1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

Handbook Of Shaft Alignment Episode 2 Part 3 ppsx

30 428 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Shaft Alignment Handbook
Tác giả Piotrowski
Chuyên ngành Mechanical Engineering
Thể loại handbook
Năm xuất bản 2006
Định dạng
Số trang 30
Dung lượng 1,22 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Getting this directioncorrect is very important because there is nothing worse than moving your machinery theright amount in the wrong direction.In our motor and pump drive system we are

Trang 1

You have to imagine that you are now looking at your drive system from above When youare looking at the drive system from the side view with the motor to your left and the pump toyour right, which way are you looking (north, south, east, or west)? Getting this directioncorrect is very important because there is nothing worse than moving your machinery theright amount in the wrong direction.

In our motor and pump drive system we are working on here, let us say that we are lookingtoward the east as we view the machinery as shown in Figure 8.8 and Figure 8.9 Now that

we are going to be viewing our machines from above when modeling the top view, we want

to zero the indicator on the side that is pointing toward the top of the graph paper and plotthe reading that is on the side that is pointing toward the bottom of the graph paper In thiscase, the direction pointing toward the top of the graph paper in the top view is going to beeast Therefore we want to zero the indicator on the east side of each shaft and plot thereading we will obtain on the west side of each shaft

There are two ways that we can do this One way is to physically rotate the bracket andindicator over to the east side of each shaft, zero the indicator there, and then rotate the bracketand dial indicator 1808 over to the west side and record the dial indicator readings we get there.The other way is to mathematically manipulate the east and west reading we obtained from thecomplete set of dial indicator readings to zero the east sides Figure 8.10 shows how to performthis math on the east and west readings

Original sag compensated readings Motor

B E

W W

W B

W B

Sag compensated readings

Sag compensated readings

Mathematcially zero the east readings

Original sag compensated readings with the east reading zeroed

FIGURE 8.10 Zeroing the east readings

Trang 2

The original readings with the indicator zeroed on the top and the new readings with theindicator zeroed on the east are telling us the same thing about the misalignment conditionbetween the two shafts All we did was zero the indicator in a different position and noticethat the validity rule still applies whether we zero on top or on the east Now that we are going

to be plotting the shafts in the top view, the top and bottom readings are meaningless, onlythe east and west readings are important

Figure 8.11 and Figure 8.12 show how to plot the east and west readings onto the top viewalignment model Notice that the scale factor in the top view is not the same as the scale factor

in the side view They do not have to be the same scale factor in both views but rememberwhat the scale factors are in each view Without being too repetitive here, remember that youonly plot half of the dial indicator reading onto the graph Also remember that whatever shaftthe dial indicator is taking readings on is the shaft that you want to draw on the graph paper.Two of the major graphing mistakes people make are to forget to only plot half of the rimreading and drawing the wrong shaft onto the graph

The alignment models shown in Figure 8.9 through Figure 8.12 were generated using thereverse indicator method, which is covered in more detail in Chapter 10 The other four alignment

Scale: 5 in. 540 mils

Notice the scale

factor here.

Plot half (20 mils)

of this measurement here.

0 E

W

− 40 Pump

FIGURE 8.11 (See color insert following page 322.) Plotting the pump shaft in the top view

Trang 3

methods (face–rim, double radial, shaft to coupling spool, and face–face) and their associatedgraphing and modeling techniques will be discussed in Chapter 11 through Chapter 15.

8.4.6 DETERMININGCORRECTIVEMOVESTOMAKE ONONEMACHINE FROM

THEALIGNMENTMODEL

Let us look at another example Figure 8.13 shows a motor and a fan shaft misalignmentcondition in the side view As you can see, the shafts are not in alignment with each other.Now what do we do? The next logical step is to determine the movement restrictions imposed

on the machine cases at the control or adjustment points (i.e., where the foot bolts are).Movement restrictions define the boundary condition that help you to make an intelligentdecision on what alignment correction would be easy and trouble free to accomplish.Trouble-free movement solutions? I fully understand that any corrective moves you make

on rotating machinery are not going to be trouble free and easy to make But there are somemoves that will be far more difficult to make than others You really need to have a wide

Motor

Motor

Pump

Pump Top view East

Plot half (30 mils)

of this measurement here.

Motor 0 E

W +60

Scale: 5 in. 20 mils

30 mils

FIGURE 8.12 (See color insert following page 322.) Plotting the motor shaft in the top view

Trang 4

variety of options to make the most effective and intelligent alignment correction Therefore,keep an open, objective mindset when you attempt to fix your alignment problem.

In Figure 8.13, notice that if you wanted to keep the fan in its current position, you wouldhave to move the motor downward at both the inboard and outboard ends As shown inFigure 8.13, the amount of movement at the outboard bolts is obtained by counting thenumber of squares (at 3 mils per square with this scale factor) from where the actual motorshaft centerline is at the outboard bolting plane to the extended centerline of rotation of thefan In this particular case, this is, 166 mils (0.166 in.) The amount of movement at theinboard bolts is obtained by counting the number of squares from where the actual motorshaft centerline is at the inboard bolting plane to the extended centerline of rotation of thefan In this case, that is, 66 mils (0.066 in.) If there is 166 mils under both outboard bolts and

66 mils under both inboard bolts (that are not soft foot shims) then a good alignment solutionwould be to remove that amount of shim stock from under the appropriate feet But what ifthere are not that many shims under the inboard and outboard feet?

As bizarre as this may sound, I have seen people in a situation like this, remove the motorfrom the baseplate and grind the baseplate away Unbelievable, but true And it is still donesomewhere today

8.4.7 OVERLAYLINE ORFINALDESIREDALIGNMENTLINE

The final desired alignment line (a.k.a the overlay line) is a straight line drawn on top of thegraph, showing the desired position both shafts should be in to achieve colinearity ofcenterlines It should be apparent that if one machine case is stationary, in this case the fanshaft, that machine’s centerline of rotation is the final desired alignment line as shown inFigure 8.13

There is another way to correct the misalignment problem on this motor and fan that will

be far less troublesome Since adjustments are made at the inboard and outboard feet of themachinery, some logical alternative solutions would be to consider using one or more of thesefeet as pivot points Both outboard feet or both inboard feet, or the outboard foot of onemachine case and the inboard foot of the other machine case could be used as pivot points By

Up

Motor shaft centerline

66 mils down

166 mils down

Scale: 5 in 30 mils

Fan shaft centerline

FIGURE 8.13 Movement solutions for the motor only

Trang 5

drawing the overlay line through these foot points, shaft alignment can usually be achievedwith smaller moves In real life situations, you will typically have greater success aligning twomachine cases a little bit rather than moving one machine case a lot Figure 8.14 shows usingthe overlay line to connect the outboard bolting plane of the motor with the outboard boltingplane of the fan The inboard bolting planes are then moved the amount shown in Figure 8.14

to correct the misalignment condition in the up and down direction No shims had to beremoved and better yet, no baseplates had to be ground away

8.4.8 SUPERIMPOSEYOURBOUNDARY CONDITIONS, MOVEMENTRESTRICTIONS,AND

ALLOWABLEMOVEMENTENVELOPE

When viewing the machinery in the up and down direction (side view), the movementrestrictions are defined by the amount of movement the machinery can be adjusted in the

up and down directions

How far can machinery casings be moved upward? There is virtually an unlimited amount

of movement in the up direction, within reason, that is Machine cases are typically movedupward by installing shims (i.e., sheet metal of various thicknesses) between the undersides ofthe machinery feet and the baseplate

How far can the machinery casings be moved downward? Well, it depends on the amount

of shim stock currently under the machinery feet that are not soft foot corrections

How far can you move a machine down? I don’t know You are going to have to lookunder the machine to see how much shim stock could be removed from under the machineryfeet on every machine in the drive system Maybe there are 10, 20, or 50 mils of shim stockunder the machinery feet that can be removed that are not soft foot corrections that could betaken out You will have to see what is there These shims define the ‘‘downward movementenvelope,’’ or as some people call it, the ‘‘basement floor,’’ or as other people call it, the

‘‘baseplate restriction point.’’

Shim stock typically refers to sheet metal thicknesses ranging from 1 mils (0.001 in.) to 125mils (0.125 in.) There are several companies that manufacture precut, U-shaped shim stock in

Up Side view

Raise 48 mils up Overlay line

Motor Pivot here

Trang 6

4 standard sizes and 17 standard thicknesses Once shim thicknesses get over 125 mils, theyare typically referred to as spacers or plates and are custom made from plate steel.

So if you want to move a machine downward and there are no shims under the machineryfeet, you are already on the basement floor and that is defined as a downward verticalmovement restriction or a baseplate restriction point Figure 8.15 shows the same motorand fan but now we have observed that there are 75 mils of shim stock under the outboardfeet and 25 mils of shims under the inboard feet that are not soft foot corrections that could beremoved if we wanted to By counting down 75 mils from the centerline of the motor shaftand the outboard bolting plane and drawing a baseplate restriction point there, we can nowsee how far that end can come down without removing metal from the baseplate or machinecasing Similarly, by counting down 25 mils from the centerline of the motor shaft and theinboard bolting plane and drawing a baseplate restriction point there, we can now see how farthat end can come down without removing metal In this particular case, there were no shimsunder any of the feet of the fan so its baseplate restriction points are positioned directly on thefan centerline at the inboard and outboard ends as shown in Figure 8.15 Now that we knowwhat the lowest points of downward movement could be without removing metal, onepossible solution would be to use the outboard feet of the fan and the inboard feet of themotor as pivot points removing 72 mils of shims from under the outboard feet of the motorand installing 42 mils of shims under the inboard feet of the fan as shown in Figure 8.15

8.4.8.1 Lateral Movement Restrictions

In addition to aligning machinery in the up and down direction, it is also imperative that themachinery be aligned properly side to side Machinery is aligned side to side by translating themachine case laterally This sideways movement is typically monitored by setting up dialindicators along the side of the machine case at the inboard and outboard hold down bolts,anchoring the indicators to the frame or baseplate, zeroing the indicators, and then movingthe inboard and outboard ends the prescribed amounts Here is where realignment typicallybecomes extremely frustrating since there is a limited amount of room between the shanks ofthe hold down bolts and the holes drilled in the machine case feet

Up Side view Overlay line Motor

Pivot here Lower 72 mils

Scale: 5 in 30 mils

Baseplate restriction points

Raise 42 mils up

Fan pivot here

No shims available to remove Fan shaft

centerline

No shims available to remove

FIGURE 8.15 (See color insert following page 322.) Movement solutions using the outboard feet of thefan and the inboard feet of the motor as pivot points

Trang 7

If, for example, you wanted to move the outboard end of a machine 120 mils to the south,began moving the outboard end monitoring the move with a dial indicator, and the machinecase stopped moving after 50 mils of translation, this would be considered a movementrestriction commonly referred to as a ‘‘bolt bound’’ condition The problem in movingmachinery laterally is that there is a limited amount of allowable movement in eitherdirection The total amount of side-to-side movement at each end of the machine case isreferred to as the ‘‘lateral movement envelope.’’ To find the allowable lateral movementenvelope, remove a bolt from each end of the machine case, look down the hole, and see howmuch room exists between the shank of the bolt and the hole drilled in the machine case atthat foot If necessary, thread the bolt into the hole a couple of turns, and measure the gapsbetween the bolt shank and the sides of the hole with feeler or wire gauges.

It is very important for one to recognize that trouble free alignment corrections can only beachieved when the allowable movement envelope is known Perhaps one of the most import-ant statements that will be made in this chapter is

When you consider that both machine cases are movable, there are an infinite number of possibleways to align the shafts, some of which fall within the allowable movement envelope

It seems ridiculous, but many people have ground baseplates or the undersides of ery feet away because they felt that a machine had to be lowered When machinery becomesbolt bound when trying to move it sideways, people frequently cut down the shanks of thebolts or grind a hole open more

machin-There is typically an easier solution Disappointingly, many of the alignment measurementsystems shown in this book force the user to name one machine case stationary and the other onemovable which will invariably cause repositioning problems when the machine case has to bemoved outside its allowable movement envelope This may not happen the first time you align adrive system, or the second or third time, but if you align enough machinery, eventually you willnot be able to move the movable machine the amount prescribed Once the centerlines of rotationhave been determined and the allowable movement envelope illustrated on the graph, it becomesvery apparent what repositioning moves will work easily and which ones will not

Figure 8.16 shows the top view alignment model of a motor and pump Not knowing anybetter, it appears that all you would have to do is move the outboard end of the motor 14 mils

to the east and the inboard end of the motor 4 mils to the west Easy enough But what if theoutboard end of the motor is bolt bound to the east already?

By removing one bolt from the inboard and outboard ends of both the motor and pump,the lateral movement restrictions can be observed In this case the following restrictions wereobserved:

1 Outboard end of motor—bolt bound to east and 40 mils of possible movement to thewest

2 Inboard end of motor—bolt bound to east and 40 mils of possible movement to the west

3 Inboard end of pump—32 mils of possible movement to the east and 8 mils of possiblemovement to the west

4 Outboard end of pump—36 mils of possible movement to the east and 4 mils of possiblemovement to the west

By plotting the eastbound and westbound restriction onto the alignment model, you cannow see the easy corridor of movement One possible solution (out of many) is shown inFigure 8.16

Trang 8

Please, for your own sake, follow these four basic steps to prevent you from wasting hours

or days of your time correcting a misalignment condition:

1 Find the positions of every shaft in the drive train by the graphing and modelingtechniques shown in this and later chapters

2 Determine the total allowable movement envelope of all the machine cases in bothdirections

3 Plot the restrictions on the graph or model

4 Select a final desired alignment line or overlay line that fits within the allowablemovement envelope (hopefully) and move the machinery to that line

If you are involved with aligning machinery, by following the four steps above, it isguaranteed that you will save countless hours of wasted time trying to move one machinewhere it does not really want to go

8.4.8.2 Where Did the Stationary–Movable Alignment Concept Come From?

I don’t know Every piece of rotating machinery in existence has, at one time or another, beenplaced there Mother Earth never gave birth to a machine They are neither part of the Earth’smantle nor firmly imbedded in bedrock Every machine is movable, it is just a matter of effort(pain) to reposition it So why have the vast majority of people who align machinery calledone machine stationary and the other machine movable?

The only viable reason that I can come up with is this—in virtually every industry there is

an electric motor driving a pump When you first approach a motor pump arrangement, youimmediately notice that the pump has piping attached to it and the only appendage attached

to the motor is conduit (usually flexible conduit) From your limited vantage point at thistime it would appear to be easier to move the motor because there is no piping attached to itlike the pump You would prefer to just move the motor because it looks easier to move thanthe pump (and so would I) The assumption is made that the pump will not be moved, nomatter what position you find the motor shaft in with respect to the pump shaft

32 mils of possible movements to the east here

Pivot here

Pump

36 mils of possible movement to the east here Move 14 mils east here

4 mils of possible movement

to the west here

8 mils of possible movement

to the west here Lateral movement restriction points

40 mils of possible movement

to the west here

20 mils

5 in.

Scale:

Move 20 mils west here

East boundary line

West boundary line

Move 22 mils west here

Bolt bound

to east here

East

FIGURE 8.16 (See color insert following page 322.) Applying lateral movement restrictions to arrive at

an easy sideways move within the east and west corridors

Trang 9

But what do you do when you have to align a steam turbine driving a pump? They are bothpiped; which machine do you call the stationary machine—the pump or the turbine? Nomatter what your answer is, you are going to have to move one of them and they both havepiping attached to their casings.

Piping is no excuse not to move a piece of machinery, particularly in light of what most of

us know about how piping is really attached to machinery For some people, they are afraid

to loosen the bolts holding a machinery with piping attached to it because the piping strain is

so severe that they fear the machine will shift so far that it will never get back into alignment

So is the problem with the alignment process or the piping fit-up? Refer to Chapter 3 forinformation on this subject

If you align enough machinery and insist that one machine will be stationary, eventuallyyou will get exactly what you deserve for your shallow range of thinking

8.4.8.3 Solving Piping Fit-Up Problems with the Overlay Line

Although we have been showing that the overlay line (a.k.a final desired alignment line) isdrawn through foot bolt points, it is important to see that the overlay line could be drawnanywhere and the machinery shafts moved to that line

This can be particularly beneficial if there are other considerations that have to be takeninto account such as piping fit-up problems Figure 8.17 shows a motor and pump where thesuction pipe is 1=4 in higher than the suction flange on the pump and there is a 1=4 in.excessive gap at the discharge flanges Rather than align both shafts, then install an additional

Bracket clamping positions

Trang 10

250 mils (1=4 in.) under all the feet, another easier solution exists Scale off where the suctionflange of the pump is onto the alignment model Extend the centerline of the pump to go out

to the suction flange point Place a mark 250 mils above the pump shaft centerline where thesuction flange is located Construct an overlay line to go from that point to the outboard bolts

of the motor as illustrated in Figure 8.18 Then solve for the moves at each bolting plane notonly to eliminate the piping fit-up problem but also to align the shafts

We have reviewed many of the basic concepts behind alignment modeling in this chapter.Determining your maximum misalignment deviation and whether you are within acceptablealignment tolerances will be covered in the next chapter Specific instruction on how toperform all five-alignment measurement methods and their associated modeling techniqueswill be covered in Chapter 10 through Chapter 15

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dodd, V.R., Total Alignment, Petroleum Publishing Company, Tulsa, OK, 1975

Dreymala, J., Factors Affecting and Procedures of Shaft Alignment, Technical and Vocational ment, Lee College, Baytown, TX, 1970

Depart-Piotrowski, J., Basic Shaft Alignment Workbook, Turvac Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1991

Suction flange moves up

250 mils at this point

Pivot here

Raise 47 mils up

Motor 0 T

compensated readings

− 70

Pump

Up Side view

Trang 12

9 Defining Misalignment: Alignment and Coupling

Tolerances

9.1 WHAT EXACTLY IS SHAFT ALIGNMENT?

In very broad terms, shaft misalignment occurs when the centerlines of rotation of two (ormore) machinery shafts are not in line with each other Therefore, in its purest definition,shaft alignment occurs when the centerlines of rotation of two (or more) shafts are collinearwhen operating at normal conditions As simple as that may sound, there still exists aconsiderable amount of confusion to people who are just beginning to study this subjectwhen trying to precisely define the amount of misalignment that may exist between two shaftsflexibly or rigidly coupled together

How do you measure misalignment when there are so many different coupling designs?Where should the misalignment be measured? Is it measured in terms of mils, degrees,millimeters of offset, arcseconds, radians? How accurate does the alignment have to be?When should the alignment be measured, when the machines are off-line or when they arerunning? Perhaps a commonly asked question needs to be addressed first

9.2 DOES LEVEL AND ALIGNED MEAN THE SAME THING?

The level and aligned does not mean the same thing The term ‘‘level’’ is related to Earth’sgravitational pull When an object is in a horizontal state or condition or points along thelength of the centerline of an object are at the same altitude, the object is considered to belevel Another way of stating this is that an object is level if the surface of the object isperpendicular to the lines of gravitational force A level rotating machinery foundationlocated in Boston would not be parallel to a level rotating machinery foundation located inSan Francisco as the Earth’s surface is curved The average diameter of the Earth is 7908.5miles (7922 miles at the equator and 7895 miles at the poles due to the centrifugal forcecausing the planet to bulge at the center) When measuring the distances of arc across theEarth’s surface, 18 of arc is slightly over 69 miles, 1 min of arc is slightly over 1.15 miles, andone second of arc is slightly over 101.2 ft

It is possible, although rare, to have a machinery drive train both level and aligned It isalso possible to have a machinery drive train level but not aligned and it is also possible tohave a machinery drive train aligned but not level As shaft alignment deals specifically withthe centerlines of rotation of machinery shafts it is possible to have, or not to have, thecenterlines of rotation perpendicular to the lines of gravitational force

Historically, there were a considerable number of patents filed from 1900 to 1950 thatseemed to combine (or maybe confuse) the concept of level and aligned A number of these

341

Trang 13

alignment devices were used in the paper industry where extremely long ‘‘line shafts’’ wereinstalled to drive different parts of a paper machine These line shafts were constructed withnumerous sections of shafting that were connected end to end with rigid couplings andsupported by a number of bearing pedestals along the length of the drive system, whichcould be 300 ft in length or more Even if a mechanic carefully aligned each section of shafting

at each rigid coupling connection along the length of the line shaft and perfectly leveled eachshaft section, the centerline of rotation at each end of a 300-ft long line shaft would be out by0.018 in due to the curvature of the Earth’s surface

Although level and aligned may not mean the same thing, proper leveling is important as well

as having coplanar surfaces Levelness refers to a line or surface, which is perpendicular togravity; coplanar surface refers to ‘‘flatness.’’ Are the points where the machinery cases contactthe baseplate (or soleplates) in the same plane? If not, how much of a deviation is there?

It is very common to see baseplates where the machinery contact surfaces are not in the sameplane or several soleplates that contact a single machine case not be in the same plane Thiscoplanar deviation may be a contributor to a condition commonly referred to as a ‘‘soft foot’’problem and was covered in Chapter 5 Figure 9.1 shows the recommended guidelines for levelingmachinery baseplates and coplanar surface deviation As will be seen, even if the surfaces of abaseplate are perfectly level and perfectly coplanar, a soft foot condition could still exist

General process machinery supported

5 mils per foot

Process machinery supported in antifriction bearings (500+ hp)

5 mils per foot

Process machinery supported in sleeve bearings (500+ hp)

2 mils per foot

Machine tools 1 mil per foot

Note: 1 mil = 0.001 in.

Coplanar Surface Deviation

FIGURE 9.1 Recommended levelness and coplanar surface deviation for rotating machinery baseplates

or soleplates

Trang 14

Another way of expressing circles is by use of radians All circles are mathematically related

by an irrational number called pi (p), which is approximately equal to 3.14159 There are 2pradians in a circle Therefore one radian is equal to 57.2958288

Despite the fact that the expression ‘‘angular misalignment’’ is used frequently it comes as asurprise to learn that no known shaft alignment measurement system actually uses an angularmeasurement sensor or device

three-on the dial indicator readings to reflect how the shafts of each unit are sitting

9.5 DEFINITION OF SHAFT MISALIGNMENT

In more precise terms, shaft misalignment is the deviation of relative shaft position from acollinear axis of rotation measured at the flexing points in the coupling when equipment isrunning at normal operating conditions To better understand this definition, let us dissecteach part of this statement to clearly illustrate what is involved

Parallel misalignment

Angular misalignment

“Real world” misalignment usually exhibits a combination of both parallel and angular conditions

FIGURE 9.2 How shafts can be misaligned

Trang 15

Collinear means in the same line or in the same axis If two shafts are collinear, then theyare aligned The deviation of relative shaft position accounts for the measured differencebetween the actual centerline of rotation of one shaft and the projected centerline of rotation

of the other shaft

There are literally dozens of different types of couplings Rather than have guidelines foreach individual coupling, it is important to understand that there is one common designparameter that applies to all flexible couplings:

For a flexible coupling to accept both parallel and angular misalignment there must be at least twopoints along the projected shaft axes where the coupling can flex or articulate to accommodate themisalignment condition

The rotational power from one shaft is transferred over to another shaft through theseflexing points These flexing points are also referred to as flexing planes or points of powertransmission Shaft alignment accuracy should be independent of the type of coupling usedand should be expressed as a function of the shaft positions, not the coupling design or themechanical flexing limits of the coupling Figure 9.3 illustrates where the flexing points in avariety of different coupling designs are located I have seen several instances where there isonly one flexing point in the coupling and have also seen more than two flexing points in thecoupling connecting two shafts together If only one flexing point is present and there is anoffset between the shafts or a combination of an angle and an offset, there will be some veryhigh radial forces transmitted across the coupling into the bearings of the two machines Ifthere are more than two flexing points, there will be a considerable amount of uncontrolledmotion in between the two connected shafts, usually resulting in very high vibration levels inthe machinery

Why should misalignment be measured at the flexing points in the coupling? Simplybecause that is where the coupling is forced to accommodate the misalignment conditionand that is where the action, wear, and power transfer across the coupling is occurring

Flex points Flex points

Flex points

Flex points Flex points

Flex points

FIGURE 9.3 Flexing point locations in a variety of couplings

Ngày đăng: 05/08/2014, 11:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN