How do you write an original research article and have it published – pubrica

Our objective is to make research findings as valuable as possible to end-users.. In its most basic form, the "Knowledge Transfer" model comprises three parts: producing information rese

How do you Write an

The Journal of the Medical Library Association

(JMLA) serves a more significant function than

storing data from librarian studies

Our objective is to make research findings as

valuable as possible to end-users In its most basic

form, the "Knowledge Transfer" model comprises

three parts: producing information (research),

translating and transmitting it to the user, and putting

the knowledge into usage

The JMLA is located in the centre of the process,

conveying and summarising information to the user

IN BRIEF

Contd

The JMLA must first gather information and expertise from researchers, then collaborate with

them to deliver it in the most usable way possible

That implies the data must be presented in a standardized, comprehensible way.

A conventional, preferred method for writing an original research report exists.

Contd

Since the second part, IMRAD has dominated academic,scientific, and public health magazines

The IMRAD framework, which is suggested in the "UniformRequirements for Manuscripts Submitted to BiomedicalJournals," helps to minimize extraneous material and allowsessential information to be presented clearly and in a logicalorder

The IMRAD portions are described here, along with ourcomments and suggestions

Double-check the publisher's requirements if you're usingthis guide to submit to Write A Original Research Article

Write for a general readership and keep this part brief(clear, concise, and as non-technical as you can be).How would you describe the study's purpose andmethodology to a distant colleague?

Contd

Take your audience through the three processes

before posing your unique question

Emphasize how your research fills in the blanks

(the unknown) and clarify your research topic.

Answer no to the research question

Remember to save the facts, descriptions,

hypotheses , and criticisms of other research for

the Discussion.

Contd

The Methods section provides a concise summary

of your work

Give your audience adequate information to assess

your study's persuasiveness

As in a recipe, describe the stages you did, but don't

go into too much detail

Explain how you choose your subjects to represent

if you're undertaking qualitative research

Contd

You might wish to split it into smaller parts withsubheadings, such as context: when, where, who haspermission or approval, sample selection, data collection(how), follow-up, and analytic technique

Rather than discussing all the specifics, cite a reference forregularly used or previously utilized procedures in ScientificOriginal Research Article

Method explanations can be made more accessible withflow diagrams and tables When discussing yourapproaches, you may use first-person voice

As far as possible, data should be kept to tables

Summarize the tables as the kind narration would; donot repeat the facts in the text

Contd

If you had a demographic table with a row of

ages, and the ages of the groups were not

substantially different, your reader might state, "All

of the participants were 47 years old on average.

The table shows that there was no significant

difference between the groups."

"The mean age of group 1 was 48.6 (7.5) years,

and group 2 was 46.3 (5.8) years, a non-significant

difference," is superior to "The mean age of group

1 was 48.6 (7.5) years and group 2 was 46.3 (5.8)

years, a non-significant difference."

Contd

Divide the Results section into subsections, if necessary,using headers

Complement the data in the tables and figures with additionalinformation

Also, only the most significant figures should be repeated

and highlighted in the text

In the Results section, use the active voice and make itvibrant

Not here, but in the Methods section, you should includeinformation about what you performed

Contd

Also, save your opinions on the significance of your findings for the Discussion section.

If you need to cite the number in the text (not just in the table), and the total in the group is less than

50, do not include the percentage Write "7 of 34," not "7 (21%)."

Do not forget that you probably need adjustment if you have multiple comparisons Ask your statistician if you are not sure.

Other tips to help you with the Results section:

DISCUSSION

The most flexibility is in the Discussion section The

majority of authors begin by reiterating what theyaccomplished

Every contributor should summarise the main points andrespond to the question posed in the introduction

Concentrate on what your statistics show rather than

what you anticipated they would deliver

Begin by saying "We discovered " (or something similar)and then explain what the data means

Contd

Anticipate your audience's inquiries and explain why your

findings are significant

Then relate your results to those of other people

This is where your literature review will be helpful

Discuss how your findings corroborate or contradict the

findings of previous research

Unless you're doing a narrative or systematic review, you

don't need to include every article from your Original

Research Review Article literature review in your paper or

reference list

Contd

Your paper isn't meant to be a comprehensive overview of

the subject

Don't give a lengthy summary of the literature; instead, focus

on past work directly related to your results

Contrary to widespread assumption, many references in the

References section do not indicate that the article is more

scholarly; instead, it suggests that the author is attempting toappear intellectual

(The citation list may be longer if your paper is a systematic review.)

DON'T OVERREACH

Don't go too far with your findings

Finding a perceived knowledge need, forexample, does not indicate that library collegesmust reform their curriculum right once or that itwould enhance health care and save lives andmoney

However, you may say "has the potential to."

Always note the restrictions that matter, not theconstraints that apply to everyone

Make a list of unsolved questions and potential future

directions

Give your results' big-picture implications and explain why

your audience should care

Finish your study's significant results, and don't deviate

too far from your data

Remember to include a final take-home message and

implications in your presentation

It's worth noting that this approach lacks a distinct

Conclusion section

Contd

The Discussion concludes with a conclusion Forexample, consider the last paragraph of a recent NEJMarticle's Discussion section.

Finally, our study did not reveal the predicted benefit [of

the intervention] in patients at high risk for problems

For abstracts, however, a separate Conclusion section

is frequently suitable

An Interpretation section should be included in

systematic reviews

Other aspects of your study article unrelated to IMRAD include: The foundation of your content

is tables and numbers, and they are the narrative's plot.

The titles, abstracts, tables, and figures are frequently the first things editors, reviewers, and readers glance at Figures and tables should communicate a full story on their own.

It should not be necessary for your readers to return to the primary material.