THÔNG TIN DI ĐỘNG C2
Trang 1Chapter 2: Wireless Channel models
Trang 2Multipath wireless propagation
reflection and diffraction
Trang 3Path loss, shadowing and fading
The characteristic of (mobile) wireless channel is the variations ofthe channel strength over time and frequency
The variations can be divided into two types:
path loss of signal as a function of distance and shadowing by large objects such as buildings and hills.
interference of the multiple signal paths between transmitter and
receiver
Trang 4An example of path loss, shadowing and fading
Pathloss
Trang 5An example of path loss, shadowing and fading (cont.)
Trang 6Path loss models
It is well known that the received signal power decays with the
square of the path length in free space
More specifically, the received envelope power is
𝑃𝑟= 𝑃𝑡𝐺𝑡𝐺𝑟(4𝜋𝑑𝜆𝑐
)2
where:
respectively
Trang 7Path loss models (cont.)
The signals in land mobile radio applications, however, do not
experience free space propagation A more appropriate theoreticalmodel assumes propagation over a flat reflecting surface (the earth)
𝑃𝑟= 4𝑃𝑡
( 𝜆𝑐4𝜋𝑑
)2
where we have used the approximation sin 𝑥 ≈ 𝑥 for small 𝑥
Trang 8Path loss models (cont.)
The path loss is defined by
𝐿𝑝 (𝑑𝐵) = 10 log10( 𝑃𝑡𝐺𝑡𝐺𝑟
𝑃𝑟)
{
4( 𝜆𝑐4𝜋𝑑
)2sin2( 2𝜋ℎ𝑏ℎ𝑚
Two of the useful models for 900 MHz cellular systems are:
Hata’s model based on Okumura’s prediction method and
Lee’s model
Hata’s empirical model is probably the simplest to use The
empirical data for this model was collected by Okumura in the city
of Tokyo
Trang 9𝐴 + 𝐵 log10(𝑑) − 𝐶 for suburban area
𝐴 + 𝐵 log10(𝑑) − 𝐷 for open area
Trang 10Okumura-Hata models (cont.)
the distance: 1 ≤ 𝑑 ≤ 20(km)
Trang 11Numerical results of Okumura-Hata models
Trang 12A signal transmitted through a wireless channel will typically
experience random variation due to blockage from objects in the
signal path, giving rise to random variations of the received power at
a given distance
Such variations are also caused by changes in reflecting surfaces andscattering objects
Thus, a model for the random attenuation due to these effects is
also needed Since the location, size, and dielectric properties of theblocking objects as well as the changes in reflecting surfaces and
scattering objects that cause the random attenuation are generallyunknown, statistical models must be used to characterize this
attenuation
The most common model for this additional attenuation is
log-normal shadowing
Trang 13where:
received signal (where the expectation is taken over the pdf of thereceived envelope)
𝜇𝑋𝑚(dBm)= 30 + 10𝔼[log10𝑋2
𝑚]
𝜇𝑋 𝑠 (dBm)= 30 + 10𝔼[log10𝑋𝑠]
Trang 14Shadowing (cont.)
Sometimes 𝑋𝑚 is called the local mean because it represents the
mean envelope level where the averaging is performed over a
distance of a few wavelengths that represents a locality
This model has been confirmed empirically to accurately model thevariation in received power in both outdoor and indoor radio
propagation environments
Trang 15Fading channel model
Two Main Multipaths
Local Scattering
The complex transmitted signal can be expressed by
Over a multipath (𝐿 physical paths) propagation channel, the
received signal can be obtained by
Trang 16Fading channel model (cont.)
Substituting (7) into (8) yields the following
Trang 17Wireless channel modeling (cont.)
The next step in creating a useful channel model is to convert thecontinuous-time channel to a discrete-time channel
We take the usual approach of sampling theorem
Assuming that the input waveform is band-limited to 𝑊 , the
baseband equivalent can be represented by
𝑛
where 𝑥𝑛= 𝑥(𝑛/𝑊 ) and sinc(𝑡)≜ sin(𝜋𝑡)𝜋𝑡
This representation follows from the sampling theorem, which saysthat any waveform band-limited to 𝑊/2 can be expanded in terms
of the orthogonal basis functions sinc(𝑊 𝑡 − 𝑛) with coefficients bysamples (taken uniformly at integer multiples of 1/𝑊 )
Trang 18Wireless channel modeling (cont.)
As a result, the baseband received signal can be determined by
𝑖
𝛼𝑖(𝑡)∑𝑛
Trang 19Wireless channel modeling (cont.)
𝑖𝛼𝑖(𝑚/𝑊 )sinc (𝑙 − 𝜏𝑖(𝑚/𝑊 )𝑊 )This simple discrete-time signal model is widely used in
physical-layer transmission techniques in OFDM systems (e.g., WiFi,WiMAX, LTE)
Trang 20Examples of transmitted baseband signal 𝑥𝑚
01
00 10
11
I +1 –1
–1 +1
Q b 0 b 1
0 1
I +1 –1
–1 +1
–1
–1 +1
Q b 0 b 1 b 2 b 3 +3
It is noted that multipath fading gainsℎ𝑙,𝑚 (channel impulse
response) is time-variant (depend on time index 𝑚)
Trang 21Channel estimation in mobile communications
Source encoder
Channel encoder
Digital modulation
Channel
Source decoder
Channel decoder
Digital demodulation
Data S
Pilot S
Data S
Data S
Pilot S
Trang 22Literature Review of Channel Estimation in Wireless
Tx signal matrix CIR vector
Rx noise vector
Noncoherent Coherent without using CSI
3-dB performance
loss
use CSI require Channel Estimation (CE)
vector matrix vector
Synch.
Imperfect Synch.
Channel Estimation (CE)
Blind Pilot Semi-blind
Joint CE and Synch.
Semi-blind
Perfect Synch.
Imperfect Synch.
Channel Estimation (CE) Pilot
Joint CE and Synch.
Semi-blind Pilot
Pilot design to minimize:
Trang 23Time-variant path gain ℎ𝑙,𝑚 under mobile speed of 5 km/h
Time (in OFDM symbol duration)
f
c = 2 GHz, 128−FFT, CP length = 10,
Trang 24ℎ𝑙,𝑚 under mobile speed of 50 km/h
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 0.95
1 1.05
1.1
1.15
Time (in OFDM symbol duration)
l Mobile user speed = 50 km/h,
fc = 2 GHz, 128−FFT, CP length = 10,
Trang 25ℎ𝑙,𝑚 under mobile speed of 300 km/h
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 0.8
0.9
1 1.1
1.2
1.3
Time (in OFDM symbol duration)
l Mobile user speed = 300 km/h,