World Forecasting Time Horizons The Influence of Product Life Cycle... Outline – ContinuedRegression and Correlation Analysis Using Regression Analysis for Forecasting Standard
Trang 1© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 1
Trang 2World
Forecasting Time Horizons
The Influence of Product Life Cycle
Trang 3© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 3
Supply Chain Management
System
Trang 4Outline – Continued
Overview of Qualitative Methods
Overview of Quantitative Methods
Trang 5© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 5
Seasonal Variations in Data
Cyclical Variations in Data
Trang 6Outline – Continued
Regression and Correlation Analysis
Using Regression Analysis for
Forecasting
Standard Error of the Estimate
Correlation Coefficients for
Regression Lines
Multiple-Regression Analysis
Trang 7© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 7
Trang 8Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to :
Understand the three time horizons and
which models apply for each use
Explain when to use each of the four
qualitative models
Apply the naive, moving average,
exponential smoothing, and trend methods
Trang 9© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 9
Develop seasonal indexes
Conduct a regression and correlation
analysis
Use a tracking signal
Trang 10Forecasting at Disney World
Global portfolio includes parks in Hong
Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and Anaheim
Revenues are derived from people – how
many visitors and how they spend their money
Daily management report contains only
the forecast and actual attendance at each park
Trang 11© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 11
Forecasting at Disney World
Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,
annual, and 5-year forecasts
Forecast used by labor management,
maintenance, operations, finance, and park scheduling
Forecast used to adjust opening times,
rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests admitted
Trang 12Forecasting at Disney World
20% of customers come from outside the
USA
Economic model includes gross
domestic product, cross-exchange rates, arrivals into the USA
A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people
survey 1 million park guests, employees, and travel professionals each year
Trang 13© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 13
Forecasting at Disney World
Inputs to the forecasting model include
airline specials, Federal Reserve policies, Wall Street trends,
vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000 school districts around the world
Average forecast error for the 5-year
forecast is 5%
Average forecast error for annual
forecasts is between 0% and 3%
Trang 14What is Forecasting?
Process of
predicting a future event
Underlying basis of
all business decisions
Trang 15© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 15
Short-range forecast
Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels, job assignments, production levels
Trang 16Distinguishing Differences
Medium/long range Medium/long range forecasts deal with
more comprehensive issues and support management decisions regarding
planning and products, plants and processes
Short-term Short-term forecasting usually employs
different methodologies than longer-term forecasting
Short-term Short-term forecasts tend to be more
accurate than longer-term forecasts
Trang 17© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 17
Influence of Product Life
Cycle
Introduction and growth require longer
forecasts than maturity and decline
As product passes through life cycle,
forecasts are useful in projecting
Trang 18Product Life Cycle
Best period to increase market share
R&D engineering is critical
Practical to change price or quality image
Strengthen niche
Poor time to change image, price, or quality
Competitive costs become critical Defend market position
Cost control critical
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
CD-ROMs
3 1/2”
Floppy disks LCD & plasma TVs Analog TVs
iPods
Trang 19© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 19
Product Life Cycle
Product design and
development critical
Frequent product and process design changes
Short production runs
High production costs
Limited models Attention to quality
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Product and process reliability Competitive product improvements and options Increase capacity Shift toward
product focus Enhance
distribution
Standardization Less rapid
product changes – more minor changes
Optimum capacity Increasing stability of process Long production runs
Product improvement and cost cutting
Little product differentiation Cost
minimization Overcapacity
in the industry Prune line to eliminate items not returning good margin Reduce
capacity
Figure 2.5
Trang 20Types of Forecasts
Economic forecasts
money supply, housing starts, etc.
Technological forecasts
Demand forecasts
services
Trang 21© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 21
Strategic Importance of
Forecasting
Human Resources – Hiring, training,
laying off workers
Capacity – Capacity shortages can
result in undependable delivery, loss
of customers, loss of market share
Supply Chain Management – Good
supplier relations and price advantages
Trang 22Seven Steps in Forecasting
Determine the use of the forecast
Select the items to be forecasted
Determine the time horizon of the
forecast
Select the forecasting model(s)
Gather the data
Make the forecast
Validate and implement results
Trang 23© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 23
The Realities!
underlying stability in the system
forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts
Trang 24Forecasting Approaches
Used when situation is vague Used when situation is vague
and little data exist
New products New products
New technology New technology
Involves intuition, experience Involves intuition, experience
e.g., forecasting sales on Internet e.g., forecasting sales on Internet
Qualitative Methods
Trang 25© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 25
Forecasting Approaches
historical data exist
Existing products
Current technology
e.g., forecasting sales of color
televisions
Quantitative Methods
Trang 26Overview of Qualitative
Methods
Pool opinions of high-level experts,
sometimes augment by statistical models
Panel of experts, queried iteratively
Trang 27© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 27
Overview of Qualitative
Methods
Estimates from individual
salespersons are reviewed for reasonableness, then aggregated
Ask the customer
Trang 28 Involves small group of high-level experts
Trang 29© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 29
Sales Force Composite
her sales
levels
Trang 30Decision Makers
(Evaluate responses and make decisions)
Respondents (People who can make valuable judgments)
Trang 31© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 31
Consumer Market Survey
plans
they actually do are often different
Trang 32Associative
Model
Trang 33© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 33
Obtained by observing response
variable at regular time periods
no other variables important
Assumes that factors influencing
past and present will continue influence in future
Time Series Forecasting
Trang 35© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 35
Seasonal peaks
Trend component
Actual demand
Random variation
Figure 4.1
Trang 36 Persistent, overall upward or
downward pattern
technology, age, culture, etc.
duration
Trend Component
Trang 37© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 37
down fluctuations
Seasonal Component
Number of Period Length Seasons
Trang 38 Repeating up and down movements
political, and economic factors
associative relationships
Cyclical Component
0 5 10 15 20
Trang 39© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 39
Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’
Trang 40Naive Approach
period is the same as demand in most recent period
e.g., If January sales were 68, then February sales will be 68
efficient
Trang 41© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 41
Provides overall impression of data over time
Moving Average Method
Trang 42Moving Average Example
10 12 13
( (10 10 + 12 + 12 + 13 + 13 )/3 = 11 2 / 3
Trang 43© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 43
Graph of Moving Average
Moving Average Forecast
Trang 44 Used when trend is present
Older data usually less important
Trang 45© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 45
[(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 14 1 / 3 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 20 1 / 2
Weighted Moving Average
10 12 13
[(3 x
[(3 x 13 13 ) + (2 x 12 ) + (2 x 12 ) + (10 ) + ( 10 )]/6 = 12 1 / 6
Weights Applied Period
1 Three months ago
6 Sum of weights
Trang 46 Increasing n smooths the forecast
but makes it less sensitive to changes
Potential Problems With
Moving Average
Trang 47© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 47
Moving Average And Weighted Moving Average
Moving average
Weighted moving average
Figure 4.2
Trang 48 Form of weighted moving average
Weights decline exponentially
Most recent data weighted most
Trang 49© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 49
Exponential Smoothing
New forecast = Last period’s forecast
+ α (Last period’s actual demand
– Last period’s forecast)
Trang 51© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 51
Trang 53© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 53
Effect of Smoothing Constants
Weight Assigned to
Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most Recent Recent Recent Recent Recent Smoothing Period Period Period Period Period Constant (α) α(1 - α) α(1 - α) 2 α(1 - α) 3 α(1 - α) 4
α = 1 1 09 081 073 066
α = 5 5 25 125 063 031
Trang 55© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 55
Chose high values of α
when underlying average
is likely to change
Choose low values of α
when underlying average
is stable
Trang 57© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 57
Common Measures of Error
MAD = ∑ |Actual - Forecast|
n
MSE = ∑ (Forecast Errors)
2
n
Trang 58Common Measures of Error
MAPE = ∑100|Actual i - Forecast i |/Actual i
n
n
i = 1
Trang 59© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 59
Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = 10 α = 10 α = 50 α = 50
Trang 60Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = 10 α = 10 α = 50 α = 50
Trang 61© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 61
Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = 10 α = 10 α = 50 α = 50
Trang 62Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = 10 α = 10 α = 50 α = 50
i = 1
Trang 63© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 63
Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = 10 α = 10 α = 50 α = 50
Trang 64Exponential Smoothing with
Trang 65© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 65
Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment
Step 1: Compute F t Step 2: Compute T t Step 3: Calculate the forecast FIT t = F t + T t
Trang 66Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t
Trang 67© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 67
Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t
Trang 68Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t
Trang 69© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 69
Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t
Trang 70Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (A t) Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t
Trang 71© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 71
Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Trang 72Trend Projections
Fitting a trend line to historical data points
to project into the medium to long-range
Linear trends can be found using the least
squares technique
y ^ = a + bx
the variable to be predicted (dependent variable)
^
Trang 73© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 73
Least Squares Method
Trang 74Least Squares Method
Trang 75© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 75
Least Squares Method
Equations to calculate the regression variables
b = Σxy - nxy
Σx2 - nx2
y ^ = a + bx
a = y - bx
Trang 76Least Squares Example
Trang 77© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 77
Least Squares Example
Trang 78Least Squares Example
Trang 79© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 80
Seasonal Variations In Data
The multiplicative
seasonal model
can adjust trend
data for seasonal
variations in
demand
Trang 80Seasonal Variations In Data
season
seasons
number of seasons, then multiply it by the seasonal index for that season
Steps in the process:
Trang 81© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 82
Seasonal Index Example
Trang 82Seasonal Index Example
Seasonal index = average 2005-2007 monthly demand
average monthly demand
= 90/94 = 957
Trang 83© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 84
Seasonal Index Example
Trang 84Seasonal Index Example
Trang 85© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 86
Seasonal Index Example
Trang 86San Diego Hospital
Trang 87© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 88
San Diego Hospital
Trang 88San Diego Hospital
Trang 89© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 90
Associative Forecasting
Used when changes in one or more independent variables can be used to predict
the changes in the dependent variable
Most common technique is linear
regression analysis
We apply this technique just as we did
in the time series example
Trang 90Associative Forecasting
Forecasting an outcome based on predictor
variables using the least squares technique
y ^ = a + bx
the variable to be predicted (dependent variable)
though to predict the value of the dependent variable
^
Trang 91© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 92
Trang 93© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 94
Associative Forecasting
Example
4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 –
Trang 94Standard Error of the
Figure 4.9
4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 –
Trang 95© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 96
Standard Error of the
Trang 96Standard Error of the
Estimate
Computationally, this equation is
considerably easier to use
We use the standard error to set up prediction intervals around the
point estimate
S y,x = ∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy
n - 2
Trang 97© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 98
Standard Error of the
Estimate
4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 –
Trang 98 How strong is the linear
relationship between the variables?
imply causality!
measures degree of association
Values range from -1 to +1
Correlation
Trang 99© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 100
Correlation Coefficient
r = nΣxy - ΣxΣy
[nΣx2 - (Σx) 2 ][nΣy2 - (Σy) 2 ]
Trang 100r = -1
Trang 101© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 102
measures the percent of change in
y predicted by the change in x
Values range from 0 to 1
Trang 102Multiple Regression
Analysis
If more than one independent variable is to be
used in the model, linear regression can be
extended to multiple regression to accommodate several independent variables
Computationally, this is quite complex and generally done on the
computer
Trang 103© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 104
means this model does a better job of predicting
the change in construction sales
Trang 104 Measures how well the forecast is
predicting actual values
Ratio of running sum of forecast errors
(RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD)
forecast has a bias error
Monitoring and Controlling
Forecasts
Tracking Signal
Trang 105© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 106
Monitoring and Controlling
Forecasts
Tracking signal = RSFE MAD
Tracking signal =
∑(Actual demand in
period i - Forecast demand
in period i)
(∑|Actual - Forecast|/n)
Trang 106Tracking Signal
Tracking signal +
0 MADs
–
Upper control limit
Lower control limit
Time
Signal exceeding limit
Acceptable range
Trang 107© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 108
Tracking Signal Example
Cumulative Absolute Absolute Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Qtr Demand Demand Error RSFE Error Error MAD