1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Water Level Temperature and Water Quality Numerical Predictions

9 2 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 9
Dung lượng 1,33 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Collins, Colorado, USA - June 2018 Jun 25th, 9:00 AM - 10:20 AM Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical Predictions of a 3D Semi-Implicit Scheme for Lakes and Reservoir

Trang 1

Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive

International Congress on Environmental

Modelling and Software

9th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software - Ft Collins, Colorado,

USA - June 2018 Jun 25th, 9:00 AM - 10:20 AM

Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical

Predictions of a 3D Semi-Implicit Scheme for Lakes and

Reservoirs: An Analytical and Field Case Study

Hussein A M Al-Zubaidi

Portland State University, alzubaidih10@gmail.com

Scott Wells

Portland State University, wellss@pdx.edu

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference

Al-Zubaidi, Hussein A M and Wells, Scott, "Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical

Predictions of a 3D Semi-Implicit Scheme for Lakes and Reservoirs: An Analytical and Field Case Study" (2018) International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software 13

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/Stream-D/13

This Oral Presentation (in session) is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental

Engineering at BYU ScholarsArchive It has been accepted for inclusion in International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive For more information, please

contact scholarsarchive@byu.edu, ellen_amatangelo@byu.edu

Trang 2

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/iemssconference/2018/

Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality

Numerical Predictions of a 3D Semi-Implicit Scheme

for Lakes and Reservoirs:

An Analytical and Field Case Study

Hussein A M Al-Zubaidi a and Scott A Wells b

a

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA,

and Faculty member in the Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq; e-mail: alzubaidih10@gmail.com

b

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA,

and Collaborative Center for Geo-hazards and Eco-Environment in Three Gorges Area,

Three Gorges University, Yichang, China; e-mail: wellss@pdx.edu

Abstract: In order to develop a three-dimensional version of the two-dimensional longitudinal-vertical

hydrodynamic and water quality model CE-QUAL-W2, the hydrodynamic numerical solution scheme

was expanded and modified to a unique 3D scheme The 2D formulation of the CE-QUAL-W2 model

is fully implicit and solves for the free surface elevation implicitly from the free surface equation, but

the solution of the momentum equations treats the free surface elevation explicitly In order to make

both solutions linked in which the free surface elevation is treated either explicitly or implicitly at the

same time step, the degree of implicitness was added to the 3D numerical solution of free surface and

momentum equations The implementation of the semi-implicit scheme in the present 3D model

improved the fully implicit scheme by reducing the free surface wave damping of the numerical

solution This is a novel approach compared to other 3D models since the 3D hydrodynamic

numerical solution was coupled with the numerical solution of heat and water quality so that

hydrodynamics, temperature, and water quality were solved at the same time step Analytical

verification was performed to show that the 3D model agreed with the exact analytical solution for

special cases Additionally, the model predictions of water level, temperature, and dissolved oxygen

were compared with field data from Cooper Creek Reservoir, Oregon, USA

Keywords: Hydrodynamic model; CE-QUAL-W2 model; Lakes and reservoirs modelling; 3D

numerical verification

1 INTRODUCTION

Numerical modelling has become a well-known tool for environmental water resources management

The CE-QUAL-W2 model (Cole and Wells, 2017) is a two-dimensional hydrodynamic and water

quality model applied to thousands of waterbodies around the world In order to develop a similar

model in three dimensions, a 3D model was developed to account for waterbodies that exhibit

pronounced three-dimensional behavior

The 2D CE-QUAL-W2 model is a two-dimensional longitudinal and vertical hydrodynamic and water

quality model CE-QUAL-W2 has been applied to many rivers, lakes, and reservoirs The 3D model

employed many of the numerical schemes and approaches of the 2D model after expanding it to the

3D form This new 3D numerical scheme was built semi-implicitly As a result, an improvement was

made to the 3D numerical solution of the free surface equation in which minimum wave damping

occurred for the water surface solution In this research, a new three-dimensional model based on the

Trang 3

H A M Al-Zubaidi and S A Wells / Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical Predictions…

2D CE-QUAL-W2 model was tested analytically and implemented to simulate water level, temperature, and dissolved oxygen in Cooper Creek Reservoir, OR, USA

2 MODEL DESCRIPTION

The present 3D model solves the three-dimensional governing equations of the continuity equation, free surface equation, momentum equations, and conservation equations of temperature and water quality (Al-Zubaidi and Wells, 2017) The 2D CE-QUAL-W2 numerical scheme solves for the water levels fully implicitly in the numerical solution of the free surface equation The numerical solution of the free surface equation discretized the surface elevation implicitly, while the numerical solution of the momentum equations treated the surface elevation term explicitly Fully implicit discretization of the free surface equation results in surface wave damping regardless of the approach that could be adopted to treat the surface elevation gradient of the momentum equations, explicitly (Wells, 2002) or implicitly (Casulli and Cattani, 1994; Casulli and Cheng, 1992)

Thus, an issue associated with solving the free surface equation fully implicitly is the diffusive nature

of the surface wave predictions (Wells, 2002) As the model time step increases, the surface wave damping increases In an attempt to reduce the amount of damping in the new 3D model, the hydrodynamic numerical scheme was derived based on the inclusion of a semi-implicit parameter (θ) The minimum damping rate can be achieved with θ =0.5 (Casulli and Cattani, 1994; Vreugdenhil, 1989) However, Vreugdenhil (1989) proposed using a value equal or close to 0.5 to take care of possible numerical instabilities Eq.1 shows the inclusion of the degree of implicitness (θ) in the x-momentum finite difference governing equation:

ui,j,kn+1= ui,j,kn + ∆t [

−u ∂u

∂x −v ∂u

∂y −w ∂u

∂z + fv + gsinα + (1 − θ)gcosα∂η

∂x

−gcosα

ρ∘ ∫ ∂ρ

∂xdz

z

ρ∘∂x +∂(τxy)

ρ∘∂y +∂(τxz )

ρ∘∂z

] i,j,k

n + ∆t [(θ)gcosα∂η

∂x] i,j,k

n+1 (1)

where u, v, and w are the velocity components in the x, y, and z-direction respectively, ∆t is the time step, η is the free surface elevation, f is the Coriolis parameter, g is the gravitational acceleration, α is the angle of the waterbody slope, h is the bottom elevation, ρ⸰is the base density, τ is the turbulent shear stress, n and n+1 are the current and next time level respectively All variables are denoted by i,

j, and k referring to the location within the grid

A similar formulation was developed for the y-momentum equation to determine vi,j,kn+1 and then both velocity components were substituted into the free surface equation to determine η at the time level n+1 This approach was also discussed in Cole and Wells, (2015) for the fully implicit numerical scheme

The scheme becomes fully implicit and reverts to the original numerical scheme of the 2D CE-QUAL-W2 model when θ=1, and it is considered semi-implicit when 1/2≤θ≤1 For θ<1/2, the scheme becomes unstable

3 ANALYTICAL CASE STUDY

A known exact solution case study was used to show the improved numerical scheme behaviour compared with the analytical solution An ideal rectangular basin was assumed filled with water in which the initial water surface wave has a cosine shape in the x-direction A 25 cm initial displacement (η°) was used on both x-sides of the basin, and then the water surface was released from rest Thus, surface waves start oscillating continuously with time Based on Eliason and Bourgeois (1997), the exact analytical solution at any time t and location x along the basin length L is as follows:

η(x,t)= η°cos (πx

L) cos⁡(π√gH

L t) (2)

u(x,t)=η° √gH

sin (πx) sin⁡(π√gHt) (3)

Trang 4

The 3D model was run using a computational grid size of ∆x=∆y=2000 m horizontally and ∆z=1 m vertically in addition to a time step of dt=5 s Figure 1 shows the basin bathymetry used in the simulation Figure 2 shows the simulation results of water level and longitudinal velocity using θ =0.55 compared with the analytical solution at a location close to the left boundary of the basin Therefore, the implementation of the semi-implicit scheme in the present 3D model improved on the fully implicit scheme by reducing numerical wave damping The degree of implicitness (θ) can be chosen in the present 3D model depending on the user choice However, using a value of 0.55 would be the best option based on numerical considerations relevant to the model

4 FIELD CASE STUDY

After developing and analytically verifying the numerical scheme of the 3D model The model was validated by comparing the model predictions of water levels, vertical profiles of temperature, and dissolved oxygen with field data

4.1 Study area overview

Cooper Creek Reservoir is a reservoir located in Douglas County, Oregon, US with an approximate elevation of 203.6 m and coordinates of (Lat: 43.23 and Long: -123.37) Figure 3 shows the location

of the reservoir within the drainage basin in additional to the dam location The main inflow is from Cooper Creek at the south east end of the reservoir The outflows are at the dam and by two outlet structures (Elevations: 192.02 and 186.84) and a spillway at an elevation of 203.73 m as shown in

Figure 1 The numerical test input bathymetry in meters

Figure 2 Water level and longitudinal velocity compared with the

analytical solution at a location close to the left boundary of the basin

Trang 5

H A M Al-Zubaidi and S A Wells / Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical Predictions…

Figure 4 The inflow/outflow data, reservoir bathymetry, water levels, and other input data required for modelling the reservoir were described in Wells et al (2000)

4.2 Model grid development

By using a tool for extracting the grid based on the Cooper Creek Reservoir bathymetry data, the computational grid centers were overlaid above the contour plot as shown in Figure 5 Longitudinal increments of ∆x=100 m and lateral increments of ∆y=50 m were used for model horizontal grid resolution, and vertical increments of ∆z=0.5 m were used for the model vertical grid resolution An

Dam

Cooper Creek Reservoir

Drainage basin boundary

Figure 3 Cooper Creek Reservoir drainage basin

Figure 4 Cooper Creek Reservoir dam outlets

Trang 6

initial water surface elevation of 203.73m was set at the surface layer of k=3 depending on the available data (May07, 1998 - Oct13 1999)

Figure 5 Cooper Creek Reservoir model computational grid

4.3 Flow boundary conditions and meteorological data

Figure 6 and Figure 7 shows the time series of the reservoir inflow from Cooper Creek and the corresponding temperature, respectively, over the simulation period from May 7, 1998 to October 13,

1999 (Julian day: 127 - 651) In order to simulate the dissolved oxygen during this period of time, it was assumed that the inflow dissolved oxygen concentration was 8 mg/l close to the saturation state

At the dam, there are two withdrawals in additional to a spillway as shown in Figure 4 Table 1 shows the outflows through the dam withdrawals based on the reservoir management requirements (an intermittent outflow for municipal water supply and a drain outflow for a week in fall to drop the water level) The spillway flow was calculated in the model internally as follows:

Qspillway= α∆hβ (4) Where Qspillway is the spillway flow (m3/s), ∆h is the water height above the weir crest (m), ⍺ and β are fitted coefficients For this case study, ⍺ and β were 3.237 m3/s and 0.373, respectively, based on the designed flow rate curves, and the weir crest was set at an elevation of 203.73 m (the model initial water surface elevation)

Additionally, the meteorological data to run and calibrate the model (air temperature, dew point, wind magnitude and direction, and cloud cover) were available hourly from a NOAA station close to the reservoir (see Wells et al., 2000) The model calculates the required short solar radiation internally

Figure 6 Cooper Creek Reservoir inflow from Cooper Creek

Trang 7

H A M Al-Zubaidi and S A Wells / Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical Predictions…

Figure 7 Cooper Creek Reservoir inflow temperature

Table 1 Cooper Creek Reservoir dam withdrawals

Julian day Municipal water line outflow (m 3 /s) Drain line outflow (m 3 /s)

4.4 Cooper Creek Reservoir model calibration

The simulation time (May07, 1998 - Oct13, 1999) includes two stratification periods in the summer

1998 and 1999 with a fall overturn event in the fall of 1999 The model was run using a time step of

2 s and calibrated using the water level data with the boundary inflow, outflow, and meteorological data Figure 8(a) shows the model predictions of water levels compared to field data at the dam location The root mean square error and absolute mean error of the water level prediction was 0.175

m and 0.129 m, respectively Figure 8(b) shows the spillway outflows associated with this run These outflows were determined internally by the model based on the water surface levels and the spillway crest level When the water level becomes above the spillway crest, the spillway is turned on

The model calibration involved temperature and dissolved oxygen for the simulated time based on vertical profile data Figure 9 shows the model vertical temperature profile predictions compared with the field data The overall absolute mean error (AME) of the temperature profiles was approximately 1°C Simultaneously, the dissolved oxygen concentrations were computed for the reservoir by applying a suitable reaeration coefficient equation and using sediments oxygen demand (SOD) of 1.3

gO2/m2/day The value of SOD was distributed through the reservoir domain with a maximum decay rate occurring at 30°C and 10% of the maximum decay rate occurring at 4ºC

Trang 8

(a) Water surface elevation (b) Spillway outflows

Starting the model run with an initial dissolved oxygen concentration of 4 g/m3, the model predictions

of dissolved oxygen concentration were plotted compared to the available field data in Figure 10 The error statistics for model predicted dissolved oxygen concentrations compared with field data were shown that 1.32 g/m3 overall AME

Figure 8 Cooper Creek Reservoir model predictions of (a) water levels and (b) spillway outflows

Figure 9 Cooper Creek Reservoir model predictions of vertical temperature profiles

Figure 10 Cooper Creek Reservoir model predictions of vertical dissolved oxygen profiles

Trang 9

H A M Al-Zubaidi and S A Wells / Water Level, Temperature, and Water Quality Numerical Predictions…

In the present model, hydrodynamic and temperature computations are active always and run together at each model time step The coupling of hydrodynamics and water quality is often very important during model simulation especially since other models usually calibrate first for hydrodynamics and temperature without running the water quality calculations, and then later perform water quality calculations All above computations were done in the model by employing algorithms in CE-QUAL-W2 (Cole and Wells, 2015) for calculating the sources and sinks of heat and dissolved oxygen, including surface heat exchange, reaeration coefficient, temperature rate multipliers, and oxygen limits

5 CONCLUSIONS

To verify and validate a new three-dimensional numerical model for simulating hydrodynamics, temperature, and water quality, an analytical verification and field validation were performed The 3D model was derived from the 2D CE-QUAL-W2 model by expanding the governing equations to the three-dimensional case and adding the degree of implicitness to the 3D numerical solution of free surface and momentum equations This new numerical scheme was tested by applying the model to a known analytical solution case study and comparing the results The analytical tests showed that the present approach improved the numerical solution by reducing the numerical diffusion of the free surface wave The 3D model predictions of dissolved oxygen were also compared with field data from Cooper Creek Reservoir, Oregon, USA This comparison showed good model-data agreement in terms of error statistics The model was validated by these tests and showed the importance of coupling hydrodynamics and temperature with water quality even in 3D models

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research was supported by Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MOHESR)/University of Babylon in association with Portland State University

REFERENCES

Al-Zubaidi, H.A.M., Wells, S.A., 2017 3D numerical temperature model development and calibration for lakes and reservoirs: a case study Proceedings, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2017, Sacramento, CA doi:10.1061/9780784480601.051

Casulli, V., Cattani, E., 1994 Stability, accuracy and efficiency of a semi-implicit method for three-dimensional shallow water flow Computers & Mathematics with Applications 27, 99–112 doi:10.1016/0898-1221(94)90059-0

Casulli, V., Cheng, R.T., 1992 Semi-implicit finite difference methods for three-dimensional shallow water flow International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 15, 629–648

Cole, T., Wells, S.A., 2015 CE-QUAL-W2: a two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, version 3.72 User Manual, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Portland State University Portland, OR

Eliason, D.E., Bourgeois, A.J., 1997 Validation of numerical shallow water models for stratified seiches International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 24, 771–786

Vreugdenhil, C.B., 1989 Computational hydraulics an introduction Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg doi:10.1007/978-3-642-95578-5

Wells, S.A., 2002 Validation of the CE-QUAL-W2 version 3 river basin hydrodynamic and water quality model Proceedings, HydroInformatics 2002, IAHR, Cardiff, England

Wells, S.A., Annear, R.L., Berger, C.J., Sytsma, M., 2000 Modeling and analysis of Cooper Creek Reservoir water quality Technical Report, Water quality research group, Department of civil and environmental engineering, Portland State University, prepared for the City of Sutherlin, Oregon

Ngày đăng: 20/10/2022, 13:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w