1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

MPLS cisco QOS VPN full mpls migration

74 119 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 74
Dung lượng 1,71 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Migration Example 1: Separate Networks -> Dual Backbones• Surround ATM network with IP+ATM Edge Switches • Link them to both backbones • Carry IP services on router backbone & ATM ser

Trang 1

1 Presentation_ID © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc

MPLS Migration &

Deployment

Jeremy Lawrence (With a few slides by Tom Downey & Rob

Redford)

Trang 2

Full Meshes & Scalability

Trang 3

Why Migrate to MPLS?

3

© 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc Cisco Confidential

Trang 4

Different Solutions for LAN and WAN

Multiprotocol over ATM

(MPOA)

MPL S

Trang 5

5 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Label Switch Routers (LSRs):

ATM Switches or

Routers

Edge Label Switch Routers (LSRs) Customer sites

run ordinary IP

Trang 6

Key MPLS Capabilities

IP/ATM Integration Traffic Engineering

IP Multicast IP CoS

RSVP

Trang 7

7 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Traditional IP over ATM

Put routers around the edge of an ATM network

Connect routers using Permanent Virtual Circuits

This does not provide optimal integration of IP

and ATM

Trang 8

Fully support IP, along with

Frame Relay and ATM, on

shared ATM backbone

Provides optimal IP

forwarding capability on an

ATM network

Trang 9

9 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

MPLS Brings IP and ATM Together

Overhead limits performance

and efficiency

Data path

IP+ATM Switch

PNN

I MPL S

IP

Cisco IP+ATM

IP Ser vi ce s

AT M Ser vi ce s

No complex translation

Full IP and ATM capabilities

Built-in IP routing

Cisco IP+ATM

Trang 10

IP over ATM Integration MPLS: IP Fundamentals

Full support for IP

CoS, soon RSVP, & IP

multicast

IP Multicast IP CoS

RSVP

Trang 11

11 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Network-Wide Delivery of Services

MPOA, similar approaches work only across network cores with:

ATM Switches

No delivery of advanced services like VPNs over network cores with:

Packet-over-SONET/SDH/WDM Routers

Switch-Routers

Very limited migration and interoperability options

?

?

Trang 12

Network-Wide Delivery of Services

VPNs across networks with all equipment types:

ATM Packet-over-SONET/SDH/WDM Switches

Routers Switch-Routers

Trang 13

13 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

300 Mbps Traffic Flow

155 Mbps Fiber Link Link Failure

No Physical Link

Trang 14

Single carrier network supporting multiple customer IP VPNs

Separately engineered

customer private IP

networks

MPLS Network

Virtual Private Networks

Trang 15

15 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Corp B Site 1

Corp A Site 3

Trang 17

17 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Common Misconceptions

compared to ordinary IP networks

Trang 18

Common Misconceptions

Myth: IP has poor Quality-of-Service options,

and MPLS has much better QoS

Reality: IP networks with DiffServ and RSVP

have largely the same QoS options as MPLS (ATM or Packet-based)

MPLS provides only a few minor QoS

advantages compared to state-of-the-art IP networks

Trang 19

19 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

MPLS & QoS: A Few Minor

Advantages

packet-based IP for higher-CoS traffic, e.g VOIP This is

significant only with mixed voice and data traffic at

lower trunks speeds: E3/T3 trunks and below.

QoS

but this function is similar to a full RSVP-on-IP

implementation

Trang 20

Keep up with Internet growth

Reduced complexity for lower operational cost

Better utilization of trunks means lower costs

Optimise performance of existing networks

New revenue opportunity for SPs

Scalability for lower operational costs and faster

rollout

L2 privacy and performance for IP

Trang 21

IP+ATM Networks &

Dual-Backbone Networks

21

© 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc Cisco Confidential

Trang 22

IP+ATM Edge

Switch

IP+ATM Core Switch

All services are fully

integrated on one set of switches and one set of links

Trang 23

23 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

MPLS

Frame Relay/ATM PVCs & SVCs

Unified access to

multiple services

Each service runs

“natively” on the ATM Switches

- no overlays

- resources partitioned by service

Each service runs

“natively” on the ATM Switches

- no overlays

- resources partitioned by service

IP+ATM Networks

Trang 24

MPLS & IP services

Frame Relay/ATM PVCs & SVCs

IP+ATM Edge Switch

Different DLCIs or VCIs on the

same customer link can go to

different

Different DLCIs or VCIs on the

same customer link can go to

different

IP+ATM Edge Switches

Trang 25

25 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Common Situation in Carriers:

Separate Networks

IP part of the carrier has router network, typically router and dial access

Often, this part uses Cisco equipment.

Router network may be running MPLS & VPNs

Traditional data part of the carrier has a FR/ATM

network This part often has non-Cisco equipment.

Router Network

ATM Network

Trang 26

Migration Example 1: Separate Networks -> Dual Backbones

Surround ATM network with

IP+ATM Edge Switches

Link them to both backbones

Carry IP services on router

backbone &

ATM services on ATM backbone

Multiservice Acceleration Program (MAP) allows 120 days free trial!

Trang 27

27 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

From a single link, a

customer can access both

DLCI into PVC

Trang 28

Dual Backbones: Summary

Dual backbone networks are an alternative to

IP+ATM networks

With an IP+ATM edge switch, dual-backbone

networks can offer the same services as

IP+ATM networks

The Multiservice Acceleration Program allows

120 days free trial of IP+ATM edge switches to qualified customers

Trang 30

Migration Technologies 1: PVCs

PVCs can be used to

carry ordinary IP (RFC 1483) from CPE to

Edge LSRs: ‘backhaul’

PVCs can be used to

connect Edge LSRs or other Packet-based

LSRs over traditional ATM switches

MPLS-over-PVCs

Trang 31

31 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

MPLS-over-PVCs

MPLS-over-PVCs connects

packet-based LSRs to each other (All edge LSRs are packet-based LSRs.)

MPLS-over-PVCs can’t terminate on ATM-LSRs

The BPX 8600 is an

exception: the Label Switch

Controller has limited ability

to terminate MPLS-over-PVCs

Edge LSR ATM-LSR

MPLS-over-PVC

Trang 32

Migration Technologies 2: VP

Tunnels

VP Tunnels (or “Virtual

Trunks”) are PVP connections

VP Tunnels can connect

to LSRs of any type, including ATM-LSRs

Exceptions: limitations on some particular LSRs and

line cards See Designing

ATM MPLS Networks.

LSR of Any Type LSR of Any Type

VP Tunnel

Trang 33

33 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Migration Example 2: Introduction

has an ATM network, but does not yet want to upgrade the edge switches to IP+ATM Edge Switches

Packet-Based MPLS

Trang 34

Migration Example 2: Starting Point

LSR Edge LSR

Application: early trials of

MPLS VPNs in an existing

SP ATM network

Trang 35

35 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Migration Example 2: Next Step

Edge LSR

Replace or upgrade some

edge switches to Edge LSR capability.

Link the edge LSRs to the

MPLS part of the network

Remove some backhaul

PVCs

Application: later deployment

of MPLS VPNs into an existing ATM network

Trang 36

Migration Example 2: Final Stage

remaining edge devices

Trang 37

37 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Migration Example 3: Introduction

has an ATM network, and does want to upgrade the edge switches to IP+ATM Edge Switches

Trang 38

Run packet-based MPLS over PVCs

Has the same scaling issues as an ordinary IP overlay

Mesh is troublesome to design What should QoS parameters be?

Application: support of VPNs in an existing ATM Network

Trang 39

39 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Run ATM MPLS over VP Tunnels between Edge LSRs

Similar issues to MPLS-over-PVCs

Application: support of VPNs in an existing ATM

Network

Trang 40

` One-armed’ ATM-LSR

Simpler mesh of PVPs

Non-MPLS

ATM Cores

Add ATM MPLS Functionality to Some Switches

Migration Example 3: Intermediate

Stage

Migrate to VP Tunnels, if necessary

Add ATM MPLS to some existing switches, or add new switches

PVP mesh is broken into smaller meshes: aids scalability,

Trang 41

41 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Migration Example 3: Final Stage

Add more ATM-LSRs for optimum scalability & simplicity

Ordinary ATM connections can still be used through ATM Label

Switches

Parts of the network can still use ordinary ATM switches, if required

VP tunnels are not required between adjacent ATM-LSRs

Ordinary ATM

switch, if required

ATM-LSRs

Ordinary ATM Connection

Trang 42

Migration Example 4: Introduction

ATM network, and does want to upgrade the edge switches to IP+ATM Edge Switches

Dual Backbones

Trang 43

43 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

ATM links

MPLS-over-PVCs

Non-MPLS ATM Core

Migration Example 4: Starting Point

ATM Network

Trang 44

Migration Example 4: Intermediate

Stage

Add packet-based LSRs

PVC mesh is broken into smaller meshes: aids

scalability, efficiency, configuration (but this solution is

Packet-Based LSR

Simpler Mesh

of PVCs

Trang 45

45 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Migration Example 4: Later Stage

the Edge LSRs to them

Packet-Based MPLS Network

Trang 46

Can be used in variants

of all the migration examples shown

Trang 47

47 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Other Alternatives

MPLS transport mechanisms may be combined in many

other ways

A Label Switch Controller can also acts as an LSR or Edge

LSR, and may terminate PVCs, PVPs or Packet-over-SDH

ATM-LSR with

LSC

SONET/SDH or WDM

Packet-Over-links

Packet-based

LSRs PVC mesh

PVP mesh

Trang 48

Routing Planning Issues

Trang 49

49 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Routing Protocol Choices

A provider’s MPLS network should use either OSPF

or IS-IS as its Interior Gateway Protocol

Other IGPs can be used with MPLS, but won’t

support MPLS Traffic Engineering

Migrating an existing network to IS-IS or OSPF may

be required before enabling MPLS support

Trang 50

ATM-LSRs and

Packet-based LSRs can act as

Area Border Routers, but

with limitations

Area 0

Area 2 Area 1

OSPF & IS-IS Design Constraints

Trang 51

51 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Area Border Routers

At LSR-based Area Border Routers:

PE routers must not be summarized

routes at all may be summarized

Trang 52

MPLS Deployment Options

Available Now

Trang 53

53 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

access lines

Trang 54

BPX 8650 or MGX8850/PXM-45 network without MPLS switching

MGX 8850/PXM-1

MGX 8850

Trang 55

55 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

BPX 8650 network with MPLS switching

MGX 8850/PXM-1

Trang 56

Option 3: Details

PVP cross connects are established on the

PXM-1 No virtual trunk configuration on the

PXM-1.

ATM MPLS Links

BPX 8650

1 Configure a UNI or NNI link (not

a feeder trunk) between the MGX

Trang 57

57 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Option 3: More Details

UNI or NNI link carrying MPLS VP Tunnels

Feeder trunk carrying AutoRoute connections

If both AutoRoute PVCs and MPLS LVCs are carried between the

MGX & BPX, then two ATM links are required:

Feeder trunk for AutoRoute UNI or NNI link for MPLS

Trang 58

Option 4: ATM MPLS with

Trang 59

59 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Option 5: Packet-Based MPLS With

Router Edges

LSRs: 3600, 4700,

7200, 7500, and/or 12000

Edge LSRs: 3600,

4700, 7200, and/or

7500

Trang 60

Option 6: Packet-Based MPLS MPLS with MGX 8850 Edge

PXM acting as PVC switch

MPLS-over-PVCs

PoS MPLS Links

GSR 12000 (or 7200/7500) network running MPLS

MGX 8850 ATM link carrying PVCs

Trang 61

Full Meshes & Scalability

61

© 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc Cisco Confidential

Trang 62

Run packet-based MPLS over PVCs or PVPs (“VP Tunnels”)

Has the same scaling issues as an ordinary IP overlay

Application: support of VPNs over an existing ATM Network

Trang 63

63 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Full Mesh Problems

ATM switches do not run IP routing (OSPF,

re-IP link failures can cause a storm of routing updates

Traffic scales as N 3

Limit without work-arounds: about 50 edge

LSRs

Another issue: each PVC on an Edge LSR

uses 1 Interface Descriptor Block (IDB)

Layer 3 View Physical View

Trang 64

Work-Arounds & Scaling

3 Partial Mesh

Trang 65

65 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

` One-armed’ ATM-LSR

Simpler mesh of PVPs

Non-MPLS

ATM Cores

Add ATM MPLS Functionality to Some Switches

1(a) VP Tunnel Network With ATM

Trang 66

1(b) PVC Network Divided by Core

Routers

Simpler mesh of PVCs

Add Packet-based Label Switch Routers

with ATM interfaces

Add some router-based LSRs (Cisco 7500, 12000) to core

PVC mesh is broken into smaller meshes, each with up to

Trang 67

67 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

1 Separated Meshes: Evaluation

Meets IP routing scalability requirements Reduces complexity of meshes, dimensioning problems, etc Reduces IDB requirements on Edge LSRs somewhat

Requires additional equipment The performance requirements on the core LSRs may be infeasibly high.

Trang 68

2(a) ATM MPLS

Add more ATM-LSRs for optimum scalability & simplicity

Ordinary ATM connections can still be used through ATM Label

Switches

Parts of the network can still use ordinary ATM switches, if

VP tunnels are not required between adjacent ATM-LSRs

Ordinary ATM

switch, if

required

LSRs

ATM-Ordinary ATM Connection

Trang 69

69 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

Trang 71

71 Presentation_ID © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc www.cisco.com

3 Partial Mesh

Partial mesh

of PVCs: some links ‘missing’ Non-MPLS

ATM Core

Trang 72

3 Partial Mesh: Evaluation

Pros

each router, guaranteeing network stability.

traffic per edge LSR) will tend to increase as the network grows.

Ngày đăng: 18/10/2019, 15:37