1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

Global Strategy Chapter 2 Managing Industry Competition

22 5 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Managing Industry Competition
Tác giả Mike W. Peng
Trường học Cengage Learning
Chuyên ngành Global Strategy
Thể loại Textbook chapter
Năm xuất bản 2014
Thành phố Unknown
Định dạng
Số trang 22
Dung lượng 1,88 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Global Strategy 1e Michael Peng Global Strategy Mike W Peng c h a p t e r 2 Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly acce.

Trang 1

Industry

Competition

Trang 2

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Outline

Trang 3

© 2009 Peng Global Strategy 2E

What Industry is This?

2–3

Trang 4

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Defining Industry Competition

• Industry:

 A group of firms producing products (goods and/or

services) that are similar to each other

• Theories of industry competition

 Perfect competition (rarely observed)

 Industrial organization (IO) economics model

(SCP model)

Trang 5

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Five Forces Framework

in 1980 by Michael Porter

 The focal firm’s performance critically depends on the degree of competitiveness of the five forces within an industry

 The stronger and more competitive these forces

are, the less likely the focal firm is able to earn above-average return, and vice versa

Trang 6

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a

publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

The Five Forces

Framework

Figure 2.1

Trang 7

Copyright © 2014 Cengage

Learning All Rights Reserved May

not be scanned, copied or

duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in

part.

Threats of the Five Forces

Table 2.1

Threats indicative of strong competitive forces that can

Five forces depress industry profitability

Rivalry among A large number of competing firms

competitors R ivals are similar in size, influence, and product offerings

H igh-price, low-frequency purchases

Capacity is added in large increments

Industry slow growth or decline

High exit costs

Threat of Little scale-based low-cost advantages

potential entry (economies of scale)

Little non-scale-based advantages  Inadequate product proliferation

Insufficient product differentiation

Little fear of retaliation

No government policy banning or discouraging entry

Trang 8

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Threats of the Five Forces (cont’d)

Threats indicative of strong competitive forces that can

Five forces depress industry profitability

Bargaining power • A small number of suppliers

of suppliers • Suppliers provide unique, differentiated products

• Focal firm is not an important customer of suppliers

• Suppliers are willing and able to vertically integrate forward

Bargaining power • A small number of buyers

of buyers • Products provide little cost savings or quality of life

Trang 9

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Threats of the Five Forces (cont’d)

Threats indicative of strong competitive forces that can

Five forces depress industry profitability

Threat of • Substitutes superior to existing products in quality and

of substitutes quality and function

• Switching costs to use substitutes are low

Table 2.1 cont’d

Trang 10

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Five Forces Framework:

Lessons from the Five Forces

Trang 11

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Table 2.4

Three Generic Competitive Strategies

PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION MARKET SEGMENTATION KEY FUNCTIONAL AREAS Cost Leadership Low (mainly by price) Low (mass market) Manufacturing, services, and

logistics Differentiation High (mainly by uniqueness) High (many market segments) R&D, marketing, and sales Focus Extremely high Low (one of a few segments) R&D, marketing, and sales

Trang 12

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Generic Strategies:

Cost Leadership

• Cost leadership

on low costs and low prices

differentiation

management

that customers desire

Trang 13

Three Generic Strategies:

Cost Leadership (cont’d)

 This forces the leader to continuously search for

ways to further reduce costs.

 In the relentless drive to cut costs, a cost leader

may make trade-offs that compromise the value customers perceive in its products or services and hurt sales.

2–13

Trang 14

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Generic Strategies:

Differentiation

and different

are willing to pay premium prices

quality, sophistication, prestige, or luxury

customers in each market segment

(source of innovation), marketing/sales, and after-sale services

Trang 15

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Generic Strategies:

Differentiation (cont’d)

 Difficult to sustain differentiation in the long run

 Relentless efforts of competitors to duplicate differentiation

Trang 16

Three Generic Strategies:

Differentiation (cont’d)

basis of its differentiation over the long run

the differentiator’s and cost leader’s products is not worth paying for.

of competitive imitation.

brand loyalty to differentiators may decline

premium in 1984 It became a commodity in 2004, which was hardly profitable – IBM sold its PC division to

Lenovo in 2004

2–16

Trang 17

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Generic Strategies:

Focus Strategy

niche of an industry such as a geographical

market, type of customer, or product line

 A specialized differentiator has a smaller, narrower, and sharper focus than a large differentiator

compared with the traditional cost leader

possesses intimate knowledge about a

particular segment

Trang 18

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Generic Strategies:

Lessons from the Three Generic

Strategies

• The essence of the three strategic choices:

 Whether to perform activities differently or to perform different activities relative to competitors

There are two fundamental strategic dimensions: cost and differentiation

 The key is to choose one dimension and execute on it consistently

have no strategy or are drifting strategically

Trang 19

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Debates and Extensions

1 Clear versus blurred boundaries of industry

2 Threats versus opportunities

3 Five forces versus a sixth force (complementors)

4 Stuck in the middle versus all rounder

5 Industry rivalry versus strategic groups

6 Integrating versus outsourcing

7 Industry-specific versus firm-specific and

institution-specific determinants of performance

Trang 20

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

Three Strategic Groups in the Global Automobile Industry

Figure 2.2

Trang 21

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Strategic Groups and Ownership Types

in the Chinese Electronics Industry

Table 2.6

Source: Adapted from M W Peng, J Tan, & T Tong, 2004, Ownership types and strategic groups

in an emerging economy (p 1110), Journal of Management Studies, 41 (7): 1105–1129.

STRATEGIC GROUP DEFENDER ANALYZER REACTOR

Ownership type State ownership Mixed Unstable

Customer base Stable Mixed Changing

Growth strategy Cautious Mixed Aggressive

Managers Older, more conservative Mixed Younger, more aggressive

Trang 22

Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not

be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly

accessible website, in whole or in part.

The Savvy Strategist

provides:

and competitor analysis, to which a more

detailed examination, introduced in later

chapters, can be added

questions in strategy discussed in Chapter 1

an important role in determining firm

performance

Ngày đăng: 03/11/2022, 21:50

w