Cancer Cell Biology and Angiogenesis Part 18 Antiangiogenic Therapy Understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate tumor angiogenesis may provide unique opportunities for cancer
Trang 1Chapter 080 Cancer Cell Biology
and Angiogenesis
(Part 18)
Antiangiogenic Therapy
Understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate tumor angiogenesis may provide unique opportunities for cancer treatment Acquired drug resistance
of tumor cells due to their high intrinsic mutation rate is a major cause of treatment failure in human cancers ECs comprising the tumor vasculature are genetically stable and do not share genetic changes with tumor cells; the EC apoptosis pathways are therefore intact Each EC of a tumor vessel helps provide nourishment to many tumor cells, and although tumor angiogenesis can be driven
by a number of exogenous proangiogenic stimuli, experimental data indicate that
at least in some tumor types, blockade of a single growth factor (e.g., VEGF) may inhibit tumor-induced vascular growth Angiogenesis inhibitors function by
Trang 2targeting the critical molecular pathways involved in EC proliferation, migration, and/or survival, many of which are unique to the activated endothelium in tumors Inhibition of growth factor and adhesion-dependent signaling pathways can induce
EC apoptosis with concomitant inhibition of tumor growth Different types of tumors use distinct molecular mechanisms to activate the angiogenic switch Therefore, it is doubtful that a single antiangiogenic strategy will suffice for all human cancers; rather, a number of agents will be needed, each responding to distinct programs of angiogenesis used by different human cancers
Four randomized phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab (Avastin; a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits VEGF) to chemotherapy results in significantly improved response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival when compared to treatment with chemotherapy alone (Table 80-3) This effect was shown in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colon, lung, and breast cancers, and in the second-line treatment of colon cancer However, not all trials have been positive;
in previously treated breast cancer, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine (an oral fluoropyrimidine) did not increase efficacy, and in previously untreated pancreatic cancer, bevacizumab did not enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine
Table 80-3 Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials Demonstrating the Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for the
Trang 3Treatment of Advanced Cancers
Tu
mor Type
Stage
of Disease
Previ ous
Treatment
Num ber of Patients
Chemothe rapy Regimen
Outc ome
Col
on cancer
Metas tatic
+ 5-FU/LV ± bevacizumab
Incre
(20.3 vs 15.6 months), PFS (10.6 vs 6.2 months),
(44.8 vs 34.8%)
Col
on cancer
Metas tatic
Seco
nd line;
previous irinotecan/5 -FU
± bevacizumab
Incre
(12.9 vs 10.8 months), PFS (7.2 vs
Trang 44.8 months),
RR (21.8 vs 9.2%)
Non
-small cell
lung
cancer
(excluding
squamous
histology)
Metas tatic
num + paclitaxel
± bevacizumab
Incre
(12.5 vs 10.2 months), PFS (6.4 vs 4.5 months),
RR (27.2 vs 10.0%)
Bre
ast cancer
Recur
metastatic
± bevacizumab
Incre ased PFS (11.0 vs 6.2 months), RR (28 vs 14%)
Note: 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; LV, leucovoran; OS, overall survival; PFS,
progression-free survival; RR, response rate; FOLFOX, folinic acid (LV), 5-FU,
Trang 5and oxaliplatinum