Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba Assignment 3 marking rubrics dba
Trang 1This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Content
Analysis (50%)
20 to >15.9 pts
HD
Consistently Use appropriate IB
concepts and correct evidence from
the case Attempts to use and apply a
wide range of concepts
15.9 to >13.9 pts DI
Use appropriate IB concepts and correct evidence from the case
Attempts to use and apply a multiple concepts
13.9 to >11.9 pts CR
Use and apply IB concepts with some minor mistakes
11.9 to >9.9 pts PA
Analysis with the use of both IB concepts and evidence There are misuses of concepts
9.9 to >0 pts NN
No relation between evidence and concepts
20 pts
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance
Presentation slides (20%)
10 to >7.9 pts
HD
Slides were designed
professionally and
beautifully Visual aids were
suitably used No slides
contained excessive texts
Fonts were consistent in all
slides
7.9 to >6.9 pts DI
Slides were designed professionally Visual aids were suitably used Slides did not contain excessive texts Fonts were consistent
in all slides
6.9 to >5.9 pts CR
Slides were well designed Visual aids were suitably used
Slides did not contain excessive texts There could be some mistakes
in fonts
5.9 to >4.9 pts PA
Slides were not very well designed Visual aids were used but limited Some slides contained excessive texts There could be mistakes in fonts
4.9 to >0 pts NN
Slides were not done well Visual aids were limited, and excessive texts were used instead There could
be mistakes in fonts
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance
Delivery (20%)
20 to >15.9 pts
HD
Presentation was very
succinct and clear,
skilfully using verbal and
15.9 to >13.9 pts DI
Presentation was succinct and clear using verbal and non-verbal
13.9 to >11.9 pts CR
Presentation was communicated in a succinct and clear manner
11.9 to >9.9 pts PA
Presentation was mostly communicated in a succinct and clear manner
9.9 to >0 pts NN
Presentation was not communicated in a succinct and clear manner
Trang 2non-verbal
communication tools to
build a narrative around
the topic Excellent
projection, rhetoric,
modulation, pace,
pronunciation,
enthusiasm, humour,
gestures, movement,
attire, demeanour
Coordination among team
members skilfully
engaged the audience
Presentation was within
the timeframe Time was
very well divided
amongst the group
members
communication tools to build a narrative around the topic Good projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour
Coordination among team members was very good and engaged the audience Presentation was within the timeframe
Time was well divided amongst the group members
using verbal and non-verbal communication tools; There were few instances of poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Good coordination among team members and audience was engaged
Presentation was within the timeframe Time was generally divided amongst the group members
using verbal and non-verbal communication tools; There were many instances of poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation, enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour
General coordination among team members but audience engagement was lacking Presentation was within the timeframe
Time was generally divided amongst the group members
using verbal and non-verbal communication tools; Poor projection, rhetoric, modulation, pace, pronunciation Poor enthusiasm, humour, gestures, movement, attire, demeanour Presentation lacked coordination among team members, and did not engage the audience It might not delivered within the timeframe Time was not properly divided amongst the group members
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation performance
Ability to answer questions (10%)
10 to >7.9 pts
HD
Very competent answers to
questions: able to form
answers that are succinct,
clear and well supported
Q&A response was excellent
and handled by the whole
team
7.9 to >6.9 pts DI
Competent answers to questions: able to form answers that are mostly succinct, clear and supported
Q&A response was very good and handled by the whole team
6.9 to >5.9 pts CR
Quite good answers to questions: able to form answers which were at times unclear and not supported Q&A handled
by a minority of the team
5.9 to >4.9 pts PA
Poor answers to questions: unable to form answers Q&A handled by a minority of the team
4.9 to >0 pts NN
Poor answers to questions: unable to form answers Q&A was not addressed as a team
10 pts
Total Points: 100