1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

Tài liệu Create a WAN Using SDSL Modems pptx

3 473 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Create a WAN Using SDSL Modems
Tác giả Joseph L. Kashi, Thomas Boedeker
Thể loại Article
Năm xuất bản 2002
Định dạng
Số trang 3
Dung lượng 537,3 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Although, not applicable for all situations, if your organizations are with-in the same city, you might be able to set up a “campus” type system using sin-gle-line Digital Subscriber Lin

Trang 1

Organizations with seve ral offices

located in the same city usually

want to link them into a single secure

n e t work Although, not applicable for all

situations, if your organizations are

with-in the same city, you might be able to

set up a “campus” type system using

sin-gle-line Digital Subscriber Line (SDSL )

modems connected by a single pair of

phone wires

This pair of wires, re f e r red to by

various names by different phone

com-panies, is most often called a “dry pair.”

This is an unconditioned telephone wire

c i rcuit from one location to another

without telephone equipment

connect-ed to it These circuits are often much

less expensive than other alternative s

offered by the phone company, and can

a c h i e ve synchronous speeds of 2

Megabits per second

(Mbps) in each direction within dis-tances not exceeding two miles

Connection speed begins to drop after distances exceeding two miles, but respectable speeds can be achieved at distances of four to five miles

SDSL modems are bridging devices used to connect to remote segments of your Local Area Network (LAN) These segments can be in different buildings

or separated by many floors in a build-ing The connecting pair of wires can

be user-owned as in a campus LAN or

p rovided by the phone company using its wiring circuits Traffic is synchro n o u s , meaning the same speed in both dire c-tions, which is an important considera-tion if you are sharing databases or files

or want to backup data over the link

C o n f i g u ration from point to point looks like the following:

Office A Hub <——> SDSL modem <——> dry pair

wiring <——> SDSL modem <——> Office B Hub

To give an example of their use and how easy or hard it is to connect offices with this setup, we will take you thro u g h

an actual installation we performed The objective was to link five offices, each with its own LAN into a single network where various facilities

a re located any w h e re from 4,000 to 13,000 feet line distance (Line distance

is the length of the wire between the

t wo end points and will have to go

t h rough a telephone wire center or switch office unless you are running your own direct wire.)

The Wide Area Network (WA N ) was constructed to share netwo r k

re s o u rces and to minimize the number

of Internet Service Provider (ISP ) accounts and the need to secure each access point (including emergency ser-vice providers), which is best done using

h a rd - w i red land line communications using a single broadband access point that is shared by all offices and secured with a firewall and antivirus system We looked at seve ral options, including a virtual private network (VPN) and wire-less networking, before deciding to use SDSL modem bridging

Although 80 2 11b wireless net-working was feasible and could provide

11 Mbps basic Ethernet performance,

80 2 11b is expensive, with pre l i m i n a r y

Create a WAN Using

SDSL Modems

These bridging devices can connect to remote

segments of your LAN.

By Joseph L Kashi and Thomas Boedeker

Bridging the Gap: The 300S modem was plugged in at each end point and connected phone

cords to wall jacks on each end for this installation.

Trang 2

ments than using routers Some ro u t e r s offer encryption and can be used ove r

a dry pair link It’s also possible to use encryption techniques in a bridging setup such as the one that we described

h e re, but an extra level of hard wa re encryption complicates the installation and was not a significant concern When the remote segments we re added, our network branches all came together as a single network The SDSL modems are tra n s p a rent to various net-works and protocols The ability to con-nect to servers and other re s o u rces is simply based on the network opera t i n g system softwa re clients and pro t o c o l s that need to be installed on your re s p e c-tive servers and workstations regardless

of how the workstations physically con-nect to the network file servers All of the links under 13,000 feet line length operate at near 2 Mbps

N e t work packet collisions cause some reduction when multiple computers are trying to use the link simultaneously, but with small remote networks of four

We installed four dry pairs in the main office, one from each of the four remote locations, and then had the phone

com-p a ny install four regular com-phone jacks in our central office, one for each end of

e very dry pair link Then, we simply plugged in a 300S modem at each end point and connected the phone cord s

to the wall jacks on each end Wi t h i n about 30 seconds, the modem indica-tor lights showed good circuits We then connected the SDSL modem to our net-work using Ethernet cables

Initially, we had some internal net-work problems until we determined that

we needed to use an uplink port on our hub or switch or use a cro s s over cable if connecting the modems to a standard Ethernet port Once the modems we re

p roperly connected to our main net-work, individual segments we re able to see each other No other configura t i o n was re q u i red Although you give up some flexibility, security and contro l , simple WAN bridges are an easier method of connecting network

seg-estimates at about $25,000, and it’s

also potentially less secure VPN wa s

also possible, but in our local market,

a vailable VPN options we re not

syn-c h ronous with an $8,000 estimated

setup charge VPN also had a re c u r r i n g

monthly fee of more than $700 per

month for a mere 328 Kbps (kilobits

per second) bandwidth VPN also left no

option for connecting to another office

location located at a line distance of

24,000 feet because our local provider

planned to use an asymmetric Digital

Subscriber Line (ADSL), which could

not reach that far

Although our local telephone

com-p a ny doesn’t actively market the dry

pair SDSL service, we we re able to

obtain dry pair connections for a

monthly rate of only $53 for each

end-point to endend-point link, for a total re c u

r-ring cost of about $210 to $265 for all

f i ve offices This lower monthly cost

caused us to look closely at the

SDSL/dry pair option

Initially, our re s e a rch indicated we

could achieve ave rage line speeds in

excess of 1 Mbps over most of our

net-work, with published data indicating

that speed dropped dramatically as line

distances increased Based on our

actu-al field results, though, we can only

assume the published performance

esti-mates are very cautious and intended to

c over a wide variety of line quality and

o p e rating conditions because we have

consistently obtained better thro u g h p u t

for a given line distance than the ve

n-dors’ published estimates

We installed an ADC Megabit

Modem 300S (www.adc.com) with

switch selectable speed options of up to

2 Mbps, partly because we knew

some-one who already had good experience

with this product The 300S has an RJ

-45 port to connect to the network and

an RJ-11 port to connect to the dry pair

using a standard phone to wall cord It

uses an external power supply and is

priced at around $400

S e ve ral other SDSL modem models

a re available, including the NetTo N e t

SNE 2000-S, the MuLogic DSL - 2048

and the Netopia R7200 Howe ve r ,

some models are limited to 1.54 Mbps

Some other models also offer differe n t

connector options, so we suggest yo u

check carefully to be sure you have the

correct parts and connections on hand

Our plan to connect five separa t e

locations required us to choose our

cen-t ral office, where cen-the main servers are

located, as the WAN’s common point

Benefits and Downsides of SDSL

The benefits we achieved using dry pair SDSL WAN were:

1 Simple setup and maintenance

2 Synchronous connections at 2 Mbps speeds, which is faster than most common VPN options

3 Simplified data backup from remote segments to a central system

4 Easy sharing of a single Internet access point

5 Robust firewall at a single public access point with reduced network management costs

6 Intranet entirely within the local network, with no need to access the public Internet

7 Improved administration of remote computers

8 All LAN segments can be accessed from anywhere in the system as if they were in the same segment, although it’s slower than Ethernet

Dry pair SDSL has some disadvantages compared to other approaches, although these disadvantages were not critical in our installation:

1 Reduced security between the various network segments because all segments are accessible from anywhere in the system

2 Conflicts can arise from multiple DHCP servers if several are active on various LAN segments

3 If the DHCP server is down (due to a power outage), it’s possible that remote computers can lose their current address assignment, which causes difficulties using single-point Internet access or some database programs that require a current IP address for the workstation

4 Bridged SDSL is limited to 255 total computers or devices using an IP address unless we want to choose different firewall and antivirus

securi-ty devices This is really a limit of those devices because the SDSL bridge can recognize 8,192 network devices Although if you need that many network addresses, you probably need a more robust solution anyway

5 Traffic going out over the wiring is not encrypted by the SDSL modems

Trang 3

to six computers we found no significant

reduction in speed

As we extended to three and a half

miles we saw throughput speed drop to

about 1.5 Mbps, still T-1 speed at a

small fraction of the cost These re s u l t s

e n c o u rage us to consider a longer link

of five miles Although that longer link

has not been installed and tested, we

h a ve read about similar SDSL bridges

achieving T-1 speeds over distances of

four to five miles, but these longer

dis-tances work better if the copper wire is

the heavier 24 AWG rather than the

26-gauge wire that is common in older

areas

S e ve ral other points should be

noted If you have been using a

Dynamic Host Configuration Pro t o c o l

( DHCP) server on each LAN segment

to assign Internet Protocol (IP) addre s

s-es, you need to shut off all but one in

o rder to avoid potential conflicts in

a d d ress assignment And, with many security systems, you are limited to one range of IP addresses This will limit yo u

to 255 devices connected to the net-work on all segments combined

If you have a need to connect

sev-e ral officsev-es locatsev-ed within two to ssev-evsev-e n miles of each other, then SDSL modems using dry pair wiring to bridge between offices is a viable solution

Our re s e a rch leads us to conclude that given the price of ISP and tele-phone company services, the cost of dry pair wiring offers some distinct cost sav-ing possibilities worth considersav-ing The simplicity is such that the connection easily can be made without extensive technical consultant costs In addition, in some areas, it might prove to be a faster, less expensive alternative than other types of broadband access

A B O U T T H E A U T H O R S

THOMAS BOEDEKER is the city man-ager of Soldotna, Alaska He is the for-mer borough attorney for the Kenai Peninsula For a break from work and computers, Boedeker plays golf and reads mysteries and science fiction Boedeker has been an active attorney and litigator for more than two decades JOSEPH L KASHI practices law in Soldotna, Alaska He has held various posi-tions in the ABA’s Law Practice Management Section He received his bach-elor’s and master’s degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in

1973 and his law degree from Georgetown University in 1976 He is admitted to prac-tice before the Alaska Supreme Court, the U.S Supreme Court and the U.S Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and speaks fre-quently on legal automation topics.

Ngày đăng: 10/12/2013, 18:15