These SMEs depend mostly on the change agent or perceived change agent efforts, and they invest limited resources in the development and management processes.. Management enthusiasm and
Trang 1Well we’ve had some sort of Web presence for quite
a long time, about three years but we had made
progress over that period and redesigned the site
a number of times but we’d not taken it seriously
enough, I don’t think until probably this year when
we put a little bit more money into it and really
looked to it as something which would support
the value of the brand of magazine itself which
is [magazine name] It’s the only magazine (…)
publishers and the Web site was designed around
two themes in terms of supplementing the brand
itself, one was to provide additional information
on the product to the consumer and the second
was to provide information to other businesses for
example, potential advertisers in the magazine,
that sort of thing, contact details, up and coming
events, readers holidays and so on, some of which
they get through the magazine We deliberately
don’t put magazine content online, the idea is that
people pay for it and we see the site at the moment
as being free access (NP SME case 11).
Quayle (2002) argues that SMEs that
devel-oped e-commerce capabilities have not done so
VWUDWHJLFDOO\DQGKDYH\HWWRHQMR\VLJQL¿FDQWFRVW
and time savings This is evident from NP SME
(case 5) who owns two Web sites; a catalogue and
an e-commerce site which is not fully functional
The owner-manager is in continuous discussions
with the change agent to provide a technical
so-lution for the e-commerce site It can be argued
that developing e-commerce capabilities does
not depend only on internal factors, but equally
depends on the availability of external support
and type of ECT solutions provided and
acces-sible to SMEs
We have two Web sites, we have a catalogue, a
magazine if you like … and we have an email,
e-commerce thing The e-commerce site is SQL
server-based which means that if you actually
click it, you call up a database, a pick list if you
like and it is slow and we are talking just now to
[Consultant at Connect] he can improve potential
customer access to it in terms of speed of delivery
So we get sales from it [site] but most of them are from the magazine where we get email contact with enquiries….so we have had business through the catalogue but not through the e-commerce site …it is enquiries that lead to business but not directly, there is always a second stage in it,
we are not directly selling from the e-commerce site at all hence our continued discussions with Connect about its effectiveness… It’s still too slow but as I say that’s since last October, we’ve been trying to get that speeded up… [Consultant
at Connect] is aware of it, he himself has in the SDVWEHHQWU\LQJWR¿QGVRPHRWKHUPHWKRGIRU speeding up the server but although I ask him on
a regular basis, it’s never there next month and probably the month after, it’s not happening yet
(NP SME case 5)
Contrary, passive adopters are companies that mostly outsource update, management and rede-sign phases Some, passive adopters have gained Web authoring skills and manage minor content update Their Web sites are in a sporadic state of content update depending on circumstances and resources While other passive adopters update their site yearly; their Web sites are in a static state where limited or no content update is evident These companies have not established a clear business objective for their Web presence, and they are not aware of the need for any strategic planning to incorporate into Web site develop-ment and redesign These SMEs depend mostly
on the change agent or perceived change agent efforts, and they invest limited resources in the development and management processes These
TP SMEs had limited involvement in Web site development and testing, and they continue to have limited impact in update and management
We just had the pictures and told them [Connect] what we wanted and they designed it…we could have done anything we wanted to but we just left
it to them because we had no knowledge on it…We
Trang 2to make the changes ourselves…we tried to get in
to change a price and we lost a picture and there
was no way we could get that picture back, so I
went to Connect for some support and they said,
we’ll put it on for you this time but after this we’ll
need to charge you further … [When asked if they
would approach another Web design bureau]…
Not really, it would be too much, we are paying
about two hundred and something to stay with
them a year to host the site, so we wouldn’t like
to change (TP case 1)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Findings presented in this chapter have shown
that NP SMEs and TP SMEs differ to a large
extent in their implementation process NP SMEs
are mostly internally motivated in their adoption
decisions Management enthusiasm and perceived
EHQH¿WVIURPDGRSWLRQHQFRXUDJHGPDQ\RZQHU
managers to gain awareness of the technology and
improve their Web authoring skills, either through
their personal efforts or through the change agent
training NP SMEs have a favourable opinion of
the technology, initiate the development of their
Web presence, and have more authority and
autonomy in their adoption and implementation
decisions However, these decisions are limited
by owner-manager Web authoring skills,
techni-cal knowhow, and knowledge of ECT solutions
Contrarily, TP SMEs are mostly externally
moti-vated by the change agent efforts and support TP
SMEs adopted a Web presence without forming a
favourable opinion of ECT They mainly wanted
to experiment with the new technology without
any objective evaluation of their business needs
and resource constraints Their Web presence was
developed by the change agent, and was mostly
LQÀXHQFHGJRYHUQHGDQGOLPLWHGE\WKHVROXWLRQV
provided by the change agent
SMEs implementation process can be grouped
into four main categories: strategic planning, ad
hoc decisions, sporadic state, and static state This categorisation is based on whether the company depends on internal resources or out-sources the development and management stages, and whether WKHFRPSDQ\LVDSDVVLYHRUDFWLYHPRGL¿HUStra-tegic Planning is evident in NP SMEs that had the initiative to develop their Web presence, and overtime developed a systematic approach to the Web site development and management These SMEs outsource the redesign of the Web site, regard the Web presence as a strategic business tool, and intend to gradually incorporate ECT functionalities that meet their business needs These SMEs have the chance of encompassing e-business These companies are larger in size and outsourced the redesign and development of the successive Web sites They have both technical and
¿QDQFLDOUHVRXUFHVWRPDQDJHWKHLU:HESUHVHQFH in-house Furthermore, the owner-manager and staff are better trained in managing their ECT adoption However, at the time of interview only one SME (NP case 11) falls in this category Generally, most NP SMEs have a tendency towards strategic planning, as they have clear business objectives that govern their maintenance process However, their implementation process
is primarily based on ad hoc decision Most NP SMEs fall within the ad hoc decision category 7KH\ DUH DFWLYH PRGL¿HUV DQG DUH LQWHUQDOO\ motivated in developing and updating their Web presence These companies have reached a stage
of self-reliance, either through their personal inter-est in Web authoring and/or change agent efforts These companies are actively and constantly FKDQJLQJ DQG XSGDWLQJ WKHLU VLWH WR UHÀHFW WKH company’s image and attract customer Web site changes and updates are driven by owner-manager enthusiasm, knowledge of Web authoring skills, and relative advantage gained These companies tend to take a pragmatic ad hoc approach to the development process The choices of ECT solution adopted are based on the owner-manager’s indi-vidual judgment and experience Although, these SMEs tend to outsource major redesign, however,
Trang 3they lack the resources to access professional
advice and encompass strategic planning
Most TP SMEs fall within the sporadic state
or static state These are companies that are
VWURQJO\ LQÀXHQFHG E\ H[WHUQDO IRUFHV QDPHO\
the change agent or any perceived change agent,
in both their awareness and adoption of ECT
Companies within the sporadic state have gained
ECT awareness, Web authoring, and knowhow,
primarily due to the change agent efforts
Simi-ODUO\ WKH ¿UVW :HE VLWH DGRSWHG ZDV WKH GLUHFW
result of the change agent services, in particular
the free Web authoring and hosting services These
companies can be described as passive adopters,
as they have limited technical skill to update Web
site content and actively change Web presence
functionality They update their Web presence on
a quarterly or yearly basis and tend to outsource
any major redesign Thus, their Web presence is
in a sporadic state of content update Companies
within the static state, share similar
implemen-tation background as companies in the sporadic
state In addition, these companies have limited
knowledge of Web presence development and
management They depend mostly on the change
agent efforts in the initial Web site developed,
Web site update and management, and subsequent
redesign Web sites These SMEs depend entirely
on external support and Web site in a static state
with minimum or no update
$QXPEHURIIDFWRUVLQÀXHQFH60(VFRQWLQX-ous adoption of a Web presence Both NP and TP
SMEs are encouraged to continue their adoption
due to the perceived and experienced relative
advantage gained, mostly from using the Web
presence as a promotional and communicational
means NP SMEs are internally motivated by the
owner-manager enthusiasm The owner-manager
is the main person developing and managing ECT
Peer pressure is motivating NP SMEs to adopt
ECT, but does not encourage further investment of
resources to develop a more competitive Web
pres-ence Lack of time and lack of technical resources
are among the common factors hindering both NP
and TP SMEs’ continuous adoption Moreover, 7360(VDUHPRVWO\H[WHUQDOO\LQÀXHQFHGGXH
to their dependence on outsourcing of Web site development and management rather than in-house expertise TP SME continuous adoption
is affected by cost of Web presence maintenance and subsequent redesign, trust in change agent services, lack of trust in independent service providers, and lack of awareness of alternative ECT solutions, and their dependence on change agent support for further awareness
7KH ¿QGLQJV SUHVHQWHG LQ WKLV FKDSWHU KDYH some limitations Mainly, the data was collected IURP 60(V WKDW KDYH EHHQ LQÀXHQFHG E\ WKH change agent efforts in the diffusion of ECT; either directly as in the case of TP SMEs or indirectly
as evident in NP SMEs The presence of external FKDQJHDJHQWVLQÀXHQFLQJWKHDGRSWLRQGHFLVLRQV and implementation process, might limit the conclusions only to similar scenarios where the involvement of a change agent, or any perceived change agent, is paramount Nonetheless, the
¿QGLQJVSUHVHQWHGDUHFRQVLVWHQWZLWKOLWHUDWXUH First, the factors that encourage implementation (e.g., management enthusiasm and relative advan-tage) and barriers to implementation (e.g., lack of resources, awareness, and trust) are in line with literature (Windrum & De Berranger, 2003), even
in the presence of a change agent that provides LQFHQWLYHVWRHQFRXUDJHDGRSWLRQ6HFRQG¿QG-ings are in agreement with the argument that SMEs underestimate the need for planning prior
to adopting e-commerce and that e-commerce strategy is missing from SME business plans (Quayle, 2002)
Finally, it is argued that in absence of a stra-tegic vision from within the company, external support can not always have the ability and desire WRSURYLGH³NQRZKRZ´NQRZOHGJHDQGDLGLQWKH formation of strategic planning (Jones, Hecker,
& Holland, 2003) This is clearly evident in the
¿QGLQJVSUHVHQWHG7KHFKDQJHDJHQWSURYLGHG knowhow knowledge and aided in creating aware-ness, but did not aid in developing ECT strategic
Trang 4planning, even in companies that host their Web
presence at the change agent’s Web directory and
are in continuous contact with the change agent
However, contrary to literature, where
implemen-tation is presented as a linear stage-based process,
the chapter presented a new dimension in SMEs
implementation of ECT, based on the allocation
of resources (in-house/outsourced),
develop-ment process (passive/active), and managedevelop-ment
practices (strategic planning, ad-hoc decisions,
sporadic state, and static state) Further research
ZLOO EHQH¿W IURP LQYHVWLJDWLQJ ZKHWKHU WKHVH
implementation patterns exist in the absence of
change agent involvement in the implementation
process
CONCLUSION
This chapter unravelled a different dimension to
SMEs implementation of electronic commerce
technologies The chapter focused on Web site
development and management practices and
explored the different Web presence
implementa-tion patterns among SMEs Two distinct groups
RI60(VDUHLGHQWL¿HG7KHPRUHDEOH1HHG3XOO
SMEs, who are aware of their business needs and
internal resources in developing and maintaining
their Web presence These companies update
and manage their Web presence based mostly
on owner-manager’s ad-hoc decisions and have
a tendency towards strategic planning Contrary,
the less able Technology Push SMEs, who have
EHHQLQÀXHQFHGDQGHQFRXUDJHGWRDGRSWD:HE
presence by change agent efforts in the diffusion
of ECT These companies gained ECT awareness
and some level of technical knowhow, due to
change agent training However, these companies
lack the technical knowledge to maintain their
Web presence in-house and depend largely on
external support, particularly the change agent
Their Web presence is either in a sporadic or a
static state of update and maintenance
REFERENCES
Chan, C., & Swatman, P M C (1999, November 29) E-commerce implementation in Australia: A
case study approach In: “CollECTeR’99”—3 r d Annual CollECTeR (Collaborative Electronic Commerce Technology and Research) Confer-ence on Electronic Commerce, Wellington, New
Zealand
Charlton, C., Gittings, C., Leng, P., Little, J., & Neilson, I (1997, June 25-27) Diffusion of the Internet: A Local Perspective on an International
Issue In IFIP TC8 WG8.6 International Working
Conference on Diffusion, Adoption and Imple-mentation of Information Technology, Ambleside,
Cumbria, UK (pp 337-351), Chapman & Hall Charlton, C., Gittings, C., Leng, P., Little, J., & Neilson, I (1998) Diffusion of Technological In-novations: Bringing Businesses onto the Internet
In T J Larsen & E McGuire (Eds.), Information
systems innovation and diffusion: Issues and di-rections (pp 251-296) Hershey, PA: Idea Group
Publishing
Clyde, L.A (2000) A strategic planning approach
to Web site management The Electronic Library,
18(2), 97-108.
DTI.(2002) The UK electronics industry e-commerce initiative: A study of the adoption
of e-commerce DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) Retrieved from http://www.intellectuk org/publications/reports/
DTI.(2003) Business in the information age: International benchmarking study 2003 DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) Retrieved from http://www.ukonlineforbusiness.gov.uk/ benchmarking2003/
Elsammani, Z., Hackney, R., & Scown, P (2004) SMEs adoption and implementation process of Web sites in the presence of change agents In N
Al-Qirim (Ed.), Electronic business in small to
Trang 5medium-sized enterprises: Frameworks, issues
and implications (pp 149-166).
Elsammani, Z., & Scown, P (2000, March/April)
How SMEs perceive and develop their Web
pres-ence Journal of New Product Development and
Innovation Management, 71-86.
Fillis, I., Johansson, U., & Wagner, B (2003) A
conceptualisation of the opportunities and
bar-riers to e-business development in the smaller
¿UPJournal of Small Business and Enterprise
Development, 10(3), 336-344.
Fillis, I., Johansson, U., & Wagner, B (2004)
Factors impacting on e-business adoption and
GHYHORSPHQW LQ WKH VPDOOHU ¿UP Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 10(3),
178-191
Grant, S (1999, November 1-3) E-commerce for
small businesses Proceedings of 2 n d International
Conference IEC’99 (Innovation Through
Elec-tronic Commerce), Manchester (pp 65-72)
Gide, E., & Soliman, F (1999, November 1-3)
A Framework for E-Commerce implementation
in Business Operations In Proceedings of 2 n d
International Conference IEC’99 (Innovation
through Electronic Commerce), Manchester (pp
58-64)
Gray, C., & Lawless, N (2002) Determinants of
HFRPPHUFHDGRSWLRQLQVPDOO¿UPV25 t h ISBA
National Small Firms Policy & Research
Confer-ence: Competing Perspectives of Small Business
and Entrepreneurship, University of Briton.
Jansen, A (1998) Technology diffusion and
adop-WLRQLQVPDOOUXUDO¿UPV,Q7-/DUVHQ (
McGuire (Eds.), Information systems innovation
and diffusion: issues and directions (pp 345-372)
Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing
Jones, C., Hecker, R., & Holland, P (2003) Small
¿UP,QWHUQHWDGRSWLRQ2SSRUWXQLWLHVIRUJRQHD
journey not begun Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, 10(3), 287-297.
King, N (1998) Template analysis In G Symon
& C Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and
analysis in organisational research: A practical guide London: Sage Publications.
Lindlof, T R (1995) Qualitative communication
research methods Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
McNaughton, R B (2001) A typology of Web site objectives in high technology business markets
Marketing Intelligence, 19(2), 82-87.
Murphey, P R., Poist, R F., Lynagh, P M., & Grazer, W F (2003) An analysis of select Web site practices among supply chain participants
Industrial and Marketing Management, 32(3),
243-250
O’Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A (2004) Testing the homogeneity of SMEs: The impact of size
on managerial and organisational processes
European Business Review, 16(1), 64-77.
Palvia, P C., & Palvia, S C (1999) An examina-tion of the IT satisfacexamina-tion of small-business users
Information & Management, 35, 127-137.
Poon, S., & Swatman, P M C (1997) Small busi-ness use of the Internet: Findings from Australian
case studies International Marketing Review,
14(5), 385-402
Olson, J R., & Boyer, K K (2003) Factors affecting the utilization of Internet purchasing
in small organisations Journal of Operations
Management, 21(2), 225-245.
Quayle, M (2002) E-commerce: The challenge
IRU8.60(VLQWKHWZHQW\¿UVWFHQWXU\Interna-tional Journal of Operations, 22(10), 1148-1161.
Rahul De’, & Mathew, B (1999) Issues in the management of Web technologies: A conceptual
framework International Journal of Information
Management, 19, 427-447.
Riemenschneider, C K., Harrison, D A., & Myky-tyn, P (2003) Understanding IT adoption decision
Trang 6in small business: Integrating current theories
Information & Management, 40, 269-285.
Rogers, E M (1995) Diffusion of innovations.
New York: Free Press
Sparrow, J (2001) A knowledge-based view of
support for business management of e-business
activities 24 t h National Firms Policy and
Re-search Conference, Leicester
Taylor, M J., England, D., & Gresty, D (2001)
Knowledge for Web site development Internet
Research: Electronic Networking Applications
and Policy, 11(5), 451-461.
Taylor, M J., McWilliam, J., Forsyth, H & Wade,
S (2002) Methodologies and Web site
develop-ment: A survey of practice Information and
Software Technology, 44(6), 381-391.
This work was previously published in SMEs ECT Reality: From Ad-Hoc Implementation to Strategic Planning, edited by N
Al Qirim, pp 63-87, copyright 2006 by IGI Publishing (an imprint of IGI Global).
Wen, H J., Chen, H G., & Hwang, H G (2001) E-commerce Web site design: Strategies and
models Information Management, 9(1), 5-12 Willcocks, L., & Sauer, C (2000) Moving to
e-business London: Random House Business
Book
Windrum, P., & De Berranger, P (2003) The adoption of e-business technology by SMEs In O
Jones & F Tilley (Eds.), Competitive advantage
in SMEs: Organising for innovation and change.
John Wiley & Sons
Trang 7Chapter 2.8 BSC-Based Framework for
E-Business Strategy
Fen Wang
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
Guisseppi Forgionne
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
INTRODUCTION
E-business is far more about strategy than
technol-ogy (Raisinghani & Schkade, 2001) An effective
e-business strategy is concerned with e-business
multidimensional characteristics associated with
different levels, parties, elements, and growth
pattern features (Bakry & Bakry, 2001) In the
process, the strategy must incorporate the effects
of the instant and global Internet communication
mechanism on the company’s business
manage-ment architecture The global reach and
intercon-nectivity of the Internet have spawned new models
of e-business strategy and radically transformed
existing ones (Pant & Ravichandran, 2001)
In-deed, what distinguishes many of the dot-coms
is not their new technical power, but the radical
new business models (Hamel, 2000)
Aided by such innovative e-business models,
managers will be able to identify the major
deci-sion factors involved in their business strategies
and generate strategies that would improve their RYHUDOO SHUIRUPDQFH DQG SUR¿WDELOLW\ ,Q WKH current context, four essential perspectives are LGHQWL¿HG WR EH DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK DQ HEXVLQHVV VWUDWHJ\¿QDQFLDOFXVWRPHULQWHUQDOSURFHVVHV and learning and growth These four perspectives ZHUH¿UVWLQWURGXFHGLQHDUO\VDVWKHbal-anced scorecard concept (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 1992) Because the BSC methodology explicitly focuses on links among business decisions and outcomes, it is intended to guide strategy devel-opment, implementation, and provide reliable feedback for management control and perfor-mance evaluation This BSC rationale is thereby appealing to managers who face new challenges
in the current turbulent e-business climate The real challenge is to determine how the BSC can be successfully applied in the context
of e-business’s constantly changing environment
of interdependencies (Hasan & Tibbits, 2000) E-business introduces new business objectives
Trang 8and strategies and the old measures of success
may no longer apply It is anticipated that the
departure from the original BSC for a strategic
e-business management framework would be more
radical than the existing BSC adaptations (e.g.,
Martinson’s balanced IS scorecard; Martinsons,
Davison, & Tse, 1999)
BACKGROUND
Few, if any, precise and complete e-business
strategy models are available from the literature
(Dubosson-Torbay, Osterwalder, & Pigneur,
2001) There are a few theoretical academic
stud-ies with some empirical evidence on e-business
models success (Horsti, Tuunainen, & Tolonen,
2005) Generally, these e-business model studies
fall into two categories: subsystem research and
generic frameworks Examples of the subsystem
research include modeling for price structures
(Liu, Wynter, & Xia, 2003), customer needs
(Ols-son & Karls(Ols-son, 2003), process synchronization
(Park, 2002), and knowledge sharing (Koh &
Kim, 2004) Since these subsystem models deal
with a particular aspect of e-business, they do
not offer a global and complete view of
e-busi-ness strategy
There are several generic frameworks for the
development and analysis of e-business models
Whelan and Maxelon (2001) proposed that an
e-business architecture requires product, channel,
customer management, resource management,
and information elements Afuah and Tucci (2001)
presented a more detailed list of components
in-cluding scope, customer value, revenue sources,
connected activities, and so forth, but like Whelan
and Maxelon, they did not specify the
interre-ODWLRQVKLSV+DPHOVSHFL¿HGDFRPSOHWH
four-part framework with bridge components
that is geared toward guiding strategic choices
of management Similarly, Dubosson-Torbay et
al (2001) used a framework with four principal
components to analyze e-business: product
in-novation, customer relationship, infrastructure PDQDJHPHQWDQG¿QDQFLDODVSHFWV*RLQJEH\RQG the segment frameworks, De, Mathee, and Abra-ham (2001) developed a pragmatic framework that offers different perspectives for the analysis
of e-business including transaction costs, switch-ing costs, infrastructure investment, and revenue models and so on
For the most part, the generic models offer theoretical, not analytical, decision guidance for practitioners One exception is the BSC-based e-business framework, with preliminary empirical evidence, proposed by Hasan and Tibbits (2000) Their empirical evidence, which was gathered from a case study in an Australian state-govern-ment utility, gave four high-level perspectives EXWQRVSHFL¿FDQGH[SOLFLWPHDVXUHVZLWKHDFK perspective Currently, there is no comprehensive and concrete investigation that applies the tradi-tional BSC to e-business strategy
EBBSC FRAMEWORK SPECIFICATION
Considering a wide range of factors and relation-ships in this fast-changing e-era, we adapt the original BSC methodology into a comprehensive e-business strategy framework (EBBSC) con-sisting of four updated perspectives: business model, analytical e-CRM, process structure, and e-knowledge network (see Figure 1) The EBBSC framework links business strategies
to a broad range of innovations and measures, examines important business issues facing e-business managers, and provides a complete view
of e-business strategies The framework can be better understood by examining the components
in detail
Business Model Perspective
Although e-business models differ from the tra-ditional brick and mortar models in various ways,
Trang 9the fundamental needs of consumers and
busi-nesses remain much the same Consumers want
the best deal by price and service comparison,
while businesses want to grow sales by targeting
the right e-shoppers On the other hand, traditional
rear-view and static planning and budgeting cycles
don’t measure up to the dynamic, competitive,
and compressed business cycles in the global
e-era E-business managers need to focus on a
IXWXUHRULHQWHGSUR¿WPD[LPL]DWLRQVWUDWHJ\WKDW
will support on-the-spot decision making at the
turning points
• 3UR¿W0D[LPL]DWLRQ3UR¿WLVHTXDOWRWKH
difference between the revenue and cost
Many intangible and tangible factors may
DIIHFW SUR¿W E\ LQÀXHQFLQJ UHYHQXH DQG
cost directly or indirectly, creating risk or
uncertainty in achieving the company’s
SUR¿WDELOLW\3DOPHU :LVHPDQ
• Revenue Increase: Revenue increase refers
to expanding and re-pricing product and
service offerings to achieve a higher value
added mix According to economics theory,
revenue equals the product of the purchases
and price Purchases equal the minimum of
the product quantity offered (quantity
sup-plied) and quantity customers are willing
and able to purchase (quantity demanded)
Quantity demanded is treated as a function
of the customer retention, marketing mix, and competition Customer retention mea-sures the company’s customer stickiness
or loyalty The marketing mix includes the company’s major marketing decisions Com-petition represents the rivalry between the company and other businesses in the target market Determinants of the quantity sup-plied include price, capacity, supply chain PDQDJHPHQWHI¿FDF\DQGVWDIISUR¿FLHQF\ E-business capacity measures not only the limit imposed by the equipment and/or avail-able personnel, but also the limit associated with the network technology Supply chain PDQDJHPHQWHI¿FDF\UHIHUVWRWKHHIIRUWRI the company in managing relationships with its suppliers
• Cost Reduction: The Internet age enables
businesses to reduce unnecessary or redun-dant buyer–seller costs Generally, cost is FRPSRVHGRI¿[HGFRVWZKLFKLQDQHEXVL-ness context can include e-busiFRPSRVHGRI¿[HGFRVWZKLFKLQDQHEXVL-ness system development and maintenance expenses, and variable cost, which equals the product of unit cost and quantity supplied
• Marketing Mix: Marketing effort helps
in identifying market opportunities and generating marketing strategies that support
Process Structure
Process intelligence &
-business
-CRM
-customer
e-Knowledge Network
E-business Strategy Business Model
Figure 1 Adapted four perspectives of e-business strategy
Trang 10attainment of e-business objectives The
major factors involved in the marketing mix
include people, promotion, price, product,
presentation, and distribution effort The
RULJLQDO³3ODFH´IDFWRULVGHFRPSRVHGLQWR
presentation and distribution effort to
rep-resent e-market reality Prep-resentation refers
to the effort involved in online product
presentation and distribution Distribution
effort facilitates the connection of the
prod-uct with the target customer
• Sales Cycle Shortened: The sales cycle
consists of the time that elapses between
the customer interest and the purchase
de-cision In e-business, a shorter sales cycle
enables management to respond promptly
to emerging opportunities or threats The
major factors that impact the sales cycle
LQFOXGHWKHFXVWRPHUSUR¿OHSURGXFWSULFH
promotion, and presentation A customer
SUR¿OHLVDFRPSRVLWHYDULDEOHWKDWUHÀHFWV
the customers’ demographic
characteris-tics, preferences and behavior patterns
Generally, the more positive the customer
SUR¿OHLQGH[WKHORZHUWKHSURGXFWSULFH
the higher the product quality, the better
promotion methods and efforts, and the
more preferable presentation formats, the
shorter the sales cycle would be Figure 2
summarizes the business model perspective
in the framework
Analytic E-CRM Perspective
The Internet enables customers to conveniently
shop online, have a broader selection, get
com-petitive pricing and greater access to critical
business information (Chen et al., 2004) Online
retailing, however, is impeded by security and
privacy concerns, downloading time and other
technology barriers (Chen, Gillenson, &
Sher-rell, 2004) Furthermore, customers can switch to
other competitive URLs in seconds with minimal
¿QDQFLDOFRVWZKLFKPDNHVVXFFHVVIXOFXVWRPHU
management vital in e-business
• New Customer Acquisition: Customer
acquisition depends on precise and timely targeting that delivers valuable offers to prospects The factors involved in customer acquisition include the company’s marketing mix, HVHUYLFHTXDOLW\WKHFXVWRPHUSUR¿OH and competition Competition represents the company’s external relationship with the supplier, availability of other distribution channels, entry barriers, and product substi-tutes When addressing the factor, we have converted the original customer perspective from an external view (Kaplan & Norton, 1992) into a relationships perspective (Hasan
& Tibbits, 2000)
• Customer Satisfaction: 6DWLVIDFWLRQLVLQÀX-enced by lead time, product quality, service quality and competitive pricing (Kaplan
& Norton, 1992) Lead time measures the time required for the company to meet its customers’ needs, sometimes referred to as
³RUGHUWRGHOLYHU\ F\FOH WLPH´ $ SURGXFW with high quality and customization level and relatively lower price may increase the degree of the customers’ satisfaction E-service quality represents the level of the service offered in e-business
Figure 2 Business model perspective for e-busi-ness strategy
... by price and service comparison,while businesses want to grow sales by targeting
the right e-shoppers On the other hand, traditional
rear-view and static planning and budgeting...
and price Purchases equal the minimum of
the product quantity offered (quantity
sup-plied) and quantity customers are willing
and able to purchase (quantity demanded)...
SUR¿WDELOLW\3DOPHU :LVHPDQ
• Revenue Increase: Revenue increase refers
to expanding and re-pricing product and
service offerings to achieve a higher value
added mix According