This new edition has been fully updated to include: • Detailed discussion of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, and an examination of the expanded role of the Lord Chief Justice • Exten
Trang 1Constitutional and Administrative Law is an up-to-date, interesting
and inquiring treatment of this wide-ranging and dynamic subject,
and is designed to meet the needs of modular course structures
at undergraduate and diploma level The mass of new legislation
in the area is considered alongside the various political, social and
cultural factors that have shaped them
This new edition has been fully updated to include:
• Detailed discussion of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, and
an examination of the expanded role of the Lord Chief Justice
• Extended coverage of the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998
• Increased consideration of topical issues, such as the impact of
terrorism
Constitutional and Administrative Law has been developed to
support study and understanding of this subject The fourth edition
now provides:
• Clearly distinguished case summaries to enable you to
quickly recognize the key cases and differentiate them from
surrounding commentary
• New colour design and larger format to help you follow the text
with ease
• Chapter summaries highlight the main points covered in each
chapter, cementing understanding
• Clear explanations of the fundamental principles in this area
ensure you gain a good understanding of the subject
About the Author
Alex CArroll MPhil, LLB, Cert Ed was formerly Senior
Lecturer in Law at Manchester Metropolitan University
and has also taught at the University of Manchester, Keele
University, and the University of Hong Kong
www.mylawchamber.co.uk/carroll This text
is supported by a My law chamber website including:
For students: regular case and legislation
updates, web links, interactive self-test questions, practice assessment questions and key term flashcards.
For lecturers: a testbank of multiple choice
questions which can be used to assess students’ progress.
Visit www.pearsoned.co.uk/casenavigator for unique online support that helps improve case reading and analysis skills in constitutional and administrative law
The lexisNexis element of case Navigator is only available to those who currently subscribe to lexisNexis Butterworths online The Publishers are endeavouring to make case Navigator available from early Summer 2007.
Trang 2Constitutional and Administrative Law
Visit the Constitutional and Administrative Law, fourth edition Companion Website at
■ Interactive multiple choice questions to test your factual knowledge of the topics
■ Exam-style questions and answer guidance to test your ability to apply knowledge
■ Links to relevant sites on the web
■ An online glossary providing definitions of key legal terms
■ Interactive online flashcards that allow you to check definitions against the keyterms during revision
■ Regular updates on major legal changes affecting the book
Case Navigator
Visit www.pearsoned.co.uk/casenavigatorto find unique onlinesupport to help improve your case reading and analysis skills Thisresource can also be used as an effective seminar preparation tool
Please note that access to Case Navigator is free but you mustregister with us for access Full registration instructions are provided at
Case Navigator provides:
Administrative Law, providing guidance on what to look out for while reading cases
the test has been completed
reading so that you are fully prepared for seminars and discussions
For more information about Case Navigator please contact your local PearsonEducation sales representative or visit www.pearsoned.co.uk/casenavigator
The LexisNexis element of Case Navigator is only available to those who currentlysubscribe to LexisNexis Butterworths online The Publishers are endeavouring tomake Case Navigator fully available from early Summer 2007
Trang 3We work with leading authors to develop the strongesteducational materials in Law, bringing cutting-edge thinkingand best learning practice to a global market.
Under a range of well-known imprints, including Longman,
we craft high quality print and electronic publicationswhich help readers to understand and apply their content,whether studying or at work
To find out more about the complete range of our
publishing, please visit us on the World Wide Web at:
www.pearsoned.co.uk
Trang 4Constitutional and Administrative Law Fourth Edition
ALEX CARROLLMPhil, LLB, Cert Ed
Formerly Senior Lecturer in Law,Manchester Metropolitan University
Trang 5Pearson Education Limited
Edinburgh Gate
Harlow
Essex CM20 2JE
England
and Associated Companies throughout the world
Visit us on the World Wide Web at:
www.pearsoned.co.uk
First published 1998
Second edition published 2002
Third edition published 2003
Fourth edition published 2007
© Pearson Education Limited 2007
The right of Alex Carroll to be identified as author of this work has been
asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988.
All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without either the prior
written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying
in the United Kingdom issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron
House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS.
Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the
Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland.
Law Commission Reports are reproduced under the terms of the Click-Use
Licence.
ISBN: 978-1-4058-1231-3
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
10 09 08
Typeset in 9.5/12.5pt Stone Serif by 3
Printed and bound in Great Britain by Ashford Colour Press, Gosport
For my late Mother, Father, and brother John, and for Frances and
‘the boys’ ( Joe, Matthew, Daniel and Sam)
Trang 6Guided tour xvi
Part 3 The composition and workings of Parliament 119
Part 5 Judicial review of administrative action 305
v
Brief contents
Trang 717 Exclusivity 377
22 Restrictions on the rights of freedom of expression and
Part 7 Tribunals, inquiries and complaints procedures 567
BRIEF CONTENTS
vi
Trang 8Guided tour xvi
Part 1 Fundamental principles
1 Introduction to constitutional and administrative law 3
Trang 9Constitutional conventions 56
Part 2 Parliament and the European Union
4 The European Union: institutions of government and
Part 3 The composition and workings of Parliament
CONTENTS
viii
Trang 107 The House of Commons: Members of Parliament 127
Right of the House to punish for breach of privilege and contempt of Parliament 217
Trang 11Part 4 The Executive
13 Legal liability of the Crown and public authorities 262
Part 5 Judicial review of administrative action
CONTENTS
x
Trang 12Review and appeal contrasted 311
16 Application for and exclusion of judicial review 357
Trang 13Summary 384
Part 6 Human rights
18 The European Convention on Human Rights 387
20 Police powers, personal liberty and privacy 463
Trang 1421 Restrictions on the rights of freedom of assembly and
Part 7 Tribunals, inquiries and complaints procedures
Trang 15The Council on Tribunals 583
Visit www.mylawchamber.co.uk/carrollto find valuable online resources
Companion Website for students
■ Interactive multiple choice questions to test your factual knowledge of the topics
■ Exam-style questions and answer guidance to test your ability to applyknowledge
■ Links to relevant sites on the web
■ An online glossary providing definitions of key legal terms
■ Interactive online flashcards that allow you to check definitions against the keyterms during revision
■ Regular updates on major legal changes affecting the book
For instructors
■ A testbank of questions allowing for class assessment
■ Search tool to help locate specific items of content
■ E-mail results and profile tools to send results of quizzes to instructors
■ Online help and support to assist with website usage and troubleshootingFor more information please contact your local Pearson Education salesrepresentative or visit www.mylawchamber.co.uk/carroll
Trang 17Guided tour
Case summaries – Highlight the facts and key legal principles of essential cases that you need to be aware of in your study of Constitutional and Administrative Law.
Chapter summaries – Located at the end of each
chapter, chapter summaries draw together the key
points that you should be aware of following your
reading, and provide a useful checklist for revision.
This basic principle may be attributed to two cases in both of which a local ernment officer gave an unauthorised assurance that a particular development or use planning authority (i.e the local council).
gov-Southend Corporation v Hodgson (Wickford) Ltd [1962] 1 QB 416
In this case, H was considering buying a piece of land for use as a builder’s yard He contacted borough engineer, without any authorisation or reference to the local council, told H that it received from nearby residents As a result, the local planning authority served H with an tinue a use of land for which planning permission has not been granted) H claimed that the
of the land in issue.
This was not something the court was prepared to accept In its view power to issue enforcement notices had been conferred on local planning authorities to enable them to might cause unwarranted interference with the rights or interests of others An unauthorised cretion as intended by Parliament.
After all, in a case of discretion there is a duty under the statute to exercise a free and unhindered fetter the exercise of its discretion Similarly an estoppel cannot be raised to prevent or hinder the exercise of the discretion (per Lord Parker CJ).
A similar decision was reached in the following case.
Western Fish Products Ltd v Penwith District Council [1981] 2 All ER 204
On this occasion conversations with local planning officers misled the complainants into ning permission When an enforcement notice was served by the local planning authority decision was summarised in the following comment by Megaw LJ:
The defendant council’s officers, even when acting within the apparent scope of their authority, could not did or said anything which purported to determine in advance what the council would have to deter-
Also see R v East Sussex County Council, ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd [2002]
by a planning officer that planning permission was not needed was binding on the authority.
In addition to the above, it has long been established that estoppel cannot be used:
ILLEGALITY AND CONTROL OF DISCRETION 327
security and defence policy’ (ibid.) The operational requirements of such a European
defence force would be identified by a ‘European Defence Agency’.
inter-■ EU law should recognise and adopt the fundamental rights in the European
by the Nice European Council of December 2000 The latter contains a range of social and employment rights not found in the ECHR (Art 1-9).
■ EU law should be recognised as superior to the national law of member states (Art 1-6).
■ The EU’s law-making power should be extended into the areas of justice, asylum, immigration and border control (Art 1-42).
Summary
The chapter gives an appreciation of the extent to which the British constitution
by membership of the European Union Matters dealt with include:
■ the composition, powers and functions of the EU’s institutions of law and ment;
govern-■ the different types of legal rules made by these institutions and how such rules take effect in the United Kingdom;
■ the emergence and development of the EU through its inception and evolution ment and resulting institutional reform, and the formation of the European Union Constitution.
Trang 18Further reading – At the end of each chapter, use the further reading section to delve deeper into the topic, and read those articles which will help you to gain higher marks in both exams and assessments.
References
Blackstone (1873) Commentaries on the Laws of England, London: Macmillan.
Blake (1999) Royal Prerogative, London: Harper Collins.
Dicey (1959) An Introduction to the Law of the Constitution (10th edn), ed Wade, E.C.S.,
Loveland (1996) Constitutional Law: A Critical Introduction, London: Butterworths, Ch 4.
Loveland (2006) Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights (4th edn), Oxford
University Press.
Monro (1987) Studies in Constitutional Law, London: Butterworths, Ch 8.
Payne and Sunkin (1999) The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis, London:
Clarendon.
Vincenzi (1998) Crown Powers, Subjects and Citizens, London: Continuum Publishing.
Companion Website – Want to test your
knowledge of a topic, practice answering
exam style questions, visit useful
Constitutional and Administrative Law
sites on the web or just check if the law
has changed?
Visit www.mylawchamber.co.uk/carroll
to find extensive resources designed to
aid you in your study, including multiple
choice questions, exam style questions
and answer guidance, web links to
further resources, an online glossary
and regular web updates on major legal
changes
For Instructors – The Companion
Website also includes a testbank of
multiple choice questions that can be
used to access students’ progress.
Trang 19This book has been written for students undertaking legal studies at undergraduatelevel and those pursuing similar courses which include constitutional and adminis-trative law as a core component (e.g the Postgraduate Diploma in Law) It is based
on over thirty years’ experience of teaching the subject at A-level, undergraduateand postgraduate courses Particular attention has been paid to the views of studentsconcerning the strengths and weaknesses of pre-existing textbooks in this discipline
No attempt has been made to produce an exhaustive reference book covering allthose issues which might conceivably fall within the boundaries of the subject.Rather the book concentrates on those topics which form the essential core of mostconstitutional and administrative law syllabi currently taught in further and highereducation institutions
Recent years have witnessed many significant changes to the law and the practise
of the British constitution Detailed comment on these changes has been includednotwithstanding that in some contexts, e.g the House of Lords, the process ofchange is not yet complete Hence, in addition to parliamentary reform, extensivecoverage is given to such further innovations as the creation of regional assembliesfor Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, developments within the EuropeanUnion, changes to electoral law, the enactment and application of the HumanRights Act 1998 and the granting of even greater powers to the executive to dealwith crime and terrorism
As with most law books many of the legal principles included are explained byreference to particular judicial decisions The approach taken here has been todiscuss those cases which illustrate the principles in issue most clearly or thosewhich exemplify their most recent application
Constitutional and administrative law cannot be fully understood without ence to the nation’s political history and its social and cultural development Thesubject is also of great topical interest and is in a constant process of change andadjustment with many of its principles and cases resulting from, or relating to,recent political controversies Hence, while every attempt has been made to explainthe necessary principles as precisely and succinctly as possible, it has also been theauthor’s intention to do so in a way which places these in their contextual frame-work This approach is intended to give insight into the relationship between thesubject and those various political, historical and cultural factors which have influ-enced and shaped its nature and content
refer-The author is greatly indebted to all those who have helped in the book’s lation and production Particular thanks is due to Ms Kelly Sidebotham, for herinvaluable administrative and clerical support The author would also like to expressbelated thanks to Mr R H Buckley, one-time Principal Lecturer in Law at ManchesterMetropolitan University, for all his help and advice over the years and for firstexciting the author’s interest in the subject
compi-Alex Carroll
xviii
Preface
Trang 20A v United Kingdom (1999) 27 EHRR 611
Agricultural, Horticultural and Forestry
Industry Training Board v Aylesbury
Mushrooms [1972] 1 WLR 190 156
Ahmed v Austria (1996) 24 EHRR 278 401
Air Canada v Secretary of State for Trade
Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd
v Customs and Excise Commissioners
Anufrijeva v Southwark London Borough
Council [2003] EWCA Civ 1406 445, 456
Application for a warrant of further
detention, An, Re [1988] Crim LR 296
478
Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302 542
Arrowsmith v United Kingdom (1978) 19 DR
5 418
Ashbridge Investments Ltd v Minister of
Housing and Local Government [1965] 1 WLR 1320 311
Ashworth Security Hospital v MGN Ltd
[2001] 1 WLR 515 460
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v
Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223
55, 323, 331, 334, 335, 336, 370, 446, 597
Association of British Civilian Internees (Far
East Region) v Secretary of State for
Defence [2003] EWCA Civ 473 335
Association X v United Kingdom (1978) 14
Trang 21Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers
Attorney General v Ryan [1980] AC 718 369
Attorney General v Sharp [1931] 1 Ch 121
Beldjoudi v France (1992) 14 EHRR 801 415
Belgium Linguistics Case (1979-80) 1 EHRR
Bentley’s Case (Dr.) (1723) 1 Stra 557 339
Beusaid v United Kingdom [2003] 33 EHRR
Biggin Hill Airport Ltd v Bromley London
Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1089
445
Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 457
Birkdale District Electric Supply Co Ltd v
Board of Education v Rice [1911] AC 179 339
Boddington v British Transport Police [1998]
2 WLR 639; Times 3 April 1998 380
Bonham’s (Dr) Case (1610) 8 Co Rep 114
91, 339, 353
Bookbinder v Tebbit [1992] 1 WLR 217 295
Bouamer v Belgium (1988) 11 EHRR 1 405
Bourgoin SA v Ministry of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food [1986] QB 716 285
Bowles v Bank of England [1913] 1 Ch 57
Bozano v France (1987) 9 EHRR 297 406
Bradbury v Enfield London Borough Council
Trang 22Brickley and Kitson v The Police,
Bronda v Italy 9 June 1998 Hudoc 415
Brooks v Commissioner of Police of the
Burdett v Abbott (1814) 14 East 1 222
Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Bank of England [1980]
Cakici v Turkey (2001) 31 EHRR 133 401
Calder ( John) (Publications) Ltd v Powell
Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works
Chief Constable of Greater Manchester v
McNally [2002] EWCA Civ 14
Trang 23Christian Democratic People’s Party v
Clarke v Chief Constable of North Wales
Coleen Properties Ltd v Minister of Housing
and Local Government [1971] 1 WLR 433
317
Collins v Wilcock[1984] 1 WLR 1172; [1984]
3 All ER 374 464
Colozza v Italy (1985) 7 EHRR 516 408
Commonwealth of Australia v John Fairfax
Cook’s Application, Re [1986] 1 NIJB 43 363
Cooper v Wandsworth Board of Works
Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 585 108
Costello v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
[2001] 1 WLR 1437 491
Costello-Roberts v United Kingdom (1993)
19 EHRR 112 414
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister
for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 49, 64,
Day v Savadge (1615) Hob 85 91
De Falco v Crawley Borough Council [1980]
Trang 24Dimes v Grand Junction Canal Proprietors
(1852) 3 HL Cas 759 353
Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1960] 2
QB 405 212, 216
Director General of Fair Trading v
Proprietary Association of Great Britain [2001] 1 WLR 700 454
Director of Public Prosecutions v A & BC
Chewing Gum Ltd [1968] 1 QB 159 528, 529
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hancock
and Tuttle [1995] Crim LR 139 518
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hawkins
Donoghue v Poplar Housing and
Regeneration Community Association [2001] EWCA Civ 595 383
Dory v Sweden 2003, Unreported 407
Earl Fitzwilliam’s Wentworth Estates Co Ltd
v Minister of Town and Country Planning
Edwards and Lewis v United Kingdom (2005)
40 EHRR 24; Times 22 July 2003 301, 408
Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health
[1934] 1 KB 590 91
Elliott v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Times 5
December 1996 285
Ellis v Dubowski [1921] 3 KB 621 321
Ellis v Home Office [1953] 2 QB 135 289
Ennhorn v Sweden, 25 January 2005 406
Ennslin, Baader and Raspe v FRG 14 DR 64
401
Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030 47
Erdogan v Turkey 26 July 2005 399
Errington v Minister of Health [1935] 1 KB
Fadeyeva v Russia 9 June 2005 414
Fairmount Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1976] 1 WLR 1255; [1976] 2 All ER 865 578
Family H v United Kingdom (1984) 37 DR
Trang 25Freda v Italy 7 October 1980 433
G v Federal Republic of Germany (1989) 60
Gezer v Secretary of State for the Home
Department [2004] EWCA Civ 1730 450, 451
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557
457
Gibson v Lord Advocate 1975 SC 136; [1975]
1 CMLR 563 103
Girling v Parole Board [2005] EWHC 546 452
Glaser v United Kingdom 19 September
Haim v Kassenzahnarztliche Vereinigung
Nordrhein (C424/97) [2000] ECR I-5123; [2000] All ER (D) 916 284
Halford v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR
Haoucher v Minister of State for
Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 93 ALR 51 343
Trang 26Harrison and Hope v Chief Constable of
Greater Manchester Unreported, September 14, 1994 501
Hashman v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR
Hipperson v Electoral Registration Officer for
the District of Newbury [1985] QB 1060
Howes v United Kingdom (1979) 24 DR 425
Humphries v Connor (1864) 17 ICLR 1 513
Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd v Curtin
International Transport Roth GmbH v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 158 105,
447, 454
Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v
Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide [1970] ECR 1125 108
Inze v Austria (1988) 10 EHRR 394 431
Ireland v United Kingdom (1979-80) 2 EHRR
25 400, 401, 432
Issa v Turkey (31821/96) (2004) 41 EHRR 27
433
J v Secretary of State for the Home
Department [2005] EWCA Civ 629 451
JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS
Trust [2003] EWCA Civ 1151 277
Jabari v Turkey (2001) 29 EHRR CD178 400
Jackson v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56
Johansen v Norway (1996) 23 EHRR 33 415
John v Express Newspapers[2000] 1 WLR
Trang 27Klass v Germany (1980) 2 EHRR 214 417
Knuller v Director of Public Prosecutions
Kokkinakis v Greece (1994) 17 EHRR 397 417
Konle v Austria [1999] ECR I-3099 284
Koshiyev v Russia, 24 February 2005 399
Krause v Switzerland (1978) 13 DR 73 411
Kremzow v Austria [1997] ECR I-2629 389
Krocher v Switzerland (1984) 6 EHRR CD395
Kyprianou v Cyprus 2004, Unreported 407
Lain v Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire,
Larner v Solihull Metropolitan Borough
Council [2000] EWCA 359; 20 December
2000, Smith Bernal Casetrack 276, 282
Laskey v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR
Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 417
Lee v Bude & Torrington Junction Railway
Co 8 (1871) LR 6 CP 576 90
Leonesio v Italian Ministry of Agriculture
and Forestry [1972] ECR 287; [1973] CMLR 343 83
Lever (Finance) Ltd v Westminster Corp
Loizidon v Turkey [1997] 23 ECHR 513 433
London Passenger Transport Board v Sumner
(1935) 99 JP 387 156
Lonrho Plc Re [1990] 2 AC 154 535
Lopez-Ostria v Italy (1994) 20 EHRR 277 414
Lord Advocate v Dumbarton DC [1990] 2 AC
580 HL; reversing 1988 SLT 546; Times 18
March 1988 55, 254
Trang 28TABLE OF CASES xxvii
Lucas v Lucas and High Commissioner for
Mansur v Turkey (1995) 20 EHRR 535 405
Manuel v Attorney General [1983] Ch 77 61, 90
Marbury v Maddison (1803) 5 US (Cranch)
Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional
de Alimentacion SA [1990] ECR I-4135; [1992] 1 CMLR 305 84, 112
Marshall v Southampton and South West
Hampshire AHA [1986] QB 401; [1986] 1 CMLR 688 84, 283
Mathieu-Mohin v Belgium (1988) 10 EHRR 1
Mella v Monahan [1961] Crim LR 175 529
Melnik v Ukraine 26 January 2006 400
Menesheva v Russia 9 March 2006 400
Mepstead v Director of Public Prosecutions
[1996] COD 13;[1996] Crim LR 111 464
Mercury Communications Ltd v Director
General of Telecommunications [1996] 1 WLR 48 379
Merseyside Police v Hickman see Chief Constable of Merseyside v Hickman Metropolitan Asylum District Managers v
Hill (1881) LR 6 App Cas 193 285
Middleweek v Chief Constable of Merseyside
Trang 29Mills v London County Council [1925] 1 KB
Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2
Nemerzhitsy v Ukraine 5 April 2005 400
New South Wales v Bardolph (1934) 53 CLR
Norris v Ireland (1991) 13 EHRR 186 444
Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and
Olsson v Sweden (1989) 11 EHRR 259 417
Open Door Counselling Ltd and Dublin Well
Woman Centre v Ireland (1993) 15 EHRR
244 419
O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237 318,
360, 366, 378, 379
Oskar v Australia [1988] AC 366 365
Osman v Director of Public Prosecutions
(1999) 163 JP 725; Lexis Transcript 1July
Ozgur v Turkey 16 March 2000 Hudoc 419
PG and JH v United Kingdom Times, 19
Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 407
Pendragon v United Kingdom 19
October1998 Hudoc 425
Pepper v Hart [1992] 3 WLR 1032 213, 440
Percy v Director of Public Prosecutions
Trang 30TABLE OF CASES xxix
Peters v Netherlands (1994) 77-A DR 75) 414
Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough
Council [2001] 2 AC 619 274, 275, 276, 279
Philcox v Civil Aviation Authority (1995) 92(27) LSG 33; Times, 8 June 1995 278
Police v Reid [1987] Crim LR 702 506
Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67 331, 355
Powell v Chief Constable of North Wales
Pretto v Italy (1984) 6 EHRR 182 409
Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1
399, 412
Prince of Wales, HRH v Associated
Newspapers [2006] EWHC 522 544
Price v Rhondda UDC [1923] 2 Ch 372 330
Price v United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 53
R (on the application of Abbasi) v Secretary
of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2002] EWCA Civ 1598
259
R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 66 451
R (on the application of Al Hasan) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 13 355
R (on the application of Al-Skeini) v
Secretary of State for Defence [2005] EWCA Civ 1609 446
R (on the application of Amin v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2003] UKHL 51 449
R (on the application of Anderson) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 46 454
R (on the application of B) v Secretary of
State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2004] EWCA Civ 1344 446
R (on the application of B) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2002] EWHC 587 260
R (on the application of Bagdanavicius) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 451
R (on the application of Beer (t/a Hammer
Trout Farm) v Hampshire Farmers Markets
Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1056 383
R (on the application of Begum) v Denbigh
High School [2006] UKHL 15 459
R (on the application of Bernard) v Enfield
London Borough Council [2002] EWHC
2282 445
R (on the application of Bibi and Al-Nashed)
v Newham London Borough Council
[2001] EWCA Civ 607 352
R (on the application of Clark-Darby) v
Highbury Magistrates Court [2001] EWHC Admin 959 346
R (on the application of Collins) v
Lincolnshire Health Authority [2001] EWHC Admin 685 352
R (on the application of Countryside
Trang 31TABLE OF CASES
xxx
Alliance) v Attorney General [2006] EWCA
Civ 817 456, 461
R (on the application of D) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2006]
EWCA Civ 143 450
R (on the application of Director of Public
Prosecutions) v Acton Youth Court [2001]
EWHC Admin 402 303
R (on the application of Farrakhan) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 606 448
R (on the application of Fuller) v Chief
Constable of Dorset [2001] EWHC Admin
1057 510
R (on the application of Gentle) v Prime
Minister [2006] EWCA Civ 1078 450
R (on the application of Greenfield) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 14 454, 455
R (on the application of Gurung) v Ministry
of Defence [2002] EWHC 2463 332, 333
R (on the application of Haw) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2006]
EWCA Civ 532 507
R (on the application of Hirst) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2006]
EWCA Civ 945 452
R (on the application of I) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2002]
EWCA Civ 888 453
R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief
Constable of Gloucestershire [2004] EWCA Civ 1639 461
R (on the application of M) v Secretary of
State for Constitutional Affairs [2004]
EWCA Civ 312 454
R (on the application of McCann) v
Manchester Crown Court [2003] 1 AC 787
455
R (on the application of Mellor) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2001]
EWCA Civ 472 461
R (on the application of Middleton) v
Coroner for Western Somerset [2004]
UKHL 10 450
R (on the application of N) v Secretary of
State for the Home Department [2006]
UKHL 31 451
R (on the application of Nilsen) v Full Sutton
Prison [2004] EWCA Civ 1540 460
R (on the application of Noorkoiv) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department (No.2) [2002] EWCA Civ 770
452
R (on the application of PW) v Metropolitan
Police Commission [2006] EWCA Civ 458
508
R (on the application of Plymouth City
Council) v HM Coroner for Devon [2005]
R (on the application of Quark Fishing Ltd) v
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2005] UKHL 57
446
R (on the application of Rashid) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 744 352
R (on the application of Reprotech
(Pebsham) Ltd) v East Sussex County
Council [2002] UKHL 8 327, 328
R (on the application of Robertson) v
Wakefield Metropoltan District Council [2001] EWHC Admin 915 458
R (on the application of Rogers) v Swindon
NHS Primary Care Trust [2006] EWCA Civ
392 332, 333
R (on the application of Samaroo) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 1139 447
R (on the application of Scholes) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2006] EWHC 1 449
R (on the application of Singh) v Chief
Constable of the West Midlands [2005] EWHC 2840 509
R (on the application of Smith) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 51 452
R (on the application of Southall) v Secretary
of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Application for Permission to Appeal) [2003] EWCA Civ 1002 61
R (on the application of Tozlukaya) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 379 451
R (on the application of Tucker) v Director
General of the National Crime Squad [2003] EWCA Civ 2 350
Trang 32TABLE OF CASES xxxi
R (on the application of West) v Parole Board
[2005] UKHL 51 452
R (on the application of Williamson) v
Secretary of State for Education and Employment [2005] UKHL 15 458, 459
R (on the application of Wooder) v Feggetter
[2002] EWCA Civ 554 350
R v A [2001] UKHL 25 440
R v Absolam (1989) 88 Cr App R 3 481
R v Advertising Standards Authority, ex p
Insurance Services (1990) 2 Admin LR 7
R v Board of Visitors of the Maze Prison, ex p
Hone and McCartan [1988] AC 379 347
R v Bow Street Magistrates Court, ex p
R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex p
International Traders’ Ferry Ltd [1997] 3 WLR 132 279
R v Chief Constable of Warwickshire, ex p [1999] 1 WLR 564; Independent 13 October
1997 487
R v Chief Constable of the West Midlands,
R v Chief Immigration Officer, Heathrow
Airport, Bibi (Salamat) [1976] 1 WLR 979; [1976] 3 All ER 843 390
R v Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew
Congregations of Great Britain and the
Trang 33R v Commissioner for Local Administration,
ex p Croydon London Borough Council
[1989] 1 All ER 1033 600
R v Commissioner for Local Administration
ex p Eastleigh Borough Council [1988] QB
R v Electricity Commissioners, ex p London
Electricity Joint Committee [1924] 1 KB
R v Football Association of Wales, ex p Flint
Town United Football Club [1991] COD
R v Governor of Armley Prison, ex p Ward
R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex p
Institute of Dental Surgery [1994] 1 WLR
242 349
Trang 34TABLE OF CASES xxxiii
R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex
R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court, ex p
Bennett (No.2) [1994] 1 All ER 289 302
R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court, ex p
R v Imam of Bury Park Mosque, Luton, ex p
Sulaiman (Ali) [1992] COD 132;
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p
National Federation of Self Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617 358, 360
R v Inner London Crown Court, ex p Baines
& Baines [1988] QB 579; [1987] 3 All ER
1025 488, 489
R v Inner London Education Authority, ex p Ali (1990) 2 Admin LR 822; Times, 21
February 1990 273
R v Inner London Education Authority, ex p
Westminster City Council [1986] 1 WLR
R v Kansal (No.2) [2001] UKHL 62 445
R v Kirk [1985] 1 All ER 453; [1984] ECR
R v Liverpool Corporation, ex p Liverpool
Taxi Fleet Operators Association [1972] 2
QB 299 342
R v London Metal Exchange Ltd, ex p
Albatros Warehousing BV Unreported 383
R v Londonderry Justices, ex p Hume [1972]
R v Marsh [1991] Crim LR 455 480
Trang 35R v Mason [1988] 1 WLR 139; [1987] 3 All
ER 481 484
R v Mason [2002] EWCA Crim 385 484, 485
R v Medical Appeal Tribunal, ex p Gilmore
R v Ministry of Defence, ex p Murray [1998]
COD 134; Times 17 December 1997
R v Pitt; R v Mead (1763) 3 Burr 1335 221
R v Poplar Municipal Borough Council, ex p
R v Secretary of State for the Environment,
ex p Doncaster Borough Council [1990]
COD 441 360
R v Secretary of State for the Environment,
ex p Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
[1991] 1 AC 521 99, 156, 373
R v Secretary of State for the Environment,
ex p Kirkstall Valley Campaign Ltd 2
R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Butt [1999]
COD 470; Smith Bernal Casetrack
R v Secretary of State for Health, ex p US
Tobacco International Inc [1992] QB 353
323, 362
R v Secretary of State for the Home
TABLE OF CASES
xxxiv
Trang 36R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Phansopkar [1976] QB
R v Secretary of State for Social Services, ex p
Association of Metropolitan Authorities [1986] 1 WLR 1; [1986] 1 All ER 164 99,
153, 361
R v Secretary of State for Social Services, ex p
Child Poverty Action Group [1989] 3 WLR
1116 359
R v Secretary of State for Trade, ex p
Anderson Strathclyde Plc [1983] 2 All ER
233 213
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p
Factortame Ltd (No.1) [1990] 2 AC 85; [1989] 2 All ER 692; [1989] 3 CML353 110
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p
Factortame Ltd (No.2) [1991] 1 AC 603; [1991] 1 All ER 70 40,110, 111
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p
Trang 37R v Southwark Crown Court, ex p Sorsky
Defries [1996] COD 117; [1996] Crim LR
R v Wiltshire County Council, ex p Lazard Brothers & Co Ltd Times 13 January 1998
371
Racal Communications Ltd, Re [1981] AC
374 319, 369
Raninen v Finland (1998) 26 EHRR 563 400
Rasmussen v Denmark (1984) 7 EHRR 371
Roberts v Parole Board [2005] UKHL 45 338
Robertson v Minister of Pensions [1949] 1 KB
Trang 38TABLE OF CASES
Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and
Westminster Family Practitioner Committee [1992] 2 WLR 239 379
Royal Aquarium Society Ltd v Parkinson
Sadik v Greece (1997) 24 EHRR 323 443
Salaman v Secretary of State in Council of
India [1906] 1 KB 613 252
Saliadin v France 26 July 2005 402
Sander v United Kingdom (2001) 31 EHRR
Secretary of State for Education and Science
v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Secretary of State for the Home Department
v SS and Others [2006] EWCA Civ 1141 452
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M
[2006] UKHL 11 456, 457
Shamayev v Georgia 12 April 2005 406
Shaughnessy v United States (1953) 345 US
Spadea v Italy (1995) 21 EHRR 482 427
Sparks v Edward Ash Ltd [1943] KB 223 156
Spiegelman v Hocker (1933) 50 TLR 87 288
Sporrong v Sweden (1982) 5 EHRR 35 427
Stafford v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 32; Times 31 May 2002 403
Stankov v Bulgaria 2 October, 2001 Hudoc
Trang 39Taylor v Lawrence [2001] EWCA Civ 119 355
Terrell v Secretary of State for the Colonies
[1953] 2 QB 482 268
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council Joined Cases: Harman v Cornwall CC; Collins v Sutton LBC; Hunt v Hackney LBC [2002]
EWHC 195 93
Thomas v Sawkins [1935] 2 KB 249 513, 514
Tims v John Lewis & Co [1952] AC 676 473
Tolstoy Miloslavsky v United Kingdom
(1995) 20 EHRR 442 421
Tomasi v France (1993) 15 EHRR 1 400
Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No.2)
Valentine v Director of Public Prosecutions
[1997] COD 339; Current Law, June 1977
Vauxhall Estates v Liverpool Corporation
Vogt v Germany (1996) 21 EHRR 205 423
W v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR 29
Wednesbury Corporation v Ministry of
Housing and Local Government [1965] 1 WLR 261 289
Wednesbury Corporation v Ministry of
Housing and Local Government (No.2) [1966] 2 QB 275 578
Weeks v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR
Trang 40TABLE OF CASES xxxix
Wemhoff v Germany (1980) 1 EHRR 55 404, 407
Wershof v Commissioner of Police of the
Whitmarsh v Chief Constable of Avon and
Somerset Unreported, CA (Civ Div)
Williams v Bedwellty Justices [1997] AC 225;
[1996] 3 All ER 737 319
Williams v Home Office (No.1) [1981] 1 All
ER 1151 293, 337
Williamson v Chief Constable of the West
Midlands [2003] EWCA Civ 337
X v United Kingdom (1982) 4 EHRR 188 107
X v United Kingdom Application 11644/8,
Yildtz v Turkey 10 November 2005 400
Young, James and Webster v United