The cost of goods transferred out from beginning work in process is obtained by 1 assigning them all costs carried over from the prior pe- riod and 2 using the current period’s unit cost
Trang 1CHAPTER 6 JOB ORDER AND PROCESS COSTING QUESTIONS FOR WRITING AND DISCUSSION
1 Job-order costing accumulates costs by
jobs, and process costing accumulates costs
by processes Job-order costing is suitable
for operations that produce custom-made
products that receive different doses of
manufacturing costs Process costing, on
the other hand, is suitable for operations that
produce homogeneous products that receive
equal doses of manufacturing costs in each
process
2 More paperwork is required Labor and
ma-terials are assigned to departments in a
process-costing system In a job-order
cost-ing system, labor and materials must be
tracked to each job, requiring time tickets
and more use of materials requisitions
Addi-tionally, a job-order costing system requires
a separate job-order cost sheet for each job
3 Job-order costing is appropriate for many
service firms The key factor is that differing
amounts of resources must be used for
dif-ferent jobs Examples of service firms that
use job-order costing are law firms,
account-ing firms, dentists, automobile repair, and
architectural firms
4 Unless all your jobs (lawns) are the same
size and require the same services, you will
need to use a job-order costing system At
minimum, you will need job-order cost
sheets for each customer You will need
la-bor time tickets to record the amount of time
spent on each job, both to cost the job and
to pay the individual doing the work A
mate-rials requisition form may be needed if
ferti-ship makes sense not only to the business but also to the customer By comparing the cost of the individual job with the price charged, the firm can determine the profit at- tributable to each job Then, the firm can de- cide whether the profit is sufficient to contin-
ue offering the product or service under the current terms
6 Materials requisition forms serve as the
source documents for posting materials usage and costs to individual jobs Time or work tickets serve a similar function for la- bor Predetermined overhead rates are used
to allocate overhead to jobs
7 In sequential processing, products pass
through a series of processes, one after another (i.e., in a given sequence) In paral- lel processing, products pass through two or more different sequences at the same time, merging eventually at the final process
8 Equivalent units are the number of whole
units that could have been produced, given the amount of materials, labor, and over- head used Equivalent units are the meas- ure of a period’s output, a necessary input for the computation of unit costs in a process-costing system
9 In calculating this period’s unit cost, the
weighted average method treats prior-period output and costs carried over to the current period as belonging to the current period The FIFO method excludes any costs and output carried over from this period’s unit cost computation
Trang 2product (or further process it), additional
ma-terials and conversion costs are added by
the receiving department
13 The work-in-process account of the
receiv-ing department is debited, and the
work-in-process account of the transferring
depart-ment is credited The finished goods
ac-count is debited, and the work-in-process
account of the final department is credited
upon completion of the product
14 The first step is the preparation of a physical
flow schedule This schedule identifies the
physical units that must be accounted for
and provides an accounting The second
step is the equivalent unit schedule This
schedule computes the equivalent whole
output for the period The schedule’s
com-putations rely on information from the
physi-cal flow schedule The next step is
computa-tion of the unit cost To compute the unit
cost, the manufacturing costs of the period
for the process are divided by the period’s
output The output is obtained from the
equivalent unit schedule The fourth step
out and those remaining in work in process The final step checks to see if the costs as- signed in step 4 equal the total costs to ac- count for
15 The weighted average method uses the
same unit cost for all goods transferred out The FIFO method divides goods transferred out into two categories: units started and completed and units from beginning work in process The period’s unit cost is used to value goods started and completed The cost of goods transferred out from beginning work in process is obtained by (1) assigning them all costs carried over from the prior pe- riod and (2) using the current period’s unit cost to value the equivalent units completed this period
16 Service firms generally do not have
work-in-process inventories, and so equivalent units
of production are not needed An important factor in process costing for services is de- termining just what constitutes a unit of out- put.
Trang 3EXERCISES 6–1
6–2
1 Auto manufacturing: A job-order example might be Rolls Royce, in which the cars are made to order A process-costing example might be Ford Motor Company
2 Dental services: A job-order example might be a local, full-service dentist A process-costing example might be a denturist (someone who makes only dentures)
Trang 53 Jordan would need to prepare a simple form that included columns for the
date, the beginning time, the ending time, the total number of hours worked,
and the job name (or number) She could have a separate page for each day
This would be especially helpful if she hired other employees from time to
time to work on jobs
Trang 62 Job#70:$25 per move × 50 moves
Job#71:$25 per move × 10 moves
Job#72:$25 per move × 200 moves
3 Job#70: $40 per PO × 10 PO’s
Job#71:$40 per PO × 40 PO’s
Job#72: $40 per PO × 10 PO’s
2 Ending balance in Work in Process = Job #72 = $56,150
3 Ending balance in Finished Goods = Job #71 = $18,650
4 Cost of Goods Sold = Job #70 = $60,050
6–8
Bosserman Company Income Statement For the Month Ended July 31, 20XX Sales ($60,050 × 1.40) $ 84,070
Cost of goods sold 60,050
Gross margin $ 24,020
Administrative expenses 3,900
Operating income $ 7,613
Trang 74 Overhead Control 1,500
Adjusted cost of goods sold:
Trang 86–11
Department Department Department
Trang 93 Unit cost = $14,625/600 = $24.38* per pair
*Rounded
6–12
2 Equivalent units in Total = 60 + 600 = 660
6–13
1 Physical flow schedule:
2 Equivalent units of production:
Trang 102 Physical flow schedule:
The schedule of equivalent units using the weighted average method does not give sufficient information to reconstruct the complete physical flow schedule Units in beginning work in process are embedded in units com- pleted
Trang 11a Units transferred out = Total units* – Ending WIP = 4,080 – 600 = 3,480
*Total units = Beginning WIP + Units transferred in = 1,200 + 2,880 = 4,080
Trang 126–16
1 Physical flow schedule:
Units to account for:
Units accounted for:
Units completed and transferred out:
5 Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Trang 136–17 Cocolots Company
Mixing Department Production Report For the Month of June 20XX (Weighted Average Method) Unit Information Physical flow:
Equivalent units:
Cost Information Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Goods transferred out
Trang 14*See solution to Exercise 6–18
Beginning WIP for B: 1,000 × 0.40 = 400
Beginning WIP for C: 0 × 0 = 0
6–20
1 Physical flow schedule:
Units to account for:
Units accounted for:
Units completed and transferred out:
Trang 154 Cost transferred out: 60,000 × $6.13 = $367,800
Cost of ending WIP:
5 Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Trang 166–21
Bath Linens Department Production Report For the Month of August 20XX (Weighted Average Method) Unit Information Physical flow:
Equivalent units:
Cost Information Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Goods transferred out
Trang 186–23
1 Physical flow schedule:
Units to account for:
Units accounted for:
2 Units started and completed 280,000
3 FIFO unit cost = $1,516,500/337,000 = $4.50
4 Costs transferred out:
Trang 196–24
Nogaleen Company Blending Department Production Report For the Month of August 20XX
(FIFO Method) Unit Information Physical flow:
Units to account for:
Units completed from beginning
Cost Information Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Units in beginning work
Trang 21PROBLEMS 6–26
1 Overhead rate = $270/$900 = 0.30 or 30% of direct labor dollars
(This rate was calculated using information from the Fazel job; however, the Myron and Patton jobs would give the same answer.)
3 Since the Fazel and Myron jobs were completed, the others must still be in process Therefore, the ending balance in Work in Process is the sum of the costs of the Patton, Raider, and Willis jobs
Cost of Goods Sold = Fazel job + Myron job = $3,890 + $2,804 = $6,694
Trang 223 The activity-based approach to assigning overhead gives a more accurate
cost figure because so much of the overhead is non unit-level and there is
product diversity
Trang 256–29 Concluded
For the Month Ended April 30, 20XX
Less: Underapplied overhead 105
Trang 266–30
Debroux Company Assembly Department Production Report For the Month of February 20XX (Weighted Average Method) Unit Information
Equivalent units:
Cost Information Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Trang 276–31
Debroux Company Assembly Department Production Report For the Month of February 20XX
(FIFO Method) Unit Information
Equivalent units:
Cost Information Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Units in beginning work in process:
Trang 286–32
1 a Physical flow schedule:
b Equivalent unit schedule:
2 Unit cost computation:
Trang 296–33
Grace Sauces, Inc
Mixing Department Production Report For the First Quarter 20XX (FIFO Method) Unit Information
* Started and completed = 148,500 + B-WIP 144,000 = 292,500
Units in beginning WIP:
Trang 306–34
Grace Sauces, Inc
Mixing Department Production Report For the First Quarter 20XX (Weighted Average Method) Unit Information
Cost Information
Goods transferred out
*Difference due to rounding
Trang 316–35
a Physical flow schedule:
Units completed and transferred out:
Costs charged to the department:
c Unit cost calculation:
Unit cost = Unit material cost + Unit conversion cost
Trang 326–35 Continued
d and e Cost reconciliation:
Total costs accounted for:
Costs in ending WIP:
Materials (2,000 × $2.26) $4,520
Conversion (1,600 × $3.45) 5,520 10,040
Costs to account for:
*When conversion costs are not broken into labor and overhead components,
a control account for conversion costs is used Some firms now combine overhead and direct labor costs into one category This practice is develop- ing because direct labor is becoming a small percentage of total manufactur- ing costs
Trang 336–35 Continued
a Physical flow schedule:
Units completed and transferred out:
Costs charged to the department:
c Unit cost calculation:
Unit cost = Unit material cost + Unit conversion cost + Unit
transferred in cost
Trang 346–35 Concluded
d and e Cost reconciliation:
Total costs accounted for:
Costs in ending WIP:
Materials $ 0
Conversion (1,500 × $4.20) 6,300
Transferred in (3,000 × $5.70) 17,100
Total costs in ending WIP 23,400
Costs to account for:
Journal entries for Department B:
Trang 35com-6–36
a Physical flow schedule:
Units completed and transferred out:
Costs charged to the department:
c Unit cost calculation:
Unit cost = Unit material cost + Unit conversion cost
Trang 366–36 Continued
d and e Cost reconciliation:
Cost of units in beginning WIP:
Costs in ending WIP:
Materials (2,000 × $2.312) $4,624
Conversion (1,600 × $3.45) 5,520
Total costs in ending WIP 10,144
Costs to account for:
Beginning WIP $ 16,900 Costs incurred 153,020
Trang 37com-6–36 Continued
a Physical flow schedule:
Units completed and transferred out:
Costs charged to the department:
c Unit cost calculation:
Unit cost = Unit material cost + Unit conversion cost + Unit
Trang 386–36 Concluded
d and e Cost reconciliation:
Cost of units in beginning WIP:
Current cost to finish units:
Costs in ending WIP:
Conversion (1,500 × $4.20) $ 6,300
Transferred in (3,000 × $5.706) 17,118
Total costs in ending WIP 23,418
Costs to account for:
*Difference due to rounding
Journal entries for Department B:
Trang 39over-6–37
1 a Molding
Molding:
Trang 406–37 Concluded
Assembly:
Unit transferred-in cost: (0 + $14,950)/1,300 = $11.50
Packaging:
Unit transferred-in cost: ($1,959 + $11,754)/1,050 = $13.06
5 Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Trang 416–38
Assembly:
Packaging:
3 Molding:
Trang 42Packaging:
Costs to account for:
Costs accounted for:
Trang 43MANAGERIAL DECISION CASES
to the proposal, she would be taking action that would discredit her sion Finally, Donna has an ethical obligation to communicate information fairly and objectively, disclosing all information that would be needed for the loan officer to fairly assess the merits of the company’s request for a loan Clearly, Donna should not agree to falsify the production report
profes-2 Donna has an obligation to report Gary to a superior only if an actual ethical problem exists If Gary decides that the course of action he is suggesting is not really in his or the company’s best interests, then no ethical problem ex- ists, and no action by Donna is needed
3 If Gary insists on his idea of falsification of the division’s reports, Donna should attempt to resolve the conflict by appealing to Gary’s immediate su- pervisor (and on up, if necessary, until a satisfactory resolution is achieved)
If no satisfactory resolution is possible, then Donna should resign and mit an informative memo to a representative of the organization
sub-4 In this situation, the ethical dilemma is complicated by two factors: Donna’s age and a low likelihood of resolution by appealing to higher-level authorities Donna’s age may make it more difficult to find alternative employment (at least at the same level and pay), and it may mean possible forfeiture of re- tirement benefits Many students will likely respond that Donna should still resign (assuming that resolution is not likely), recommending the ideal out- come While Donna’s ultimate resignation is the right choice if resolution fails, students should realize that ethical behavior may often carry with it