1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Improved Outcomes in Colon and Rectal Surgery part 36 pps

10 320 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 338,9 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Biologic Response Modifiers In 1998, the FDA approved use of Infliximab for use in treatment of moderate to severely active CD and patients with fistulizing Crohn’s disease, who have had

Trang 1

Although TPMT testing is helpful in avoiding early, profound

bone marrow suppression, it should not take the place of careful

monitoring of full blood counts throughout the duration of

treat-ment on AZA/6-MP If the patient is a slow metabolizer, clinical

decision on treatment dose with consideration for lower dosing

and closer follow-up must be made, while those that are deficient

should not be treated due to bone marrow toxicity Patients who

are found to be nonresponders are suggested to have metabolite

testing The utility of measuring the 6-MP metabolites 6-TGN

and 6-MMP has been debated in the literature and even referred

to as the “metabolite controversy” According to expert opinion, it

would seem reasonable to recommend checking 6-TGN/6-MMP

metabolites when patients are not achieving therapeutic efficacy

despite adequate weight-based dosing to ascertain noncompliance

or metabolism favoring 6-MMP.(59)

Methotrexate has also been shown to be effective in CD for

both treating active disease (66) and maintaining remission (67)

However, like AZA/6-MP, its slow onset of action limits its use in

induction therapy Nausea is a common side effect of methotrexate,

but more serious concerns over opportunistic infections,

hypersen-sitivity pneumonitis, and hepatotoxicity add to the factors limiting

its use as a first line immunomodulator in treatment of CD

Although some data have suggested a beneficial effect of

high-dose cyclosporine in active luminal CD (68), the benefit was not

durable (69) An open-label trial of 16 patients with fistulizing

dis-ease found that cyclosporine treatment resulted in 88% response

and 44% complete closure.(70) However, a comprehensive review

of the literature has shown that 39 patients with fistulizing disease

who were treated with cyclosporine had 82% relapse rate in absence

of oral cyclosporine.(71) Therefore, cyclosporine is not

recom-mended for use in luminal CD and its use in fistulizing disease

with subsequent maintenance therapy on AZA/6-MP is debatable

(72) Cyclosporine has several serious side effects including renal

failure, seizures, and opportunistic infections

Biologic Response Modifiers

In 1998, the FDA approved use of Infliximab for use in treatment of

moderate to severely active CD and patients with fistulizing Crohn’s

disease, who have had inadequate response to conventional

ther-apy In fact, it is the first drug to gain FDA approval for treatment

of CD Prior to the late 1990s, patients who had failed response to

first-line therapies or were steroid-dependent had few nonsurgical

options The mechanism of action of biologic response modifiers

in CD is through the interaction of the interleukins and cytokines

Neutrophils from patients with colitis (e.g., CD, ulcerative colitis,

and infectious colitis) all produce significantly more IL-1 and TNF

than neutrophils from healthy controls.(73)

Infliximab is a chimeric IgG-1 monoclonal antibody

com-prised of 75% human and 25% murine sequences, which has a

high specificity for and affinity to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α

The pivotal trial for assessing the efficacy of Infliximab in CD in

1997 showed 33% rate of remission and 81% overall symptom

improvement in patients who had been resistant to conventional

treatment.(74) However, up to 40% of patients do not respond

to treatment initially The standard dose of Infliximab at 5 mg/

kg of body weight given as infusion every 8 weeks can sustain

remission for up to 1 year in only 30% of initial responders This

is likely due to a combination of loss of efficacy and intolerable side effects Infliximab also has modest steroid-sparing efficacy where at week 54, about 3 times as many patients (29% vs 9%)

on Infliximab versus placebo had discontinued treatment with corticosteroids while maintaining clinical remission.(75)

The efficacy of regularly scheduled treatment versus episodic treatment with Infliximab for patients with CD was compared

in a posthoc analysis of the ACCENT I trial in 2004.(76) It was shown that regularly scheduled treatment resulted in a higher proportion of patients in remission at weeks 10, 14, 22, and 46 compared with the episodic treatment group Patients were also found to have improved mucosal healing, less likelihood of hav-ing antibodies to Infliximab, fewer Crohn’s-related hospitaliza-tions, and fewer surgeries if on regularly scheduled treatment Infliximab therapy causes antibody formation in up to 61%

of patients and they correlate with increased risk of transfusion reactions as well as decline in efficacy.(77) Concomitant use

of AZA/6-MP has been shown to reduce rate of antibodies to Infliximab (ATI), although currently there is no prospective trial comparing remission and response rates in patients concomi-tantly using AZA/6-MP and Infliximab.(78–80)

Infliximab is also effective in closure of perianal enterocutane-ous and rectovaginal fistulas and maintaining fistula closure Two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shown closure rate of 55% at week 4 and maintenance of closure in 39%

of patients respectively.(81, 82)

In February 2007, Adalimumab gained FDA approval for the treatment of moderate to severe CD Adalimumab is a fully human recombinant immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and specificity to human soluble TNF Its efficacy is similar to Infliximab except that there is currently not enough evidence to comment on its value in fistulizing dis-ease.(83) However, certain features make it more attractive for use in clinical practice It is thought that Adalimumab may be less immunogenic because it is a fully human antibody Indeed, some evidence does exist for inducing remission in those who cannot tolerate Infliximab or have disease activity despite receiv-ing Infliximab therapy.(84) Another advantage is that it is admin-istered as a subcutaneous injection whereas Infliximab must be given as an infusion

Main side effects of Infliximab and Adalimumab include infec-tions, infusion reacinfec-tions, serum-sickness-like reactions and a pos-sible increased risk of lymphoma A tuberculin skin test should be done before initiating therapy, as reactivation of latent tuberculosis

is a potential complication

Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence

Approximately 75% of patients with CD require surgery within the first 20 years after symptom onset.(85, 86) Several studies have shown that, 1-year postresection, the endoscopic recurrence rate

is near 73% with clinical relapse rate of 50% in 5 years.(87, 88) Increased risk of recurrence is associated with the following prog-nostic variables at the time of surgery: female gender, perianal dis-ease, smoking, use of 5-ASA, jejunal site, ileal and ileocolonic site, and Nod2/Card15 gene variants Severity of endoscopic recur-rence at the neoterminal ileum within 1 year of surgery was found

to be the most powerful predictor of symptomatic recurrence.(89)

Trang 2

Most studies of postoperative recurrence of CD have found that

endoscopic findings predate clinical relapse

Management options to prevent postoperative recurrence vary

and depend on the patient The first line treatment, despite

mar-ginal efficacy, has been mesalamine Most studies only

demon-strate a modest relative risk reduction in recurrence rates when

compared to placebo A recent meta-analysis showed an

abso-lute risk reduction of 10% in postoperative patients at 2 years

(90) The largest benefit was found in pts with ileitis and

pro-longed disease duration The number needed to treat (NNT) to

prevent one relapse was found to be 10 patients.(91) Whether or

not this is a clinically relevant finding and the financial cost and

effort spent in taking these medications merit their use is highly

debatable Azathioprine and 6-MP have both been used

exten-sively in the postoperative patient, but data is limited and shows

only modest efficacy for prevention of recurrence The general

consensus is that larger blinded controlled trials are warranted

A randomized, prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled,

dou-ble-blind, double-dummy trial done in 2004 by Hanauer showed

relapse rates of 50% with 6-MP (50 mg), 58% with mesalamine

(3 g), and 77% with placebo.(92) There were several shortcomings

in this study, including the use of a suboptimal fixed dose of 6-MP,

a high drop-out rate, higher clinical vs endoscopic relapse rate, and

lack of a validated, reproducible clinical index used to judge clinical

relapse A prospective, open-label, randomized study of 142 patients

who received AZA (2 mg/kg/day) or mesalamine (3 g/day) for

24 months found AZA effective in preventing relapse in those patients

who had undergone previous intestinal resection.(93) Shortcomings

of this study included open label bias Currently, AZA/6-MP use is

recommended for postoperative prophylaxis in those patients who

are deemed to have high risk of recurrence or in those for whom

recurrence would have substantially harmful effects

The use of antibiotics has been long debated in the prevention of

recurrence in the postoperative Crohn’s patient There are no large

controlled trials that show clear effectiveness of the use of antibiotics

in postoperative Crohn’s patients beyond 1 year One large trial on

metronidazole has shown a 4% clinical recurrence rate in the

treat-ment group versus 25% in placebo group at 1 year, 52% endoscopic

recurrence versus 75% in the placebo group at 3 months, and no

significant difference in clinical recurrence rate at 2 or 3 years.(94)

Another trial of Ornidazole showed an 8% clinical recurrence versus

38% with placebo at 1 year, but no significant difference at 2 or

3 years.(95) These agents may be considered for prevention of

post-operative recurrence but their utility beyond 1 year and potential for

considerable side effects in long- term use limit their clinical utility

The last group that has shown possible effectiveness in

post-operative Crohn’s patients is the biologic response modifiers, but

these have yet to be adequately studied in this setting A

nonran-domized, open-label, single-center experience involving 7 patients

who received Infliximab with methotrexate has demonstrated no

endoscopic or clinical recurrence at 2 years.(96) Adalimumab has

not been studied in this respect Multicenter, randomized,

con-trolled studies are needed to further define the role of Anti-TNF

agents in postoperative recurrence of CD

Treatments that have been shown to be ineffective in the

pre-vention of postoperative recurrence are systemic corticosteroids,

budesonide, probiotics, and interleukin-10

Nutritional Therapy

There is no proof that any food or substance is responsible for causing the initial episode or recurrence of CD.(97) The biggest challenge in patients with CD is restoration and maintenance of weight, particularly in the presence of sepsis and/or obstruction

SurgICal trEatMEnt Indication

Table 32.2 summarizes the indications for surgical treatment of

a CD.(98) Surgical management of CD has changed considerably dur-ing the past as a result of numerous advances in medical therapy Regardless of these developments, patients with CD will undergo

a surgical procedure in up to 80% of the cases.(99) Patients often come to the surgeons office with worsening symptoms, a compli-cation, or as steroid-dependent

Failure of medical therapy or complications of medical therapy

• Surgery may be indicated if the medication cannot control inflammation and its symptoms, or if the medication causes significant intolerable or inducible side effects Symptoms that can be an indication for surgery includes diarrhea, anemia, pain, weight loss, sepsis, and obstruction Most patients are either ste-roid-dependent or steroid-resistent (100) by the time of surgical consultation In addition, pancreatitis from GRMP, osteoporosis from steroids, and leucopenia from infliximab are all potential reasons for surgery to be recommended

Acute and chronic disease complications

• Although rates are decreasing, up to 20% of procedures are still performed to treat acute complications.(101) Among the indica-tions is toxic megacolon, obstruction, hemorrhage, perforation with or without peritonitis, and abscess

Perforation

According to the Viena classification, intestinal perforation is a penetrating disease The penetrating disease behavior is defined

by the occurrence of intraabdominal or perianal fistulas, inflam-matory masses or abscesses, or perianal ulcers at any time in the course of disease Neither postoperative intraabdominal compli-cations nor perianal skintags constitute evidence of penetrating disease.(102) Penetration of the bowel wall often presents not as

an acute abdomen but as an indolent process related to fistuliza-tion Diffuse peritonitis due to perforation is a rare but recognized complication of Crohn’s disease Perianal disease manifestations include perianal pain and drainage from large skin tags, anal

Table 32.2 Indications for Surgery in Crohn’s Disease.

Failure of medical management Complications of Medical Management

Dysplasia/carcinoma Growth retardation

Trang 3

fissures, perirectal abscesses, and anorectal fistulae Emergency

surgical therapy for a perforation behavior includes: free

perfora-tion, intraabdominal abscess or masses with sepsis, and intestinal

obstruction

In Crohn’s disease, free perforation is a rare but severe

com-plication occurring in 1% to 3% of cases.(103) Free perforation

in the absence of a megacolon should alert for the suspicion of

CD It can occur anywhere in the gastro-intestinal tract, from

the stomach through the colon; a distal stricture might exist and

make the perforation possible Other etiologies for perforation

include the presence of malignancy, and of endoscopic

proce-dures Frequently, the perforations are sealed Gastro-duodenum

perforations are best treated by debridement and primary suture

For jejuno-ileal perforations, resection and primary anastomosis

are best if feasible and conditions favorable Factors associated

with postoperative complications include abscess,

enterocutane-ous fistulae, steroid-dependence, and albumin <2 g/L If one or

more of the risk factors is present, a diversion is suggested.(104)

Colonic perforation in Crohn’s colitis, often seen in the setting

of toxic colitis, usually requires subtotal colectomy with rectal

preservation and end ileostomy If the etiology is not toxic

coli-tis, a segmental resection and fecal diversion might be an option

(105) A postcolonoscopic perforation must be managed

regard-ing the absence or presence of CD at the site of perforation and

elsewhere in the colon If the perforation occurs in a diseased

seg-ment, the segment along with the perforation is reseated to allow

reconstruction with or without fecal diversion depending upon

the factors mentioned above.(104) If perforation occurs during

a follow-up for surveillance, resection or primary repair may be

feasible

Abscess

Between 10–30% of patients with CD may present with

intraab-dominal abscesses Abscesses can develop because of a local

sealed perforation, in association with a fistula, or postoperatively

because of intraabdominal contamination or anastomotic leakage

Yamaguchi et al found that almost 50% of the abscess were due

to an anastomosis (surgical anastomosis and peristomal) (106),

Preoperative percutaneous transcutaneous drainage and

admin-istration of antibiotics is preferable if possible Otherwise, surgery

with resection of the disease site is necessary

Perianal CD

Perianal Crohn’s Disease (PCD) occurs in 5–25% of CD patients

and can be associated with active disease in the proximal

gas-trointestinal tract or colon in about one-third to one-half of

patients It is often associated with colonic and rectal

inflamma-tion Perianal manifestations include cutaneous (tag and

ulcer-ations), anal canal lesions (fissures, ulcers, stenosis), and septic

(abscess, fistulas) (Figure 32.3)

The purpose of surgical treatment in PCD is to improve quality

of life and offer effective palliation, and therefore is reserved for

patients who develop perianal complications of the disease or are

unresponsive to aggressive medical therapy The surgical

treat-ment of PCD can be divided into two main categories: urgent and

emergent treatment (to control perineal sepsis); and elective (to

treat sequelae such as perianal fistulas and anal strictures).(107)

Prompt and definitive surgical incision and drainage is required in all patients suspected of having acute abscesses These lesions will not spontaneously resolve and delays can lead

to uncontrolled sepsis with necrotizing infections, sphincter impairment and anal stenosis If a fistula is identified a noncut-ting Seton (nonabsorbable suture) is inserted through the fistula tract to ensure continuous drainage, leading to the resolution

of the perianal sepsis Primary fistulotomy should be avoided Premature removal of the seton increases the incidence of recur-rent perianal sepsis If the abscess is superficial, the procedure may be completed under anesthesia It is important to mini-mize trauma or additional injuries so that the incision must be

as close as possible to the anal verge Excision of skin edge or latex mushroom catheter placement can be utilized to obtain adequate drainage

Fistulotomy can be safely performed on simple (low) fistulas which do not include any significant portion of the external anal sphincter, in patients without active proctitis, well-controlled proximal luminal disease and adequate continence

Endorectal advancement flap is a surgical technique that repairs perineal fistulas with the preservation of anal sphincter function The principal idea of this procedure is to surgically close the internal opening of the fistula using a flap made of rec-tal wall, allowing the healing of the fistula from inside out The reported success rate of endorectal advancement flap in patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas ranges from 25 to 100% in different series, with an average success of approximately 50–60%.(108) Elective surgery for PCD may include procedures for nonfistulous complications such as dilation of anorectal strictures Most com-monly, however, patients with PCD will require surgery to repair perianal and rectovaginal fistulas not responsive to medical ther-apy, which may include fistulotomy, fibrin glue injection, transanal endorectal flap advancement, and gracilis muscle interposition Fibrin Glue is a technically simple procedure for the treatment of perianal fistulas and it is associated with low risk and early return

to normal activity Fibrin glue is a blood by-product that uses the activation of thrombin to form a fibrinclot, mechanically sealing the

Figure 32.3 Typical perianal Crohn’s Disease with associated fistulas and scars from

prior surgery (Picture taken by Badma Bashankaev, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida).

Trang 4

fistula tract Series using fibrin glue for perianal fistulas of mixed

eti-ologies have yielded success rates of approximately 30–70%.(109)

Gracilis transposition can be an option in patients after

proc-tocolectomy or others types of CD related fistulas in whom other

options may have failed before proctocolectomy.(110) Occasionally,

temporary diverting colostomy or ileostomy is required to control

symptoms, and in extremely severe cases resistant to both

medi-cal and surgimedi-cal therapy, proctectomy or proctocolectomy may be

required

The PCD score developed by Wexner et al can be very helpful

in selecting therapeutic alternatives and in prognostication.(111)

The PCD Activity Index analyzes 6 features in PCD: abscess,

fistula, fissure and/or ulcer, stenosis, and incontinence

Obstruction

Gastrointestinal obstruction usually results from acute active

inflammation superimposed on a stenotic segment Mass effect

from an adjacent phlegmon or abscess is not an uncommon

sce-nario Malignancy must be excluded in CD strictures involving the

colon Yamazaki et al noted a 6.8% malignancy rate in 132 patients

with colonic Crohn’s disease complicated by stricture.(112)

Although traditionally by-pass without vagotomy was

consid-ered the best option for gastro-duodenal obstruction

stricture-plasty has become acceptable.(113)

Complete or near-complete intestinal obstruction

unrespon-sive to medical therapy requires surgical correction Depending on

location, this treatment involves either resection or strictureplasty

(114) If malignancy is present or suspected, a resection is obviously

indicated following standard oncologic principles

Bleeding

Whereas mild gastrointestinal bleeding is a common

manifes-tation of inflammatory bowel disease, severe bleeding is a rare

phenomenon CD has been reported to be an established source

of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, in 0.9% to 2.5% of patients with

this disease.(115) CD bleeding is often from a localized source

This is caused by erosion of a blood vessel within multiple deep

ulcerations that extend into bowel wall The small bowel is the

site of bleeding in 65% of cases, whereas the colon was involved

in 12%, and in 23% the site could not be identified

It is important to exclude a gastroduodenal source before bowel

resection Angiography is often performed to identify and possibly

treat the bleeding site by selective or superselective angiographic

infusion of vasopressin.(116) Embolization should be the initial

treatment of choice in CD in an attempt to avoid surgical

resec-tion Cirocco et al (115) reported that surgical resection offered

excellent palliation, with low mortality (3%) and a low

rebleed-ing rate (3.5%) Surgery is indicated in those patients who fail to

show improvement of bleeding after 4 to 6 units of blood, have

recurrent hemorrhage, or have other indications to resect diseased

bowel.(114) A bowel preparation is contraindicated, and the aim

is to remove the patient from life threatening hemorrhage

Toxic Megacolon

Toxic megacolon is a potentially lethal complication which has

gradually decreased in incidence because of earlier recognition

and intensive management of severe colitis A possible mechanism

is that mucosal inflammation sequentially leads to the release of inflammatory mediators and bacterial products, increased nitric oxide syntheses, generation of excessive nitric oxide, and colonic dilation Toxic megacolon affects all ages and both genders Signs and symptoms of acute colitis that are frequently resistant to therapy are often present for at least 1 week before the onset of acute dilatation Severe bloody diarrhea is the most common pre-senting symptom, while improvement of diarrhea usually occurs because of the onset of megacolon Other futures include malaise and abdominal pain and distention.(117) Up to 47% of patients require surgery due to failure in medical therapy Factors affecting mortality are age (>40), gender (female), and presence of colonic perforation The overall mortality rate is 16%.(118)

Although the frequencies of performed emergency surgery have decreased, improved medical treatment has lead to higher rates of elective operations Siassi et al published a 33 years expe-rience, and prospectively found that the rates of elective sur-gery rose from 69.5% (1970 to 1980) to 81.4% (1981–1991) and 80.9% (1992–2002) (101) This change might reflect the changes

in disease location Combined large/small bowel resections such

as ileocecal resections increased from 27.5% (1970–1980) to 41.9% (1981–1991) and 67.1% (1992–2002) (101), as CD limited

to this region that is unresponsive to medical management is best treated by ileocolectomy and anastomosis (119) Similar results were found by Reissman et al with a 59% rate of ileocolectomy and anastomosis.(120)

SpECIFIC ConSIdEratIonS In SurgICal tEChnIquES For Cd patIEnt

The philosophy behind surgical intervention in Crohn’s disease rests on the fact that Crohn’s disease is currently incurable and potentially involves the entire intestine, and that surgery relieve only the complications

Strictureplasty

Over one-third of patients with CD will develop an intestinal stricture and the great majority of these will require at least one surgical procedure The initial view was that strictureplasty should only be undertaken for recurrent disease and in patients who have had previous multiple resections The potential benefits

of any surgery include symptom relief, improved nutritional sta-tus, and reduced dependence on medication The most obvious advantage of strictureplasty over resection is that the development

of short bowel syndrome can be avoided All jejunoileal strictures and most duodenal strictures are able to strictureplasty.(121) The procedure can also be undertaken in patients with symptomatic anastomotic strictures Table 32.3 shows current indications for strictureplasty and contraindications.(122)

There are two main types of operation used The Heineke– Mikulicz procedure is used for strictures of up to 10 cm in length For strictures up to 25 cm long, the Finney procedure (a side to side amastomosis) is done Most of the others methods of strictureplasty are generally derivations of one of the above methods, or a combi-nation of both In 2000, Tichansky et al published a meta-analysis that showed that Heineke-Mikulicz technique is most often used for Crohn’s strictureplasty However, the outcome revealed that the Finney strictureplasty may reduce the reoperation rate.(123)

Trang 5

Stricture biopsy

The morbidity rate ranges from 10.2–13%, with fistula

forma-tion as the most frequent complicaforma-tion.(123) Strictureplasty has

been found to be a safe and efficacious procedure for small bowel

Crohn’s disease.(124)

Resection

The most common surgery is ileocolic resection (Figure 32.4a,

32.4b, 32.4c), usually undertaken for medical therapy failure, fistula,

obstruction, mass, perforation, or malignancy The development of

malignancy increased to 4 to 20 times of the average population

As previously mentioned, strictureplasty site should be evaluated

for intraoperative biopsy and resection, the only procedure which

should be considered in the setting of carcinoma Over the past two

decades, laparoscopic resection has demonstrated clear superiority

over laparotomy relative to postoperative recovery, cost, morbidity,

cosmesis, and long-term bowel obstruction.(125–128)

Regardless of the technique of resection performed, the

anas-tomosis should be between two and of grossly normal bowel

Histologic disease free margins and further resection add no

ben-efit and may predispose to the onset of short bowel syndrome

Bemelman et al (129) showed that medical therapy was able

to prevent surgery in one third of the cases of CD in the terminal

ileum Patients who probably will fail medical therapy are those

with stenosis, extraintestinal manifestation, or known history of CD

for more than 5 years Some patients might undergo resection if the

obstruction is contra-indicated to have strictureplasty Many studies

compare the outcomes between medical therapy and conventional

laparoscopic procedure A meta-analysis done in 2007 showed

14 studies with 881 patients The operative time for laparoscopic

surgery was longer, but morbidity was lower.(130)

The Surgical treatment for large bowel Crohn’s disease has

included total proctocolectomy, segmental colectomy or

colec-tomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), depending on severity and

disease distribution Conventional proctocolectomy is reserved

for those patients with anorectal involvement, but in the 50%

of patients with large bowel Crohn’s disease with rectal sparing,

Table 32.3 Current indication for strictureplasty and

contraindications

Indication

Previous extensive (>100 cm) resections of small bowel

Short bowel syndrome

Duodenal strictures

Rapid recurrence of disease with obstruction

Strictures at previous anastomotic sites, particularly ileorectal or ileocolic

Fibrotic strictures within diffuse involvement of the small bowel

Small bowel stricture (active or nonactive disease)

Contra indications

Perforation of the small bowel, with or without peritonitis

Serum albumin <2.0 g dl

Fistula or phlegmonous inflammation at intended strictureplasty site

Likelihood of tension on closure of strictureplasty

Intended strictureplasty site next to segment requiring resection

Presence of malignancy

Figure 32.4 (A)Terminal ileal strictures are the most common cause for surgery

(Picture taken by Wang Hao, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida) (B) The best surgical option for stricturing terminal ileal disease is often an ileocolic resection (Picture taken by Wang Hao, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida) (C) The length

of the narrowing in the small bowel varies (Picture taken by Wang Hao, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida)

(A)

(B)

(C)

Trang 6

Figure 32.5 (A) After an ileocolic resection, the recurrence is most commoly at the anastomotic site (arrow) (Picture taken by Jorge Canedo, M.D., Cleveland Clinic

Florida) (B) A 15 cm stricture; also note the creeping fat (Picture taken by Jorge Canedo, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida) (C) Small bowel resection and anastomosis (Picture taken by Jorge Canedo, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida) (D) Note the thick fibrotic stricture (Picture taken by Jorge Canedo, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Florida)

(D) (C)

resection diminishes over time, especially from more than 20 years after the first resection.(133)

Bypass

Bypass surgery enjoyed popularity many decades ago, at the begin-ning of CD surgery, when complication rates for resection were high However, it fell out of use due to high rates of recurrence, great metabolic changes, higher risk of malignancy, and higher rates of postoperative complications.(104)

Bypass surgery is currently undertaken for duodenal stricture, although fecal diversion may have a long dysfunctional segment Diversion without resection may be indicated in very selective situations, like severe perianal disease.(134)

poStopEratIvE rECurrEnCE aFtEr SurgEry

Rates for recurrence after resection are up to 73% after 1 year, although only 20% of patients have symptoms After 3 years, recurrence has been noted in 85% of patients, with symptoms present in only 34% The site of recurrence is usually the anasto-mosis site.(135)

segmental resection or colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis has

been used A meta-analysis done in 2005 comparing segmental

ver-sus subtotal ⁄ total colectomy concluded that both procedures were

equally effective as treatment options for colonic Crohn’s disease,

however, patients in the SC group exhibited recurrence earlier than

those in the IRA group.(131) The choice of operation is dependent

on the extent of colonic disease Better outcomes are expected for

IRA in patients with two or more colonic segments involved

A meta-analysis done in 2007 compared the end-to-end

anas-tomisis to other configurations (132) and found that end-to-end

anastomosis after resection for Crohn’s disease may be associated

with increased anastomotic leak rates Side-to-side anastomosis

may lead to fewer anastomotic leaks and overall postoperative

com-plications, a shorter hospital stay, and a perianastomotic recurrence

rate comparable to end-to-end anastomosis Further randomized,

controlled trials should be performed for confirmation

Resection is contra-indicated in duodenum stricture, due the

high risk of the procedure In order to avoid short small bowel

syndrome, the resection should include macroscopic intestinal

disease It is known that activity of CD necessitating intestinal

Trang 7

Reoperation for recurrence rates after strictureplasty is between

24–26% after 5 years Medical therapy may have a great value in

lowering rates of recurrence Smoking significantly increases the

risk of recurrence after surgery for CD, especially in women, and

it is dose-dependent Another feature that influences recurrence

after surgery is a short duration of disease before surgery

The site of the disease also affects recurrence rates, as small bowel

and ileocolic disease have higher rates of recurrence (Figure 32.5a,

32.5b, 32.5c, 32.5d) Perforation is associated with a higher rate

of recurrence in patients who have had a colonic resection.(136)

Gender, family history of CD, blood transfusion, length of resection,

presence of granuloma in the specimen, and postoperative

compli-cations do not correlate with recurrence

qualIty oF lIFE aFtEr SurgEry:

Patients who undergo surgical treatment for CD experience

improve-ment in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) up to 1 year after

surgery Most of the studies focus on assessment of quality of life for

ileocolic resection, the most common procedure Controversies exist

as to whether there is actually improvement or not in a long term

fol-low-up for these patients Thaler et al (137) concluded that HRQL

actually reduces in patients with CD in a long-term follow-up, no

matter whether the surgery was open or laparoscopic compared to a

normal control population And recurrence was the most important

factor adversely affecting quality of life

Casellas et al (138) analyzed the impact of previous surgery

for complicated or refractory CD on HRQOL The results

indi-cated that patients with active CD have a serious impairment in

HRQOL and patients with a history of previous surgical bowel

resection are not different from patients who have never had

surgery, as long as those patients remain in clinical remission

rEFErEnCES

1 Crohn BB, Ginzburg L, Oppenheimer GD Regional ileitis

A pathological and Clinical entity JAMA 1932; 99: 1323–9

2 Lockhart-Mummery HE, Morson BC Crohn’s disease

(regional enteritis) of the large intestine and its distinction

from ulcerative colitis Gut 1960; 1: 87–105

3 Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P Chapter 54: Crohn’s Disease in the

… edition of Diseases of the Gut and Liver

4 Heresbach D, Alexandre JL, Bretagne JF ABERMAD

((Association Bretonne d’Etude et de Recherche sur les

Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif) Crohn’s disease in the

over-60 age group: a population based study Eur J Gastroenterol

Hepatol 2004; 16(7): 657–64

5 Andres PG, Fridman LS Epidemiology and the natural

course of inflammatory bowel disease Gastroenterology

Clin North Am 1999; 28(2): 255–81

6 Loftus EV Jr, Snadborn WJ Epidemiology of inflammatory

bowel disease Gastroenterol clin North Am 2002; 31: 1–20

7 Nikolaus S, Schreiber S Diagnostics of inflamatory bowel

disease Gastroenterology 2007; 133(5): 1670–89

8 Gasche C, Lomer MCE, Cavill I Weiss, G Iron, anaemia,

and inflammatory bowel diseases Gut 2004; 53(8): 1190–7

9 Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P Laboratory markers

in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut 2006; 55(3):

426–33

10 Denis MA, Reenaers C, Fontaine F, Belạche J, Louis E Assessment of endoscopic activity index and biological inflamatory markers in clinical active Crohn’s disease with normal c-reative protein serum level Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13(9): 1100–5

11 Papp M, Norman GL, Altorjay I, Lakatos PL Utility of sero-logical markers in inflammatory bowel diseases: Gadget or magic? World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(14): 2028–36

12 Ferrante M, Henckaerts L, Joossens M et al New serological markers in inflammatory bowel disease are associated with complicated disease behaviour Gut 2007; 56(10): 1394–403

13 D’Incà R, Dal Pont E, Di Leo V Calprotectin and lactoferrin

in the assessment of intestinal inflammation and organic disease Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 429–37

14 Gionchetti P Imaging of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease:

a review of old and new techniques World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(24): 3279–87

15 Antes G Barium examinations of the small intestine and the colon in inflammatory bowel disease Radiologe 2003; 43(1): 9–16

16 Lemberg DA, Clarkson CM, Bohane TD, Day AS Role of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the initial assessment of

children with inflammatory bowel disease J Gastroenterol

Hepatology 2005; 20: 1696–700

17 Isaacs KL Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in inflam-matory bowel disease Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002; 12: 451–62

18 Nahon S, Bouhnik Y, Lavergne-Slove A et al Colonoscopy accurately predicts the anatomical severity of colonic Crohn’s disease attacks: correlation with findings from colectomy specimens Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97(12): 3102–7

19 Gan SI, Beck PL A new look at toxic megacolon: an update and review of incidence, etiology, pathogenesis, and man-agement AJG 2003; 98(11): 2363–71

20 Minderhoud IM, Samson M, Oldenburg B What predicts mucosal inflamation in Crohn’s disease patients? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13(12): 1567–72

21 Parente F, Grecoa S, Moltenia M, Anderlonic A, Porroa GP Imaging inflammatory bowel disease using bowel ultra-sound Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 17: 283–291

22 Parente F, Maconi G, Bollani S et al Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn’s disease and detection of related small bowel strictures A prospective comparative study versus X-ray andintraoperative findings Gut 2002; 50: 490–5

23 Maconi G, Sampietro G, Parente F et al Contrast radiol-ogy, computer tomography and ultrasonography in detect-ing septic abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease Am

J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1545–55

24 Maconi G, Ardizzone S, Greco S et al Transperineal ultra-sound in the detection of perianal and rectovaginal fistulae in Crohn’s disease Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102(10): 2214–9

25 Schlottmanna K, Kratzerb W, Schưlmericha J Doppler ultrasound and intravenous contrast agents in gastrointes-tinal tract disorders: current role and future implications Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 17(3): 263–75

26 Turetsschek K, Gasche C Current status and new imaging trends in IBD In: Bernstein CN, eds The Inflammatory

Trang 8

Bowel Disease Yearbook London: Remedica Publishing,

2003:129–45

27 Rajesh A, Maglint DDT Multislice CT enteroclysis:

tech-nique and clinical applications Clin Radiol 2006; 61, 31–9

28 Andersen K, Vogt C, Blondin D et al Multi-detector CT

colonography in inflammatory bowel disease: prospective

analysis of CT-findings to high-resolution video

colonos-copy Eur J Radiol 2006; 8: 140–6

29 Carrascosa P, Castiglioni R, Capunãy C, López EM, Carrascosa

J CT colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease Abdom

Imaging 2007; 32: 596–601

30 Schwartz DA, Wiersema M, Dudiak KM et al A comparison

of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and

exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal

fistulas Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1064–72

31 Schwartz DA, White CM, Paul E et al Crohn’s perianal

fistulas Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005; 11: 727–32

32 Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella et al Crohn disease: magnetic

resonance enteroclysis Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 326–34

33 Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ et al MR Imaging evaluation of

the activity in Crohn’s disease AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;

177: 1325–32

34 Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D et al Magnetic

reso-nance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal

fistuliz-ing Crohn’s disease Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98(2): 332–9

35 Yamamoto H, Kito H Double-balloon endoscopy Curr

Opin Gastroenterol 2005; 21: 573–7

36 Oshitani N, Yukawa T, Yamagami H et al Evaluation of deep

small bowel involvement by double-balloon enteroscopy in

Crohn’s disease Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(7): 1484–9

37 Pohl J, May A, Nachbar L, Ell C Diagnostic and

therapeu-tic yield of push-and-pull enteroscopy for symptomatherapeu-tic

small bowel Crohn’s disease strictures Eur J Gastroenterol

Hepatol 2007; 19(7): 529–34

38 Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A et al Diagnosis of

small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of

capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and

fluoroscopic enteroclysis Gut 2005; 54(12): 1721–7

39 Park CH, Kim JO, Choi M et al Utility of capsule endoscopy

for the classification of Crohn’s disease: a multicenter study

in Korea Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52(6): 1405–9

40 Spada C, Shah SK, Riccioni MEl et al Video capsule

endos-copy in patients with known of suspected small bowel

stricture previously tested with the dissolving patency

capsule J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41(6): 576–82

41 Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K et al Noninvasive

assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography,

hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte

scin-tigraphy with labeled antibodies Am J Gastroenterol 2002;

97(8): 1978–85

42 Annovazzi A, Biancone L, Caviglia R et al

99mTc-inter-leukin-2 and 99mTc-HMPAO granulocyte scintigraphy in

patients with inactive Crohn’s disease Eur J Nucl Med 2003;

30: 374–82

43 Almer S, Granerus G; Ström M et al Leukocyte scintigraphy

compared to intraoperative small bowel enteroscopy and

laparotomy findings in Crohn’s disease Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13: 164–74

44 Saibeni S, Rondonotti E, Iozzelli A et al Imaging of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease: a review of old and new

techniques World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(24): 3279–87.

45 MacKalski BA, Bernstein CN New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease Gut 2006; 55: 733–41

46 Bergman R, Parkes M Systematic review: the use of mesala-zine in inflammatory bowel disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23(7): 841–55

47 Nielsen OH, Munck LK Drug insight: aminosalicylates for the treatment of IBD Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4(3): 160–70

48 Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR Medical manage-ment of mild to moderate Crohn’s disease: evidence-based treatment algorithms for induction and maintenance of remission Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26(7): 987–1003

49 Qureshi AI, Cohen RD Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005; 57(2): 281–302

50 Morikawa K, Watabe H, Araake M Morikawa S.Modulatory effect of antibiotics on cytokine production by human monocytes in vitro Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40(6): 1366–70

51 Xu G, Fujita J, Negayama K et al Effect of macrolide antibi-otics on macrophage functions Microbiol Immunol 1996; 40(7): 473–9

52 Caprilli R, Gassull MA, Escher JC et al European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation European evidence based consen-sus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: special situations Gut 2006; 55(Suppl 1): i36–58

53 Summers RW, Switz DM, Sessions JT et al National co- operative Crohn’s disease study group: results of drug treat-ment Gastroenterology 1979; 77: 847–69

54 Malchow H, Ewe K, Brandes JW et al European co-operative Crohn’s disease study (ECCDS): results of drug treatment Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 249–66

55 Irving PM, Gearry RB, Sparrow MP, Gibson PR Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn’s disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26(3): 313–29

56 Steinhart AH, Ewe K, Griffiths AM, Modigliani R, Thomsen

OO Corticosteroids for maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (4): CD000301

57 Kane SV, Schoenfeld P, Sandborn WJ et al The effective-ness of budesonide therapy for Crohn’s disease Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 1509–17

58 Sandborn WJ, Löfberg R, Feagan BG et al Budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease in medically induced remission: a predetermined pooled anal-ysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trials Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100(8): 1780–7

59 Siegel CA, Sands BE Review article: practical management

of inflammatory bowel disease patients taking immuno-modulators Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22(1): 1–16

60 Present DH, Korelitz BI, Wisch N et al Treatment of Crohn’s disease with 6-mercaptopurine A long-term, randomized, double-blind study N Engl J Med 1980; 302(18): 981–7

Trang 9

61 Pearson DC, May GR, Fick GH, Sutherland LR Azathioprine

and 6-mercaptopurine in Crohn disease A meta-analysis

Ann Intern Med 1995; 123(2): 132–42

62 Osterman MT, Kundu R, Lichtenstein GR, Lewis JD

Association of 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels and

inflamma-tory bowel disease activity: a meta-analysis Gastroenterology

2006; 130(4): 1047–53

63 Weinshilboum RM, Sladek SL Mercaptopurine

pharma-cogenetics: Monogenic inheritance of erythrocyte

thio-purine methyltransferase activity Am J Hum Genet 1980;

32: 651–62

64 Black AJ, McLeod HL, Capell HA et al Thiopurine

meth-yltransferase genotype predicts therapy-limiting severe

toxicity from azathioprine Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(9):

716–8

65 Gisbert JP, Nino P, Rodrigo L, Cara C, Guijarro LG

Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity and adverse

effects of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease:

long-term follow-up study of 394 patients Am J Gastroenterol

2006; 101(12): 2769–76

66 Feagan BG, Rochon J, Fedorak RN et al Methotrexate for the

treatment of Crohn’s disease The North American Crohn’s

Study Group Investigators N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 292–7

67 Feagan BG, Fedorak RN, Irvine EJ et al A comparison of

methotrexate with placebo for the maintenance of

remis-sion in Crohn’s disease North American Crohn’s Study

Group Investigators N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1627–32

68 Brynskov J, Freund L, Rasmussen SN et al A

placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of cyclosporine

therapy in active chronic Crohn’s disease N Engl J Med

1989; 321: 845–50

69 Brynskov J, Freund L, Norby Rasmussen S et al Final report

on a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized,

mul-ticentre trial of cyclosporin treatment in active chronic

Crohn’s disease Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26: 689–95

70 Present DH, Lichtiger S Efficacy of cyclosporine in treatment

of fistula of Crohn’s disease Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39: 374–80

71 McDonald JW, Feagan BG, Jewell D et al Cyclosporine

for induction of remission in Crohn’s disease Cochrane

Database Syst Rev 2005; 2: CD000297

72 Judge TA, Lichtenstein GR Treatment of fistulizing Crohn’s

disease Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2004; 33: 421–54,

xi–xii

73 Nikolaus S, Bauditz J, Gionchetti P et al Increased secretion

of pro-inflammatory cytokines by circulating

polymorpho-nuclear neutrophils and regulation by interleukin-10 during

intestinal inflammation Gut 1998; 42: 470–6

74 Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJ et al A

short-term study of chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2 to tumor

necrosis factor _ for Crohn’s disease Crohn’s Disease cA2

Study Group N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1029–35

75 Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR et al Maintenance

Infliximab for Crohn’s disease: the ACCENT I randomized

trial Lancet 2002; 359: 1541–9

76 Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR et al Comparison

of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab

in Crohn’s disease Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 402–13

77 Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S et al Influence of immuno-genicity on the long-term efficacy of Infliximab in Crohn’s disease N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 601–8

78 Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR et al ACCENT I Study Group Maintenance Infliximab for Crohn’s disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial Lancet 2002; 359: 1541–9

79 Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S et al Influence of immuno-genicity on the long-term efficacy of Infliximab in Crohn’s disease N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 601–8

80 Farrell RJ, Alsahli M, Jeen YT et al Intravenous hydrocortisone premedication reduces antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease: a randomized controlled trial Gastroenterology 2003; 124(4): 917–24

81 Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S et al Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease N Engl

J Med 1999; 340: 1398–405

82 Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN et al Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease N Engl

J Med 2004; 350: 876–85

83 Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P et al Human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody (Adalimumab)

in Crohn’s disease: the CLASSIC-I trial Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 323–33

84 Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, Colombel JF, Panaccione R et al Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn disease previously treated with Infliximab A randomized trial Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 829–38

85 Becker JM Surgical therapy for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohns Disease Gastroentero Clinic North Am 1999; 28: 371–390, viii–ix

86 Mekhjian HS, Switz DM, Watts HD et al: National Cooperative Crohns Disease Study: Factors determining recurrence of Crohns disease after surgery Gastroenterology 1979; 77: 907–13

87 Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease Ann Surg 2000; 231: 38–45

88 Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G et al Predictability of the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 956–63

89 Caprilli R, Corrao G, Taddei G et al: Prognostic factors for postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio del Colon e del Retto (GISC) Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 335–41

90 Cammà C, Giunta M, Rosselli M, Cottone M Mesalamine in the maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease: a metaanaly-sis adjusted for confounding variables Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 1465–73

91 Cottone M, Camma C Mesalamine and relapse prevention

in Crohn’s disease Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 597

92 Hanauer SB, Korelitz BI, Rutgeerts P et al Present DH Postoperative maintenance of Crohn’s disease remission with 6-mercaptopurine, mesalamine, or placebo: a 2-year trial Gastroenterology 2004; 127(3): 723–9

93 Ardizzone S, Maconi G, Sampietro GM et al Azathioprine and mesalamine for prevention of relapse after conservative surgery for Crohn’s disease Gastroenterology 2004; 127(3): 730–40

Trang 10

94 Rutgeerts P, Hiele M, Geboes K et al Controlled trial of

metronidazole treatment for prevention of Crohn’s

recur-rence after ileal resection Gastroenterology 1995; 108(6):

1617–21

95 Rutgeerts P, Van Assche G, Vermeire S et al Ornidazole for

prophylaxis of postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence:

a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Gastroenterology 2005; 128(4): 856–61

96 Sorrentino D, Terrosu G, Avellini C, Maiero S Infliximab

with low-dose methotrexate for prevention of postsurgical

recurrence of ileocolonic Crohn disease Arch Intern Med

2007; 167(16): 1804–7

97 Kotze LMS Crohn’s Disease In: Dantas W, Koltze LMS, eds

Condutas em gastroenterologia 1st Ed Editora Revinter,

Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2004: 216–38

98 Fishera A, Fabrizio M Surgical Treatment of Crohn’s

Disease J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 791–803

99 Hancock L, Windsor AC, Mortensen NJ Inflammatory

bowel disease: the view of the surgeon Colorectal disease

2006; 8 (suppl 1): 10–4

100 Diziki A, Galbfach P Crohn’s disease when to operate?

Acta Chir Iugosl 2004; 51(2): 61–8

101 Siassi M, Weiger A, Hohenberger W, Kessler H Changes in

surgical therapy for Crohn’s disease over 33 years: a

prospec-tive longitudinal study Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 319–24

102 Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J et al A simple

classi-fication of Crohn’s disease: report of the Working Party for

the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998

Inflamm Bowel Dis 2000; 6(1): 8–15

103 Bundred NJ, Dixon JM, Lumsden AB, Gilmour HM, Davies

GC Free perforation in Crohn’s colitis: a ten year review

Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 35–7

104 Keighley MRB Surgical Management of Crohn’s Disease

in the Small Bowel (Chapter 55) In: Surgery of the Anus,

Rectum and Colon, eds Keighley MRB, Williams NS 1st

Edtion in Brasil Editora Manole Ltda, São Paulo-SP, 1998:

1608–50

105 Mahadevan U, Young-Fadok T Crohn’s Disease of the colon

In: Diseases of the Colon, eds Wexner SD, Stollman N

Informa Healthcare USA, Inc New York-NY, 2007: 625–46

106 Yamaguchi A, Matsui T, Sakurai T et al The clinical

charac-teristics and outcome of intraabdominal abscess in Crohn’s

disease J Gastroenterol 2004; 39(5): 441–8

107 Khaikin M, Chowers Y, Zmora O Perianal Crohn’s Disease

IMAJ 2007; 9: 163–8

108 Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI et al Endorectal

advance-ment flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated

anorectal fistulas Surgery 1993; 114: 682–90

109 O’connor L, Champagne BJ, Ferguson MA et al Efficacy of

anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistulas Dis

Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1569–73.

110 Rius J, Nessim A, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD Gracilis

transpo-sition in complicated perianal fistula and unhealed perineal

wounds in Crohn’s disease Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 218–22

111 Pikarsy AJ, Gervaz P, Wexner SD Perianal Crohn disease:

a new scoring system to evaluate and predict outcome of

surgical intervention Arch Surg 2002; 137: 774–7

112 Yamazaki Y, Ribeiro MB, Sachar DB, Aufses AH Jr, Greenstein

AJ Malignant strictures in Crohn’s disease Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 882–5

113 Takesue Y, Yokoyama T, Akagi S et al Strictureplasty for short duodenal stenosis in Crohn’s disease J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 929–32

114 Berg DF, Bahadursingh AM, Kaminski DL, Longo WE Acute surgical emergencies in inflammatory bowel disease

Am J Surg 2002; 184: 45–51

115 Cirocco WC, Reilly JC, Rusin LC Life-threatening hemor-rhage and exsanguination from Crohn’s disease Report of four cases Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 85–95

116 Kazama Y, Watanabe T, Akahane M et al Crohn’s disease with life-threatening hemorrhage from terminal ileum: successful control by superselective arterial embolization

J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 1155–7

117 Ng SC, Kamm MA Fulminant Crohn’s colitis: when only an antibody will do Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13(8): 971–4

118 Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB, Gibas A et al Outcome of toxic dilatation in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s colitis J Clin Gastroenterol 1985; 7(2): 137–43

119 Hamel CT, Hildebrandt U, Weiss EG, Feifelz G, Wexner SD Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Ileocolic resection vs subtotal colectomy Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 642–5

120 Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J et al Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease Am J Surg 1996; 171(1): 47–51

121 Roy P, Kumar D Strictureplasty Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1428–37

122 Roy P, Kumar D Strictureplasty for active Crohn’s disease

Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 427–32

123 Tichansky D, Cagir B, Yoo E, Marcus SM, Fry RD Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: meta-analysis Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 911–9

124 Fernhead NS, Chowdhury R, Box B et al Long-term follow-up of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease Br J Surg 2006; 93(4): 475–82

125 Wexner SD, Johansen OB Laparoscopic bowel resection: advantages and limitations Ann Med 1992; 24: 105–10

126 Schmitt SL, Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman

DG Does laparoscopic-assisted ilealpouch anal anastomo-sis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int J Colorectal Dis 1994; 9: 134–7

127 Fichera A, Peng SL, Elisseou NM, Rubin MA, Hurst RD Laparoscopy or conventional open surgery for patients with ileocolonic Crohn’s disease? A prospective study Surgery 2007; 142(4): 566–71

128 Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease:

a meta-analysis Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 576–85

129 Bemelman WA, Ivenski M, van Hogezand RA et al How effective is extensive nonsurgical treatment of patients with clinically active Crohn’s disease of the terminla ileum in preventing surgery? Dig Surg 2001; 18: 56–60

130 Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Lanitis S et al A comparison of segmental vs subtotal/total colectomyfor colonic Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 82–90

131 Simillis C, Pukayastha S, Yamamoto T et al A meta-anal-ysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs

Ngày đăng: 05/07/2014, 16:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN