Ü The important issue for financial management is the cash flows created by a lease, as compared to a straight purchase of the asset.. Focus on the NPV of the operating cash flows Is it
Trang 1OVERVIEW
Objective
Ü To apply discounted cash flow techniques to specific areas
LEASE v BUY
CAPITAL
RATIONING
Ü Definition
Ü Methods
ASSET REPLACEMENT DECISIONS
Ü The issue
Ü Limitations of replacement
analysis
Ü The issue
Ü Decision-making
Ü The investment decision
Ü The financing decision
Ü The final decision
DCF APPLICATIONS
Trang 21 CAPITAL RATIONING
1.1 Definition
A situation where there is not enough finance available to undertake all
available positive NPV projects
Ü Hard capital rationing – where the capital markets impose limits on the amount of finance available e.g due to high perceived risk of the company
Ü Soft rationing – where the company itself sets internal limits on finance availability e.g
to encourage divisions to compete for funds
Ü Single-period capital rationing – where capital is in short supply in only one period
Ü Multi-period – where capital is rationed in two or more periods
1.2 Methods
1.2.1 Divisible projects
A divisible project is where the company can undertake between 0-100% of the project - infinite divisibility However a project cannot be repeated
Ü Calculate a “profitability index” for each project = NPV/Initial Investment
Ü Rank projects according to their index
Ü Allocate funds to the most effective projects in order to maximise NPV
Example 1
Cash is rationed to $50,000 at t0
Projects are divisible
Required:
Determine the optimal investment plan
Trang 3Solution
1.2.2 Non-divisible projects
A non-divisible/indivisible project must be done 100% or not at all
Ü Do not calculate a profitability index;
Ü Simply list all possible combinations of projects
Ü Choose combination with highest NPV
Example 2
Detail as for example 1 but assume that projects are non-divisible
Solution
1.2.3 Mutually-exclusive projects
Mutually exclusive projects is where two or more particular projects cannot be undertaken
at the same time e.g because they use the same land
Ü Divide projects into groups; with one of the mutually-exclusive projects in each group
Ü Calculate the highest NPV available from each group (assume projects are divisible unless told otherwise)
Ü Choose the group with the highest NPV
Trang 4Example 3
As for example 1 but C and D are mutually exclusive
Solution
1.2.4 Multi-period capital rationing
Ü If finance is limited in several periods then a linear programming model would have to
be set up and solved in order to find the optimal investment strategy
Ü This is outside of the scope of the syllabus
2.1 The issue
Ü Assume that the company has already decided it requires a particular non-current asset
Ü A secondary decision is about how often to replace the asset
Ü For example how often should the company replace its fleet of motor vehicles or its computer equipment?
Ü This is referred to as an asset replacement decision
Method:
1 Calculate the NPV of each possible replacement cycle
2 Calculate the Annual Equivalent Cost (AEC) of each cycle
AEC = NPV/Annuity factor
3 Choose the cycle with the lowest AEC
Trang 5Example 4
A machine costs $20,000
Running costs Scrap proceeds
Company’s cost of capital = 10%
Required:
Should the machine be replaced every one or every two years?
Solution
2.2 Limitations of replacement analysis
Ü Changing technology e.g it may be advisable to replace IT equipment more often than suggested by the above analysis
Ü Asset requirements may change over time
Ü Non-financial factors e.g employees may be more satisfied if their company cars are replaced more often
Trang 63 LEASE v BUY
3.1 The issue
Ü Should the company acquire an asset through:
̌ A straight purchase i.e borrowing to buy, or
̌ A lease
Ü There are two main types of lease:
̌ Operating lease; where the asset is simply rented for a relatively short part of its useful economic life;
̌ Financial/capital lease; where the asset is leased for most of its life
Ü Although the distinction between operating and finance lease is important in financial reporting, it is not so relevant in financial management
Ü The important issue for financial management is the cash flows created by a lease, as compared to a straight purchase of the asset
3.2 Decision-making
TWO DECISIONS
Does the asset give operational benefits?
Focus on the NPV of the operating cash
flows
Is it cheaper to buy or lease?
Focus on the relative beefits of WDA’s from buying and the tax relief on the lease payments
Discount these cash flows using a rate
which reflects operating risk of
investment e.g average cost of capital
Discount these cash flows using
after-tax cost of borrowing
Commentary
Ü The issue here is stripping financing cash flows from operating cash flows and
using separate discount rates for each
Ü Examination questions may focus merely on the financing decisions
Trang 73.3 The investment decision
Discount the cash flows from using the asset (sales, materials, labour, overheads, tax on net
cash flows, etc) at the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
3.4 The financing decision
Discount the cash flows specific to each financing option at the after-tax cost of debt The assumption is that shareholders view borrowing and leasing as equivalent in terms of
financial risk, so the after-tax cost of debt is an appropriate discount rate for both options The preferred financing option will be that with the lowest NPV of cost
The relevant cash flows for each possible method of financing are as follows
Buy asset – Purchase cost, tax saving on WDA’s, scrap
proceeds Lease asset (operating
or finance lease) – Lease payments, tax saving on lease payments
Under UK tax law all lease payments are tax allowable deductions – both for finance leases and operating leases
3.5 The final decision
If the NPV of the cost of the best finance source is less than the NPV of the operating cash flows, then the project should be undertaken
Trang 8Example 5
New project
Asset costs $200,000 on the first day of a new accounting period
Scrap value $25,000 on the last day of the next accounting period
Operating inflows $150,000 for two years
Tax at 33% and paid one year in arrears
Weighted average cost of capital 10%
Capital allowances at 25% reducing balance
Finance options:
(1) borrowing at a post-tax cost of 7%;
(2) lease for $92,500 per year in advance for two years (lease payments
are tax allowable)
Required:
(a) Determine the operational benefit of the project
(b) Determine how the project should be financed
(c) Decide whether the project is worthwhile
Solution
(a) Operational value
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 10% PV
∴
Trang 9(b) Financing decision
(1) Borrow and buy flows
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 7% PV
(W) WDA’s
at 33% Time
(2) Leasing flows
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 7% PV
(c) Final decision
$
PV of operating flows
PV of cheaper finance
Trang 10
Key points
ÐWith capital rationing it is essential to identify the nature of the projects
i.e divisible or non-divisible, mutually exclusive or not
ÐWith asset replacement decisions, the key is the use of Annual Equivalent
Cost to compare cycles of different lengths
ÐWith lease vs buy decisions, the key is to separate the financing decision
from the investment decision and analyse each at a discount rate reflecting
the risk of the cash flows Also remember all lease payments are tax
deductible expenses in the UK
FOCUS
You should now be able to:
Ü distinguish between hard and soft capital rationing;
Ü apply profitability index techniques for single period divisible projects;
Ü use DCF to analyse asset replacement decisions;
Ü apply DCF methods to projects involving lease or buy problems
Trang 11EXAMPLE SOLUTIONS
Solution 1 — Divisible projects
Investment
NPV
50
100
10
) 50 (
10
84
15
45
AVAILABLE 50
_
40
_
25
_
Solution 2 — Non-divisible
$000
A only
Choose C + D
Solution 3 — Mutually exclusive
Group 1 Group 2
NPV
$ 100 50 (50) 10 84 10 100 50 (50) 10 45 15
Index
_
2 _
_
(5) _
_
8.4 _
_
2 _
_
(5) _
_
3 _
Trang 12Plan
NPV Capital NPV Capital
Accept C and 0.8A
Solution 4 — Machine replacement
Replace every year
Time Cash flow Discount factor PV
1 Running costs (5,000) 0.909 (4,545)
Annual equivalent cost =
factor annuity
year
909 0
001 ,
Now repeat the above procedure, assuming the machine is replaced every two years
Time Narrative Cash flow
@ 10% Discount factor value Present
0
1
2
2
Purchase
Running costs
Running costs
Scrap proceeds
(20,000) (5,000) (5,500) 13,000
1 0.909 0.826 0.826
(20,000) (4,545) (4,543) 10,738
NPV = (18,350)
736 1
350 , 18 AF 10%
year 2
350 ,
Conclusion Replace every two years
Trang 13Solution 5 — Lease or Buy
(a) Operational value
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 10% PV
1–2
2–3 (49,500) 150,000 Project returns Tax on above 1.736 1.578 (78,111) 260,400
182,289 _
(b) Financing decision
(1) Borrow and buy flows
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 7% PV
0
2
2
3
(200,000) 25,000 16,500 41,250
Purchase cost Sale proceeds (W)
(W)
1 0.873 0.873 0.816
(200,000) 21,825 14,405 33,660
(130,110)
(W) WDA’s
at 33% Time
0
1 Purchase WDA at 25% (50,000) 200,000 16,500 2
WDV b/f
2 Balancing allowance
125,000
(2) Leasing flows
Time Cash flow Narrative DF @ 7% PV
0–1
2–3 (92,500) 30,525 Lease payments Tax relief thereon 0.873 + 0.816 1.935
= 1.689
(178,988) 51,557
(127,431)
Conclusion: The cheapest method of finance is to lease
Trang 14(c) Final decision
$
PV of operating flows
PV of leasing flows (cheaper finance – see (b)) (127,431) 182,289
54,858 The asset should be acquired using a lease