Table 3.1 Silicide film thickness and relative ratios of silicide to Ni films for different as-deposited metal films.. Table 6.3 Minimum total energy and interface formation energy of va
Trang 1Acknowledgements
It is my great pleasure to have the opportunity here to record my gratitude to people and institutions that made this thesis possible
Foremost, I would like to express my utmost gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor, Professor FENG Yuan Ping for his invaluable guidance, kindness and encouragement throughout my research And it is my co-supervisor Dr ZHENG Jia Zhen who guides me into the field on CMOS and transition-metal silicides
I would like to thank Dr Lap CHAN and Dr Alex SEE in Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd for their education on the advanced technologies in semiconductor industry I also thank Assoc Prof SHEN Ze Xiang, Assoc Prof Thomas OSIPOWICZ, Dr LIU Jin Ping, and Dr CHI Dong Zhi for their constructive suggestions and great support on my experimental work
My gratitude is also conveyed to all my colleagues and friends in Theoretical and Computational Condensed Matter Physics group, Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory group, and Special Project group, for their continuous co-operations, fruitful discussions, and warm care during my PhD study
The award of Research Scholarship by National University of Singapore and the financial support from Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd throughout this project are highly appreciated
Finally, I owe my beloved family for their consistent love and support
Trang 2Table of Contents
Acknowledgements………i
Table of Contents……….………ii
Summary………v
List of Tables………viii
List of Figures………ix
Chapter 1 Introduction………1
1.1 Evolution of CMOS Technologies………1
1.2 Transition-Metal Silicides………7
1.3 Objective and Scope………17
References………19
Chapter 2 Experimental and Computational Methodologies………24
2.1 Thin Film Growth……….………24
2.2 Thin Film Characterization Techniques………29
2.3 First-Principles Calculation………….………37
References………52
Chapter 3 Growth and Stability of Ultra-Thin Nickel Silicide Films………55
3.1 Introduction………55
3.2 Ultra-Thin Nickel Silicide Film Growth………56
3.3 Electrical Property of Nickel Silicides………57
Trang 33.4 Phase Identification and Transformation………60
3.5 Thermal Stability………65
3.6 Conclusions………70
References……… 71
Chapter 4 Surface and Interface Roughness of Silicide Thin Films…………72
4.1 Introduction………72
4.2 New Approach by Micro-Raman Imaging………74
4.3 Modeling of Interface Roughness………77
4.4 Surface and Interface Roughness………81
4.5 Agglomeration Mechanism………95
4.6 Conclusions………99
References………99
Chapter 5 Interface Reconstruction of Silicide/Si(001) Heterostructure…101 5.1 Introduction………101
5.2 Interfacial Structures of Silicide/Si(001)………102
5.3 Models and Calculation Details……….………105
5.4 Results and Discussion……….………109
5.5 Conclusions………117
References……… 118
Chapter 6 Strain Effects on Interface of Silicide/Si(001) Heterostructure 120
6.1 Introduction………120
6.2 Total Energy Calculations………122
Trang 46.3 Strain Effect on Interface Atomistic Configuration………127
6.4 Strain Effect on Interface Formation Energetics………129
6.5 Strain Effect on Electronic Properties………131
6.6 Strain Effect on Schottky Barrier Height………135
6.7 Conclusions………146
References………147
Chapter 7 Ge Composition Effects on Formation of Germanosilicides……149
7.1 Introduction………149
7.2 Total Energy Calculations………151
7.3 Ge Composition Effect on Atomistic Structure………160
7.4 Ge Composition Effect on Energetics………161
7.5 Ge Composition Effect on Electronic Properties………164
7.6 Conclusions ………171
References………171
Chapter 8 Conclusions and Future Work………173
8.1 Conclusions………173
8.2 Future Work………175
Publication List………177
Trang 5Summary
Transition-metal silicides are self-aligned to Si with low resistivity, good adhesion, and self-passivation characters Silicides have been widely used to decrease contact resistance and thus increase speed of devices in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) ultra-large-scale integration (ULSI) technologies Among various silicides, titanium, cobalt, and nickel silicides are the most popular materials used in Si fabrication process
Rapid pace of development leads semiconductor industry exciting but facing a lot of challenges As device feature dimensions shrink to nanoscale, new architectures and materials have to be employed Silicides have been extensively studied for a few decades both experimentally and theoretically However, most of the studies have been carried out on the conventional bulk Si substrate Silicides for advanced CMOS technologies are still not well-studied due to the lack of effective characterization tools and their formation mechanisms are still far from deep understanding The goal of this research is to fill in some of the technical gaps through both experimental and theoretical approaches
Ultra-shallow junction is a necessity of shrinkage in lateral dimensions of CMOS devices To avoid excessive consumption of silicon, ultra-thin silicide films must be adopted The formation process and stability of ultra-thin nickel silicide films with as-deposited metal thickness down to 4nm have been systematically studied It was found that thermal stability of NiSi degrades gradually with the
Trang 6decrease in the as-deposited Ni film thickness, especially when thinner than 8nm Both the NiSi film agglomeration and the NiSi2 phase transformation take place at lower temperatures as Ni film thickness decreases Interface condition is crucial for applications of ultra-thin films To effectively determine the morphology of interfaces between silicide thin films and silicon substrate, a new technique, micro-Raman imaging (µMI), has been successfully developed in our study based on modeling and experiments The thickness of silicide films is determined by the attenuation of Si Raman peak at 520cm-1 Compared with cross-section TEM and SEM, micro-Raman imaging does not require special sample preparation and can easily resolve features of micrometer scale in a plane and nanometer scale in the normal direction
Strained-Si is a promising replacement of conventional Si substrate due to the enhanced carrier mobility of both electrons and holes Various interface structures of CoSi2/Si(001) and NiSi2/Si(001) system with different degrees of strain have been intensively investigated To understand the effects of strain/stress, first-principles calculation was used to expand the system to extreme conditions (from fully-relaxed
to fully-strained) which is difficult to reach via experimental approaches A new model for the MSi2/Si interface, the sevenfold-Z model with a zigzag Si dimer arrangement at the interface, has been proposed The proposed model is equally possible as the existing model with comparable interface formation energy and atomic plane space The possible coexistence of this model and the existing one can well explain the ambiguity in the earlier STEM study Strain does show great impact on atomistic, energetic, electronic and transport properties of the interfaces With
Trang 7biaxially tensile strain induced by Si substrate, the atomic distance in the perpendicular axis is compressed accordingly In terms of energetics, the higher the in-plane strain, the smaller the interface formation energy generally Strain in substrate also causes the compression in PDOS of Si atoms, but has less impact on metal atoms Most importantly, Schottky barrier height of the MSi2/Si(001) heterojunction changes significantly with strain, which has direct impact on device performance
As new materials are being introduced into advanced CMOS technologies, such as SiGe, chemical composition of the substrates will also influence the solid-state reaction process in silicidation Germanosilicides Co(Si1-xGex)2 and Ni(Si
1-xGex)2 with different Ge compositions, ternary compounds formed on Si1-xGex
substrates, have been systematically investigated using first-principle method Simulation results show that Ge composition dominates the configuration of the ternary compounds The equilibrium volume of M(Si1-xGex)2 shows a linear increase with the increase of the Ge composition x, following Vegard’s law Si/Ge-rich system tends to form the MSi2 plus Ge rather than MSiGe and SiGe or MGe2 and Si The lower cohesive energy of M(Si1-xGex)2 with larger x explains the reason for the tendency of Ge agglomeration and cluster formation in the compounds under thermal stress Ge composition also affects electronic properties of silicides With increase of the Ge composition, upward shift of the valance bands and compression of the whole energy states are observed The M d−band becomes stronger and narrower with the increase of Ge composition in the silicides
Trang 8List of Tables
Table 1.1 Important properties of common self-aligned silicides
Table 3.1 Silicide film thickness and relative ratios of silicide to Ni films for
different as-deposited metal films
Table 5.1 Optimized lattice parameter c (Å) and calculated interface formation
energy ∆Eform is the difference in formation energy of a given structure and that of the sevenfold-R model
Table 5.2 Bond length (Å) between interface metal atoms and their neighboring Si
atoms for sevenfold-R and Z configurations Refer to Figure 5.6 for labels of the bonds
Table 5.3 Calculated inter-atomic-plane distance (Å) for the sevenfold-R and Z
models of NiSi2/Si(001) Refer to Figure 5.6 for labeling of atomic planes
Table 6.1 Calculated lattice constants of Si, CoSi2, and NiSi2 with strain varying
from 0% (fully-relaxed as aSi) to 100% (fully-strained as aGe)
Table 6.2 Equilibrium lattice constant c0 and volume V0 of various MSi2/Si(001)
interface structures with substrate strain varying from 0% to 100% Table 6.3 Minimum total energy and interface formation energy of various
MSi2/Si(001) interface structures with substrate strain varying from 0%
to 100%
Table 6.4 Lineup and p-type SBH Φp of various MSi2/Si(001) interface structures
with substrate strain varying from 0% to 100%
Table 7.1 Lattice constants of Co, Ni, Si, CoSi2 and NiSi2 obtained by LDA and
GGA
Table 7.2 Calculated equilibrium volume, total energy, and bulk modulus of
M(Si1-xGex)2 with Ge composition x variation
Trang 9List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Cross section of modern CMOS transistor with an n-channel MOSFET
and a p-channel MOSFET
Figure 1.2 Intel CPU processing power projection by Moore’s Law (Cited from
http://www.intel.com/technology/mooreslaw/)
Figure 1.3 Phase diagram of Ni-Si phase binary system (Cited from SGTE alloy
databases 2004)
Figure 2.1 Schematic illustration of a RF sputtering chamber
Figure 2.2 Schematic diagram of a rapid thermal processing system
Figure 2.3 Energy level diagram of Raman scattering
Figure 2.4 Schematic diagram of a four-point probe
Figure 2.5 Principle of Rutherford Back-scattering Spectrometry
Figure 2.6 Schematic diagram of an atomic force microscope (cited from Vecco
application notes)
Figure 3.1 Sheet resistance of nickel silicide (NiSi and NiSi2) films as a function of
initial Ni thickness and annealing temperature
Figure 3.2 Silicide formation rate as a function of the initial Ni film thickness To
calculate the film thickness, the resistivity of NiSi and NiSi2 are taken as
13 ohm/sq and 50 ohm/sq respectively
Figure 3.3 Raman spectra of NiSi formed at 450°C with different initial Ni
thickness
Figure 3.4 Raman spectra of NiSi2 formed at 800°C with different initial Ni
thickness
Figure 3.5 Raman spectra of NiSi formed at 450°C and NiSi2 formed at 800°C on
(100) Si substrates The Raman spectrum with co-existence of two phases indicates the phase transition process from NiSi to NiSi2 at the critical temperature of 750°C
Trang 10Figure 3.6 RBS spectra of 16nm as-deposited Ni films under various thermal
treatments, (a) uniform NiSi film formed at 500°C, (b) agglomerated NiSi film formed at 750°C, and (c) NiSi2 film formed at 850°C
Figure 3.7 AFM images of Ni/Si samples with 16nm as-deposited Ni on top of Si
substrates annealed at (a) 500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, (d) 750°C, (e) 800°C, and (f) 850°C RMS surface roughness increases with temperature dramatically when temperature higher than 750°C
Figure 3.8 Comparison of sheet resistance and surface roughness of 16nm Ni/Si
samples as a function of annealing temperatures
Figure 4.1 Schematic diagram of the scanning Raman system: 1-XYZ scanning
stage, 2-tip, 3-driving piezo, 4-laser diode, 5-microscope objective, 6-laser, 7-Raman signal, 8-quadrant detector, 9-sample, 10-controllor, 11-spectrometer, 12-computer 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 constitute the scanning head, which is put on the mechanical stage of the microscope Laser is delivered by microscope objective 5, which is also used to collect Raman signal in this embodiment
Figure 4.2 Schematic diagram of film thickness measurement by micro-Raman
spectroscopy The laser and Raman signal are exponentially attenuated
by the optical absorption thin film
Figure 4.3 Schematic diagram of thin film with (a) two-step interface and (b)
sinusoidal interface configurations
Figure 4.4 Calculation results of Si Raman peak intensity attenuation at 520cm-1 as
a function of (a) uniformity variable x for two-step configuration; and (b) amplitude A for sinusoidal configuration
Figure 4.5 Si Raman peak intensity at 520cm–1 attenuated by NiSi thin films The
inset shows the calculated NiSi film thickness from 45nm down to 10nm, which is verified by RBS, where the Si peak intensity of the film with thickness of 10nm is chosen as the reference intensity I0
Figure 4.6 Standard deviation of Si Raman peak intensity and derived film
thickness The 30nm NiSi film forms under 500°C RTA
Figure 4.7 Raman spectra of the C49 phase, C54 phase and C40 phase TiSi2 on
(100) Si substrates The C49 phase is annealed by RTA, while the C40 phase is annealed by PLA The C54 phase can be obtained based on both of them
Figure 4.8 Micro-Raman images of (a) C49 TiSi2 phase formed at 600°C and (b)
C54 TiSi2 phase formed at 800°C plotted by intensity of Si Raman peak
Trang 11Figure 4.9 Micro-Raman image of as-deposited 16nm pure Ni film plotted by (a)
the intensity of Si Raman peak at 520cm-1 and (b) the resulting calculated thickness of the film
Figure 4.10 Cross-section SEM image of the interface between NiSi film and Si
substrate
Figure 4.11 Micro-Raman images of NiSi film formed in N2 ambient at 500°C for
30s, plotted by (a) the intensity of Si Raman peak at 520cm-1 and (b) the resulting calculated thickness of the film
Figure 4.12 Micro-Raman images of NiSi film formed in N2 ambient at 500°C for
30s, plotted by (a) the intensity of Si Raman peak at 520cm-1 and (b) the intensity of NiSi Raman peak at 214cm-1
Figure 4.13 AFM and Micro-Raman morphologies of NiSi films after annealing at (a)
500°C, (b) 600°C, (c) 700°C, and (d) 750°C
Figure 5.1 Conventional MSi2/Si(001) interface models: (a) sixfold, (b) eightfold,
(c) LJY, (d) BJV, (e) sevenfold unconstructed, and (f) sevenfold reconstructed
Figure 5.2 Interface structures, (a) sixfold; (b) eightfold; (c) sevenfold-R; and (d)
sevenfold-Z, of MSi2/Si interface in < 110 > (top) and < 1 10 > (bottom) directions Si atoms are shown by the yellow balls while metal atoms are represented by the blue balls
Figure 5.3 (a) Side view and (b) top view of the sevenfold-R and sevenfold-Z
interface structures For easy reference, metal atoms at the layer beneath are projected to the interfacial layer Si atoms are shown by the yellow balls while metal atoms are represented by the blue balls
Figure 5.4 Calculated total energy as a function of the lattice parameter c, for the
four interface models with 13 atomic layers of CoSi2 and 15 atomic layers of Si each
Figure 5.5 Calculated total energy as a function of the lattice parameter c, for the
four interface models with 13 atomic layers of NiSi2 and 15 atomic layers of Si each
Figure 5.6 Bond and atom layer of sevenfold-Z interface structures in (a) < 110 >
and (b) < 1 10 > directions Si atoms are shown by the yellow/light balls while metal atoms are represented by the blue/dark balls
Figure 5.7 Contour plots of valence electron charge density (electron/A3) at the
Si-dimer interface plane for (a) sevenfold-R model and (b) sevenfold-Z model, overlaid by atomic structures at the interface plane with Si atoms