Global Strategy 1e Michael Peng Global Strategy Mike W Peng c h a p t e r 7 Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly acce.
Trang 2Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Outline
• Defining strategic alliances and networks
• A comprehensive model of strategic alliances and networks
• Formation
• Evolution
• Performance
• Debates and extensions
• The savvy strategist
Trang 3Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Defining Strategic Alliances and
• Strategic networks are strategic alliances formed by
multiple firms to compete against other networks
and singular firms
Trang 4Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
The Variety of Strategic Alliances
• Strategic Alliances
A compromise between short-term, pure
market transactions (e.g., spot transactions)
and long-term, pure organizational solutions
(e.g., mergers and acquisitions)
The Variety of Strategic Alliances
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
Trang 6Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
A Comprehensive Model of
Strategic Alliances and Networks
• Industry-based considerations
Traditional: Firms are independent players
The dynamic of five forces:
Horizontal alliances, entry barriers, upstream
alliances with suppliers, downstream vertical alliances with buyers, and alliances and networks
to provide substitute products/services
• Resource-based considerations
The resource-based view is embodied in the VRIO framework, which are value, rarity,
imitability and organizational aspect of
strategic alliance and networks
Trang 8Potential partner opportunism Risk of helping nurture
competitors (learning
race).
Trang 9to observe and imitate firm- specific capabilities
Organization –
some successful alliances are organized in a way that is difficult to replicate
Trang 11INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONS
Informal institutions
Normative pillar –firms copy other
reputable organizations to establish
legitimacy
Cognitive pillar – internalized, granted values that guide alliances and
taken-for-acquisitions
Trang 12Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Strategic Alliances and Networks: Advantages and Disadvantages
• Strategic alliances and networks must create value
• Advantages must outweigh disadvantages
Table 7.1
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Reduce costs, risks, and uncertainties Possibilities of choosing the wrong partners
Gain access to complementary assets and capabilities Costs of negotiation and coordination
Opportunities to learn from partners Possibilities of partner opportunism
Possibilities to use alliances networks as real options Risks of helping nurture competitors (learning race)
Trang 13Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Formation
• Stage one: To cooperate or not to cooperate
• Stage two: Contract or equity?
• Stage three: Positioning the relationship
Trang 14© M W Peng (www.mikepeng.com)
FORMATION OF ALLIANCES
Trang 15Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Stage Two: Contract or Equity?
DRIVING FORCES EQUITY-BASED
ALLIANCES/NETWORKS
NON-EQUITY-BASED ALLIANCES/NETWORKS Nature of shared resources High Low
(degree of tacitness and complexity)
Importance of direct organizational High Low
monitoring and control
Potential as real options High (for possible upgrading to M&As) High (for possible upgrading to
equity-based relationships) Influence of formal institutions High (when required or encouraged by
regulations)
High (when required or encouraged by regulations)
Trang 16Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Evolution
• Combating opportunism
Need to protect against opportunism
Contractual safeguards and credible commitment
• Evolving from strong ties to weak ties
Strong ties are cultivated over a long period of time
Weak ties are characterized by infrequent
interaction and low intimacy
Firms have a combination of strong ties and weak ties
Benefits of the different types of ties depend on the firms’ strategies
Many interfirm relationships evolve from an
emphasis on strong ties to a focus on weak ties
Trang 17Source: M Peng and O Shenkar (2002) Joint venture dissolution as corporate divorce Academy of
Management Executive, 16 (2): 95.
Evolution (cont)
Trang 18Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Performance
• The performance of strategic alliances and networks
A combination of objective and subjective
measures can be used to determine
performance
Four factors may influence the performance of alliances and networks: equity, learning and experience, nationality, and relational
capabilities
• The performance of parent firms
Trang 19Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Alliance- and Network-Related Performance Measures
ALLIANCE/NETWORK LEVEL PARENT FIRM LEVEL
Financial performance (for example, profitability) Financial performance (for example, profitability)
Product market performance (for example, market share) Product market performance (for example, market share)
Stability and longevity Stock market reaction
Table 7.4
Trang 20Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
Debates and Extensions
• Majority JVs as control mechanisms versus minority JVs as real options
• Alliances versus acquisitions
• Acquiring versus not acquiring alliance partners
Trang 21© M W Peng (www.mikepeng.com) 7–21
Alliances versus Acquisitions
Trang 22Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Improving the Odds for Alliance Success
Table 7.7
Source: Based on text in M W Peng & O Shenkar, 2002, Joint venture dissolution as
corporate divorce (pp 101–102), Academy of Management Executive, 16 (2): 92–105.
AREAS DO’S AND DON’TS
Contract versus “chemistry” No contract can cover all elements of the relationship Relying on a detailed contract does
not guarantee a successful relationship and it may indicate a lack of trust.
Warning signs Identify symptoms of frequent criticism, defensiveness (always blaming others for
problems), and stonewalling (withdrawal during a fight).
Investment in the relationship Like married individuals working hard to invigorate their ties, alliances require continuous
nurturing Once a party starts to waver, it is difficult to turn back.
Conflict resolution mechanisms “Good” married couples also fight Their secret weapon is to find mechanisms to avoid
unwarranted escalation of conflicts Managers need to handle conflicts-inevitable in any relationship-in a credible, responsible, and controlled fashion.
Trang 23Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not
be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.
The Savvy Strategist
• New generation of strategists needs to be savvy at
both competition and cooperation—