SNV REDD+Low emissions development plans LEDPs have become a central focus of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries.. SNV’s approach to LEDPs SNV, with partn
Trang 1A major challenge to the success of REDD+ is how to balance the goals of rural economic growth through agricultural and infrastructure development with better protection and management of forests With the competition for land there is real potential for confl ict and continued deforestation and degradation, unless a balance can be found Introducing more open, integrated and effective planning through the development of Low Emission Development Plans provides a
blueprint for this to be achieved.
SNV Pro-Poor REDD+
L o w E m i s si on
Dev e l op me n t Pl a n s
Participatory Forest
Monitoring
Multiple Benefi ts
Agriculture
Renewable Energy
Benefi t Distribution
Systems
Trang 2SNV REDD+
Low emissions development plans (LEDPs) have become a central focus of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries The draft decision of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action, agreed
at COP 17 in Durban, ‘’encourages developing country Parties to develop
low-emissions development strategies, recognising the need for fi nancial and technical support by developed country Parties…’’1 The focus of SNV’s support
on LEDPs is in rural areas, looking at the interaction between forest, agriculture and energy sectors Agriculture and forestry activities account for the majority
of emissions in most developing countries, and are also important sources of national income and provide livelihoods for the vast majority of the world’s poor
SNV’s approach to LEDPs
SNV, with partners, has developed an overall framework to help governments
to factor GHG emissions into key sectoral and land use plans in order to meet the dual goals of pro-poor economic development and sustainable land and forest use planning within a chosen sub-national jurisdiction This provides the groundwork for the establishment of a performance based fi nance mechanism Such an approach will help ensure permanence and sustainability Under
each step of the LEDP, tools and guidance are provided to allow the multiple stakeholders to better understand, discuss and agree on activities Community engagement and participation is essential
The LEDP approach is outlined in Figure 1 These steps are not linear LEDPs are
currently being tested through the Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (LEAF) programme, with a focus on forest plans
Case study: The LEAF programme
LEAF is a USAID supported
programme which began in 2011
and is due to be completed in 2016
It is implemented through a consortium of SNV, Winrock International and
Climate Focus, covering six core countries: Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Thailand and Vietnam
Part of the LEAF programme aims to demonstrate innovation in sustainable land management In Vietnam, Provincial REDD+ Action Plans are being
developed with the National REDD+ Offi ce while in Lao PDR LEAF is
considering working at the village level and moving through a
bottom-up approach The ‘top-down’, spatially explicit, work in Vietnam and the
‘bottom-up’ fi eld based approach in Lao PDR provide two opportunities
to evaluate both the development and outcomes of LEDPs on balancing
social, economic and environmental needs (as measured through carbon
emissions) at a sub-national level
Trang 3Baseline
LEDP Plans
Implementation
MRV
Finance
The scoping will require compilation of current socio-economic development/ sectoral and land use plans, as well as tenure arrangements, to identify key intervention opportunities for the integration of emissions This could be at
the level of the district, province, forest management unit, community etc A stakeholder analysis will need to be carried out to assess stakeholder’s rights
in land use planning, their responsibilities and their returns (or incentives) and capacity for incorporating carbon into sub-national land use planning processes
The baseline is produced by examining historical landscape change
Jurisdictional Reference Emission Levels (REL/RLs) are established using
historical data to project future forest and land use change, incorporating threat analysis and forward looking land use and sector plans The drivers and those responsible (the ‘actors’) for deforestation and forest degradation must be clearly identifi ed Consideration must be made of how this sub-national REL can be nested both vertically, into national emission reduction targets, and horizontally, with other sectors
Design of Low Emission Development Plans to ensure ‘Business As Usual’ is not followed Different scenarios which meet socio-economic development and environmental (including emission reduction) targets will be examined There needs to be wide stakeholder consultation Appropriate environmental and social safeguards need to be integrated and benefi t distribution systems designed
LEDP implementation could include a range of activities such as better land and forest use zoning, forest protection and reforestation development, agricultural intensifi cation and production Efforts will focus on introducing activities that satisfy the needs of the multiple stakeholders across the landscape in a low GHG emissions pathway
A robust MRV system must be in place to measure changes in GHG emissions, ultimately to be able to link to a performance-based fi nance mechanism Any MRV system must be compatible with UNFCCC requirements SNV is examining the use of different measuring options, as well as the use of non-carbon
performance measures and the role of communities in data collection
REDD+ implementation needs to be linked to secure and long term fi nancing Different funding options need to be examined in collaboration with stakeholders,
in particular through the various REDD+ carbon funds being introduced
Figure 1 Generic framework for LEDPs
Trang 4While LEDP development is still relatively immature, a number of important
principles are emerging (see Box 1).
Box 1 Guiding principles for LEDPs
1 It is critical to integrate emissions reductions into on-going national and
sub-national plans and programmes; preferably cross sectoral plans, such
as socio-economic development plans, land use plans and sectoral plans
This is important in order to achieve permanence and sustainability of
any intervention
2 Alternative options are available and economically feasible which
meet the goal of rural development in a lower emissions pathway
3 There are suffi cient incentives for stakeholders to invest in the development
of LEDPs These incentives are likely to be economic, through carbon
fi nance and/or as a result of legal requirements, be it national and/or
sub-national policies Without a carrot or stick, or preferably both, there will not
be genuine incentives to make LEDPs work
4 LEDPs must be context specifi c Land use and sectoral planning
processes across the region differ and so the LEDP model must
differ to accommodate country context Some countries already
have strong planning systems in place, while others will require
the gradual building up and introduction of activities Also different
countries have different capacities, systems and structures in place
to measure and report changes in the forest landscape.
5 There is a need to understand and be inclusive of the multiple objectives
and interests to be met across the landscape, as well as understanding
the potential trade-offs This requires horizontal coordination across
different ministries and agencies and inclusion of relevant stakeholders in
the process The LEDP process will help better understand and show the
changes within the landscape; sharing this information across stakeholders
will be key
Trang 51 See paragraph 38 Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01_02cp17.pdf
2 Ogonowski, M (2012), SNV Internal Strategy Papers on: (i) MRV near term options; (ii) fi nancing; (iii) integration of agriculture; and (iv) scenario planning SNV Vietnam
3 Walker, S., T Pearson, F Casarim, N Harris, A Grais & S Brown (2011) Standard Operating Procedures for Terrestrial Carbon Measurement Version 1.0 Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (LEAF) programme,
Bangkok.
4 Building up on utilising the World Agroforestry Centre Abacus software.
5 Swan, S and McNally, R.H.G (2011) High Biodiversity REDD+: Operationalising Safeguards and Delivering Environmental Co-benefi ts SNV Vietnam.
6 SNV (2008) Using the Value Chain Approach for Pro Poor Development: Experiences from SNV in Asia
SNV Vietnam
SNV activities with LEDPs
1 Development of the LEDP Framework
It is expected that the LEDP framework will be dynamic and evolve as it responds
to the needs of partners and requirements under future international REDD+ agreements In order to further develop and refi ne this framework, SNV is
carrying out the following activities:
• Lesson learning: Across Asia there are various initiatives underway which are
exploring emission reductions in land use planning; for example, the land use planning for low emissions development strategy (LUWES) model developed by CIFOR in Indonesia Through the LEAF programme’s regional learning platform, experiences are being shared;
• Testing different approaches: As highlighted in Box 1, LEDPs are being tested
under different local contexts Although the general steps may be the same the approach will differ across countries;
• Innovation: SNV is further exploring some of the key challenges to ensuring
a robust and pro-poor LEDP framework, such as the use of near-term MRV options; integration of safeguards into sub-national planning; defi ning non-carbon performance indicators; and access to different fi nancing options2
Figure 2 Tools/approaches used at different stages of the LEDPs process
plan
Carry out
multi-stakeholder
analysis
Reference emissions level development tool
Developing pro-poor benefit distribution system
Value chain analysis (integrating REDD+)
Compilation and
assessment of
planning documents
Terrestrial carbon stock and sampling design stand operating procedure
Assessment of renewable energy technologies
Assessment of
drivers of deforestation
Participatory carbon monitoring:
operational guidance
Integration of environmental and social safeguards and co-benefits
Scenario planning exercises
Holding multi-stakeholder platforms and analysis
Decision making support tool to determine REDD+
compatible agriculture systems
Trang 6www.snvworld.org/redd SNV REDD+
2 Producing tools, guidelines and standard operating procedures to
support the LEDP process
Tools/approaches used at different stages of the LEDPs process are shown in
Figure 2.
• Baseline development: Various manuals and standard operating procedures
to support the measurement of forest based carbon emissions and the
development of baselines can be used This includes the Terrestrial Carbon
Stock and Overall Sampling Design Standard Operating Procedure3 produced by
Winrock International under the LEAF project Different guidance will be relevant
depending on the type and scale of intervention Participatory methods of data
collection are encouraged through participatory carbon monitoring (see SNV
briefi ng paper on REDD+ and Participatory Forest Monitoring)
• LEDP design: During this phase there is a need to hold multi-stakeholder
assessments and carry out inclusive scenario planning exercises that include
carbon emissions In order to examine trade-offs, opportunity cost assessments4
can be carried out At this design stage there is also the need to integrate
environment and social safeguards5, promote multiple benefi ts and design a
pro-poor benefi t distribution system in order to maximise social and environmental
benefi ts (See SNV REDD+ briefi ng papers on REDD+ and Benefi t Distribution
Systems and REDD+ and Multiple Benefi ts).
• During LEDP implementation SNV can draw on existing expertise in the
agriculture and renewable energy sectors by applying a number of tools and
technologies that can be adapted to integrate REDD+ For example, integrating
REDD+ into the agriculture value chain tool6 Under the new SNV REDD+ and
Energy and Agriculture Programme (REAP) new tools will be developed (See
SNV REDD+ briefi ng papers on REDD+ and Agriculture and REDD+ and
Renewable Energy).
As well as helping develop and apply the tools there is a large training and
capacity building component to ensure our government partners and local
community partners are able to understand, apply and adopt such tools
Supported by:
SNV
Contacts:
Richard McNally
SNV REDD+
Global Coordinator rmcnally@snvworld.org
Peter Stephen
LEAF Forest Management and Climate Change Technical Advisor pstephen@snvworld.org
For more information on the SNV REDD+ Programme go to www.snvworld.org/redd and follow us on twitter: @SNVREDD
If you are interested in receiving our bimonthly newsletter then please contact Nga: nnguyendaotuyet@snvworld.org