Smog - A REPORT TO THE PEOPLE Episode 9 pot

Figure 13SUMMARY OF PROPANE SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANNUAL AVERAGES FOR CALIFORNIA to-' .j:>... EMISSIONS FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES a:: ou... Figure 16CARBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY VS... oZs Figu

w

Cl

w

U

X

w

~

c::: 100

:>

0

J:

c:::

u

:a:

0.

In

C"!

2-60

Cl

c:::

«

Cl

z

«

c:::

«w

>

CIl

>

Cl

Figure 8

IMPROVEMENT IN NITROGEN DIOXIDE AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN

w

Cl

w

U

w

en

a:

:::l

o

J:

a:

o

u

~

Q.

Q.

N

e

Cl

a:

«

Cl

z

~

CI)

a:

«

w

>-CI)

>-«

Cl

80

Figure 9

IMPROVEMENT IN OXIDANT AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (0.20 ppm)

PRESENT StRATEGY (1971)

- /

YEAR

139

Figure 10

BREAKDOWN OF REDUCTIONS IN AUTOMOTIVE CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY

7

>

Cl

CI)

Z

0

M

0

~

w

Cl

X

0

\ 1 r-,""~;o" to

0

2:

z

\\~'

0

co

II:

«

~otou~

w

>

0

2:

0

I- 2

=>

«

Figure 11

@)m

IMPROVEMENT IN CARBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY

FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY

80 77

75

YEAR 1970

200

300

250

o

ex::

«

o

z

«

~

ex::

«

w

>-CJ)

>-«

o

ex::

o

u

2

0-o

o

w

o

w

U

x

w

!1

en

ex::

;:)

o

:I:

N

141

Figure 12 SUPPLY AND DEMAND OF NATURAL GAS IN AUGUST 1975 FOR SOUTHERN CAliFORNIA 5.0

I-Peak Supply Level

->=

<!

Cl

4.0

25% A u t o - - - - H -f-

l-UJ

Other-UJ

u

-u

V)

Interruptible-0

J

o::l 2.0

l-V)

<!

-Cl

<!

ex:

::J

f- 1.0~

<!

2

Figure 13

SUMMARY OF PROPANE SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANNUAL AVERAGES FOR CALIFORNIA

to-'

.j:>.

w

a:

<l:

w

>

a:

w

Q.

(I,)

J

W

a:

<l:

a3

U.

o

(I,)

2

o

J

2 w

2

<l:

Q.

o

a:

Q.

5

YEAR

74

Present Demand +8%

Conversion

~

w

Cl

w

w

U

><

w 250

C/J

0::

::::>

o

::c

0::

o

LL.

~

c

2

Cl

0::

«

Cl

z

«

f-C/J

0::

«

w

>

C/J

>

«

Cl

200

50

Figure 14

LONG RANGE PROJECTION OF OXIDANT

AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN

PRESENT STRATEGY (1971) - /

Long Terr

Growth R

4%

2%

4%

2%

YEAR

Figure 15

Cl

w

Cl

w

w

U

X

~

a::

:l

o

J:

C~RBONMONOXIDE AIR QUALITY VS EMISSIONS

FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES

a::

ou.

30

CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS (TONS / DAY)

IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY

15,000 10,000

1964-66 Level 10,000 r'Id.Y

5000

Cf.)

>

<l:

Cl

2:

0-o

c::i

:!

Cl

a::

<l:

2

<l:

I-Cf.)

a::

<l:

w

> 10

145

Figure 16

CARBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY VS

EMISSIONS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY

10,000

1968 Level

8000 tons/day

5000

o

w

o

w

C.J

X

w

~

en

cr:

=>

o

:I:

N

o

cr:

<:(

o

:2

~ 100

en

cr:

<:(

w

>

cr:

o

u

~

Q

o

~ 50

<:(

o

@)m

oZs

Figure 17 PROBABILITY THAT THE MID- DAY MAXIMUM ONE HOUR AVERAGE OXIDANT LEVEL IN CENTRAL LOS ANGELES IS GREATER THAN 10 PPHM (SUMMER)

SYMBOL

(;)

A C

•

•

0.5 PPMC 1.5 PPMC 2.7 PPMC 4.0 PPMC 6.5 PPMC 10.0 PPMC

1.0

•

"'" ""

"""" '"

EARLY MORNING NOx PPHM (Y)

.8

.j:>.

@)m

>-<C

z:

r-o

~

p

z: G':) rr1

r-rr1

(r,)

C"":l

o

C

z:

I

-<

~

a

.,.,

J:

< o

:0

o ("')

»

:0

to

o

Z rn

s:

CI>

o z:

CI>

~

(,0

~

HC=120%

HC=140%

HC=80%

HC=60%

HC=100%

HC=40%

Figure 18 OXIDANT AIR QUALITY VS EMISSIONS FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES (0.10 PPM)

50

75

150

125

100

en

Cl

UJ

(,)

X

UJ

UJ

(.:J

<C

a:

UJ

~-o

a: a:

:::)<C

0 0

:I:Z

<C

UJf-Zen

OUJ

~f­

:::)<C

~tii

x;

<Co

~o

a:o

<C'-:

UJO

>-t-'

~

00

JJ

0

Cl

w

w

>

z

<!

"

<!

V)

OXIDES OF NITROGEN EMISSIONS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (% OF 1969 LEVEL)

Figure 20

:c

-<

0

:0 0 (")

:t> :0

III

0 Z

m

s:

en

0

Z

en

Z

r 0

en :t>

Z

G>

m

r

m en HC=c.20% (")

0 C

z

HC=100% -l-<

~

"T1

to

al

OXIDANT AIR QUALITY VS EMISSIONS FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES (0.20 PPM)

75

50

25

100

2

c

0

C'!

0

en

Cl

w

()

X

w

w

<-'

«

CC

w

>

«

cc

::::l

0

:c

w

Z

0

2:

::::l

2:

X

«

2:

cc

«

w

>

en

>

«

>-«

o

(I)

z

o

t:

(I)

z

o

a:l

cc

«

u

o

cc

o

>-J:

u

o

(I)

w

~

o

J

W

>

i=

«

cc

o

Q.

«

>

w

w

>

i=

o

2

o

I-::>

«

500

400

Figure 21 EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS OF HYDROCARBONS FROM AUTOMOBILES FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY

PRESENT STRATEGY (1971)

.-/

1970

YEAR

151

Figure 22 BREAKDOWN OF IMPROVEMENT IN OXIDANT AIR QUALITY

"EQL STRATEGY #1

Stationary Source Control

r /" Vacuum Spark / ' Advance Disconnect

Evaporative~

Control Retrofit

Reduced Auto

Use Conversion to Gaseous Fuels_

140

Cl

w

Cl

w

U

X

w

~

a:

::l

0

:I:

a:

0

u

:a:

c

2

Cl

a:

<l:

Cl

z

<l:

I-en

a:

<l:

w

>-

"-en

>-<l:

Cl

@)m

Figure 23

IMPROVEMENT IN OXIDANT AIR QUALITY FOR

0

w

0

w

(.l

X

w

~

~

0

:I:

a:

0U- 50

2:

'":

~

0

a:

.:l:

0

Z

.:l:

30

l-V)

a:

.:l:

w

>-.:l:

0

10

YEAR

75

153

80

Figure 24

w

Cl

w

X

w

~

~

=>

0

a::

0

LL

2

c

9

Cl

a::

Cl

~

z

I-en

a::

«

w

>-en

>- 10

«

Cl

YEAR