DECONSTRUCTING MORALITY: A DISCOURSE ON THE FIRST ESSAY

THE EVOLUTION OF GOOD AND ITS CONTRARY SO THE IDEA OF GOOD AND NON-GOOD... WHERE DID IT ALL COME FROM? HOW THE IDEAS EVOLVED HOW THE RICH AND POWERFUL INTERFERED

Trang 1

SA21 // On the Genealogy of Morals, First Essay Castillo / Saw / Paris / Tan / Medina, K

Trang 2

SO WHAT’S IN STORE THIS AFTERNOON?

THE EVOLUTION OF GOOD VS NON-GOOD

1

MASTER MORALITY

Trang 3

1

THE EVOLUTION OF GOOD AND ITS CONTRARY

DID IT ALL COME FROM?

HOW THE IDEAS EVOLVED HOW THE RICH AND POWERFUL INTERFERED

THE BIG TRANSITION

Trang 4

GOOD WAS ONCE

THE

UNEGOISTIC

ACT

Trang 5

THEN ANYTHING THAT WAS

USEFUL

UTILITARIANISM

Trang 6

BUT BECAME THE

DICTATION

OF THE POWERFUL

(THEY’VE GOT

SERIOUS

BACKUP.)

Trang 7

FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF

WERE DONE AND USEFUL

FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF

AND POWERFUL

SO WHO JUDGED GOODNESS?

VS

Trang 8

IF IT

IS N0T A

WORD THEN IT

DOES NOT EXIST.

Trang 9

SO IF IT’S WORDED, THEN

IT SHOULD MEAN

SOMETHING

Trang 10

AS A VITAL SOCIAL COMPONENT,

LANGUAGE ADAPTS TO ITS USERS.

Trang 11

IN RESPONSE TO SOCIAL CHANGES,

ESSENTIAL LANGUAGE TRANSFORMATIONS OCCUR.

Trang 12

RICH ASSERT POWER VIA

THE PATHOS OF DISTANCE

FROM THE POOR.

Trang 13

AND THEY ALSO HOLD

THE POWER OF

LANGUAGE.

Y’KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS.

Trang 14

THIS MEANS THAT

LANGUAGE TRANSFORMS

IN THEIR FAVOR.

THERE’S GERMAN, LATIN, GAELIC, GREEK, AND SO MUCH MORE!

malus & melas

Trang 15

WORDS REFERRING TO

GOOD

BECOME ASSOCIATED

REMEMBER THEIR SHAMELESS PLUG:

THEY’RE GOOD BECAUSE THEY SAID SO

Trang 16

THAT WASN’T TOO NICE , WAS IT?

AND FOR THE POOR BACK THEN,

BECAUSE EVERYTHING REFERRING TO “BAD” ENDED UP BECOMING ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR CLASS

oh no you didn’t!

Trang 17

THE RICH AND THE POOR.

SO THE GOOD-CONTRARY POLARITY BECAME

A.K.A THE MASTERS AND THE SLAVES.

Trang 18

I’M RICH, I’M HAPPY

Trang 19

BUT WAIT!

SOMETHING CHANGED.

Trang 20

BUT WAIT!

NOBLE RACES BECAME BARBARIC :o

Trang 21

THE SHIFT

FROM MASTER TO SLAVE MORALITY.

Trang 22

THE SHIFT

FROM MASTER TO SLAVE MORALITY WTF?!

Trang 23

2

THE IDEAS OF NIETZSCHE’S MORALITIES

MORALITY AND SLAVE

DETAILING MASTER AND SLAVE MORALITY

COMPARISONS AND CONTRASTS OTHER IMPORTANT IDEAS ON NIETZSCHE

Trang 24

DURING THE EVOLUTION OF GOOD AND ITS CONTRARY,

MASTER MORALITY AND SLAVE MORALITY

WERE FORMED UNDERNEATH.

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/barbstur/3952443557/

Trang 25

BEGAN AFTER

UTILITARIANISM

MASTER MORALITY

Trang 26

FURTHER WIDENED THE

GAP BETWEEN

Trang 27

THE CLASS POLARITY

ASSURES THE STATUS OF

MASTER MORALITY

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/66854664@N00/107715395/

Trang 28

GOFFMAN’S DRAMA

TURGY

REFINED BEHAVIOR

BARBARISM THE SHIFT OF MORALITY

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/mark_boucher/2562714830/

Trang 29

WHATEVER.

SUCKS TO BE YOU.

MASTERS DON’T

TAKE THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE SLAVES.

LEADING TO MISCONCEPTIONS OF

THEM

MASTER MORALITY

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/apathyisboring/2089527526/

Trang 30

ARISTOCRA

Y-TIC

CLASS, BUT SOON DEVELOPS CONFLICT WITH IT

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/lifeisaprayer/3657308867/

Trang 31

THE RISE OF

EVIL!

SLAVE MORALITY

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/jonbradbury/2958823235/

Trang 32

GOODNESS OUT OF WEAKNESS

Trang 33

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/dunechaser/103723419/

Trang 34

THE GREAT

JEWISH

REVERSAL

Trang 35

SLAVE MORALITY

THE PREDOMINANCE OF

CHRISTIANITY

http://www.ﬂickr.com/photos/seanguzman/3792973865/

Trang 37

ON PROBLEMS.

THE MASTERS TAKE THEM IN STRIDE.

THE SLAVES PULL THEIR HAIRS OFF EVERY SINGLE ONE.

Trang 38

ON THE CONCEPT OF GOOD.

THE MASTERS TAKE IT AS POWERFUL PHYSICALITY AND MAINTAINING THAT.

THE SLAVES TAKE IT AS BEING HUMBLE AND UNLIKE THE MASTERS.

Trang 39

THE MASTERS TAKE IT AS ANYTHING THAT ISN’T THEM.

THE SLAVES TAKE IT AS EVIL , MUCH GREATER THAN THE MASTERS’ “BAD”.

Trang 40

THEIR PRIMARY FOCUS.

THE MASTERS FOCUS ON THEMSELVES AND ONLY USE THE SLAVES AS A BENCHMARK OF THEIR SOCIAL STATUS.

THE SLAVES ARE FIXATED ON THE MASTERS ; THEY EXIST

FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE OPPOSING CLASS.

Trang 41

A FEW IMPORTANT IDEAS BEFORE WE END

GRAMMAR PREDICAMENT

Trang 42

“THOSE LEAST LIKE THE

ACCORDING TO THE SLAVES,

“WE MOCK LAMBS, BUT WE

DON’T HATE THEM.”

ACCORDING TO THE MASTERS, ESPECIALLY IF THEY’RE THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

WHO DOESN’T LIKE A TENDER LAMB?

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/82841279/Digital-Vision

Trang 43

GRAMMAR MAKES US UNDERST AND

BUT THIS ISN’T REALL

Y HOW THINGS WORK.

Trang 44

WHAT IS LIGHTNING IF IT DOESN’T FLASH?

“BIRDS OF PREY KILL.” WHAT ARE BIRDS OF PREY IF THEY DON’T KILL?

“LIGHTNING FLASHES.”

THE SUBJECTS ARE THEIR PREDICATES.

Trang 45

TO DEMAND FROM STRENGTH THAT IT DOES NOT EXPRESS ITSELF AS STRENGTH (…) IS JUST AS UNREASONABLE AS TO DEMAND FROM WEAKNESS THAT IT EXPRESS ITSELF AS

STRENGTH -NIETZSCHE

“ TO DEMAND A BIRD OF PREY NOT TO KILL IS JUST AS

UNREASONABLE AS TO DEMAND FROM A LAMB THAT IT KILL.

Trang 46

NOW IS THE TIME FOR YOUR VIOLENT REACTIONS.

(ALTHOUGH WE DISCOURAGE THAT BECAUSE IT IS A QUITE

COVERT DISPLAY OF SLAVE MORALITY.)

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ph/

Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Philippines For more information about this work’s license, visit

For Twitter discussions, use the hashtag

#Nietzsche

Tiêu đề	Deconstructing Morality: A Discourse on the First Essay
Chuyên ngành	Philosophy
Thể loại	Essay

Định dạng
Số trang	46
Dung lượng	15,52 MB