Thus, if actual costs were used to cost products, it would be necessary either 1 to wait until the period was over to add overhead costs to jobs, or 2 to simply add overhead cost to jobs
Trang 1CHAPTER 10
SYSTEMS DESIGN: JOB-ORDER COSTING AND
PROCESS COSTING
I Questions
1 Job-order costing is used in those manufacturing situations where there are many different products produced each period Each product or job
is different from all others and requires separate costing Process costing is used in those manufacturing situations where a single, homogeneous product, such as cement, bricks, or gasoline, is produced for long periods at a time
2 The job cost sheet is used in accumulating all costs assignable to a particular job These costs would include direct materials cost traceable to the job, and manufacturing overhead cost allocable to the job When a job is completed, the job cost sheet is used to compute the cost per completed unit The job cost sheet is then used as a control document for: (1) determining how many units have been sold and determining the cost of these units; and (2) determining how many units are still in inventory at the end of a period and determining the cost of these units on the balance sheet
3 Many production costs cannot be traced directly to a particular product
or job, but rather are incurred as a result of overall production activities Therefore, in order to be assigned to products, such costs must be allocated to the products in some manner Examples of such costs would include utilities, maintenance on machines, and depreciation of the factory building These costs are indirect production costs
4 A firm will not know its actual manufacturing overhead costs until after
a period is over Thus, if actual costs were used to cost products, it would be necessary either (1) to wait until the period was over to add overhead costs to jobs, or (2) to simply add overhead cost to jobs as the overhead cost was incurred day by day If the manager waits until after the period is over to add overhead cost to jobs, then cost data will not
be available during the period If the manager simply adds overhead
cost to jobs as the overhead cost is incurred, then unit costs may fluctuate from month to month This is because overhead cost tends to
be incurred somewhat evenly from month to month (due to the presence
Trang 2of fixed costs), whereas production activity often fluctuates For these reasons, most firms use predetermined overhead rates, based on estimates of overhead cost and production activity, to apply overhead cost to jobs
5 An allocation base should act as a cost driver in the incurrence of the overhead cost; that is, the base should cause the overhead cost If the allocation base does not really cause the overhead, then costs will be incorrectly attributed to products and jobs and their costs will be distorted
6 A process costing system is appropriate in those situations where a homogeneous product is produced on a continuous basis
7 In a process costing system, costs are accumulated by department
8 First, the activity performed in a department must be performed uniformly on all units moving through it Second, the output of the department must be homogeneous
9 The reason cost accumulation is simpler is that costs only need to be identified by department - not by separate job Usually there will be only a few departments in a company, whereas there can be hundreds
or even thousands of jobs in a job-order costing system
10 A quantity schedule shows the physical flow of units through a department during a period It serves several purposes First, it provides the manager with information relative to activity in his or her department and also shows the manager the stage of completion of any in-process units Second, it serves as an essential guide in computing the equivalent units and in preparing the other parts of the production report
11 By definition, manufacturing overhead consists of costs that cannot be practically traced to products or jobs Therefore, if these costs are to be assigned to products or jobs, they must be allocated rather than traced
12 Assigning manufacturing overhead costs to jobs does not ensure a profit The units produced may not be sold and if they are sold, they may not be sold at prices sufficient to cover all costs It is a myth that assigning costs to products or jobs ensures that those costs will be recovered Costs are recovered only by selling to customers—not by allocating costs
13 (a) Job-order costing and process costing have the same basic purposes
—to assign materials, labor, and overhead cost to products and to provide a mechanism for computing unit product costs
Trang 3(b) Both systems use the same basic manufacturing accounts.
(c) Costs flow through the accounts in basically the same way in both systems
14 The company will want to distinguish between the costs of the metals used to make the medallions, but the medals are otherwise identical and
go through the same production processes Thus, operation costing is ideally suited for the company’s needs
II Exercises
Exercise 1 (Process Costing and Job Order Costing)
* Some of the listed companies might use either a process costing or a job-order costing system, depending on how operations are carried out and how homogeneous the final product is For example, a plywood manufacturer might use job-order costing if plywoods are constructed of different woods or come in markedly different sizes
Exercise 2 (Applying Overhead with Various Bases)
Requirement 1
Predetermined overhead rates:
Company X:
Company Y:
Predetermined
Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost Estimated total amount of the allocation base
= 60,000 DLHsP432,000 = P7.20 per DLH
Predetermined
Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost Estimated total amount of the allocation base
= 90,000 DLHsP270,000 = P3.00 per MH
Trang 4Company Z:
Requirement 2
Actual overhead costs incurred P420,000
Overhead cost applied to Work in Process:
58,000* actual hours × P7.20 per hour 417,600
Underapplied overhead cost P 2,400
* 7,000 hours + 30,000 hours + 21,000 hours = 58,000 hours
Exercise 3 (Departmental Overhead Rates)
Requirement 1
Milling Department:
Assembly Department:
Requirement 2
Overhead Applied
Requirement 3
Predetermined
Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost Estimated total amount of the allocation base
= P240,000 materials cost = 160% of materials cost P384,000
Predetermined
Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost Estimated total amount of the allocation base
= 60,000 machine-hoursP510,000 = P8.50 per machine-hour
Predetermined
Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost Estimated total amount of the allocation base
= P640,000 direct labor cost = 125% of direct labor cost P800,000
Trang 5Yes; if some jobs required a large amount of machine time and little labor cost, they would be charged substantially less overhead cost if a plantwide rate based on direct labor cost were being used It appears, for example, that this would be true of job 123 which required considerable machine time to complete, but required only a small amount of labor cost
Exercise 4 (Process Costing Journal Entries)
Work in Process—Mixing 330,000 Raw Materials Inventory 330,000 Work in Process—Mixing 260,000 Work in Process—Baking 120,000 Wages Payable 380,000 Work in Process—Mixing 190,000 Work in Process—Baking 90,000 Manufacturing Overhead 280,000 Work in Process—Baking 760,000 Work in Process—Mixing 760,000 Finished Goods 980,000 Work in Process—Baking 980,000
Exercise 5 (Quantity Schedule, Equivalent Units, and Cost per Equivalent Unit – Weighted Average Method)
Requirement 1
Weighted-Average Method
Quantity Schedule
Gallons to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 (materials 80%
complete, labor and overhead 75%
Trang 6Equivalent Units Materials Labor Overhead
Gallons accounted for as follows:
Transferred to the next department 790,000 790,000 790,000 790,000 Work in process, May 31 (materials 60%
complete, labor and overhead 20%
complete) 50,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 Total gallons accounted for 840,000 820,000 800,000 800,000
Requirement 2
Total Costs Materials Labor Overhead Whole Unit
Cost to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 P 146,600 P 68,600 P 30,000 P 48,000
Cost added during the month 1,869,200 907,200 370,000 592,000
Total cost to be accounted for (a) P2,015,800 P975,800 P400,000 P640,000
Equivalent units (b) — 820,000 800,000 800,000
Cost per equivalent unit (a) ÷ (b) P1.19 + P0.50 + P0.80 = P2.49
Exercise 6 (Quantity Schedule, Equivalent Units, and Cost per Equivalent Unit – FIFO Method)
Requirement 1
Quantity Schedule
Gallons to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 (materials 80%
complete, labor and overhead 75%
Equivalent Units Material
Trang 7Gallons accounted for as follows:
Transferred to the next department:
From the beginning inventory 80,000 16,000* 20,000* 20,000* Started and completed this month** 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 Work in process, May 31 (materials 60%
complete, labor and overhead 20%
complete) 50,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 Total gallons accounted for 840,000 756,000 740,000 740,000
* Work required to complete the beginning inventory.
** 760,000 gallons started – 50,000 gallons in ending work in process = 710,000 gallons started and completed.
Requirement 2
Total Costs Materials Labor Overhead Whole Unit
Cost to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 31 P 146,600
Cost added during the month (a) 1,869,200 P907,200 P370,000 P592,000
Total cost to be accounted for P2,015,800
Equivalent units (b) 756,000 740,000 740,000
Cost per equivalent unit (a) ÷ (b) P1.20 + P0.50 + P0.80 = P2.50
Exercise 7
Requirement (1)
The direct materials and direct labor costs listed in the exercise would have been recorded on four different documents: the materials requisition form for Job KC123, the time ticket for Kristine, the time ticket for Clarisse, and the job cost sheet for Job KC123
Requirement (2)
The costs for Job KC123 would have been recorded as follows:
Materials requisition form:
Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
P8,960
Trang 8Time ticket for Kristine
Started Ended
Time Completed Rate Amount
Job Number
Time ticket for Clarisse
Started Ended
Time Completed Rate Amount
Job Number
Job Cost Sheet for Job KC123
Direct materials P8,960.00
Direct labor:
Kristine 390.00
Clarisse 315.00
P9,665.00
Exercise 8
The predetermined overhead rate is computed as follows:
Estimated total manufacturing overhead P586,000
÷ Estimated total direct labor hours (DLHs) 40,000 DLHs
= Predetermined overhead rate P14.65 per DLH
Exercise 9
Weighted-Average Method
Work in process, May 1 P 14,550 P23,620 P118,100
Cost added during May 88,350 14,330 71,650
Total cost (a) P102,900 P37,950 P189,750
Equivalent units of
production (b) 1,200 1,100 1,100
Cost per equivalent unit
(a) ÷ (b) P85.75 P34.50 P172.50 P292.75
Trang 9Exercise 10
FIFO Method
To complete beginning work in process:
Materials: 400 units x (100% – 75%) 100 Conversion: 400 units x (100% – 25%) 300 Units started and completed during the period
(42,600 units started – 500 units in ending
inventory) 42,100 42,100 Ending work in process
Materials: 500 units x 80% complete 400 Conversion: 500 units x 30% complete 150 Equivalent units of production 42,600 42,550
III Problems
Problem 1
Requirement 1
a Raw Materials Inventory 210,000
Accounts Payable 210,000
b Work in Process 178,000
Manufacturing Overhead 12,000
Raw Materials Inventory 190,000
c Work in Process 90,000
Manufacturing Overhead 110,000
Salaries and Wages Payable 200,000
d Manufacturing Overhead 40,000
Accumulated Depreciation 40,000
e Manufacturing Overhead 70,000
Accounts Payable 70,000
Trang 10f Work in Process 240,000
Manufacturing Overhead 240,000 30,000 MH x P8 per MH = P240,000
g Finished Goods 520,000
Work in Process 520,000
h Cost of Goods Sold 480,000
Finished Goods 480,000 Accounts Receivable 600,000
Sales 600,000 P480,000 × 1.25 = P600,000
Requirement 2
(Overapplied overhead)
Problem 2
Requirement 1
The costing problem does, indeed, lie with manufacturing overhead cost, as suggested Since manufacturing overhead is mostly fixed, the cost per unit increases as the level of production decreases The problem can be solved
by use of predetermined overhead rates, which should be based on expected activity for the entire year Many students will use units of product in computing the predetermined overhead rate, as follows:
Estimated manufacturing overhead cost, P840,000
The predetermined overhead rate could also be set on the basis of either direct labor cost or direct materials cost The computations are:
= P4.20 per unit
Trang 11Estimated manufacturing overhead cost, P840,000
Estimated manufacturing overhead cost, P840,000
Requirement 2
Using a predetermined overhead rate, the unit costs would be:
Quarter First Second Third Fourth
Direct materials P240,000 P120,000 P 60,000 P180,000 Direct labor 96,000 48,000 24,000 72,000 Manufacturing overhead:
Applied at P4.20 per
units; 350% of direct
labor cost, or 140% of
direct materials cost 336,000 168,000 84,000 252,000 Total cost P672,000 P336,000 P168,000 P504,000 Number of units
produced 80,000 40,000 20,000 60,000
Problem 3
Weighted-Average Method
Quantity Schedule
Pounds to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1
(all materials, 55% labor and
overhead added last month) 30,000
Started into production during
May 480,000
Total pounds 510,000
350% of direct labor cost
=
140% of direct materials cost
=
Trang 12Equivalent Units Materials Overhead Labor &
Pounds accounted for as follows:
Transferred to Department 2 490,000* 490,000 490,000 Work in process, May 31
(all materials, 90% labor and
overhead added this month) 20,000 20,000 18,000 Total pounds 510,000 510,000 508,000
* 30,000 + 480,000 - 20,000 = 490,000
Problem 4 (Weighted-Average Method; Interpreting a Production Report)
Requirement 1
Weighted-Average Method
The equivalent units for the month would be:
Quantity Equivalent Units Schedule Materials Conversion
Units accounted for as follows:
Work in process, April 30
(75% materials, 60%
conversion cost added this
month) 40,000 30,000 24,000 Total units and equivalent units
of production 230,000 220,000 214,000
Requirement 2
Total Cost Materials Conversion Whole Unit
Work in process, April 1 P 98,000 P 67,800 P 30,200
Cost added during the
month 827,000 579,000 248,000
Total cost (a) P925,000 P646,800 P278,200
Equivalent units of
production (b)
– 220,000 214,000
P4.24