Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection Introduction Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory Factors Affecting Corrosion Behav
Trang 2α
α
Trang 5High-Temperature Gaseous Corrosion Testing
David A Shifler, Naval Surface Warfare Center
References
Trang 12α
α
Trang 15High-Temperature Gaseous Corrosion Testing
David A Shifler, Naval Surface Warfare Center
Trang 17Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection
Introduction
Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Factors Affecting Corrosion Behavior
Trang 18Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Galvanic Couples
Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Coatings
Trang 19Introduction to Methods of Corrosion Protection
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Inhibitors
Introduction to Corrosion Resistance of Bulk Materials
Introduction
Trang 20Introduction to Corrosion Resistance of Bulk Materials
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Alloying
Fig 1 The effect of alloying is shown as the influence that various elements have on the corrosion rate of
a base 19Cr-9Ni casting alloy in boiling 65% nitric acid The specimens were solution annealed and quenched Composition of the base alloy was 19Cr, 9Ni, 0.09C, 0.8Mn, 1.0Si, 0.04P (max), 0.035S (max), and 0.06N (Ref 1)
Reference cited in this section
Trang 21Introduction to Corrosion Resistance of Bulk Materials
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Metallurgical Factors
Trang 22Fig 2 The relationship between microstructure and corrosion behavior From the phase diagram (top), alloys with differing compositions—and thus differing relative amounts of alpha and beta phase particles—are selected A profile of the material in a corrosive medium is shown when alpha is active and beta is noble The bottom line illustrates when alpha is more noble than beta (adapted from Ref 2)
Reference cited in this section
Introduction to Corrosion Resistance of Bulk Materials
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Mechanical Treatments
Trang 23Introduction to Corrosion Resistance of Bulk Materials
Paul Natishan, Naval Research Laboratory
Trang 24Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Alloying to Improve Corrosion Resistance
Trang 25Reference cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Mechanical Treatments to Improve Corrosion Resistance
Trang 26Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Surface Treatment to Improve Corrosion Resistance
μ
Trang 27μ
References cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Processing to Improve Corrosion Resistance
Trang 28Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Selection of Fabrication Operations
Trang 29Corrosion Resistance of Aluminum Alloys
Jack Snodgrass and Jim Moran, Alcoa, Inc
Trang 31Ba(OH) 2 saturated
Fig 2 Corrosion rates as a function of time for commercially pure magnesium Curve A, distilled water vented to air through a caustic trap; curve B, distilled water vented to atmospheric CO 2 Source: Ref 2 Table 3 Corrosion rate of commercially pure magnesium in various media
mm/yr mils/yr Humid air
Humid air with condensation
Distilled water
Distilled water exposed to acid gases
Hot deionized water (100 °C) (14 days stagnant immersion)
Hot deionized water inhibited with 0.25 NaF
Seawater
3M MgCl2 solution
3M NaCl (99.99% high-purity Mg with <10 ppm Fe)
Table 4 Typical magnesium alloy systems and nominal compositions
Trang 32UNS Al Zn Mn Ag Zr Th Re AM60
References cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Alloys
Revised by Barbara A Shaw, Pennsylvania State University
Metallurgical Factors
Trang 33Fig 3 Effect of iron content on the corrosion rate of commercially pure magnesium subjected to alternate immersion in 3% NaCl Source: Ref 4
Trang 34Fig 4 Effect of alloying and contaminant metals on the corrosion rate of magnesium as determined by alternate immersion in 3% NaCl solution Source: Ref 5
Table 5 Contaminant tolerances and manganese limits for magnesium die castings
Trang 35Table 6 Known contaminant tolerance limits in high- and low-pressure cast forms
Trang 36Fig 6 Effect of heating temperature on corrosion rate of die-cast AZ91D and AM60B in salt-spray test for 10 days using ASTM B 117 method Data are for test specimens that were heated from 0.5 to 36 h Source: Ref 12
Table 7 Contaminant tolerance limits versus temper and cast form for AZ91 alloy
Trang 38Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Alloys
Revised by Barbara A Shaw, Pennsylvania State University
Causes of Corrosion Failures in Magnesium Alloys
Fig 7 Effect of heavy-metal contamination on the salt-spray performance of sand-cast AZ91 samples in the T6 temper, as determined by ASTM B 117 method The samples, containing less than 10 ppm Ni and less than 100 ppm Cu, were simultaneously exposed for 240 h The sample at left contained 160 ppm Fe and had a corrosion rate of 15 mm/yr (591 mils/yr) The sample at right contained 19 ppm Fe, and the corrosion rate was 0.15 mm/yr (5.9 mils/yr)
Trang 39Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Alloys
Revised by Barbara A Shaw, Pennsylvania State University
Acknowledgment
Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Alloys
Revised by Barbara A Shaw, Pennsylvania State University
References
Trang 40Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys
Introduction
Table 1 Compositions of selected stainless steels and related higher alloys
C Mn P S Si Cr Ni Mo Others (a) PREN (b)
Trang 42S32760 (c)
J95150
J94224
S32615
Trang 43Table 2 Compositions of selected copper-nickel and nickel-base alloys
Trang 45N08330
N08800 N08825 N08904 N10276 N10665
Trang 46Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys
A John Sedriks, Office of Naval Research
Stainless Steels
Trang 47Fig 1 Compositional and property linkages for stainless steels
Trang 48Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys
A John Sedriks, Office of Naval Research
Nickel-Base Alloys
Trang 49Fig 2 Compositional and property linkages for nickel-base alloys
γ′
γ′
Trang 50Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys
A John Sedriks, Office of Naval Research
Trang 51Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Introduction
References cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Corrosion Resistance of Titanium and Titanium-Base Alloys in Aqueous Environments
Trang 52References cited in this section
Trang 53Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Passivating Titanium Oxides
Trang 54Fig 1 Potential-pH equilibrium diagram for the titanium-water system at 25 °C (77 °F) The diagram was established by considering, as derivatives of the tri- and tetravalent titanium, the hydroxide Ti(OH) 3
and the hydrated oxide TiO 2 -H 2 O Lines a and b establish the stability region of water Consult Ref 7 for further explanation
Table 1 Lattice parameters of crystalline titanium oxide
TiO 2 -(anatase) tetragonal
Trang 55TiO 2 -(rutile) tetragonal
TiO 2 -(brookite) orthorhombic
References cited in this section
Trang 56Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Corrosion Vulnerability of Titanium and Titanium Oxides: The Effect of Selected Environments
•
•
•
Trang 57Table 2 Pitting potential of commercially pure titanium
Trang 5811.5%Mo-6%Zr-4.5%Sn) It is evident that the alloying additions of molybdenum, zirconium, and palladium were beneficial in raising the 70 °C (158 °F) threshold for crevice corrosion Source: Ref 6
→
Trang 59Fig 3 Electrochemical polarization tests of titanium and titanium-base alloys, including Ti-6%Al-4%V (Ti-6-4), Ti-15%Mo-3%Nb-3%Al (Ti-15-3-3), Ti-13%Nb-13%Zr (Ti-13-13), Ti-55%Ni, and commercially pure (CP) titanium (grade 2), revealed that titanium and titanium-base alloys are
spontaneously passive in a deaerated 0.1 M NaCl solution The potentiodynamic scans were conducted at
a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s SCE, saturated calomel electrode
References cited in this section
Trang 61Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Effects of Alloying on Active Anodic Corrosion of Titanium
αβ
β
Trang 62Fig 4 Electrochemical polarization tests of titanium and titanium-base alloys, including Ti-6%Al-4%V (Ti-6-4), Ti-15%Mo-3%Nb-3%Al (Ti-15-3-3), Ti-13%Nb-13%Zr (Ti-13-13), Ti-55%Ni, and
commercially pure (CP) titanium (grade 2), in a deaerated 5 M HCl solution The potentiodynamic scans
were conducted at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s SCE, saturated calomel electrode
Trang 63Fig 5 Open-circuit potentials of commercially pure (CP) titanium in deaerated 0.1 M NaCl solution and deaerated 5 M HCl solution at 37 °C (99 °F) In 0.1 M NaCl, CP titanium did not exhibit the drop in
open-circuit potential that is characteristic of surface activation after oxide dissolution SCE, saturated calomel electrode
Trang 64Fig 6 Open-circuit potentials of Ti-45%Nb and Ti-50%Zr (bulk alloys), initially with air-formed oxides,
in deaerated 0.1 M NaCl and 5 M HCl solutions at 37 °C (99 °F) Ti-45% Nb and Ti-50%Zr did not exhibit surface reactivation in 0.1 M NaCl solution (pH ~ 6.8) In contrast, both alloys exhibited surface reactivation in 5 M HCl due to chemical dissolution of the oxide SCE, saturated calomel electrode
Fig 7 Potential-pH equilibrium diagram for Ti-H 2 O system of 37 °C (99 °F) The dissolved titanium species are at an activity of 10 -6 Lines a and b define the region of water stability The experimentally recorded open-circuit potentials (OCP) of commercially pure (CP) titanium, Ti-45%Nb, and Ti-50%Zr
Trang 65in deaerated 0.1 M NaCl and 5 M HCl solutions before and after surface activation at 37 °C (99 °F) are
presented SCE, saturated calomel electrode NHE, normal hydrogen electrode
References cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Effects of Alloying Additions on Titanium Passivity
Trang 66Fig 8 Polarization measurement of titanium-palladium alloys in acidic sodium chloride solution (deaerated, sweep rate = 0.2 V/min, NaCl = 250 g/L, pH = 0.5, and boiling) SCE, saturated calomel electrode; CP, commercially pure Source: Ref 51
References cited in this section
Trang 67Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Formation of Amorphous or Vitreous Oxide
References cited in this section
Trang 68Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Reduction of the Potential Gradient across Surface Film
Trang 69Fig 9 Schematic of the active metal/passive oxide/Helmholtz double layer/solution interfaces that are present on a passivated metal surface
Reference cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Enhancement of Atomic Bond Strength
ε
Δ
Trang 70Table 3 Data for enthalpy of adsorption (oxygen), ΔHads , and atomic bond strength, ε M-M , for a selection
Trang 71Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Lowering of the pH of Zero Charge
References cited in this section
Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
Repassivation Behavior of Titanium and Titanium-Base Alloys
Trang 73Δ Δ
References cited in this section
Trang 74Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Alloys
Steven Yu, 3M Company
References
Trang 77Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Introduction
References cited in this section
Trang 78Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Structure and Function of the Phosphate Film
Table 1 Characteristics of different types of phosphate coatings and associated processes (general formulas)
Heavy phosphating Alkali
phosphating (iron
phosphating)
phosphating (dry-in-place phosphating)
No-rinse-Low-zinc phosphating Standard-zinc phosphating (a)
Trang 79needed for tanks
Application method
mg/L (d)
c(Na + ), g/L c(NO 3 - ), g/L
Trang 80Fig 1 Scanning electron micrographs and x-ray diffraction patterns comparing crystalline and amorphous phosphate layer (a) Tri-cation phosphate layer of a spray process (b) Tri-cation phosphate layer of a no-rinse process Substrate is electrogalvanized steel
Table 2 Phosphate compounds found in conversion coatings
Trang 82Fig 3 Trend of paint delamination of steel products (a) Cold rolled steel (b) Hot dip galvanized steel (c) Galvannealed steel (Fe-Zn alloy) Coating is approximately 25 μm electrophoretic paint with and without phosphate treatment Artificial damage by Van Laar scratch, scalpel comparable to a ball-point pen, then exposed in a cyclic corrosion test Test cycle was 1 day salt spray fog, plus 4 days condensed water exposure plus 2 days dry period Creepage is defined as the distance between the artificial damage and the border of delamination Note that the y-axes are different in scale Source: Ref 6
Fig 4 Delamination of painted steel substrates treated with different zinc phosphatations after 1 year outdoor exposure Substrate CRS, cold rolled steel; EG, electrogalvanized Coating electrophoretic paint + filler + top-coat Artificial damage by Clemen scratch, like a cut with a scalpel
Trang 83Fig 5 Delamination of painted steel substrates treated with four different alkali phosphatations after
504 h exposure in salt spray fog Coating, electrophoretic paint + filler + top-coat Artificial damage, Van Laar scratch
References cited in this section
Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Phosphating Steps
Trang 84Table 3 Typical process sequences in different industries
Trang 85Table 4 General formulas of alkaline cleaning products
°C °F Steel
Trang 86Phosphating
→
→
Trang 89References cited in this section
Trang 90Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Physical and Chemical Properties
Table 7 Stripping solutions for phosphate layers
°C °F Iron, steel
Zinc
Aluminum
Magnesium
Trang 91References cited in this section
Trang 92Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Processing Equipment and Control
Trang 93•
•
ΔΔ
•
•
•
•
Trang 94Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
References
Trang 96Phosphate Conversion Coatings
Kevin Ogle, Irsid, Arcelor R&D (Maizières-lès-Metz, France); Michael Wolpers, Henkel KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Trang 97Chromate and Chromate-Free Conversion Coatings
R.G Buchheit, The Ohio State University; A.E Hughes, CSIRO
Historical Perspective
References cited in this section
Trang 98Chromate and Chromate-Free Conversion Coatings
R.G Buchheit, The Ohio State University; A.E Hughes, CSIRO
Chromate Conversion Coating Formation
Fig 1 Speciation of soluble Cr(VI) as a function of pH and concentration The labels indicate the predominant soluble chromium species in a given pH-concentration domain Many commercial CCC bath formulations have Cr(VI) concentrations that fall in the shaded box so that the primary film- forming species is dichromate (Equilibrium constants from Ref 16)