1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

Tài liệu shi20396 chương 16 pdf

24 386 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Chapter 16
Chuyên ngành Mechanical Engineering
Thể loại Solutions manual
Năm xuất bản 2003
Định dạng
Số trang 24
Dung lượng 203,13 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

p a = 57.9 psi for ccw rotationA maximum pressure of 111.4 psioccurs on the RH shoe for cw rotation... c The direction of brake pulley rotation affects the sense of S y, which has no eff

Trang 1

p a = 57.9 psi for ccw rotation

A maximum pressure of 111.4 psioccurs on the RH shoe for cw rotation Ans.

R y

R

Primary shoe 30⬚

Trang 2

RH shoe: F x = 500 sin 30° = 250 lbf, F y = 500 cos 30° = 433 lbfEqs (16-8): A =

1

p a = 500/3.872 = 129.1 psi on RH shoe for cw rotation Ans.

Eq (16-6): T R = 0.28(129.1)(1.5)(62)(cos 15°− cos 105°)

Trang 3

 π180

Trang 4

T = 0.24[0.619(10)6](0.075)(0.200)2(cos 10°− cos 75°)

so the braking capacity is Ttotal= 2(541) + 2(335) = 1750 N · m Ans.

Trang 5

R V

R H

Trang 6

16-7 Preliminaries: θ2 = 180° − 30° − tan−1(3/12) = 136°, θ1 = 20° − tan−1(3/12) = 6°,

θ a = 90◦, a = [(3)2+ (12)2]1/2 = 12.37 in, r = 10 in, f = 0.30, b = 2 in.

Eq (16-2): M f = 0.30(150)(2)(10)

sin 90°

 136◦ 6°

sinθ(10 − 12.37 cos θ) dθ

= 12 800 lbf · in

Trang 7

On this shoe, both M N and M f are ccw.

Also c R = (24 − 2 tan 14°) cos 14° = 22.8 in

Fact = F Lsin 14°= 361 lbf Ans.

Trang 8

6.375"

Actuation lever

Trang 9

(c) The direction of brake pulley rotation affects the sense of S y, which has no effect on

the brake shoe lever moment and hence, no effect on S xor the brake torque

The brake shoe levers carry identical bending moments but the left lever carries atension while the right carries compression (column loading) The right lever is de-signed and used as a left lever, producing interchangeable levers (identical levers) But

do not infer from these identical loadings

2.68P

Right shoe lever

2.125P 1.428P

2.049P

4.174P 1.252P

1.68P

Left shoe lever

2.125P 0.428P

Trang 11

Eq (16-14): P2 = P1exp(− f φ) = 1680 exp(−0.942) = 655 lbf

16-15 Given: φ =270°, b=2.125 in, f =0.20, T =150 lbf · ft, D =8.25 in, c2 = 2.25 in

Notice that the pivoting rocker is not located on the vertical centerline of the drum

(a) To have the band tighten for ccw rotation, it is necessary to have c1 < c2 When tion is fully developed,

Trang 12

If friction is not fully developed

P1/P2 ≤ exp( f φ)

To help visualize what is going on let’s add a force W parallel to P1, at a lever arm of

c3 Now sum moments about the rocker pivot

The device is self locking for ccw rotation if W is no longer needed, that is, W ≤ 0

It follows from the equation above

P1 = 2.25P2 = 2.25(349) = 785 lbf

p= 2P1

b D = 2(785)

2.125(8.25) = 89.6 psi Ans.

Trang 13

(c) The torque ratio is 150(12)/100 or 18-fold.

As the torque opposed by the locked brake increases, P2 and P1 increase (although

ratio is still 2.25), then p follows The brake can self-destruct Protection could be

provided by a shear key

Trang 14

(c) The torque-diameter curve exhibits a stationary point maximum in the range of

diameter d The clutch has nearly optimal proportions.

Trang 15

12 60

Not to scale

CL

Trang 16

2 + 452

Trang 17

The bearing and shear stress estimates are

σ b = −2.15(103)10(22.5 − 13) = −22.6 MPa Ans.

τ = 2.15(103)

10[0.25π(17.75)2] = 0.869 MPa Ans.

16-22 ω1 = 2πn/60 = 2π(1800)/60 = 188.5 rad/s

ω2 = 0From Eq (16-51),

Trang 18

16-24 (a) The useful work performed in one revolution of the crank shaft is

U = 35(2000)(8)(0.15) = 84(103) in· lbfAccounting for friction, the total work done in one revolution is

U = 84(103)/(1 − 0.16) = 100(103) in· lbfSince 15% of the crank shaft stroke is 7.5% of a crank shaft revolution, the energyfluctuation is

Trang 19

(2) Equivalent energy

(1/2)I2ω2

2 = (1/2)(I2)1

w2 1

( I2)1 = ω22

ω2 1

16-27 (a) Reflect I L , I G2 to the center shaft

Reflect the center shaft to the motor shaft

Trang 20

Optimizing the partitioning of a double reduction lowered the gear-train inertia to

20.9/112 = 0.187, or to 19% of that of a single reduction This includes the two

100

20.9

Trang 21

The load torque, as seen by the motor shaft (Rule 1, Prob 16-26), is

Continue until convergence

T2 = 26.771

Eq (16-69):

I = −21.41(10 − 0.5)ln(26.771/168.07) = 110.72 in · lbf · s/rad

ω = T − b

a

Trang 22

= 88 508 in · lbf, close enough Ans.

During the punch

V = πl4

Trang 23

where l is the rim width as shown in Table A-18 The specific weight of cast iron is

γ = 0.260 lbf · in3, therefore the volume of cast iron is

Proportions can be varied

16-30 Prob 16-29 solution has I for the motor shaft flywheel as

ωmax = 121.11/10 = 12.111 rad/s Ans.

ωmin= 117.81/10 = 11.781 rad/s Ans.

E1, E2,E and peak power are the same.

From Table A-18

Trang 24

Scaling will affect d o and d i , but the gear ratio changed I Scale up the flywheel in the

Prob 16-29 solution by a factor of 2.5 Thickness becomes 4(2.5) = 10 in.

Proportions can be varied The weight has increased 3026/189.1 or about 16-fold while

the moment of inertia I increased 100-fold The gear train transmits a steady 3 hp But the

motor armature has its inertia magnified 100-fold, and during the punch there are eration stresses in the train With no motor armature information, we cannot comment

decel-16-31 This can be the basis for a class discussion

Ngày đăng: 27/01/2014, 05:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

w