ICSET 2008Abstract—For converter-based wind turbine systems in grid-connected applications as distributed generators DG, variable sources often cause wide changes in the converter inpu
Trang 1ICSET 2008
Abstract—For converter-based wind turbine systems in
grid-connected applications as distributed generators (DG),
variable sources often cause wide changes in the converter input
voltage above and below the output ac voltage, thus demanding
a buck-boost operation of converters Many traditional
full-bridge buck converters, two-stage converters and
single-stage buck-boost converters either have complex
structure or have limited range of input dc voltage The authors
have proposed and developed an innovative single-phase,
single-stage, flyback-based, buck-boost converter for renewable
energy systems, especially for wind turbine systems in
grid-connected applications This paper focuses on the analysis
of the working principles, computer simulation of the operation,
and design consideration of the converter for grid-connected
applications
I. INTRODUCTION For inverter-based wind turbine systems in grid-connected
applications as distributed generators (DG), resources often
cause wide variations in the input voltage to inverters above
and below the output ac voltage This is particularly true for
PV and wind systems This then demands the buck-boost (i.e.,
step-down and step-up) operation of inverters
Traditional full-bridge buck inverters do not have the
flexibility of handling a wide range of input dc voltage, and
require heavy line-frequency step-up transformers [1]
Although this topology currently has the largest market share
of the commercial DG system market due mainly to its
simplicity and electrical isolation, it is gradually replaced by
advanced topologies using “more silicon and less iron” This
leads to the pursuance of compact designs with wide input
voltage ranges and improved efficiency
Two-stage inverters normally accomplish dc voltage boost
in the first stage, and achieve buck dc-ac conversion in the
second stage, with a typical high-frequency transformer to
accomplish the voltage boost [1] Although they can
accommodate a wide range of input voltage, the complicated
structure makes them costly, particularly for small wind
turbine systems
A single-stage inverter is an inverter with only one stage of
conversion for both stepping-up and stepping-down the dc
voltage from wind turbine sources and modulating the
sinusoidal output current or voltage Single-stage buck-boost
inverters, have a simple circuit topology and low component
count, leading to low cost and high efficiency Previously
Bing Hu is with University of New Brunswick, NB, Canada (e-mail:
hubing_1977@ hotmail.com)
Liuchen Chang is with University of New Brunswick, NB, Canada
(e-mail: lchang@ unb.ca)
Yaosuo Xue is with University of New Brunswick, NB, Canada (e-mail:
y.x@ unb.ca)
available single-stage buck-boost inverters either need more than 4 power switching devices or have a limited range of input dc voltage Most of them have two symmetrical dc-dc converters operating in the opposite phase angle in order to generate a sinusoidal current waveform feeding to a single-phase grid
For small grid-connected wind turbine systems, inverters should be small, inexpensive and reliable Further efforts have been directed to innovative inverters and controls
II. A NEW BUCK-BOOST INVERTER WITH 4 SWITCHING
DEVICES The Authors have firstly proposed and developed an innovative single-phase, single-stage, flyback-based, buck-boost inverter for renewable energy conversion systems, especially for wind turbine systems in both grid-connected and standalone applications As shown in Figure 1, this buck-boost inverter has 4 switching devices [2]
The operating principles of this buck-boost inverter can be described by three operation modes
Mode 1: Charge mode
In this mode, switches T1 and T4 are turned on and switches T2 and T3 are turned off From an energy point of view, during Mode 1, inductor L1 is charged to store energy and the output current is provided by the discharge of capacitor C
Mode 2: Positive half cycle (PHC) discharge mode
Research on a Novel Buck-Boost Converter for Wind Turbine Systems
Bing Hu, Liuchen Chang, Yaosuo Xue
Fig 1 A new buck-boost single-stage inverter with
4 switching devices
Trang 2In this mode, switch T4 is turned off and T3 is turned on,
while T1 is keeping on and T2 off.In this mode, the dc source
is disconnected temporarily from the output
Two current conduction modes can be defined here If the
time of Mode 2 is so short that the inductor current is not
decreasing to zero when the next charge cycle Mode 1 starts,
the current of energy-storage inductor is continuous, and we
define this operation the continuous conduction mode
(CCM) On the contrary, if the inductor current drops zero in
Mode 2 and probably sustains zero for certain time, the
operation is defined the discontinuous conduction mode
(DCM)
So far, in the PHC of ac output, the energy is transferred
from dc source (i.e Wind Turbine) to ac grid through the
alternations of Mode 1 and Mode 2
Mode 3: Negative half cycle (NHC) discharge mode
This mode is combined with Mode 1 to provide ac NHC
output when switch T1 is tuned off and T2 is turned on
Through a flyback operation, the current of primary side of
the coupled inductor L drops to zero suddenly and the current
of secondary side reaches to the initial current of primary
side, if the inductances and turns of both sides of the coupled
inductor are identical and there is no magnetic leakage
The only differences between Mode 3 and Mode 2 are that
in Mode 3, the grid is in the negative half cycle and the
discharging current has an opposite direction Then similar
arguments regarding energy exchange and transfer in Mode 2
can be also applied to Mode 3 As a result, in the NHC of ac
output, the energy is transferred from dc source to ac grid
through L1, L2 and C by the alternations of Mode 1 and
Mode 3
In summary, during each switching interval, the
energy-storage inductor is charged from a dc source (i.e
Wind Turbine) and discharged to a grid through a low pass
filter The inductor current can be discontinuous as shown
in Figure 2, and continuous as shown in Figure 3
The simulation waveforms for the buck-boost inverter
subject to a variable dc voltage sources, controlled by an open
loop feedforward compensation [3], are shown in Figure 4
The current total harmonic distortion (THD) of the 120V grid
side is 2% for a switching frequency of 9.6 kHz
The simulation waveforms for the buck-boost inverter
subject to a variable dc voltage sources, controlled by a
closed-loop sinusoidal PWM modulation [3], are shown in
Figure 5 The current total harmonic distortion (THD) of the
120V grid side is 3.4% for a switching frequency of 9.6 kHz
It is noted that the grid voltage has been assumed containing
significant harmonic contents
Fig 2 Buck-boost inverter operation in the discontinuous current mode
Fig 3 Buck-boost inverter operation in the continuous current mode
Fig 4 Simulated waveform of the buck-boost inverter under the
open loop feedforward compensation control
Trang 3III. A NEW BUCK-BOOST INVERTER WITH 3 SWITCHING
DEVICES Based on the buck-boost inverter with 4 switching devices
as developed by the Authors for small distributed generators,
further improvements have been proposed, which leads to a
new buck-boost inverter with 3 switching devices [4] This
inverter is shown in Figure 6 The simple circuit topology of
this invention provides the possibility for a low cost and high
efficiency dc-ac converter appropriate for small wind turbine
applications The inverter has a low component count with
only 3 power semiconductor switches to accomplish dc-ac
conversion
The inverters can accommodate a wide range of input dc
voltage for an improved energy output from variable wind
turbine resources The input source and the output grid are
separated based on flyback operation principles As
compared to traditional buck inverters with line-frequency
transformers, two-stage buck-boost inverters, and other
single-stage buck-boost inverters, both the component count,
cost and size of the newly proposed buck-boost inverter are
reduced, thereby presenting a more reliable and economical
design for wind turbine systems and other distributed generators
The two coupled inductors L1 and L2 have the same inductance L Since only one switch is turned on in each operation mode and an inductor is always connected in the charge/discharge circuit, the dead time for preventing two switches from shoot-through can be eliminated The inverter operation can be divided into charge and discharge operation working in the positive half cycle and in negative half cycle, similar to the buck-boost inverter with 4 switching devices, as presented in the previous section
Mode 1: Charge mode
During Mode 1, switches Q2 and Q3 are turned off, and switch Q1 is turned on to charge inductor L1 from the dc source through diode D1 Capacitor C provides the continuous current for the grid in Mode 1 The governing equations are the same as in Mode 1 of the 4-switch buck-boost inverter
Mode 2: Positive half cycle (PHC) discharge mode
Mode 2 is the discharge mode in positive half cycle During Mode 2, switches Q1 and Q3 are turned off, and switch Q2
is turned on to discharge the energy, which was stored in inductor L1, to the grid through diodeD2 Figure 7 is the operation waveforms in a positive half cycle
I(Q1) I(Q2)
Iout1
Ich+
Idisch+
Ich+
Idisch+
Idisch+
Q2 Q1
D1 D2
ON
ON
ON
ON
t1 t0
I(L1)
Mode 3: Negative half cycle (NHC) discharge mode
Mode 3 follows Mode 1 in a negative half cycle of the grid voltage During Mode 3, switches Q1 and Q2 are turned off, and switch Q3 is turned on The energy which is stored in the coupled inductor L1 will transfer to the coupled inductor L2
and then discharges to the load through switch Q3 and diodeD3 Figure 8 is the operation waveforms in a negative half cycle
Assume that the resistance of the switches, diodes, and coupled inductors are negligible; two coupled inductors are perfectly coupled; the inverter works in discontinue current mode (DCM); the averaged current of Mode 2 is the average output current of the inverter and can be expressed as,
Fig 5 Simulated waveform of the buck-boost inverter under the
closed loop sinusoidal PWM control
Fig 6 Newly proposed buck-boost inverter with 3 switching
devices
Fig 7 Operation waveforms in a positive half cycle
Trang 4³ = =
=
2 grid s
2 2 dc 1
LI V LT T V dt i T
where,
grid
1
LI
T = , and TS is the switching period
It is assumed that the utility line voltage Vgrid is expressed
as a sinusoidal waveform:
) sin(
2
V = ω (2)
One of the algorithms for sinusoidal PWM is to control the
turn-on time of switch Q1 in proportion to the utility voltage
Vgrid
) sin(
s
T = ω (3)
where k is the coefficient factor Substituting (2) and (3)
into (1), the ac output current iac is expressed as,
) sin(
2 2
2 s 2 dc
L k T V
i = ω (4)
In practical implementation of an inverter control, a
sinusoidal reference wave, serving as the modulating signal,
is compared with a triangular wave, serving as the carrier
signal The intersection points determine the switching angles
and pulse widths as in Figure 9 [4]
The current ratings of the power semiconductor switches of
the 3-switch buck-boost inverter are the same as those of the
4-switch buck-boost inverter presented in the previous
section The voltage stresses of the power semiconductor
devices in the charging control circuits are the same for the
4-switch buck-boost inverter (T1 and T4) and for the 3-switch
buck-boost inverter (Q1), and are equal to the Vdc+vc, where
vc is the capacitor voltage and is in the same order as the grid voltage The voltage stresses of the power semiconductor devices in the discharging circuits of the 3-switch buck-boost inverter and the 4-switch buck-boost inverter are somewhat different The blocking diodes in the discharging circuits of the two inverters have the same reverse voltage of Vdc+vc However, the switching devices (IGBTs or MOSFETs) in the discharging circuits of the 3-switch inverter have a reverse voltage of 2vc, which is twice the reverse voltage of the 4-switch inverter of vc For a 120V/60Hz single-phase grid, the peak value of vc is in the level of 200V In summary, the voltage stress of some switching devices of the 3-switch buck-boost inverter is twice that of the 4-swich inverter, but still in the range readily available in commercial IGBT or MOSFET devices
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS OF THE 3-SWITCH BUCK-BOOST
INVERTER
In designing the parameters of the inverter, a consideration for overall inverter operation under various input voltage is required Through simulation studies, the required modulation index and operation region under variable dc input voltages are presented in Figure 10
Fig 8 Operation waveforms on a negative half cycle
Fig 10 Control-to-output curves of SPWM control
(L = 150 × 10-6H, V = 120V)
Trang 5Based on SPWM strategy of Figure 9, the inverter gating
signals are shown in Figure 11 The operation of the inverter
is simulated for different dc source voltages from 50V to
300V, as if it were from a wind turbine source The inverter is
designed for a rated power of 1 kW The grid voltage is fixed
at 120V/60Hz The switching frequency is set at 5 kHz,
considering a compromise between reducing switching losses
and ensuring output current quality Figures 12-15 present the
simulated output current waveforms Table I summarizes the
simulation parameters and output current performance
From the figures, it has been seen that the newly proposed flyback single-stage
single-phase buck-boost inverter can accomplish both buck
and boost operation, feeding power to a grid with a reasonable
power quality from a widely variable dc source
Fig 11 Gating signals of the 3-device buck-boost inverter
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF SIMULATION RESULTS
Fig 12 Output current waveform when the dc voltage is 50V
Fig 13 Output current waveform when the dc voltage is 100V
Fig 14 Output current waveform when the dc voltage is 200V
Fig.15 Output current waveform when the dc voltage is 300V
The implementation of the 3-switch buck-boost inverter is still yet to be done The output current waveforms are to be improved, possibly using a close-loop sinusoidal PWM as presented
V. CONCLUSION
The Authors have proposed an innovative single-phase, single-stage, flyback-based, buck-boost inverter for renewable energy conversion systems, based on a previously developed 4-switch buck-boost inverter The simple circuit topology of this inverter provides the possibility for a low cost and high efficiency dc-ac converter The inverters have a low component count with only 3 power semiconductor switches to accomplish dc-ac conversion with a high output power quality The inverter can accommodate a wide range of input dc voltage for an improved energy output from variable
PV resources The inverter separates the input source from the output grid through a flyback operation As compared to traditional buck inverters with line-frequency transformers, two-stage buck-boost inverters, and previous single-stage buck-boost inverters, both the cost and size of the newly proposed inverter are reduced, thereby presenting a more reliable and economical design for wind turbine systems The
DC
voltage
Power
factor
Output current
Output power
THD (%)
50 V 0.30 1.24 A 44.6W 2.05
100 V 0.50 1.52 A 91.2W 2.00
200 V 0.95 5.66 A 645.2W 4.50
300 V 0.98 8.50 A 999.6W 4.90
Fig 9 Sinusoidal pulse-width modulation
Trang 6analysis of the working principles, and computer simulation
of the operation for this inverter have proved its feasibility for dc-ac conversion in wind turbine applications
The authors wish to thank Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the financial support to this research project
[1] Xue, Y., Chang, L., Baekhj Kjaer, S., Bordonau, J and Shimizu, T.,
“Topologies of single-phase inverters for small distributed power generators: an overview,” IEEE Trans Power Electronics, vol 19, pp 1305-1314, Sept 2004
[2] Liu, Z., Study Of Single-Phase Single-Stage Buck-Boost Inverters, University of New Brunswick M.Sc Thesis, Aug 2004
[3] Xue, Y., Study Of Single-Phase Single-Stage Buck-Boost Inverters, University of New Brunswick M.Sc Thesis, Jan 2004
[4] Xue, Y., Chang, L., "Closed-Loop SPWM Control for Grid-Connected Buck-Boost Inverters,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference
2004, Aachen, Germany, Vol 5, pp.3366-3371, June 2004