Therefore, the circuit is, as suspected, a low-pass filter, and it is possible to say that it exhibits a phase shift.. By letting the cutoff frequency be ω0, it is possible to go on to s
Trang 1Amplifiers and Filtering 263 11.2.4.5 Other Functions
It is clear from the foregoing discussion that various mathematical functions can be implemented using op-amps, provided that a component with an appropriate response can be placed in the feedback circuit One additional function that used to be fairly common was the logarithm (and antilog) circuit, which made use of the logarithmic response of the BJT These would facilitate the multiplication and division of two signals However, with the advent of powerful digital signal processors and computing techniques, coupled with the difficulty of designing stable and accurate analog circuits and their inflex-ible nature, most signal processing has now migrated to the digital domain This is dealt with in Chapter 12
There are times when it may be desirable to compare one signal with a threshold level; this function is accomplished using a comparator circuit Ded-icated comparator ICs are usually faster or have specialized outputs with lower open-loop gains than op-amps These, or op-amp comparators, are usually operated with a little positive feedback so that noisy signals do not cause rapid repeated switching of the output as the signal approaches and passes the
thresh-old; i.e., some hysteresis is introduced This configuration is known as a Schmitt trigger.
The op-amp is the fundamental building block of hundreds of useful circuits: oscillators, level detectors, filters, etc Only some of these are dealt with here, but many ideas can be found in Horowitz and Hill [2] or the many books on hobby electronics that are available
11.3 INSTRUMENTATION AMPLIFIERS
The concept of CMRR was introduced in Subsection 11.2.2.3 for op-amps; it describes how good the circuit is at removing a signal that appears simultaneously
on both inputs
Many sensors are particularly bad signal sources; they often produce very small signals with very high source impedances, subject to drift, and, worse still, they are often connected to the nearest amplifier by a long cable Cables are particularly susceptible to picking up stray signals radiated from a variety
of sources The worst offenders are electronic equipment, especially comput-ers, televisions, cell phones, and the main power supply Heavy industrial equipment and electric motors are even worse Often these signals can be filtered out, but this assumes first that the interfering signal is smaller than the signal of interest (otherwise, the first stage amplifiers may saturate) and second that it is well outside the frequency range of interest Even so, there are situations in which a differential measurement is preferable to an absolute measurement
Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Trang 2264 Microengineering, MEMS, and Interfacing: A Practical Guide
The basic single-op-amp differential amplifier circuit is shown in Figure 11.17 Strictly speaking, this is a differential input amplifier — the output is single ended (i.e., not differential) Truly differential amplifiers do exist, but they are relatively uncommon The disadvantage of this circuit for use in sensor applications is imme-diately apparent: it has a low input impedance For this reason, the three-op-amp circuit, or instrumentation amplifier, is used (Figure 11.18)
FIGURE 11.17 Basic differential amplifier.
Differential and Absolute Values
An absolute value is measured with respect to a specific reference point, usually the equipment’s 0 V or ground line Two wires will connect the sensor
to the input of the instrumentation: the signal wire and ground
A differential value is the difference between two measured values (e.g., voltage A minus voltage B) So if the absolute value of signal A with respect
to 0 V is 1000 V and of signal B is 1001 V, the differential value will be 1 V Measurements are normally made with three wires — one to carry each signal and one reference signal (often, but not always, 0 V) Without a fixed reference, the circuit will make up its own paths for stray currents, which causes many problems
FIGURE 11.18 Instrumentation amplifier; the gain of each of the two stages is indicated.
If:
R4 = R2 and R3 = R1 then
Vo = (R2/R1) (Vb− Va )
R2
Vo
Va R1
− + R3 R4
Vb
R1
− +
R R
− +
RF
RF
+
−
R R
Signal gain = 1 + 2RF/R1 Common mode gain = 1
Signal gain = 1 Common mode gain = 0
Trang 3Amplifiers and Filtering 265
Notice that the common-mode voltage may be tapped from the center of R1 (by making R1 two resistors of equal value) This can then be fed back as the reference signal through the third connection (the shield connection of the cable)
to increase the input impedance of the circuit
Both the simple differential amplifier and instrumentation amplifier can be purchased as single ICs The gain is normally fixed or adjusted by using an external link or resistor The internal circuitry should be laser-trimmed to provide
a very accurate circuit and eliminate the problems that may otherwise be expe-rienced when creating a circuit from individual op-amps, such as component tolerances and offsets
11.4 WHEATSTONE BRIDGE
In many cases, small variations in the parameter to be sensed cause variations
in the impedance or resistance of a sensor element These can be detected most
sensitively by use of a bridge configuration, commonly called the Wheatstone Bridge (Figure 11.19)
In practice, the voltmeter would be replaced by an instrumentation amplifier The bridge consists of a measurement arm and a reference arm, and is initially
Cabling
If it is not possible to mount the sensor close to the signal-conditioning equipment and digitize the signal as soon as possible, then the wrong choice
of cabling can result in interference problems The basic choice is:
• Twisted pair — two wires twisted together; good for fairly strong signals in benign environments
• Screened cable — one or more signal wires with one or more braided wire or foil screens; the screen will carry 0 V (ground) or the reference signal; better immunity in noisy environments for multiple signals
• Coaxial cable — one central core separated from a screen by an insulating layer; both screen and the core share the same longitu-dinal axis (hence the name); used for high frequency signals (hun-dreds of kHz up)
• Fiber-optics — uses light and not electrical current and is therefore almost completely immune to electrical interference; drawbacks include cost and difficulty of installing the system
Note that the coaxial cable has a characteristic impedance (usually 50 ohms) this needs to be matched by the driving circuit (50 ohms output impedance) and receiving circuit (50 ohms input impedance), otherwise it will suffer from signal distortions due to reflections, etc
Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Trang 4Amplifiers and Filtering 267
FIGURE 11.20 Bridge configuration of piezoresistors in beams supporting a seismic mass
(see also Chapter 5 ): (a) piezoresistors (dark rectangles) are implanted into the beam suspending an accelerometer mass, seen from above, and a reference pair is implanted on
a dummy beam; (b) the four resistors are connected in a bridge circuit; if all resistances
match, then V diff will be 0 V; if the beam bends as a result of acceleration, then R2 will change its resistance and the bridge circuit will no longer be balanced; to make measure-ments over a range, an actuator would be included (e.g., an electrostatic actuator created
by mounting an electrode below the mass and using the mass as the opposite pole); then, under acceleration, the actuator is activated to force the mass back to its original position and zero the bridge; acceleration is then measured by the drive level to the actuator.
FIGURE 11.21 Thermal air mass-flow-rate sensor; the 100R (R is often used as an
alternative to Ω ) platinum resistor is the main sensing element and the 1 k platinum element adjusts for ambient temperature; the bridge will balance when the 100R platinum element has been heated to 100 ° C (by current flowing through the bridge).
R1 R2
R3 R4
(a)
V dif
V bridge
R4
R3
R2 R1
(b)
V dif
V bridge
100 R Platinum
139 R
1 k Platinum
1 k
Flow
Trang 5268 Microengineering, MEMS, and Interfacing: A Practical Guide
those required to measure changes in resistance If the expected value of the capacitance is known or, better still, is controlled by feedback to remain at a fixed value, then a capacitance bridge can be used (Figure 11.22)
11.5 FILTERING
As discussed in Subsection 11.2.3, there are a large number of sources of electronic and electrical noise that can interfere and obscure a weak signal that one is trying
to measure Some of these will be white noise sources and some will be at a fixed frequency The main power line interference at 60 Hz (in the U.S., or 50Hz in Europe) is one example of the latter case that often causes problems Furthermore, Equation 11.24 suggests that by reducing the bandwidth of the system to the minimum necessary, interference from white noise sources can be reduced Finally, it may be that the signal of interest is superimposed on another much larger signal of a different frequency One example would be where the aim is
to use the same set of electrodes to control the position of an electrostatic actuator
— a small AC measurement signal would be imposed upon a much larger DC actuation signal In this case, an AC-coupled amplifier of the type discussed in Subsection 11.2.4.2 may be appropriate The AC-coupled amplifier in Figure 11.16d
incorporates one of the simplest possible filters, the RC filter
11.5.1 RC F ILTERS
These employ a single resistor and a single capacitor, hence the term RC filter Both forms are shown in Figure 11.23 and have the following characteristics:
low-pass, Figure 11.23a (11.32)
high-pass, Figure 11.23b (11.33)
FIGURE 11.22 Capacitor bridge.
Rx
R1
Cx
C1
+
− 1/j ωCx
1/j ωC1
v
o i
= +
1
v v
j CR
j CR
o i
= +
ω ω
1
Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Trang 6270 Microengineering, MEMS, and Interfacing: A Practical Guide
Similarly, the phase of the output signal relative to that of the input signal will be shifted by tan1(ωCR) So for DC signals, there will be no phase shift, but
at high frequency (ω → ∞) the phase shift will approach 90°
Therefore, the circuit is, as suspected, a low-pass filter, and it is possible to say that it exhibits a phase shift The question that follows is: What is the cutoff frequency of the filter? In other words, at what frequency of input signal does the output signal start to become significantly attenuated? Referring back to the box entitled “Decibels,” it was suggested that a reduction in amplitude by 3 dB was a useful measure of the filter cutoff point By referring to this box, it will
be seen that this is equivalent to a loss of half the power of the signal, or an attenuation of the signal amplitude by a factor of 1/√2 (approximately 0.707) From Equation 11.36, it can be seen that this occurs when:
(11.38) Notice also that at the cutoff frequency, the phase shift is 45° By letting the cutoff frequency be ω0, it is possible to go on to say that at one decade below ω0
(i.e., ω0/10) the amplitude of vo is approximately equal to the amplitude of vi and the phase shift is close to 0 Similarly, for each decade (factor of 10) increase of frequency above ω0, the amplitude of vo drops further by 20 dB, and at 10ω0 the phase shift stabilizes at approximately 90° This information is conveyed by a
“Bode plot” (Figure 11.24a) The same information is plotted for the high-pass filter (Equation 11.37) in Figure 11.24b Note that both these Bode plots have been
normalized by setting R = C = 1, giving a 3 dB point at ω= 1 The cutoff frequency
of both filters can, therefore, be set by selecting appropriate values of R and C:
(11.39) Again, do not forget that ω0 is in radians per second Divide this by 2π to get the frequency in hertz Also, note that if the next circuit element has a noninfinite input impedance (i.e., is not an op-amp in the noninverting configuration), it will load the filter circuit and the resulting response will not be as predicted Component tolerances will also have some effect on the cutoff frequency
Equation 11.29, then, allows one to design a simple RC filter with an arbitrary cutoff frequency This may be a high-pass or low-pass filter, depending on the circuit architecture (Figure 11.23a or Figure 11.23b), which will have unity gain
in the pass band and attenuate the signal by 20 dB per decade in the stop band For a low-pass filter, the phase shift will be 0° in the pass band, increasing to
45° at the 3-dB point and to 90° in the stop band For a high-pass filter, it will
be +90° in the stop band, falling to 45° at the 3-dB point and 0° in the pass band
Of course, a simple low- or high-pass filter may be insufficient for the application in question There are two other filter configurations that may be of use, the band-pass filter and band-stop filter These can be created by cascading
RC low-pass and high-pass filters with buffer amplifiers (see Figure 11.25a and Figure 11.25c) Their characteristics can be quite easily determined by using the
ω2C R2 2=1
CR
Trang 7Amplifiers and Filtering 273
To design a filter, it is necessary to ensure that the frequency of the signal of interest lies well within the pass band and that the nearest interfering frequency
is sufficiently attenuated This can be done by employing more complex filter designs, as discussed in the following section
11.5.2 B UTTERWORTH F ILTERS
The RC filters dealt with in Subsection 11.5.1 are termed passive filters because only passive components (a resistor and a capacitor) are required to implement them By incorporating inductors, it is possible to build very complex passive filters It is easier, however, to incorporate op-amps into the circuit to form active filters; this became apparent in Subsection 11.5.1 when the buffer amplifier was introduced so that RC filters could be joined together without the first section being loaded by the following section
There are three different types of continuous-time filters (as opposed to switched-capacitor filters or digital filters, which sample the signal at discrete points) in common use These are the Butterworth, Bessel, and Chebyshev filters
Nonsinusoidal Signals
The frequency domain analysis of filters is only applicable to sinusoidal signals Fortunately, however, most other signals of interest can be created
by adding up a number (infinite number) of sinusoidal signals of different amplitudes and phases Determining the effect of the filter on nonsinusoidal signals, therefore, involves determining how it affects each of the sinusoidal components in terms of attenuation and phase shift (changing the relative phase of the components will change the shape of the resulting signal, thus
it is important to consider phase effects as these can extend a long way from the 3 dB point) Working out the sinusoidal components of signals is performed by using Fourier analysis, or Fourier transforms These are not dealt with in this volume Generally speaking, given a signal with a funda-mental frequency of ω0 [i.e., 2π/(the time before the signal starts to repeat itself; the period, in other words)], then signals that are similar in shape to
a sinusoidal wave will not have significant components at very high fre-quencies, whereas a rapidly changing signal such as a square wave will have significant components at two, four, six, and eight times the funda-mental frequency To avoid distortion, then, the 3 dB point of a low-pass filter would need to be at least two decades beyond the fundamental fre-quency, preferably more Also, if this is an interfering signal, then a high-pass filter would need to be chosen that is two or three decades (preferably more) above ω0, so that high-frequency components of this signal do not
appear in the pass band
Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Trang 8274 Microengineering, MEMS, and Interfacing: A Practical Guide
They have the following characteristics:
• Butterworth: maximal gain in the pass band, reasonable cutoff
• Bessel: minimal phase distortion, poor cutoff
• Chebyshev: controllable ripple in pass-band gain; this is traded off against a steep initial cutoff (the more ripple that can be tolerated, the sharper the initial cutoff)
These comments assume filters of equivalent complexity Of these filters, the Butterworth is relatively easy to synthesize, and is therefore introduced here There are a number of continuous–time-filter ICs on the market that use different approaches to implement the different filter types Given modern computing power, however, for many transducer applications, complex continuous-time fil-ters are not required because digital filtering and digital signal processing tech-niques have taken their place
The transfer function of a Butterworth filter takes the form:
(11.40)
The transfer function is a formal way of writing vout/vin B n is the appropriate
Butterworth polynomial selected from Table 11.2 The subscript n gives the number of poles of the filter, a technical term also referred to as the order of the filter Here, it is only necessary to know that for each increase in n, the cutoff
rate increases by a further 20 dB per decade For a single-pole filter, the gain drops off at 20 dB per decade, for a two-pole filter it is 40 dB per decade, three poles give 60 dB per decade, and so on The fact that the equations are given as
a function of s will also be neglected for now Note, however, that the frequency response can be found by replacing s with jω
Butterworth filters are relatively easy to deal with because only a first-order filter circuit and a second-order filter circuit are required Higher-order filters are made up by cascading combinations of first- and second-order circuits
TABLE 11.2
Butterworth Polynomials
Cutoff (dB per decade)
B s
vo n
( ) ( )
=
Trang 9Amplifiers and Filtering 275
Examples, based on the Sallen and Key filter, are shown in Figure 11.26 These
are low-pass filters; to make high-pass filters simply switch the Rs and Cs around Figure 11.27 shows the typical frequency response of one- and two-pole low-pass Butterworth filters Straight line approximations have been drawn to show how the analytical responses deviate from these
FIGURE 11.26 Low-pass filter circuits: (a) first-order filter circuit, (b) second-order filter
circuit These can be used to synthesize Butterworth filters; high-pass filters are created
by changing R2 with C2 and R3 with C3 (R with C for the first-order circuit).
FIGURE 11.27 Normalized frequency response of Butterworth low-pass filters: (a)
one-pole, (b) two-pole (frequency axis is in radians per second); straight line approximations are shown as dashed lines.
(a)
− +
Rf R1
(b)
− + R3 C3
Rf R1
R2 C2
0 0.01 0.03 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 100
−5
−10
−15
−20
−25
−30
−35
−40
Gain (dB)
(a)
Phase
Gain
Phase (deg)
−45
0
−10
−20
−30
−40
−50
−60
−70
−80
−90
−100
0 0.01 0.03 0.1 0.3 1 3 10 30 100
−10
−20
−30
−40
−50
−60
−70
−80
Gain (dB)
(b)
Phase
Gain
Phase (deg)
−90
0
−200
−180
−160
−140
−120
−100
−80
−60
−40
−20
Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Trang 10276 Microengineering, MEMS, and Interfacing: A Practical Guide
Notice that the 3 dB (cutoff) point occurs at ω = 1/RC and the signal is
attenuated by 20 dB per decade thereafter for the single-pole filter, and 40 dB per decade for the two-pole filter This 20-dB-per decade attenuation means that for every factor of ten increase in signal frequency, the signal amplitude at the output is reduced by a factor of 10 This is related to the number of filter poles
— after the 3 dB point, attenuation will be 20 dB per decade per pole (i.e., a four-pole filter will attenuate the signal by 80 dB for every decade above the
3 dB point)
Furthermore, the phase shift of the filter is 45° at the 3 dB point for the single-pole filter and 90° at the 3 dB point for the double-pole filter The phase shift will distort the signal for one decade on either side of the 3 dB frequency
11.5.2.1 Synthesizing Butterworth Active Filters
The procedure described here is for synthesizing a low-pass filter The procedure for synthesizing high-pass filters is the same, but discussion will focus on the lowest frequency of interest, as opposed to the highest
The first step is to decide the order of the filter The maximum frequency
of interest and the lowest interfering frequency should be determined The magnitude of the interfering signal (at this frequency) should also be deter-mined To avoid phase distortion, it is best to place the 3 dB point at least one decade (a factor of 10) above the highest frequency of interest, and the inter-fering signal should be attenuated to a reasonable fraction of the signal of interest, e.g., 10% This will enable an estimate to be made of the number of poles required for the filter
Example
A very slowly changing signal is to be measured with a maximum frequency
of interest of 0.6 Hz The signal has an amplitude of 50 mV The main interference is at 60 Hz from main power Even with shielding, this signal has an amplitude of 30 mV
To avoid phase distortion, the cutoff frequency of the filter is selected to
be 6 Hz, thus a single-pole Butterworth filter will attenuate the main inter-ference down to 3 mV (i.e., by a factor of 20 dB) It may be desirable to use
a two-pole filter just to be on the safe side It will then be necessary to find a suitable resistor–capacitor combination for the filter, given that (it is necessary to convert from hertz to radians per second)
Studying an electronics catalog will reveal that the desired combination cannot be purchased, and a compromise will be necessary Additionally, the components will not have the exact resistance or capacitance marked; they will vary by a given tolerance (±1%, ±5%, etc.) about the given value
RC= 1f
2 π