HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LAW LUND UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LAW ANTIDUMPING ISSUES IN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION AND VIETNAMESE LAW AND PRACTICE SPECIALTY: INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW... I
Trang 1hanoi l ;:?y o r law iuijd univet^ t
Trang 2HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LAW LUND UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF LAW
ANTIDUMPING ISSUES
IN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
AND VIETNAMESE LAW AND PRACTICE
SPECIALTY: INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
Trang 41 1 - C o m m it te e o n A n t i - D u m p in g P ra c tic e s 2 8
1 2 - C o n s u lt a t io n a n d D is p u te S e ttle m e n t 2 8
C H A PT E R II A N T I-D U M P IN G LA W AND PR A C T IC E IN V IE T N A M 30
I- S ocio-econom ic and political background in V ietnam 30
3.1- The real situation o f Investigation and application o f anti- 3 9
dumping measures in Vietnam.
3.2- The real situation o f imports and exports o f Vietnam being 3 9
investigated and applied anti-dumping measures in foreign
markets
C H A PT E R III- R E C O M M E N D A T IO N S A ND SO L U T IO N S TO P E R F E C T 42
O N T H E A N T I-D U M P IN G LA W IN V IE T N A M
I- Point o f view on an ti-d u m p in g law perfecting d irection 42
II- Som e recom m en d ation s to perfect the anti-d u m pin g law 43
Trang 7I go my gratitude to lecturer, lawyer Nguyen Van Thao and the Economic Law Faculty o f Hanoi University o f Business and Management for encouragement and support.
I would like to extend my acknowledgement to sirs and madams working at Ministry of Justice, Ministry o f Trade, National A ssem bly’s Office, and Governmental O ffice for enthusiastic assistance for my completion o f this thesis.
Finally, I should give my thanks to SIDA project, colleagues, friends and family for their understanding and both material and spiritual support along my study.
Trang 8U n d e r th e in c r e a s in g ly s tr o n g e r g lo b a liz a t io n , V ie t n a m has b e e n a c t iv e ly p r o m o tin g its
Trang 9s c h o la rs a p p r o a c h in g t h e o r ie s a n d p r a c tic e s r e la t in g to a n t i- d u m p in g as “Scientific bases
P o lic y - M in i s t r y o f T r a d e ; th e b o o k “D u m pin g a n d A n ti-d u m p in g m easures a n d
Trang 10W T O m e m b e r c o u n tr ie s
Trang 11C hapter 1: Som e th eories o f du m pin g and anti-du m pin g in G A T T /W T O
C hapter 2: A n ti-d u m p in g L aw and Practice in V ietnam
C hapter 3: R ecom m en d ation s and R esolutions to perfect on anti-d u m p in g law in
V ietnam
Trang 12CHAPTER I SOME THEORIES OF DUMPING AND ANTI-DUMPING IN GATT/WTO
Trang 13to d is t in g u is h w it h d u m p in g in d o m e s tic tra d e ( A r t i c l e 2 o f A D A ) T h is a c tio n p r e v e n te d
to e n s u re a h e a lth y tra d e a n d p r o t e c tio n f o r d o m e s tic p r o d u c e rs
' O x f o r d A d v a n c e d G enie, O x f o r d U n iv e r s ity Pre ss 2 000
8 A n ti - D u m p i n g law and necess ities, V i e tn a m Industrial and C o m m e r c ia l C h a m b e r , p 32
Trang 16E C f u r t h e r s ta te d :
“Thank to the high profits gained in their protective home market, Japan exporters can be afford to invest in marketing and commercial promotions in the Commodity By this practice, they imposed influences of their labels on consumers and increased the quantity
of sales so that they have become the market leader in all member countries but one In addition, they reinforce the leading position by advantages of price resulted from the increase of the dumped ”
10 See footnote No 1
" Lawsuit: A u d io tapes in c a s s e tte s (Japan, S K o re a and H ong K o n g ), O J 1990 L 313/5.
Trang 17A f t e r c o n s id e r a t io n a n d a n a ly s is , E C c o n c lu d e d :
"The EC industry has been increasingly considered as "bottom” producer, has no serious chances to compete either with the dumped imports from Japan on labels, images, promotion, design or on price of dumped imports from Hong Kong and S Korea”'2
Trang 182 Norm al V alue
A r t ic le V I 1 o f th e G A T T 1 9 4 7 is r e g u la te d : "products of one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products, is to be condemned if it causes or threatens material injury to an established industry in the territory of a contracting party or materially retards the establishment of a domestic industry"
Trang 19c a lc u la te d o n th e b a s e o f c o m p a r is o n a m o n g th e export price to th e normal price th a t
c a lc u la te d b y value in a third country.
For exam ple: I n th e p r o c e e d in g A n t id u m p in g D u t y I n v e s t ig a t io n o f C e r t a in F ro z e n F is h
F ille t s f r o m th e S o c ia lis t R e p u b lic o f V i e t n a m ^ , th e D e p a r tm e n t o f C o m m e r c e , th e U n it e d
S ta te s c o n c lu d e d th a t V ie t n a m w a s n o n - m a r k e te d e c o n o m y , th e n o r m a l v a lu e o f c a t fis h
p r o d u c ts w a s n o t d e t e r m in e d b e c a u s e th e p r ic e w a s c o n t r o lle d b y th e G o v e r n m e n t b u t n o t
b y th e la w o f d e m a n d a n d s u p p ly in m a r k e t T h is s a le d i d n ’ t r e f le c t th e r e a l v a lu e o f th e
c o m m o d it y , o r m o r e b r o a d ly , “market forces in Vietnam are not yet sufficiently developed
to permit the use of prices and costs in that country for purposes of the purposes o the Department’s dumping analysis etc". S o , th e D e p a r tm e n t t o o k I n d ia as th e r e p la c in g
Trang 21C ase I: E xport Sales to u n rela ted im porters
e v a s io n
Example 1: I n th e “ B ic y c le s ” 18 c a s e , th e In d o n e s ia n f i r m a n d M a la y s ia n f ir m s o ld b ik e s to
E C v ia t r a d in g c o m p a n ie s o u ts id e I n d o n e s ia a n d M a la y s ia b u t in J a p a n
Example 2: T h e E U p u t a n t i- d u m p in g ta x o n th e m e ta l r in g s im p o r t e d f r o m C h in a b u t fin is h e d in V ie t n a m , th e n r e - e x p o r te d to E U E U ju d g e d th a t th e a c tio n o f C h in e s e f ir m
17 S e a m le ss p ipes a n d T u b e s ( R ussia, t h e C z e c h R epublic, R o m a n ia a n d t h e S lovak R e p u b lic ) O J 1 997 L 141/36 ( p r o v is io r a l) , OJ 1997 L 322/1 (d efin itiv e).
IS B icycles (I n d o n e sia , M a l a y s i a an d T h a ila n d ), O J 1995 L 248/1 2 (p r o v isio n a l), O J 1996 L91/1 (definitive).
Trang 29q u e s tio n a t d u m p e d p r ic e s so th a t th e a u th o r itie s a re s a tis fie d th a t th e in ju r io u s e f fe c t o f
Trang 3112 C onsultations and D ispute Settlem ent
Trang 32CHAPTER II ANTI-DUMPING LAW AND PRACTICE IN VIETNAM
p o lic y o f e c o n o m ic in t e g r a t io n a n d d e v e lo p m e n t s u ita b le w i t h th e g lo b a liz a t io n te n d e n c y
w it h th e o b je c t iv e “taking initiatives of integration into the regional and international economy in the sprit of developing maximum internal strengths, improving international cooperation, ensuring independence and self-control and socialist orientation” w a s
r e a f fir m e d in th e I X P a r ty C o n g r e s s R e s o lu t io n N o 0 7 o f th e P o lit b u r o o n th e R e g io n a l
a n d I n te r n a tio n a l e c o n o m ic I n t e g r a t io n a ls o s e t o u t th e o b je c t iv e “taking initiatives in integrating the international economy in order to expanse markets, mobilize capital, technology and management knowledge to speed up the socialist oriented modernization and industrialization etc ”
W it h th e h ig h d e t e r m in a t io n t o in t e r n a t io n a l e c o n o m ic in t e g r a t io n , in 1 9 9 2 , V ie t n a m
u n s to p p e d th e r e la t io n s h ip w i t h th e in t e r n a t io n a l m o n e t a r y o r g a n iz a tio n s s u c h as I M F ,
W B O n 2 5 J u ly 1 9 9 5 , V ie t n a m b e c a m e th e o f f i c i a l m e m b e r o f A s ia n S o u th E a s t N a tio n s ( A S E A N ) , s ig n e d th e P r o t o c o l in c o m m it m e n t to ta k e p a r t in th e C E F P / A F T A ; s in c e 01
Trang 35be tre a te d as n o t b e in g in th e o r d in a r y c o u rs e o f tr a d e ” ( A r t i c l e 2 2 l o f A D A ) a n d th is
m a y b e d is r e g a r d e d in d e t e r m in a t io n o f th e n o r m a l v a lu e o f th e p r o d u c t b y th e a u th o r itie s
Trang 362; EU at the R e g u la tio n N o 5 1 9 /9 4 / C E listed e c o n o m i e s c o n s i d e r e d as n o n - m a r k e t o nes, in c lu d in g Albania, A rm en ia,
A zerb aijan , B elarus, G e o r g ia , K a z a k h s ta n , N o r th K o re a , K y rg y z , M o l d o v a , M o n g o l ia , T a jik ista n , T u rk m e n ista n , Ukra ine, U z b e k is ta n , C h in a and V ietn am
Trang 37V ie t n a m is in th e t r a n s it io n in t o th e m a r k e t o n e , s o th e V A D n o t d is tin g u is h e s th e n o n -
m a r k e t a n d m a r k e t e c o n o m ie s
2.2.3 Conditions for application of anti-dumping measures
T o e n s u re th e o b je c tiv e n e s s o f th e a p p lic a tio n o f a n t i- d u m p in g m e a s u re s , in th e
Trang 39' s T h e r e are tw o auth o rities in U S , th ey are Intern ational T ra d e C o m m it t e e an d D e p t o f C o m m e r c e
T h a ila n d , b e fo r e 1999, there w ere tw o authorities: D ept o f F o re ig n T r a d e (in c h a rg e o f in vestigation o f a n ti
d u m p in g ), and D e p t o f D o m e s t ic T ra d e (in charge o f in vestigation o f injuries) U n d e r the A n ti- D u m p in g L a w and
S u b sid ia ry B E 2 5 4 2 (2 0 0 0 ) , all these tw o p ro c e s se s are re sp o n sib ility o f the D e p t o f F o r e i g n T ra d e
Trang 40U n d e r th e V A D , th e t im e o f in v e s t ig a t io n f o r a p p lic a tio n o f a n t i- d u m p in g m e a s u re s is n o t
o v e r 12 m o n th s f r o m th e d a te o f th e d e c is io n o n in v e s t ig a t io n In s p e c ia l c a s e , th e M in is t e r
o f T ra d e m a y e x t e n d th e in v e s t ig a t io n tim e , b u t th e e x te n s io n is n o t o v e r 0 6 m o n th s T h is
p e rio d is e q u a l to th a t o f W T O B u t, h e re , i t s h o u ld b e n o te d th a t V ie t n a m d o e s n o t h a v e
e n o u g h q u a lif ie d s t a f f th a t a re lim it e d in b o th th e o r ie s a n d p r a c tic e s ( k n o w le d g e o f f o r e ig n
la n g u a g e , o f a c c o u n t in g , e tc W h ile th e W T O a u t h o r it ie s o f a n t i- d u m p in g in v e s tig a tio n
Trang 42L IST O F A N T I-D U M P IN G IN V E S T IG A T IO N S
TO V IE T N A M E S E E X P O R T S , U P T O I1 /2 0 0 4 31
NO YEAR COUNTRY
I
1 1994 Colombia Rice No anti-dumping tax imposed Dumped in the rate of
9.07% but not injury to the rice industry in Colombia.
2 1998 EU Glutamate Anti-dumping tax imposed, the rate 16,8%
3 1998 EU Shoes and
slippers
No anti-dumping tax imposed, because its market share was increased smaller than China, Indonesia and Thailand.
4 2000 Poland Lighters Anti-dumping tax imposed, the rate of 0.09/pcs
5 2001 Canada Garlic Anti-dumping tax imposed; CAD 1,48/kg
8 2002 S Korea Lighter The prosecutor withdrawn the complaint, the Trade
Committee of S Korea decided suspension
9 2002 US Catfish Anti-dumping tax imposed The rate was about from
12 2004 EU Bicycle Investigation was initiated in April, 2004
13 2004 US Shrimp
Anti-dumping tax imposed at rate of from 12,11 to 93,13% according to the preliminary judgment of DOC, US.
11 S o u i.e : c o lle c te d from intern et by a u th o r
Trang 44CHAPTER III RECOMMENDATIONS AND SOLUTIONS
TO PERFECT THE ANTI-DUMPING LAW IN VIETNAM
Trang 45d o c u m e n t T h e V A D n o t p r o v id e d e t a ile d d e f in it io n s o f “the ordinary course of trade”,
“significant injury to the domestic industry”, ‘‘threat of significant injury to ”, " export price" thai m a y p r o v id e S ta te ’ s b o d ie s c o n v e n ie n c e in im p le m e n t a t io n b u t c a u s e c e r ta in
d i f f i c u l t y to e n te r p r is e s a n d r e la te d p a r tie s in o b s e r v a tio n , im p le m e n t a t io n a n d a p p lic a tio n
A lth o u g h , th is d i f f i c u l t y c a n b e o v e r c o m e b y d o c u m e n ts o f in s t r u c t io n is s u e d b y th e
G o v e r n m e n t a n d o t h e r S ta te b o d ie s , th e s t a b ilit y is lo w c a u s in g th e a p p lie d s u b je c ts o n th e
d e fe n s iv e
Trang 4612 O n 2 9 /4 /2 0 0 4 , E u r o p e a n B ic y c le A s s o c i a tio n (E B A ) su b m it te d the a p p lic a tio n for a n t i - d u m p in g investi gati on on
b ic y c le s im p o r t e d fr o m 9 V ie t n a m e s e c o m p a n i e s to EU 03 c o m p a n i e s out o f th ese 9 c o m p a n i e s s u e d d i d n ’t e x p o rt
b ic y c le s to EU m arket T h e c o m p e t e n t a u th o r ity o f C /O in V ie tn am , V ie tn a m C h a m b e r o f C o m m e r c e and In dustry ( V C C 1 ) a s s e rte d not to issu e C /O to three d e p e n d e n ts
Trang 47V ie tn a m h a s s ig n e d o r a c c e d e d to o th e r w is e p r o v id e f o r , s u c h in te r n a t io n a l a g re e m e n ts
s h a ll a p p ly ” ( A r t i c l e 2 7 - S e ttle m e n t o f d is p u te s a n d h a n d lin g o f v io la t io n s ) T h e
G o v e r n m e n t o f V ie t n a m s h o u ld p a y a tte n tio n to th e c o m p a t ib ili t y w it h th e g e n e ra l
in te r n a tio n a l p r a c tic e s a n d W T O ’ s p r o v is io n s b o th in th e o r y a n d p r a c tic e s w h e n b u ild in g
1.3 The G o vern m en t sh o u ld strengthen the State m a n a g em en t ability o f the
C om petition D epartm en t, M in istry o f Trade a n d o th er S ta te ’s organs f o r anti-dum ping.