Practice: Example 1, CFA Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 4

the sector Some common value indicators are P/E, P/B,

current ratio, P/CF, D/E, dividend yield etc Average

valuation multiples may vary for different sectors

3.1.1.2.) Contrarian Investing

Contrarian investors tend to go against the crowd by

buying and selling shares in contrast to the prevailing

market sentiment Contrarian purchase poorly

performing stocks trading below their intrinsic value with

the expectation that their stock prices will rebound later,

resulting in a price appreciation

Contrarian investors just like value investors purchase(sell)

shares trading at discount(premium) to their intrinsic

value The main difference is that the contrarian investors

rely on market sentiments and sharp price movements

instead of fundamental metrics

3.1.1.3.) High-Quality Value

High-quality value investment style considers financial

strength, earnings power and top-class management in

addition to valuation

3.1.1.4.) Income Investing

Income investing approach target shares with high

dividend yields and positive dividends growth rates

Historically high dividend paying stocks have been

relatively more stable

3.1.1.5.) Deep-Value Investing

Deep-value investors look for shares selling at extremely

discounted prices e.g., shares of financially distressed

companies (low P/B) This approach is for experts who

understand their strategy well

3.1.1.6.) Restructuring and Distressed Investing

Restructuring investors purchase debt or equity of a

distressed company at a large discount with an aim to

gain control over a company and then restructure it to

restore the company’s intrinsic value

Distressed investors tend to identify companies heading

into distress that still have sufficient assets upon

liquidation

3.1.1.7.) Special Situations

Investors following ‘special situations’ investment style

tend to recognize opportunities (often short-term) arise

as a result of corporate situations such as divestitures,

spinoffs of assets or divisions, mergers This investment

style requires skill and expertise in identifying pertinent

company

3.1.2.) Growth-Based Approaches

Growth-based investors focus on high-quality companies

that are expected to grow faster than their industry or

overall market analyzed by growth in earnings, revenues

or cash flows, above average return on equity Growth

investors generally look for are companies with

consistent growth or companies with strong earnings

momentum Growth investors may invest in companies

with high price multiples if they find growth prospects attractive

GARP (growth at a reasonable price) also referred as

hybrid of growth and value investing is a sub-category of growth investing GARP investors search for above-average growth companies trading at reasonable valuation multiples PEG ratio calculated as

!/#

Top-down investment process begins at macro level Top-down investors focus on variables such as macroeconomic factors, demographic trends, government policies Top down managers often use instruments such as futures contracts, ETFs, swaps and custom baskets of individual stocks

3.2.1) Country and Geographic Allocation to Equities

Investors following this strategy invest in various geographic regions or countries based on the regions’ prospects Managers following this strategy analyze supply and demand for equities in different countries

3.2.2) Sector and Country Rotation

This strategy is based on investor’s view on the expected returns of different sectors and industries on global basis Some industries are suitable to global sector allocation decisions e.g IT industry, energy sectors whereas other sectors or industries are appropriate for sector allocation within a country e.g real estate or consumer staples etc Some managers implement sector and industry rotation strategy by investing in sector and industry ETFs instead

of buying individual stocks of pertinent industries or sectors

3.2.3) Volatility-Based Strategies

Investors using this strategy form portfolios based on their views on volatility usually through derivative instruments Skill and expertise are required to predict future market volatility better than option-implied volatility

For example, an investor who anticipates high index volatility but is not sure about the direction, can capitalize on his view by entering into a long index straddle (buying call and put option with the same strike price and expiry date)

3.2.4) Thematic Investment Strategies

Thematic investors discover investment strategies based

on some new or promising ideas or themes using macroeconomic, demographic, political drivers or bottom-up ideas on industries or sectors

It is imperative for thematic investors to observe whether

the nature of trend or any new change is structural (that

Practice: Example 2 and 3, CFA Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 5

have long-term impacts on market such as growth of

smartphones, tablets, cloud computing, development in

medicine etc.) or short-term (such as short-term view on

currency movements)

Portfolio Overlays:

A Portfolio overlay is a set of derivative positions

managed separately from the portfolio to attain overall

portfolio characteristics Bottom-up strategists often

control unintended macro risk exposures through

portfolio overlays Portfolio overlays are also used to

enhance active returns that are uncorrelated with the

underlying portfolio strategy

3.3 Factor-Based Strategies

A factor is any variable with which individual asset

returns are correlated They represent variables which

can be used to rank stocks for investment and predict

future returns & risk

Factors can be classified as rewarded factors – such as,

value, style, momentum, and profitability, which offer a

persistent return premium – or unrewarded factors – do

not offer a persistent return premium

A factor-based strategy aims to identify factors which

can predict stock returns and constructs portfolios which

tilts towards those factors Factor-based strategies can

employ a single factor or multiple factors

Portfolio managers who use strategies that are based on

new or innovative factors often rely on academic

research

Using data on value and growth style indices over a

28-year period, value and growth styles, which represent

traditional style factors, produced the same returns with

growth equities being more volatile Over the same

period, small-cap stocks earned marginally higher

returns than large-cap stocks but with higher risk

Equity style rotation strategies – based on the belief that

factors work well in some periods but not during others

An investment process is used to allocate to stocks

representing a style which generates positive excess

return relative to the benchmark during a period

Generally used as part of quantitative investing

Manager may be data mining if the selection of a factor

lacks common senses, i.e the factor passes statistical

backtesting but there is weak evidence on its ability to

produce returns in the future

Hedged Portfolio Approach

Most common approach to implement factor-based

portfolios Portfolio is constructed as follows:

Step 1: Select factor (s) and rank investable stock

universe stock using the factor (s)

Step 2: Divide the universe into quantile portfolios (typically quintiles or deciles)

Step 3: Weight each stock using equal-weighting or market-capitalization weighting

Step 4: A long/short hedged portfolio is formed by going long the best quantile and shorting the worst quantile

Step 5: Track the performance of the hedged portfolio

Drawbacks of the approach:

• Information contained in the bottom and top quantiles is utilized to form the hedge portfolio while information in the middle quantile is ignored

• Implicit assumption that relationship between factor and future stock returns is linear (monotonic) which is unrealistic

• Resulting portfolios tend to be concentrated

• Hedged portfolio requires managers to short stocks which may be expensive or not possible

• Portfolio is not a pure factor portfolio because

it has significant exposure to other factors Factor-tilting portfolio: Used to establish a long exposure

to a given factor with controlled tracking error Termed

as an enhanced indexing strategy – tracks the benchmark index and provides factor exposure

Factor-mimicking portfolio (FMP):

• Theoretical long/short dollar-neutral portfolio with a unit exposure to one factor and no exposure to other factors

• Drawback of the portfolio is that it can be expensive to trade as portfolio takes long/short exposure in almost every stock without

considering short availability issues or transaction costs

• Pure factor portfolio can be constructed by following FMP theory but adding liquidity and short availability constraints

3.3.1) Style Factors

3.3.1.1) Value

Value can be measured in a number of ways:

• Stocks with low P/E or high earnings yield provide higher returns, Basu (1977)

• Book-to-market ratio is a way to measure value and growth, Fama and French (1993)

Why value stocks deliver superior returns:

• Value premium exists to compensate investors for the greater likelihood that such companies will experience financial distress, Fama and French (1993, 1996)

• The effect is a result of behavioral bias on the

Trang 6

part of the investor, Lakonishok, Shleifer, and

Vishny (1994)

Value factors can be constructed using fundamental

performance metrics as:

• Dividends

• Earnings

• Cash flow

• EBIT

• EBITDA

• Sales

• Adjustments for industry (and/or country) and

historical differences

Valuation ratios can be computed using historical

(trailing) or forward-looking metrics

3.3.1.2) Price Momentum

Researchers found a strong price momentum effect in

most asset classes in most countries According to

research:

• stocks that are winners over the previous 12

months tend to outperform losers (classified as

such over the past 12 months) and the

outperformance persists over the next 2 to 12

months

• short-term reversal effect: stocks that have

high price momentum tend to underperform

over the next 2 to 12 months

o this effect is attributable to behavioral

biases such as overreaction to information

Price momentum is subject to extreme tail risk

Sector-neutralized price momentum factor: Factor used

to reduce downside risk by removing the effect of sector

exposure from price momentum factor returns

3.3.1.3) Growth

Growth factors aim to measure a company’s growth

potential and can be calculated using historical growth

rates or projected forward growth rates Growth factors

can be short-term or long-term

Higher than sector or market growth is considered an

indicator of strong future stock price performance for

most metrics except assets

3.3.1.4) Quality

The accruals factor can be used as a style factor Based

on research paper on earnings quality, stock prices were

found to fail to fully reflect information contained in the

accruals and cash flow components of earnings The

performance of this factor is cyclical

Factors based on a company’s fundamental data include profitability, balance sheet, solvency risk, earnings quality, stability, sustainability of dividend payment, capital utilization, and management efficiency measures

Earnings revision – another analyst sentiment indicator which refers to the phenomenon of analysts revising their corporate earnings estimates Analysts have now started

to include cash flow revisions, sales revisions, ROE revisions, sell-side analyst stock recommendations, and target price changes as variables in the analyst sentiment category

News sentiment – Investors use natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to analyze the large volume

of news stories and quantify the news sentiment on stocks

3.3.2) Unconventional Factors Based on Unstructured Data

The rapid growth in technology and computational

algorithms has resulted in investors embracing big data –

extremely large data sets that includes structured and unstructured data Examples of unstructured data include satellite images and textual information Factor based on customer-supplier chain data is one example of an unconventional factor

3.4 Activist Strategies

Activist investors take stakes in target companies and advocate changes for the purpose of producing a gain

on the investment

Activists may want representation on company’s board

of directors in order to initiate strategic, operational, or financial structure changes Active investors may also support activities such as cost-cutting measures or asset sales and so forth

The Shareholder Activism Process:

• The process begins with investors screening companies and analyzing opportunities in the market

• The investor reviews companies carrying out

an in-depth analysis of their business and opportunities for unlocking value

• Investors then buy an equity stake in the company and start advocating for change

• Stakes above a certain threshold must be made public in certain jurisdictions

• The goal of activist investing could either be a financial gain or non-financial gain

• Activist investors aim to achieve their goals with smaller stakes rather than a full takeover bid

Practice: Example 4, CFA

Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Practice: Example 5, CFA Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 7

• Activist’s time horizon is shorter than a

buy-and-hold investor but the whole process can

last for several years

3.4.1.) The Popularity of Shareholder Activism

Proponents of shareholder activism argue that it is an

important and necessary activity that helps discipline

corporate management to the benefit of all

shareholders Opponent argue that activism can cause

distraction and negatively impact management

performance

Activist hedge funds are one of the most prominent

activist investors to resume their popular status following

a brief period of decline during the global financial crisis

These funds enjoy lighter regulation than other fund

types and maintain fee structures which offer greater

rewards

The popularity and viability of shareholder activism is also

influenced by:

• legal frameworks in different jurisdictions,

• shareholder structures, and

• cultural considerations

Shareholder activism is greatest in the US and visible in

Europe Other countries have a relatively limited degree

of activism due to cultural reasons and more

concentrated shareholder ownership of companies

3.4.2) Tactics Used by Activist Investors

Tactics used by activists to boost target company value

include:

• Seeking board representation and nominations

• Engaging with management by:

o Writing letters to management calling

for an explanation of suggested changes

o Participating in management

discussions

o Private meetings with management

o Launching proxy contests

• Proposing significant corporate changes

during the annual general meeting

• Proposing restructuring of the balance sheet

• Reducing management compensation or

realignment of compensation with share price

performance

• Launching legal proceedings against existing

management for breach of fiduciary duties

• Reaching out to the other company

shareholders for executing corporate action

• Launching a media campaign against existing

management practices

• Breaking up a large conglomerate to unlock

value

Effectiveness of shareholder activism depends on the response of the existing management team and the tools at the team’s disposal

Defense mechanisms available to hinder shareholder activism include:

• Multi-class share structures – a company founder’s shares are entitled to multiple votes per share

• Poison pill plans allowing the issuance of shares at a deep discount This causes economic and voting dilution

• Staggered board provisions – a portion of the board members are not elected at annual shareholder meetings

• Charter and bylaws provisions and announcements

3.4.3) Typical Activist Targets

Activist investor look for specific characteristics when looking for a target company On average, target companies feature slower revenue, earnings growth than the market, suffer negative share price momentum, and have weaker-than-average corporate governance Refer to Pages 42-45 of Reading 28 for further

information on activist investing

Other strategies active portfolio managers employ to beat the benchmark index include statistical arbitrage and event-driven strategies Both strategies extensively use quantitative data and are implemented in a systematic, rule-based way but can also incorporate management judgment

3.5.1) Strategies Based on Statistical Arbitrage and Market Microstructure

Statistical arbitrage strategies use statistical and technical analysis to exploit pricing anomalies

Data commonly used include:

• Stock price

• Dividend

• Trading volume

• Limit order book Analytical tools used include:

• Traditional technical analysis

• Sophisticated time-series analysis and econometric models

• Machine-learning techniques

Practice: Example 6, CFA Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 8

Portfolio managers take advantage of mean reversion in

share prices or opportunities created by market

microstructure issues

A Statistical Arbitrage Strategy: Pairs Trading

Statistical techniques are used to identify two securities

which are highly correlated with each other

Pairs trading takes a bet on the mean reversion in prices:

When the price relationship between the two securities

deviates from the long-term average and the deviation

is temporary, managers go long the underperforming

stock and short the outperforming stock As prices

converge to the long-term average, the manager closes

the trade securing a profit

Risk of pairs trading: The price divergence is not

temporary but due to structural reasons

Investors use a stop-loss rule for the risk management of

such trades

Identifying stocks pairs can be done either by using a

quantitative approach and creating models of stock

prices or by using a fundamental approach to judge the

two stocks whose prices should move together for

quantitative reasons

Many market microstructure-based arbitrage strategies

in the US take advantage of the NYSE Trade and Quote

database and often involve extensive analysis of the

limit order book Investors with analytical tools and

capabilities for high-frequency trades are in a position to

profit from such very short-term price discrepancies

3.5.2) Event Driven Strategies

Strategies exploit market inefficiencies related to corporate events such as mergers and acquisitions, earnings or restructuring announcements, share buybacks, special dividends, and spinoffs

Risk arbitrage associated with merger and acquisition (M&A) activity is the most common example of an event-driven strategy Two types of compensation for M&A transactions:

1) Cash-only transaction:

• Acquirer purchases shares of target at a proposed price

• Stock price of target < offer price until transaction completion

• Difference in prices creates profit opportunity for acquirer

2) Share-for-share exchange transaction:

• Acquirer uses own shares to purchase target company shares at an exchange ratio

• A risk-arbitrageur purchases target shares and short-sells acquirer shares using exchange ratio

• Shares of the target are used to cover acquirer’s short positions when acquisition is closed

Considerations for a risk-arbitrageur:

• Estimating the risk of a deal failing is challenging

• Deal duration must be considered to accurately estimate deal premium and decided which deal to participate in

4 Creating a Fundamental Active Investment Strategy

4.1 The Fundamental Active Investment Process

Goal of active management is to outperform a

benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis net of fees and

transaction costs

Steps followed by fundamental investors in the process:

1 Define the investment universe and market

opportunity or investment thesis, which is the

opportunity to earn an active return based on the

investment mandate

• Investment universe is determined by the

mandate agreed on by the manager and

client

• Mandate defines the market segments,

countries and regions in which value will be

sought

Investment thesis: Investors need to know what

is the opportunity and why is it there

o The ‘why’ can be determined by

understanding economic, financial, behavioral or other rationale for a strategy’s profitability in the future

2 Prescreen the investment universe to identify manageable securities for further analysis:

• May be done using qualitative and quantitative criteria

• Can be associated with a particular investment style

• For example, value style managers may rule out stocks with high P/E ratios and high debt-to-equity ratios

Practice: Example 7, CFA

Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 9

3 Identify company and business of screened stocks

by performing:

• industry and competitive analysis and

• analyzing financial reports

4 Forecast company performance often done in

terms of earnings or cash flows

5 Convert forecasts to valuations and identify ex

ante profitable investments

6 Construct a portfolio of identified investment with

the desired risk profile

• Stocks with high potential versus benchmark

are overweighed

• Stock with low potential versus benchmark are

underweighted, not held at all, or shorted

7 Rebalance the portfolio using buy and sell

disciplines

• Ensure desired risk exposures and investment

mandate are maintained

• A stock sell discipline will enable profiting from

a successful investment and timely exit from an

unsuccessful investment

In fundamental analysis, target stock price = fair market

value of stock

If actual stock price > target price:

• stock is overvalued

• upside potential is limited

• potential for downside risk exists

• managers should sell stock

Target price may be revised with the arrival of new

information Stock may also be sold if target price is

adjusted to be lower than current market price

Note:

• Analyst must consider his/her behavioral biases

when a stock continues to be held despite

deteriorating fundamentals

• Stop-loss trigger point: Sets maximum loss for asset

and is intended to limit behavioral biases by stock

to be sold when the stock price touches this

point

4.2 Pitfalls in Fundamental Investing

Common pitfalls include behavioral biases, the value

trap and the growth trap

4.2.1.) Behavioral Bias

Fundamental, discretionary investing and stock selection

are subject to behavioral bias as they depend on

subjective judgments by portfolio managers in research and analysis

CFA Program Curriculum divides biases into two groups

as follows:

1 Cognitive errors - basic statistical, information-processing, or memory errors

2 Emotional biases – arise spontaneously as a result of attitudes and feelings

Both biases cause decisions to deviate from rational decisions of traditional finance

4.2.1.1) Confirmation Bias

• A cognitive error

• Analysts look for information confirming their existing beliefs on favored companies and ignores/undervalues contradictory information

Also known as stock love bias

• known as selection bias - results in selective exposure, perception and retention

• Consequence of bias: poorly diversified portfolio, excessive risk exposure, and holdings

in poorly performing securities

• Risk of bias is reduced by actively seeking opinion of others considering a range of information sources

4.2.1.2) Illusion of Control

A cognitive error

• Investors overestimate their ability to select

stocks and influence outcomes

• Consequences of bias: Excessive trading and/or heavy weighting in selected stocks

• Bias can be reduced by seeking contrary viewpoints and setting and enforcing proper trading and diversification rules

4.2.1.3.) Availability Bias

• Information-processing bias falling in the cognitive error category

• Probability of outcome is estimated based on information availability and how easily outcome are recalled

• Easily recalled outcomes are perceived as more likely than those harder to recall or understand

• Consequence of bias: May reduce investment opportunity set and result in insufficient

diversification as manager opts for selective stocks which are familiar

• Bias can be reduced by conducting a disciplined portfolio analysis with a long-term focus which will eliminate any short-term emphasis caused by this bias

Practice: Example 8, CFA

Curriculum, Volume 4, Reading 28

Trang 10

4.2.1.4.) Loss Aversion Bias

• Emotional bias

• Investors prefer avoiding losses over achieving

gains

• Utility derived from a gain is lower than the

utility given up in a loss

• Consequences of bias: Unbalanced portfolios

are held: poorly performing positions are kept

in home of recovery and successful

investments are sold early to avoid risk

• Bias can be avoided by a disciplined trading

strategy with a stop-loss rule

4.2.1.5) Overconfidence Bias

• Emotional bias

• Investors demonstrated a high level of faith in

their judgement, reasoning and/or cognitive

abilities

• Individuals may overestimate knowledge,

abilities and access to information

• Consequences of bias: Overestimation of

expected results and underestimation of risks

• Bias can be avoided by regular review of

actual investment records and seeking

constructive feedback from other

professionals

4.2.1.6) Regret Aversion Bias

• Emotional bias

• Investors avoid pain of regret associated with

making poor decisions

• Consequence of bias: Investors may refrain

from decision-making, hold on to positions for a

long time and miss out on profitable

opportunities

• Bias can be avoided by using a carefully

defined portfolio review process – review and

justify existing positions and provide evidence

for a decision to avoid certain stocks

4.2.2) Value and Growth Traps

Value- and growth-oriented investors face risks known as

traps

4.2.2.1.) The Value Trap

A stock that appears to be attractively value with a low P/E multiple and/or low book value or price-to-cash flow multiples but is overpriced given worsening future prospects

A value trap appears to be an attractive investment and so investors should conduct research in a company before investment so that they understand reasons for attractive valuation

An investor is likely to fall into a value trap if a company does not have any catalysts available to trigger a reevaluation of its prospects In this case, a stock is less likely to adjust to fair value

4.2.2.2) The Growth Trap

Possible growth traps:

• Growth investors invest in stocks with the expectation of above-average earnings growth in the future If expectations are not met, company stock will underperform

• An overpriced stock is purchased, and the investee company may deliver above-average earnings and/or cash flow growth, in line with expectations However, share price does not move higher due to its high starting level

Investors are willing to pay a high price for growth stocks

as they believe earnings are sustainable and earnings are likely to grow fast in the future

Risks of value trap investing:

• Company’s superior market position may not

be sustainable due to competitive forces

• Earnings may experience an initial accelerated increase only to undergo a marked slowdown subsequently

5 Creating a Quantitative Active Investment Strategy

5.1 Creating a Quantitative Investment Process

Quantitative/systematic/rules-based investing generally

has a structured and well-defined process

The process starts with a belief or hypothesis and relies

on data from a wide range of sources, data science

and management to deal with missing values and

outliers, and quantitative models to test the hypothesis

5.1.1) Defining the Market Opportunity (Investment Thesis)

Like fundamental active investors, quantitative active investors believe that market is not efficient Fund managers use publicly available information to predict future stock returns

Ngày đăng: 21/10/2021, 07:58