One UN Initiative in Viet Nam Tripartite Results Framework

One UN in Viet Nam• Subsequently, tripartite agreement reached on Success Criteria to measure progress with UN Reform in Viet Nam • OP2 expands from 6 to 14 UN organisations • Developme

Trang 1

One UN Initiative in Viet Nam

Tripartite Results Framework

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Van Head, RCO Malawi

Trang 2

One UN in Viet Nam

• Subsequently, tripartite agreement reached on Success

Criteria to measure progress with UN Reform in Viet Nam

• OP2 expands from 6 to 14 UN organisations

• Development results of OP2 to be measured via

monitoring and evaluation system

• Results Framework proposed as a basis for tracking

progress with the process of UN Reform in Viet Nam

Rationale for Results Framework

Trang 3

UN Reform in Viet Nam

The What

Five outcomes of the

One Plan measured by

the

Results and Resources

Framework

The How

Progress with UN reform in Viet Nam measured by the

Results Framework

Trang 4

The How – Five Ones

• One Plan

• One Budget

• One Leader

• One Set of Management Practices

• One House

Trang 5

Outcome 1

• Successful implementation of OP2 demonstrates

progress with UN reform in Viet Nam

• Measured by

• Programme Coordination Groups

• One Leader

• One Plan Management Plan

• Un-earmarked and multi-year resources for One Plan Fund

Trang 6

Outcome 1

• Assumes

• Donor mutual accountability – un-earmarked

resources; informed HQs and Permanent Missions

• Efficient flow of funds from Administrative Agent

• Allocation process takes into account low

disbursement

• Authority and accountability lines between RC, UNCT and agencies clearly defined and accepted

Trang 7

Outcome 2

• One Plan (2011-2015) reflects prioritisation based on

SEDP, UN comparative advantage and results of UN

Evaluation Group findings

• Roadmap for the One UN in Viet Nam

• Programme Coordination Groups respond to MIC status and UN comparative advantage, deliver on their TOR, and are properly resourced

• Staffing mix able to deliver OP2 and OP (2011-2015)

Trang 8

Outcome 2

• “Clarity of Intent” ensured

• Tripartite agreement on UN comparative advantage

• SEDP (2011-2015) clearly articulates GoVN

priorities

• Changing outlook for bilateral donors (MIC status for VN) does not inhibit support for One Plan

• UN HR strategy starts now; achieves required skill mix within UN in Viet Nam

Trang 9

Outcome 3

• Approach to reducing programmatic and project

transaction costs tested by UN agencies and reflected in project outlines from 2010 onwards

• Harmonised Programme and Project Management Guidelines agreed by GoVN and resident ExCom

• Agreement on non-ExCom implementation

• Harmonised Approach to Cash Transfers introduced

in all new ExCom projects

Trang 10

Outcome 3

• HPPMG clarifies application of rules and regulations

by UN and by GoVN

• HQs of resident ExComs authorise use of HPPMG

• Agreement between non-ExCom and GoVN;

HPPMG implementation by non-ExCom commences

in 2011

Trang 11

Outcome 4

• Robust resource allocation process for OP2 and OP

(2011-2015) demonstrates capacity to allocate One Plan Funds based on GoVN priorities, UN agency

performance and UN comparative advantage

• One Plan Steering Committee operational; One Plan Fund allocation criteria agreed and utilised

• One Plan Fund Mobilisation and Allocation

Committee enlarged to include all 14 UN organisations

Trang 12

Outcome 4 (cont’d)

• UN Resident Coordinator as One Leader has ultimate authority on allocation from One Plan Fund

• Conflict resolution mechanism in place for One Plan Fund allocation process and other One UN issues

• Monitoring and reporting system operating; annual reviews conducted

• Performance informs One Plan Fund allocations

• Prioritised budget allocations for OP (2011-2015)

Trang 13

Outcome 4

• OPSC membership – 4 GACA, 4 UNCT (rotation)

• UN participation on basis of UNCT Code of Conduct

• Consultative Forum ensures stakeholder input to

OPSC reviews of OP and to OPF allocation criteria

• OPSC defines priorities, implementation modalities

• OPF allocation criteria prioritise UN comparative

advantage, normative mandates and policy advice, based on historic delivery; reform ambition supported

Trang 14

Outcome 4

• One Plan Fund transition from OP1 to OP2 achieved

• MoU for One Leader is institutionally sustainable

• Conflict resolution robust enough to avoid escalation

• UN HQs agree to simplified reporting (HPPMG)

• OPFMAC utilises transparent performance info

• HQ/governing bodies change resourcing culture

• Common approach to overheads and cost recovery

Trang 15

Outcome 5

• Significant efficiencies demonstrated by end 2010

• Common Service action plan achieves cost savings

• GoVN, UN and Donors share funding of One House

• Refurbishment of UN Apartment Building tendered

• Co-locating 16 resident UN agencies in One House achieves programmatic efficiency, synergies and savings

Trang 16

Outcome 5 (cont’d)

• Positive financial return from common services and common support office structure

• Funds saved from operational budgets increase

programmatic funding

• Co-location has increased joint programming

• Programme cycle simplified as a result of joint

programming

Trang 17

Outcome 5

• Integrated support services save costs

• GoVN, UN and Donors fund green UN House

• Co-location fosters common UN identity, maximises inter-agency teamwork; common support office

structure established in UN House

• HQs/governing bodies approve switch of savings in admin to programme budgets; no parallel planning

• UNDAF is collapsed into One Plan (2011-2015)

Trang 18

1 Number of

UNCT

organizations

adhering to the

OP-OPF-OL

nexus

6 Participating Agencies in July 2007

14 Participating Agencies in May 2008

Integration of 8 Incoming Agencies achieved

2 Composition of

OPSC agreed,

with

representation

of GACA and

key line

ministries

OPSC membership:

GACA and 6 OP1 Participating Agencies

OPSC co-chaired by

VM MPI and UN RC with equal

participation of GACA and UNCT Consultative Forum co-chaired by VM MPI and UN RC and will include GACA and Line Ministries,

UN, donors and civil society

Consultative Forum

as a platform for stakeholder

consultation, partnership building, coordination and consensus-building

3 Policy statement

on UN comparative

advantages in Viet

Nam endorsed

December 2008, as per Results

Framework of the Reform Process

Trang 19

One UN Initiative in Viet Nam

Thank You

Định dạng
Số trang	19
Dung lượng	508,5 KB