The photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs for the degradation of rhodamine B RhB under visible light irradiation was investigated in detail.. The adsorption and photocatalytic activity tes
Trang 1Contents lists available atScienceDirect Applied Surface Science
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / a p s u s c
Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes loaded with Ag nanoparticles on the photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B under visible light irradiation
Ya Yan, Huiping Sun, Pingping Yao, Shi-Zhao Kang, Jin Mu∗
Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, China
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 5 September 2010
Received in revised form
11 November 2010
Accepted 13 November 2010
Available online 19 November 2010
Keywords:
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes
Silver
Adsorption
Rhodamine B
Visible light photocatalysis
a b s t r a c t
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes loaded with Ag nanoparticles (Ag/MWNTs) were prepared by two meth-ods (direct photoreduction and thermal decomposition) The photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light irradiation was investigated in detail The adsorption and photocatalytic activity tests indicated that the MWNTs served as both an adsorbent and a visible light photocatalyst The photocatalytic activity of MWNTs was remarkably enhanced when the Ag nanoparticles were loaded on the surface of MWNTs Moreover, the visible light photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs depended on the synthetic route On the basis of the experimental results, a possible visible light photocatalytic degradation mechanism was discussed
© 2010 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved
1 Introduction
Since discovered by Iijima in 1991[1], carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
have captured the worldwide researchers’ interest because of their
small dimension, high surface area, unique structure, ultrastrong
mechanical property and high stability[2] With the development
of CNTs chemistry in the past decade, the integration of
one-dimensional nanotubes with zero one-dimensional nanoparticles (NPs)
has received increased attention due to their interesting
struc-tural, electrochemical, electromagnetic and other properties which
are not available to the respective components alone [3–6] Ag
NPs have been known for their unique properties of high
cat-alytic activity[7,8], good antibacterial activity[9,10]and excellent
surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)[11,12] When Ag NPs
were loaded on CNTs, the Ag/CNTs nanocomposite exhibited not
only good electrocatalytic activity, remarkable antibacterial
activ-ity and excellent SERS properties but also high chemical stabilactiv-ity,
excellent absorption capacity, high selectivity, etc.[13–22]
How-ever, there is less literature concerning the photocatalytic activity
of Ag NPs/CNTs
We had reported that the loading of Pt NPs on the surface
of MWNTs obviously enhanced the photodegradation of methyl
orange under visible light irradiation[23] However, the high cost
of Pt is a great drawback for the full commercial application of
Pt/MWNTs Therefore, it is necessary to search for an abundant,
∗ Corresponding author Tel.: +86 21 64252214; fax: +86 21 64252485.
E-mail address: jinmu@ecust.edu.cn (J Mu).
inexpensive, stable and efficient visible light photocatalytic mate-rial as a substitute for Pt/MWNTs Here, we found an interesting phenomenon that Ag/CNTs could replace Pt/MWNTs for the vis-ible light photodegradation of rhodamine B To the best of our knowledge, this study may be the first one about the visible light photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs Therefore, our results not only extend the applications of Ag/MWNTs, but also provide some clew for developing visible light responsive photocatalyst for dye degradation
To date, strategies including physical method[24–26], electro-chemical method[16,21,27]and chemical method[28], have been developed to prepare the NPs/CNTs nanocomposites The physi-cal method is to deposit the metal particles onto the CNTs from the metal vapor, which needs expensive apparatus The electro-chemical method is to apply a current through an aqueous metal salt solution with the CNTs serving as one of the electrodes Same
as the physical method, the electrochemical method also needs expensive apparatus, and moreover, technique of producing gram quantity of Ag/CNTs nanocomposites is very difficult[4] In the gen-eral chemical method, metal salts or other precursors are usually adsorbed onto the CNTs and then reduced to metal via using the reducing agent such as hydrogen[29], sodium borohydride[14,30], ethylene glycol[31]and hydrazine hydrate[32]etc In these pro-cesses, impurities are easily to be involved since reducing agents are needed
In this study, we take two approaches, i.e photoreduction and thermal decomposition, to prepare Ag/MWNTs which are denoted
as Ag/MWNTs-P and Ag/MWNTs-T, respectively No reducing agent
or electrical current is used in both of two methods The photo-0169-4332/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
Trang 2reported previously[33] Silver nitrate (AgNO3) and rhodamine B
(RhB) were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.,
sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and nitric acid (HNO3) from Shanghai Lingfeng
Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) from Shanghai
No 4 Reagent Factory All the reagents were used as received All
aqueous solutions were prepared using doubly distilled water
2.2 Synthesis of Ag/MWNTs
The Ag/MWNTs were synthesized via photoreduction or
ther-mal decomposition The amount of Ag loaded on MWNTs was
calculated from an initial dosage The samples were denoted as
x wt% Ag/MWNTs, where x indicated the mass percentage of
start-ing Ag in theoretical products In the first method, 200 mg MWNTs
were added into 50 mL double distilled water and dispersed
ultra-sonically for 10 min Then 50 mL AgNO3 aqueous solution was
added into this suspension dropwise The obtained mixture was
stirred magnetically for 24 h and illuminated for 4 h under UV light
from a 300 W high-pressure Hg lamp (365 nm) After filtrating,
washing with double distilled water and drying, the Ag/MWNTs-P
was obtained
The second method is a straightforward “mix-and-heat” process
in the absence of any solvent, reducing agent or electric current
The purified MWNTs were mixed with AgNO3at a certain weight
ratio in an agate mortar and grounded for 30 min at room
tem-perature The obtained solid mixtures of AgNO3and MWNTs were
transferred into the small alumina crucibles and heated in a
nitro-gen oven at 450◦C for 6 h with a heating rate of 2◦C/min After
naturally cooled to the room temperature, the product denoted as
Ag/MWNTs-T was obtained
2.3 Adsorption experiment
To determine the adsorption equilibration time, 8 mg
MWNTs were added into the 50 mL aqueous solution of RhB
(2× 10−5mol L−1) After 10 min ultrasonic treatment, the
sus-pension was magnetically stirred in dark at 25◦C At a given
time, the suspension was filtered through a 0.22m millipore
cellulose acetate membrane to remove the catalyst According
to the standard curve, the concentration of RhB was monitored
by measuring the absorbance at the wavelength of 554 nm The
amount of adsorption q (mg g−1) could be calculated by Eq.(1):
q =V(C0− C) × 479.02
where C0and C (mol L−1) are the concentration of the RhB solution
at initial and at the given time, respectively V (mL) is the volume
of the solution, andω (g) the mass of the dry adsorbent
To determine the adsorption isotherm, 8 mg MWNTs were
added into the 50 mL aqueous solution of RhB with initial
concen-trations of 8× 10−6, 1.0× 10−5, 1.5× 10−5, 2.0× 10−5, 2.5× 10−5,
Clausius–Clapeyron equation[34]:
Equation derived from adsorption isotherm[35]:
Gibbs–Helmholtz equation:
S =H − G
where k is a constant, Ce(mg L−1) is the equilibrium concentration and n the Freundlich constant
2.4 Photocatalytic experiment The visible light photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs was eval-uated by the photocatalytic degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation ( > 420 nm) The photocatalytic experiments were car-ried out in a reactor containing the 50 mL aqueous solution of RhB (2.0× 10−5mol L−1) and 8 mg catalysts The distance between the lamp and the reactor was 15 cm Before irradiation, the suspension was magnetically stirred in dark for 4 h to establish an adsorp-tion/desorption equilibrium under ambient conditions Then, the mixture was exposed to the visible light irradiation At the given irradiation time, the concentration of RhB was quantified by the absorbance The degradation efficiency was calculated according
to Eq.(5): Degradation (%)=A0− A
where A0 and A represent the absorbances of the RhB solution before and after visible light irradiation, respectively
2.5 Characterization The morphological characterization of Ag/MWNTs was per-formed on a JEOL JEM 2010 field-emission transmission electron microscope (FETEM) (Japan) The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were measured using a Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Japan) The UV–vis absorption spectra of the solu-tions were obtained on a UV-2102 PCS spectrophotometer (China) The photoelectrochemical measurements were performed with the PCI4/300 electrochemistry station (Gamry, USA) in a conven-tional three-electrode cell with a quartz window, using a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, a platinum circle
as the counter electrode, and an Ag/MWNTs modified ITO glass as the working electrode The working electrode was prepared accord-ing to the followaccord-ing procedure The ITO electrode with an area
of 10 mm× 15 mm was ultrasonicated successively in anhydrous ethanol, acetone, and doubly distilled water for 30 min, respec-tively, then, dried in air The Ag/MWNTs was dispersed in distilled
Trang 3Fig 1 FETEM images of 3.0 wt% Ag/MWNTs-P (a) and 3.0 wt% Ag/MWNTs-T (b).
water ultrasonically to form a 0.1 mg mL−1aqueous solution 0.1 mL
of the dispersed solution was dropped onto the surface of the ITO
electrode and dried under an IR lamp After the surface was dried
thoroughly, dropping 0.1 mL of the dispersed solution onto the
sur-face again, repeating the process 3 times, the Ag/MWNTs modified
ITO electrode was obtained A 1000 W halide lamp (FELCO, China)
with a cutoff filter (JB-420) was employed as the visible excitation
light source
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of Ag/MWNTs
The FETEM images of 3.0 wt% Ag/MWNTs are shown inFig 1 It
can be observed that the inner radius of MWNTs is between 5 and
10 nm and the Ag NPs deposit on the MWNTs For the
Ag/MWNTs-P (Fig 1a), the size of Ag NPs is smaller (ca 5 nm), some of them could enter the cavities of MWNTs and deposit on the inner wall For the Ag/MWNTs-T, the Ag NPs are larger (ca 22 nm) and can only deposit on the surface of MWNTs, as shown inFig 1b
The Ag/MWNTs is analysed by XPS, as shown inFig 2 It can
be observed from the survey XPS spectra (Fig 2A) that the puri-fied MWNTs are composed of C and O elements Compared with the MWNTs, there appears a peak at 368.5 eV in the XPS spectra
of Ag/MWNTs-P and Ag/MWNTs-T, which is ascribed to the Ag 3d [36] The existence of Ag 3d signal indicates that the Ag element was successfully introduced onto the MWNTs with both methods
In the high resolution XPS spectra of Ag 3d (Fig 2B), there are two peaks centered at 368.6, 374.6 eV for Ag/MWNTs-P and 368.5, 374.5 eV for Ag/MWNTs-T, which are ascribed to Ag 3d5/2and Ag 3d3/2, respectively The binding energies of Ag 3d in Ag/MWNTs-P are larger slightly than those in Ag/MWNTs-T, which may be caused
Trang 4Fig 3 Adsorption kinetic curve of RhB on the MWNTs at 25◦ C.
by the different sizes of Ag NPs As we know, the binding energy
increases with decreasing the Ag particle size The binding
ener-gies (BE) of Ag 3d5/2 for the Ag, Ag2O and AgO are 368.2, 367.8
and 367.4 eV, respectively[37,38] Here, no peak corresponding to
Ag2O or AgO is observed in the XPS spectra of Ag/MWNTs
There-fore, the Ag species deposited on MWNTs is metal Ag Compared
with the Ag/MWNTs-P, the peaks of Ag 3d in the XPS spectrum of
Ag/MWNTs-T are stronger, which means that the content of Ag in
Ag/MWNTs-T is higher than that in Ag/MWNTs-P The
quantifica-tion results of XPS show that the mass concentraquantifica-tion of Ag element
is 1.42% and 2.11% for the Ag/MWNTs-P and Ag/MWNTs-T,
respec-tively The results indicate that the loss of Ag by the photoreduction
method is larger than that by the thermal decomposition method In
the process of the photoreduction, Ag may lose during the washing
procedure The full wave half maximum (FWHM) of Ag 3d5/2in the
Ag/MWNTs-P and Ag/MWNTs-T is 0.964 and 0.860 eV, respectively,
indicating that the Ag NPs size in the Ag/MWNTs-P is smaller than
that in the Ag/MWNTs-T, which is in agreement with the FETEM
images shown inFig 1 FromFig 2C, it can be observed that the
asymmetric BE peaks of C 1s in the spectra of MWNTs, Ag/MWNTs-P
and Ag/MWNTs-T are 284.5, 284.7 and 284.8 eV, respectively Since
the binding energy correlates with the electron density around the
nucleus, the higher binding energy indicates the stronger
inter-action between Ag NPs and MWNTs, and the trapping electron
capability of the Ag NPs in the Ag/MWNTs-T is stronger than that
in the Ag/MWNTs-P
3.2 Adsorption properties of MWNTs for RhB in aqueous solution
Fig 3shows the adsorption kinetic curve of RhB on the MWNTs
in aqueous solution The adsorption/desorption equilibrium can
be achieved in 4 h Therefore, 4 h is selected as the
adsorp-tion/desorption equilibrium time in the following experiments
Fig 5 Linear fitting of ln Ce vs T−1.
Fig 4a shows the adsorption isotherm curve of RhB on the MWNTs The amount of adsorbed RhB increases acutely with increasing initial concentration of RhB The result fits the Freundlich adsorption isotherm model:
lnqe= ln KF+1
where qe(mg g−1) represents the amount of adsorbed RhB at the equilibrium, Ce(mg L−1) is the equilibrium concentration of RhB
KFand n are Freundlich constants which relate to the adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively[39] The linear equation is
ln qe= 4.37 + 0.42 ln Cewith the correlation coefficient of 0.98, as shown inFig 4b So KFand n are calculated to be 78.86 and 2.37, respectively The large KFvalue means strong adsorption capability
of MWNTs for RhB The n value with a range of 2–10 means that the adsorption is a preferential adsorption and takes place easily[40] The effect of temperature on the adsorption of MWNTs for RhB was also studied.Fig 5shows that the natural logarithm of the equilibrium concentration of RhB depends linearly on the recipro-cal value of temperature and the linear correlation coefficient of the curve is−0.997 The Clausius–Clapeyron equation (Eq.(2)) can
be used to fit the experimental data According to Eqs.(2)–(4), the values ofH, G and S can be calculated as follows:
H = R × (−6164.78) = −51.25 kJ mol−1
G = −nRT = −2.37 × 8.314 × 298.15 = −5.87 kJ mol−1
S =H − G
−51250 + 5870
298.15 = −152.21 J K−1mol−1 The large negative value of H implies the adsorption is an exothermic process and the interaction between MWNTs and RhB
is strong TheG is negative, indicating that the adsorption is a
Trang 5Fig 6 Degradation efficiency of RhB using Ag/MWNTs as photocatalysts with
var-ious Ag contents under 6 h irradiation.
spontaneous process The negative value ofS reveals that the
randomness at the solid–solution interface decreases during the
adsorption process of RhB on the MWNTs
3.3 Photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs for the degradation of
RhB under visible light irradiation
To explore the effect of synthetic approach on the visible light
photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs, the photocatalytic
activi-ties between Ag/MWNTs-P and Ag/MWNTs-T are compared, as
shown inFig 6 It can be observed that the photocatalytic
activ-ity of Ag/MWNTs-T is higher than that of Ag/MWNTs-P In general,
the smaller particles possess higher catalytic activity due to the
more active sites However, as we know from the FETEM images
(Fig 1), the size of Ag NPs in the Ag/MWNTs-P is smaller than that
in the Ag/MWNTs-T There are three possible reasons leading to
this abnormal result Firstly, the XPS analysis results indicate that
the trapping electron capability of Ag NPs in the Ag/MWNTs-T is
stronger than that in the Ag/MWNTs-P As a result, the charge
sep-aration is promoted and the photocatalytic activity is improved
Secondly, it is confirmed by XPS that the amount of Ag NPs
deposited on the MWNTs by the thermal decomposition method
is higher than that by the photo reduction method Thirdly, the
removal of impurities on the surface of Ag/MWNTs-T in the
calci-nation process makes the excited electron move more smoothly on
the surface of MWNTs, which leads to better separation of
photo-generated charges Thus, higher visible light photocatalytic activity
is achieved
As shown inFig 6, the photocatalytic activity of Ag/MWNTs
varies with the Ag NPs content and the optimum Ag content is
3.0 wt% for both synthetic methods In order to further understand
the role of Ag NPs on the visible light activity of Ag/MWNTs, EIS
is used to characterize MWNTs and Ag/MWNTs electrodes under
visible light irradiation The measurement results of EIS are shown
inFig 7
As shown inFig 7, all the Nyquist plots (Zim vs Zre) include
a semicircle region lying on the Zre-axis observed at higher
fre-quencies corresponding to the electron-transfer-limited process,
followed by a linear part at lower frequencies representing the
diffusion-limited process[41] The semicircle diameter represents
the electron-transfer resistance which is controlled by the surface
modification of the electrode[42] The size of the arc radius in the
Nyquist plot of the MWNTs electrode under visible light irradiation
reduces when the Ag NPs was loaded on the MWNTs, indicating that
the loading of Ag NPs induces the decrease of the electron-transfer
resistance and the enhancement of the interfacial electron-transfer
Fig 7 Nyquist plots of impedance spectra for various electrodes under visible
light irradiation Electrolyte: 0.1 mol L −1 Na 2 SO 4 Scan rate: 2 mV s −1 (Z im : imaginary impedance, Z re : real impedance).
rate Thereby, the quenching of photogenerated electrons is effec-tively restrained and the visible light photocatalytic activity is remarkably enhanced The electron-transfer resistance decreases with increasing the Ag NPs amount, and loading 5.0 wt% Ag on the MWNTs induces the smallest electron-transfer resistance among the four electrodes It is notable that the Ag NPs can also act as quenching centers, which is caused by the electrostatic attraction
of negatively charged silver and positively charged cationic radical
of RhB So the presence of optimal content of Ag NPs, here is 3.0 wt%, can reduce the possibility of excitons quenching and improve the visible light photocatalytic activity
The kinetic curves of RhB degradation using various photo-catalysts under visible light irradiation are shown in Fig 8 The self-degradation of RhB is only 28% after 8 h visible light irradi-ation The degradation percentage doubles when 8.0 mg MWNTs are added into the RhB solution The improvement of the degrada-tion efficiency is probably due to the fast charge transfer ability
of MWNTs The photocatalytic activity of MWNTs can be fur-ther enhanced when Ag NPs are loaded on them When 3.0 wt% Ag/MWNTs-T are added into the solution, the degradation effi-ciency of 72% can be achieved after 8 h irradiation The results indicate that the Ag/MWNTs-T are of high visible light photocat-alytic activity for RhB degradation
Our previous studies show that loading Pt NPs on the surface
of MWNTs can strongly enhance the visible light photocatalytic activity of MWNTs for methyl orange degradation[23] Therefore,
we make a comparison of visible light photocatalytic activities between 3.0 wt% Ag/MWNTs-T and 3.0 wt% Pt/MWNTs for RhB degradation In the first 5 h, the visible light photocatalytic
effi-Fig 8 Kinetic curves of RhB degradation using 8.0 mg photocatalysts under visible
light irradiation ( > 420 nm).
Trang 6ciency of Ag/MWNTs-T is lower than that of Pt/MWNTs After being
irradiated for 6 h, the photocatalytic efficiency of Ag/MWNTs-T is
almost as high as that of Pt/MWNTs Since the Ag/MWNTs-T possess
high photocatalytic activity and low cost, it is an ideal alternative
to the Pt/MWNTs
3.4 Mechanism of visible light degradation of Ag/MWNTs for RhB
On the basis of the experimental results, we infer that the
degra-dation of RhB on the Ag/MWNTs under visible light irradiation is
a self-sensitized photocatalytic process, as illustrated inScheme 1
The oxidation of MWNTs introduces many functional groups such
as hydroxyl (–OH), carboxyl (–COOH) and carbonyl (>C O) on the
surface of MWNTs These functional groups act as the active sites
which help the MWNTs to adsorb Ag NPs[43] Then the Ag–MWNTs
junctions are built up and the silver islands act as electron
accep-tors, which are similar to the semiconductor–metal junctions[44]
Since the MWNTs are a strong adsorbent for RhB in aqueous
solu-tion, a large amount of RhB molecules are adsorbed on the surface
of MWNTs because of the strong interactions between MWNTs and
RhB Under the visible light irradiation, RhB molecules can be
acti-vated to the excited state (RhB*) Due to the strong electron affinity
of MWNTs, the electrons transfer from RhB*to the MWNTs The 1D
carbon-based nano-cylinder structure of MWNTs makes the
elec-trons move freely without any scattering from atoms or defects
[45] The moving electrons will be trapped when they encounter
the Ag NPs islands The electrons accumulated on the Ag NPs reduce
the adsorbed oxygen species to superoxide anion radical (O2•−)
and hydroxyl radical (OH•) Subsequently, RhB is degraded by these
active oxygen species
4 Conclusion
The photocatalytic activity of MWNTs can be promoted by
load-ing Ag NPs on them via photoreduction or thermal decomposition
method Moreover, the sample prepared by the thermal
decom-position method shows higher visible light photocatalytic activity
than that by the photoreduction method In the photodegradation
process, the MWNTs serve as absorbents and electron transmission
channels The loaded Ag NPs can trap and accumulate electrons
The photodegradation of RhB on the Ag/MWNTs is a self-sensitized
process The results suggest that the Ag/MWNTs-T are an ideal
alternative to Pt/MWNTs for the RhB degradation due to the low
cost and high visible light photocatalytic activity
Acknowledgement
This work was financially supported by the National High
Technology Research and Development Program of China (No
2009AA05Z101)
References
[1] S Iijima, Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354 (1991) 56–58 [2] J Hilding, E.A Grulke, S.B Sinnott, D.L Qian, R Andrews, M Jagtoyen, Sorption
of butane on carbon multiwall nanotubes at room temperature, Langmuir 17 (2001) 7540–7544.
[3] Y Lin, K.A Watson, M.J Fallbach, S Ghose, J.G Smith, D.M Delozier, W Cao, R.E Crooks, J.W Connell, Rapid, solventless, bulk preparation of metal nanoparticle-decorated carbon nanotubes, ACS, Nano 3 (2009) 871–884.
[4] G.G Wildgoose, C.E Banks, R.G Compton, Metal nanopartictes and related materials supported on carbon nanotubes: methods and applications, Small
2 (2006) 182–193.
[5] V Georgakilas, D Gournis, V Tzitzios, L Pasquato, D.M Guldi, M Prato, Deco-rating carbon nanotubes with metal or semiconductor nanoparticles, J Mater Chem 17 (2007) 2679–2694.
[6] M.A Correa-Duarte, L.M Liz-Marzan, Carbon nanotubes as templates for one-dimensional nanoparticle assemblies, Mater Chem 16 (2006) 22–25 [7] K Mallick, M Witcomb, M Scurrell, Silver nanoparticle catalysed redox reac-tion: an electron relay effect, Mater Chem Phys 97 (2006) 283–287 [8] N Pradhan, A Pal, T Pal, Silver nanoparticle catalyzed reduction of aromatic nitro compounds, Colloids Surf A 196 (2002) 247–257.
[9] A Panacek, L Kvitek, R Prucek, M Kolar, R Vecerova, N Pizurova, V.K Sharma,
T Nevecna, R Zboril, Silver colloid nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and their antibacterial activity, J Phys Chem B 110 (2006) 16248–16253 [10] P Prema, R Raju, Fabrication and characterization of silver nanoparticle and its potential antibacterial activity, Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 14 (2009) 842–847 [11] H Ciou, Y.W Cao, H.C Huang, D.Y Su, C.L Huang, SERS enhancement factors studies of silver nanoprism and spherical nanoparticle colloids in the presence
of bromide ions, J Phys Chem C 113 (2009) 9520–9525.
[12] D.R Whitcomb, B.J Stwertka, S Chen, P.J Cowdery-Corvan, SERS characteriza-tion of metallic silver nanoparticle self-assembly within thin films, J Raman Spectrosc 39 (2008) 421–426.
[13] B Khoshnevisan, M Behpour, S.M Ghoreishi, M Hemmati, Absorptions of hydrogen in Ag-CNTs electrode, Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 3860–3863 [14] C.-Y Liu, J.-M Hu, Hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on the direct electro-chemistry of myoglobin immobilized on silver nanoparticles doped carbon nanotubes film, Biosens Bioelectron 24 (2009) 2149–2154.
[15] A Balamurugan, S.M Chen, Silver nanograins incorporated PEDOT modified electrode for electrocatalytic sensing of hydrogen peroxide, Electroanalysis 21 (2009) 1419–1423.
[16] Y.C Tsai, P.C Hsu, Y.W Lin, T.M Wu, Silver nanoparticles in multiwalled car-bon nanotube-Nafion for surface-enhanced Raman scattering chemical sensor, Sens Actuators B 138 (2009) 5–8.
[17] Y.C Chen, R.J Young, J.V Macpherson, N.R Wilson, Single-walled carbon nan-otube networks decorated with silver nanoparticles: a novel graded SERS substrate, J Phys Chem C 111 (2007) 16167–16173.
[18] G.Q Luo, H Yao, M.H Xu, X.W Cui, W.X Chen, R Gupta, Z.H Xu, Carbon nanotube-silver composite for mercury capture and analysis, Energy Fuels 24 (2010) 419–426.
[19] Z.Q Tan, H Xu, H Abe, M Naito, S Ohara, Anisotropic polyhedral self-assembly
of Ag-CNT nanocomposites, J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10 (2010) 3978–3982 [20] R Kumar, H Zhou, S.B Cronin, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and cor-related scanning electron microscopy of individual carbon nanotubes, Appl Phys Lett 91 (2007) 1/223105–3/223105.
[21] J.Y Qu, H.J Chen, S.J Dong, In situ fabrication of noble metal nanoparticles modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes and related electrocatalysis, Electro-analysis 20 (2008) 2410–2415.
[22] G.Y Gao, D.J Guo, C Wang, H.L Li, Electrocrystallized Ag nanoparticle on functional multi-walled carbon nanotube surfaces for hydrazine oxidation, Electrochem Commun 9 (2007) 1582–1586.
[23] Y Yan, H.P Sun, L Zhang, J Zhang, J Mu, S.Z Kang, Effect of multiwalled car-bon nanotubes on the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation, J Dispersion Sci Technol., in press [24] K Kim, S.H Lee, W Yi, J Kim, J.W Choi, Y Park, J.I Jin, Efficient field emission from highly aligned, graphitic nanotubes embedded with gold nanoparticles, Adv Mater 15 (2003) 1618–1622.
Trang 7[25] W Chen, K.P Loh, H Xu, A.T.S Wee, Nanoparticle dispersion on reconstructed
carbon nanomeshes, Langmuir 20 (2004) 10779–10784.
[26] C Pham-Huu, N Keller, V.V Roddatis, G Mestl, R Schlogl, M.J Ledoux, Large
scale synthesis of carbon nanofibers by catalytic decomposition of ethane on
nickel nanoclusters decorating carbon nanotubes, Phys Chem Chem Phys 4
(2002) 514–521.
[27] Z He, J Chen, D Liu, H Tang, W Deng, Y Kuang, Deposition and
electrocat-alytic properties of platinum nanoparticals on carbon nanotubes for methanol
electrooxidation, Mater Chem Phys 85 (2004) 396–401.
[28] G.P Jin, R Baron, N.V Rees, L Xiao, R.G Compton, Magnetically
move-able bimetallic (nickel/silver) nanoparticle/carbon nanotube composites for
methanol oxidation, New J Chem 33 (2009) 107–111.
[29] B Xue, P Chen, Q Hong, J.Y Lin, K.L Tan, Growth of Pd, Pt, Ag and Au
nanopar-ticles on carbon nanotubes, J Mater Chem 11 (2001) 2378–2381.
[30] D Wang, Z.C Li, L.W Chen, Templated synthesis of single-walled carbon
nan-otube and metal nanoparticle assemblies in solution, J Am Chem Soc 128
(2006) 15078–15079.
[31] V Lordi, N Yao, J Wei, Method for supporting platinum on single-walled
car-bon nanotubes for a selective hydrogenation catalyst, Chem Mater 13 (2001)
733–737.
[32] K Dai, L.Y Shi, J.H Fang, Y.Z Zhang, Synthesis of silver nanoparticles on
func-tional multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Mater Sci Eng A 465 (2007) 283–286.
[33] J Zhang, H.L Zou, Q Qing, Y.L Yang, Q.W Li, Z.F Liu, X.Y Guo, Z.L Du, Effect of
chemical oxidation on the structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes, J Phys.
Chem B 107 (2003) 3712–3718.
[34] G.F Payne, N Maity, Solute adsorption from water onto a “modified” sorbent
in which the hydrogen binding site is protected from water Thermodynamics
and separations, Ind Eng Chem Res 31 (1992) 2024–2033.
[35] R.A Garcia-Delgado, L.M Cotoruelo-Minguez, J.J Rodriguez, Equilibrium study
of single-solute adsorption of anionic surfactants with polymeric XAD resins, Sep Sci Technol 27 (1992) 975–987.
[36] K Heister, M Zharnikov, M Grunze, L.S.O Johansson, Adsorption of alka-nethiols and biphenylthiols on Au and Ag substrates: a high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study, J Phys Chem B 105 (2001) 4058–4061 [37] X.F You, F Chen, J.L Zhang, M Anpo, A novel deposition precipitation method for preparation of Ag-loaded titanium dioxide, Catal Lett 102 (2005) 247–250 [38] G Wee, W.F Mak, N Phonthammachai, A Kiebele, M.V Reddy, B.V.R Chowdari,
G Gruner, M Srinivasan, S.G Mhaisalkar, Particle size effect of silver nanopar-ticles decorated single walled carbon nanotube electrode for supercapacitors,
J Electrochem Soc 157 (2010) A179–A184.
[39] P Balaz, A Alacova, J Briancin, Sensitivity of Freundlich equation constant 1/n for zinc sorption on changes induced in calcite by mechanical activation, Chem Eng J 114 (2005) 115–121.
[40] X.Z Lan, X.L Li, Y.H Song, Q.L Zhang, Adsorption kinetics of 201 × 7 resin for iron cyanocomplexes, Chin J Nonferrous Met 18 (2008) 166–171.
[41] H.L Pang, J.H Chen, L Yang, B Liu, X.X Zhong, X.G Wei, Ethanol electroox-idation on Pt/ZSM-5 zeolite-C catalyst, J Solid State Electrochem 12 (2008) 237–243.
[42] X.X Zhong, J.H Chen, B Liu, Y Xu, Y.F Kuang, Neutral red as electron transfer mediator: enhanced electrocatalytic activity of platinum catalyst for methanol electro-oxidation, J Solid State Electrochem 11 (2007) 463–468.
[43] Y.J Gu, W.T Wong, Nanostructure PtRu/MWNTs as anode catalysts prepared
in a vacuum for direct methanol oxidation, Langmuir 22 (2006) 11447–11452 [44] Y.Y Zhang, J Mu, One-pot synthesis, photoluminescence, and photocatalysis
of Ag/ZnO composites, J Colloid Interface Sci 309 (2007) 478–484.
[45] J.C Charlier, Defects in carbon nanotubes, Acc Chem Res 35 (2002) 1063–1069.