NATURE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN MALAYSIA Raja Badrol Hisham Raja Mohd Ali Department of Public Law International Islamic University Malaysia... Criminal procedure Code contains pr
Trang 1NATURE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
IN MALAYSIA Raja Badrol Hisham Raja Mohd Ali
Department of Public Law International Islamic University Malaysia
Trang 2BASIC FEATURES:
1 Criminal procedure Code contains procedural laws.
Criminal Procedural laws refers to law
governing the manner to which rights under criminal law can be enforced and crime
prosecuted under criminal law.(i.e how do we
go about)
Trang 3 In comparison, substantive laws tell us what the law is, i.e the requirement, exception,
punishment.
Trang 42 Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) is drafted and intended to be the most comprehensive and exhaustive.
Section 3 of CPC – all criminal laws in
Malaysia must be done in accordance to CPC.
Trang 5 However, although it is the most comprehensive) if there is any other specific law/provisions, that
specific law/provision shall prevail.
The relevant maxim: ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ – general things do not derogate from special things
- special law shall prevail over the specific law.
Trang 6 Eg: under First Schedule of CPC (general
provision) there are bailable offences However,
under Sec 41B of Dangerous Drugs Act
(specific provision) mentions that no one can be given bail over the provision in CPC The provision in DDA shall prevail over the provision
in CPC
PP v Chew Siew Luan
Held: “being a general legislation must
ex-necessitate yield to the specific provision of
Section 41B of Dangerous Drugs Act 1950
relating to bail.”
Trang 73 Whenever there is lacunae in our CPC and no case law decided on the matter, English cases can be authoritative.
- Sect 5 CPC
Ong Lai Kim v PP
In this case, it is correct to follow English case which provides identification parade by using one way mirror to identify accused person since our CPC is silent on the manner to identify accused person under custody of police and no local case deal with this matter.
Trang 84 Approach in interpretation of provisions found in code.
Sec 2 of CPC – Interpretation section for CPC.
Sec 2(3) of CPC – “all words and expressions used herein
and defined in the Penal Code or Police Act 1967, and not herein before defined shall be deemed to have the meanings attributed to them by that Code or that Act, as the case may be”.
It means that, we have to refer the definition of words in CPC first, then only can refer to Penal Code and Police Act 1967.
Trang 9 Eg:if one is looking for the definition of
‘Inspector’ appearing in Sec 113(1) of CPC, it
is already defined under Sec 2(i) that the term
‘Inspector of Police’ is defined to mean
‘Inspector of Police of any class but does not include a Sub-Inspector’.
That would mean that a ‘probationary inspector’ would be considered to be an
‘Inspector’ for the purpose of Sec 113(1) of
CPC.
Trang 10 However, the then Federal Court in Abdul
Ghani bin Jusoh & Anor v PP, appeared to
have erred in this regard when straightaway referred to the provisions of the Police Act 1967
in deciding whether a Probationary Inspector
was as ‘Inspector’ for the purpose of Sec 113(1)
of CPC
Trang 115 Criminal Procedure Code: mandatory or mere directory?
Mandatory the provisions must be
followed If it is not followed,
it is substantially wrong
Directory the provisions (procedure) is
just as a guide
CPC is mandatory! This is based on case law
Secretary of State for Defence v Warm (English
case)
Trang 12
Secretary of State for Defence v Warm
Lord Hodson:- “the presumption is that criminal
procedures are mandatory unless proven otherwise”.
The decision of this case has been followed by
Malaysian
(i) Kamarul Azman v Lef Colonel Wan Abdul Majid (ii) Mersing Omnibus v Minister of Manpower.
Trang 13 Sec 422 of CPC – provides that we must follow the procedures laid in CPC, however, if we fail
to follow the procedure and such failure will lead to minor breach, it can be cured by this provision.
2.2jurisdiction.ppt