• Less evapotranspiration may affect high base flow • Reducing infiltration capacity due to soil compaction increase runoff.. Effects of forest roads on storm flow generation and sedi
Trang 1VFU, 23-September-2014
Principles of
Watershed management
Lecture #7 Vegetation, landuse, and runoff generation
Dr Bui Xuan Dung- Department of Environment Management
Watershed morphometry and
discharge
• What is the primary difference between these two basins?
• How much potential hydrograph differed
Drainage Density
• The drainage density is a measure of the total length
of well defined channels that drain the watershed
(sometimes measured as the blue lines representing
the streams on a topographic map)
• Drainage density is defined as the sum of the lengths
of all of the channels (km or miles) divided by the total
watershed area (km2 or ft2) This ratio can be
determined from topographical maps
Trang 2Drainage Density
• Drainage density affects the response of the
watershed to rainfall
• High densities usually allow fast runoff removal
Therefore, greater peaks and hydrographs with
shorter durations are expected for watersheds with
higher drainage densities
• The effect of drainage density on runoff volume is
associated with the time during which the runoff
remains in the watershed
• Low densities allow for long
residence times; therefore,
abstraction mechanisms have
more time to remove water
Trang 3• Drainage density can be increased by urbanization Because of the faster response facilitated by high densities, the frequency distribution of streamflow approximately follows that of precipitation events
Effects of land use on hydrograph
shape
Urbanization effects
Trang 4Vegetation Management and water
yield
• What are the real and anticipated effects of
vegetation removal on the amount and distribution of
precipitation?
• What degree can water yields be manipulated by
altering vegetation yield?
• Can vegetation be manipulated to complement water
resources management objectives?
• What extent of seasonal stream flow patterns altered
by changing vegetation cover?
Forest Types
acre to several hundred acres
been cut
Trang 5Forest Management
• Clear-Cutting - cutting all trees in a stand at
one time
• Shelterwood cutting – cutting dead/undesirable
trees - Always have young trees
Approaches, cont
• Seed-tree Cutting - removes all but a few with good genetics and high seed production which will be used to promote regeneration
• Selective Cutting - Individual trees are cut
Thinning of small, poorly formed trees, or trees of specific sizes
Landuse activity and flooding
• Removal vegetation decrease interception
loss
• Less evapotranspiration may affect high
base flow
• Reducing infiltration capacity due to soil
compaction increase runoff
• Increasing the soil erosion decreases
capacity of channel for flow
Trang 6Effects of forest roads on storm flow
generation and sediment transport in
mountainous catchments
五味 高志
throughfall stemflow
subsurface flow
precipitation evapotranspiration
precipitation
roads overland flow
subsurface flow
evapotranspiration
Road hydrology
Hortonian overland flow (HOF)
intercepted subsurface flow (ISSF)
Does ISSF-derived erosion and solute export need to
be considered?
If so, road design needs to
be better planned in relation with soil depth and subsurface flow pathway
Cutslope seepage
Bedrock
Subsurface flow
………
Hortonian overland flow
林道のり面からの水
岩盤
地表面流
地下水流・土壌中水流 林道面からの排水
Drainage discharge Effects of forest road on flow generation and soil erosion (Hillslope scale)
林道が水・土砂流出に与える影響 (斜面スケール)
Trang 7Hortonian overland flow Cutslope
interception
135 E
130 E
35 N
40 N
Stream Experimental plot Forest road plot
Forest road plots
林道面
等高線
Convex shape
Planar shape
Concave shape
V-notch weirs pipe
water shut plate
gutter
water gauge Road runoff monitoring
Trang 850
100
Rainfall (mm)
0
25
50
谷
y = 0.5x 尾根
y = 0.3x
平行
y = 0.5x
0
50
100
150
総降雨量 (mm)
kr-1
kr-3
線形 (kr-1)
線形 (kr-3)
2 4
2011.5.28 - 30 Total rainfall : 62.2 mm Max 1hour rainfall: 6 mm
0 60 120
1 2 0 0 1 1 2
ff (%
kr-1 kr-3
2011.10.5 - 6 Total rainfall: 64.4 mm Max 1hour rainfall: 7.6 mm
kr-1 kr-3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0
1
2
3
4
API = 0
n = 12, 17, 12
0 < API < 0.1
n = 5, 7, 5
API > 0.1
n = 7, 9, 7
kr-1 kr-2 kr-3 (5.5)
Soil
Bedrock/
Restrictive Layer Travelway
Cutslope Interception
of SSF
Effects of roads on runoff:
Intercepting subsurface flow (SSF)
Interception of SSF is greatest when cutslope height > soil depth
Trang 9Primary Controls on Road Surface Erosion
1 Amount of road surface runoff, which depends on:
- Precipitation;
- Road surface area;
2 Hydraulics of overland flow, which depends on:
- Amount of runoff;
- Road segment slope (energy);
- Road surface area x segment slope (A*S) often used to predict road
surface erosion;
3 Erodibility of the road surface = complex function of:
- Soil texture;
- Surface cover (vegetation, rocks, litter);
- Pattern of flow on the road surface (e.g., rilling);
- Time since construction or maintenance;
- Age of road;
- Amount and type of traffic
Trang 10Base flow
Road and skid trail
Overland, Quick flow
Utilization of machine
area in road increased peak flow from 50 to 100%
attributed to the hydrological connectivity of overland flow via skid trails and roads
Effects of harvest operation
Definition of hydrological connectivity
Stream channel
Hydrological connection
No hydrological
connection
Road, skid
trail runoff
12
True or false?
• The forest lower air temperature inside and above it?
• Forest increase the abundance and frequency of precipitation?
• The destruction of forest affect the climate?
• In hill and mountain country, forests conserve water for streamflow?
• Forest road affect high runoff?
Trang 11True and false?
• Forest prevent erosion?
• Forest regulate the flow of spring?
• The total discharge the large rivers depends on
forest
• Forests tend to equalize throughout year and by
making the low stage higher and the high stages
lower
• Forest cannot prevent floods production by
exceptional precipitation, but they can mitigate
their destructiveness
Difficulties for evaluation of effect of forest removal
Trang 121970 1980 1990 2000
0
1e+7
2e+7
3e+7
4e+7
Year vs Total
Year vs Platation forest
40000
0
10000
20000
All forest
Plantation forest
Ratio of plantation: 44%
30000
All land in Japan
林業センサス累計統計書より
Cypress plantation: 26%
Forest plantation in Japan
Background
Infiltration capacity of dense Japanese cypress forest with sparse understory vegetation tends to be low
Hortonian overland flow and related soil erosion is one of the major concerns in the forest management
of headwater catchments in Japan
rain
Infiltration
Forest plantation and runoff generation
Natural Forest
Plantation
Subsurface and
groundwater flow
Bare soil surface
Low infiltration Overland flow
M3
M5
No understory vegetation
M6
M4 Dense Hinoki with fern cove M7
M1: 4.9ha M8
Deciduous forest
M2 Managed Hinoki
Outline of Mie Site
M5 M4 M2
Kyoto
Mie
Trang 13Field Infiltration Measurement
0
100
200
300
Cover class
+ 2 3 4 5
8 x 25 m hillslope scale
Small plot
Large plot
Monitoring Hortonian Overland Flow in Multiple Scales
0.5 x 2.0 m plot scale
Catchment scale
Small plot with a stem
12/4/2004
12:00
12/5/2004
0:00
12/5/2004 12:00
0
2
4
0
2
4
0
2
4
Runoff coefficient:
0.28
Runoff coefficient:
0.41
Runoff coefficient:
0.28
Plot1(M2)
Plot3 (M5)
Plot4 (M8)
Observed overland flow in the small plots
•Significant overland flow occurred from the beginning of the storm event
Infiltration
Runoff
Overland flow
Before thinning After thinning
Changes in hydrological processes due to thinning
Decrease interception loss
Increase throughfall